![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Nutr. , 09 November 2022
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1079618
This article is part of the Research Topic Biogenic Amines: Their Role in Food Safety, Food Quality, and Health, and Novel Strategies to Reduce Consumer Exposure View all 4 articles
This article is a correction to:
Approaching to biogenic amines as quality markers in packaged chicken meat
A corrigendum on
Approaching to biogenic amines as quality markers in packaged chicken meat
by Esposito, L., Mastrocola, D., and Martuscelli, M. (2022). Front. Nutr. 9:966790. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.966790
In the published article, there was an error. The ratio of gases composition in MAP packaging was reported inverted.
A correction has been made to Materials and methods, Origin of the samples and sampling, 2 This sentence previously stated:
“The cuts were packaged using three types of packaging and conditions: under modified atmosphere or MAP (CO2:O2 - 70%:30%); …”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The cuts were packaged using three types of packaging and conditions: under modified atmosphere or MAP (CO2:O2-30%:70%);…”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: biogenic amines, chicken meat, quality, safety, BAI index, TBARS, packaged meat, refrigerated meat
Citation: Esposito L, Mastrocola D and Martuscelli M (2022) Corrigendum: Approaching to biogenic amines as quality markers in packaged chicken meat. Front. Nutr. 9:1079618. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1079618
Received: 25 October 2022; Accepted: 27 October 2022;
Published: 09 November 2022.
Copyright © 2022 Esposito, Mastrocola and Martuscelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria Martuscelli, bW1hcnR1c2NlbGxpQHVuaXRlLml0
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.