Renan Oliveira Corrêa1,2†
Pollyana Ribeiro Castro1†
René Moser3†
Caroline Marcantonio Ferreira4Valerie F. J. Quesniaux5
Marco Aurélio Ramirez Vinolo1,6,7*
Bernhard Ryffel5*- 1Laboratory of Immunoinflammation, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- 2Laboratory of Intestinal Immunology, Institut Imagine, INSERM U1163, Paris, France
- 3IBR Inc., Matzingen, Switzerland
- 4Department of Pharmaceutics Science, Institute of Environmental, Chemistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Diadema, Brazil
- 5CNRS, INEM, UMR 7355, University of Orléans, Orléans, France
- 6Experimental Medicine Research Cluster, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- 7Center for Research on Obesity and Comorbidities, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are metabolites released by bacterial components of the microbiota. These molecules have a wide range of effects in the microbiota itself, but also in host cells in which they are known for contributing to the regulation of cell metabolism, barrier function, and immunological responses. Recent studies indicate that these molecules are important players in the gut-lung axis and highlight the possibility of using strategies that alter their intestinal production to prevent or treat distinct lung inflammatory diseases. Here, we review the effects of the SCFA butyrate and its derivatives in vitro and in vivo on murine models of respiratory disorders, besides discussing the potential therapeutic use of butyrate and the other SCFAs in lung diseases.
Introduction
The prevalence of pulmonary disorders such as asthma and allergic disease has increased in industrialized countries, which may be partially explained by environmental exposures and changes in lifestyle. The qualitative and quantitative composition of diets is central to health and has a profound impact on the emergence and/or prevention of diseases. In fact, studies comparing different diets and their effects on the composition of the intestinal microbiota have been carried out in recent years. One of the first studies that associated the gut microbiome with different diets in humans occurred when the fecal microbiota of European children was compared with the microbiota of children from a rural African village of Burkina Faso where the diet is based on the ingestion of high amounts of fiber (1). According to this study, African children showed a distinct composition of the intestinal bacterial community with enhanced abundance of Bacteroidetes and lower abundance of Firmicutes, as well as increased levels of SCFAs propionate and butyrate, which was at least four times higher than those of European children. These characteristics were directly linked with the low prevalence of allergies and autoimmune disease in this African population (1). After this, many studies have shown the influence of a Western-style type (WD) diet versus plant-based diets on the intestinal microbiota and the generation of SCFAs (2).
Western-style type (WD) is primarily characterized by high content of animal proteins, fat and refined carbohydrates, which are strongly associated with elevated risks of diseases by promoting body weight gain and changes in energy metabolism and immune system activation (3, 4). In addition, WD has been implicated with negative outcomes on the airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5). On the other hand, plant-based diets, which are enriched in dietary fibers (DFs), are known to beneficially modulate energy metabolism, systemic immunity and microbiota composition, thus contributing to disease prevention (6, 7). A meta-analysis published by Reynolds et al. (8) found a 15–30% reduced risk of the incidence of several diseases, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer in people eating DFs containing whole grains and fruits compared with those with those with the lowest intake (8). In this study, the authors recommend a daily intake of 25 to 29 grams of fibers to prevent chronic diseases and suggested a 15 g increment of whole grains consumed per day to obtain the beneficial effects (8). Regarding the lung context, a study has analyzed data from 1,921 adults retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) and found that 68.3% of the adults eating more than 17.5 grams of fiber a day (highest fiber group–ingestion of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains) had normal lung function, compared to 50.1% in the group with lowest intake of fiber (< 10,75 grams of fiber a day) (9). Furthermore, only 14.8% of the adults in the highest-fiber group had airway restriction compared to 29.8% in the lowest-fiber group (9).
A diet based on fruits, vegetables, and whole grains was shown to mitigate the inflammatory responses in COPD (5). Furthermore, low fiber diets are associated with reduced diversity of the intestinal microbiota and an imbalanced ratio of metabolites produced by these microorganisms, a process known as dysbiosis, which is involved in the genesis of several pathologies including respiratory diseases (7, 10).
Dietary fibers (DFs) are carbohydrate polymers provided essentially by plant-derived food that can vary in structure, size, and physico-chemical properties (11). Fibers are classified in two main groups: soluble (i.e., gums, fructans, and pectins) and insoluble fibers (i.e., cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin). Soluble fibers are highly metabolized by the gut microbiota, having relevant effects on composition and production of bioactive metabolites, which can provide a link between microbes and host cells (12). As an example, the consumption of inulin, a type of soluble fiber, has been associated with an increase in beneficial bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) at the expense of potentially pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli) in the intestine of adult humans (12, 13). This modulation has a significant impact on metabolic capacity of the microbiota, influencing the profile of metabolites that are produced and consequently, its interactions and effects on host biological functions (6).
Several studies have demonstrated that alterations in the gut microbiome by different dietary approaches can have a significant impact in the outcome of lung diseases (1, 6, 10), besides showing a higher prevalence of lung pathologies in patients with gastrointestinal diseases (14), thus reinforcing the existence of a crosstalk between the intestinal and pulmonary compartments. This bidirectional communication is defined as the gut-lung axis (15), which includes the responses of immune and epithelial cells of both locations, host and microbiota distinct signaling pathways, and the action of bacterial metabolites including the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Therefore, in this review, we aim to discuss the impact of the intestinal microbiota and the action of SCFAs, especially butyrate, on regulating the immune system responses and how this facet of the gut-lung axis may be altered in respiratory disorders. This review compiles the most recent advances in this field, highlighting the gaps and the complexity associated with the different cellular and molecular targets of the microbiota-derived molecules in the context of lung disorders.
Butyrate: From dietary fibers to cellular effects
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are small carboxylic acids produced predominantly in the large intestine following fermentation of soluble DFs by the gut microbiota. This class of molecules includes acetate, propionate, and butyrate, with acetate being the most abundant and corresponding to almost half the total production of SCFAs in the colon. Besides carbohydrates, amino acids such as valine, leucine, and isoleucine can also be converted into branched-chain fatty acids, although they contribute to less than 5% of total SCFA production (16–18).
Among these metabolites, butyrate has been shown to have important effects in different aspects of pulmonary diseases such as allergic asthma, COPD, and lung fibrosis (19, 20). Although butyrate can be obtained directly from the diet through the ingestion of dairy products such as butter, it is mainly obtained through the bacterial fermentation of soluble fibers in the colon (19). In humans, most of the Gram-positive bacteria found in the large intestine are butyrate producers, although these are interspersed with other non-butyrogenic species. Butyrogenic bacteria are strictly anaerobic and oxygen-sensitive saccharolytic bacteria from the Firmicutes phylum, including Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Erysipelotrichaeceae, and Clostridiaceae (Clusters IV and XIVa) (19, 21–24). Analysis of metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data from human samples has identified an enrichment of butyrate producers, including 17 taxa, primarily members of the Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae family along with some Bacteroidetes, in 70% of the subjects and in various niches of the gut ecosystem (22). Most of butyrogenic bacteria species are founded colonizing the colon mucus layer in proximity of the intestinal epithelium, which aids the butyrate interaction and physiological, metabolic, and immunologic effects on the host cells (25). In addition, non-butyrogenic bacteria can also influence butyrate formation by the generation of other metabolites such as lactate, which in turns contributes to the acidic gut milieu that favors butyrogenic species in the colon (25).
Once produced, butyrate acts mainly as an energy source to colonocytes and impacts the mucosal homeostasis with effects on the epithelial barrier and the associated immune system (26). Although most of the butyrate is taken up and consumed in the colon, the literature indicates several effects of this metabolite in different peripheral tissues with a significant relevance in the context of lung diseases (27). The systemic effects of butyrate depend on its uptake by intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and the subsequent distribution of this metabolite through the bloodstream (28). Butyrate is mostly uptaken by IECs by active transport via sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 (SMCT1, encoded by SLC5A8) and proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1, encoded by SLC16A1) (Figure 1; 29). Butyrate can also cross the cellular membrane by diffusion when it is protonated in luminal low pH conditions.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of actions of short-chain fatty acids. Production of SCFAs by bacterial fermentation of soluble dietary fibers in the colonic lumen. These metabolites can activate GPCRs expressed on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells (HCAR2/GPR109a, FFAR2/GPR43, and FFAR3/GPR41) or be internalized by cellular transporters (MCT and SMCT). Once inside the cells, SCFAs can be used in the mitochondria for ATP generation, act in the nucleus as HDAC inhibitors, or be transported outside of the cells into the intestinal lamina propria and subsequently into the bloodstream. Upon reaching systemic circulation, SCFAs can modulate the function of several target tissues, including lungs, kidneys, and brain. SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; GPCRs, G-protein-coupled receptors; FFAR, free fatty acids receptor; HCAR2, hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2; MCT, proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporter; SMCT, sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter; HDAC, histone deacetylase.
Inside the cells, butyrate is largely used to generate ATP in the mitochondria where it is converted to pyruvate and then to Acetyl-CoA to feed the citric acid cycle, but it can also act as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, thus impacting the host epigenome and overall health (26, 30, 31). It has been proposed that other transporters such as proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4, encoded by SLC16A3) and proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 5 (MCT5, encoded by SLC16A4) move the remaining butyrate out of the cells (32, 33), therefore contributing to its passage to the portal circulation into the liver with the other SCFAs (27). In addition, butyrate is also known to bind and activate different G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as free-fatty acid receptor 3 (FFAR3, or GPR41), free-fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2, or GPR43), and the hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCAR2, or GPR109a) (Figure 1). These receptors are broadly expressed in different tissues and cell types, in humans and animals (2, 34).
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) act on several distinct host organs and tissues including the immune system, brain, bone marrow, and kidneys, exerting a crucial role in the crosstalk between them and the intestinal microbiota, a communication that has relevant implications in the maintenance of the host homeostasis (35). In this regard, alterations in the gut microbiome with changes in the pattern of SCFAs production have local (intestinal) and systemic consequences on physiological and pathological responses. For example, in a dysbiotic state with lower production of these bacterial metabolites, a low-grade systemic inflammation is induced, thus impairing the kidneys functionality and contributing to chronic kidney diseases (36). Additionally, studies have shown that changes in the gut microbiota composition cause a disruption of intestinal-pulmonary crosstalk, which is associated with increased susceptibility to respiratory acute infections and chronic lung diseases (14, 37). Interestingly, the effects of butyrate in the lungs appear to occur indirectly by modulating immune cell function, as this metabolite does not seem to accumulate in the airways, and no significant local production has been described in this tissue (14, 37). Terms such as the “Gut-Lung Axis,” “Gut-Brain Axis,” and “Gut-Kidney Axis” were coined to highlight the relevance of this crosstalk between the gut microbiota and the respiratory, nervous, and renal systems. Butyrate has a significant participation on all these axes through direct or indirect (i.e., through the immune system) actions in different cell types. Hence, in the next section, we will review the main immunomodulatory effects of butyrate described in the recent literature (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Immunomodulation driven by butyrate. Butyrate produced by butyrogenic bacteria in the intestinal lumen acts on immune cells and regulates their functions. Butyrate induces neutrophil responses to pathogens, reduces cytokine production by mononuclear cells, decreases mast cell, eosinophil and innate lymphoid cell activity, and induces a tolerogenic response in lymphocytes. DCs, dendritic cells; ILC2, innate lymphoid cells type 2; GATA3, GATA binding protein 3; IL-10, interleukin 10; IL-22, interleukin 22; IgA, immunoglobulin A.
The effects of butyrate/SCFAs on innate immune cells
Neutrophils
Neutrophils are generally the first cell type to arrive at infectious sites, being a major player that orchestrates the subsequent immune response by the release of several mediators such as cytokines and chemokines. FFAR2 is highly expressed by neutrophils, which makes them very responsive to SCFAs (38). However, divergent results on the effects of the SCFA-FFAR2 activation in neutrophils have been described. In vitro activation of FFAR2 by butyrate present in the culture supernatant of the oral commensal Fusobacterium nucleatum acts as chemoattractant to neutrophils (39). In vivo, oral administration of butyrate has been shown to alleviate intestinal inflammation conditions, but this response can be achieved by modulating neutrophils in different ways depending on the pathological context. For example, in sterile inflammation induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS), treatment with butyrate was shown to reduce the recruitment of neutrophils to the colon, lowering the local production of proinflammatory cytokines (40). On the contrary, during inflammation induced by Clostridioides difficile infection, the presence of butyrate enhances neutrophil recruitment and their inflammatory activity in the colon, thus improving clinical symptoms (41).
On the contrary, the presence of SCFAs in the site of bacterial infection does not impact neutrophil migration, but it impairs their responses by decreasing their phagocytic capacity and the production of inflammatory molecules. This phenotype does not depend on the GPCRs activation but may involve HDAC inhibition (42). More recently, butyrate was shown to induce the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) when added at colonic luminal levels, but not at peripheral blood concentrations (43). Some authors have then suggested that these paradoxical effects of butyrate on neutrophils can be partially explained by the different concentrations that the cells are exposed to. For example, low butyrate concentrations as found in the circulation may activate FFAR2 (and inhibits HDAC), which in turn suppresses neutrophil recruitment and activation, preventing an immune response against commensal microbes and host tissues. However, high concentrations of this metabolite, as found in the colon, may have the opposite effect, favoring neutrophil migration and thereby contributing to elimination of pathogens (44). The discrepancy between the effects of butyrate may also be due to the activation of other cellular mechanisms or to the contribution of the other SCFAs to the biological effects analyzed.
Monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) act as important immunoregulatory molecules preventing the development of exaggerated inflammation (45–47), even though the opposite effect has also been described (48). More recently, one study demonstrated a dual role of SCFAs, in which the innate response is reduced while the adaptive response is promoted, generating effective protection against viral infection in the airways. The authors showed that the high levels of SCFAs induced by high-fiber diets affects hematopoiesis, enhancing the generation of a specific population of patrolling monocytes and alternatively activated macrophages with a limited capacity to produce chemokines. In this sense, fewer neutrophils are recruited to the airways during a flu viral infection, limiting the local inflammatory response and consequently, the immune-associated pathology, while boosting influenza-specific CD8+ T cells to control the viral load (49).
Regarding the actions of SCFAs in macrophages, distinct populations have been shown to be impacted differently by these metabolites. For example, in white adipose tissue the activation of FFAR2 by SCFAs in anti-inflammatory M2-type macrophages increased their production of TNF-α, a response that was not observed in inflammatory M1-type macrophages (50). Moreover, RNA-Seq analysis showed that butyrate induces an antimicrobial signature on macrophages of mucosal sites by the inhibition of HDAC3 (51). Lately, even the systemic inflammatory responses have also been shown to be modulated by butyrate. In a small cohort of obese patients with metabolic syndrome, oral supplementation of butyrate decreased the trained innate immunity of monocytes, which suggests a potential approach for reducing the overall inflammatory status of these circulating cells under certain conditions (52). Corroborating this concept, the literature shows that butyrate is critical to the induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs), which in turn activate regulatory T cells via IL-10 and ALDH1A (53).
A high-fiber diet, via SCFAs, induces vitamin A metabolism on CD103+ DCs, which correlates with increased Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells (54). Butyrate can also control the expression of costimulatory molecules such as CD40, CD80, and CD83 in DCs, thus limiting their activation by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (55), besides impacting their chemotactic responses by affecting their responsiveness to CCL19 (56). Furthermore, butyrate profoundly impacts the immune response to allergens by reducing the ability of DCs to migrate to lymph nodes and to prime polarization of the Th2 population (19).
Mast cells and eosinophils
Mast cells are abundant at mucosa and submucosa sites and are critical in diseases such as allergic asthma, food allergy, colitis, and Crohn’s disease. DFs have a protective effect in animal models of food allergy by controlling mast cells (57). HDAC inhibition by butyrate in murine mast cells suppress their proliferation and production of cytokines (58). In a murine model of colitis, increased levels of SCFAs in the feces were correlated with beneficial effects including improvement of the intestinal barrier and reduction of mast cell degranulation and inflammation (59, 60). More recently, a study showed that OVA-sensitized guinea pig precision cut lung slices incubated with butyrate had a significantly lower release of histamine and decreased airway contraction (61). Butyrate also inhibits degranulation of both human and mouse mast cells, decreasing their production of IL-6 in IgE-and non-IgE, a response that was independent of GPCRs, but that can be linked to butyrate role on HDAC inhibition (61).
Eosinophils are also important players in allergic asthma (62) which may be modulated by SCFAs. SCFAs can affect many eosinophil functions, such as adhesion to the endothelium, migration, and survival. Interestingly, these effects are associated with histone acetylation and are normally independent from GPCR signaling (63), Interestingly, this induction is only observed in eosinophils from allergic donors, while cells from non-allergic volunteers require an extra stimulation by IL-5 to show the same phenotype (63). Inhibition of class IIa HDACs by butyrate also impacts allergic-donor eosinophil migration by decreasing expression of homing chemotactic receptors (19). In vivo experiments with intravenous administration of butyrate revealed that this metabolite reduces the number of eosinophils and the concentrations of type-2 cytokines in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, thus impacting the allergic response (63). Altogether, these findings further corroborate the immunomodulatory role of butyrate by promoting mucosal tolerogenic responses and protection against allergic disorders (64).
Innate lymphoid cells
Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are regulated by multiple endogenous mammalian cell-derived factors and integrate innate and adaptive immune responses to assist in maintaining physiological homeostasis (65, 66). ILCs are currently divided into five subsets: ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3 (resembling the classic T helper division of Th1, Th2, and Th17), natural killer (NK) cells, and LTi (lymphoid tissue-inducer) cells. This division is based on their distinct transcription factors and production of specific cytokines, although it is well-established that ILCs present high plasticity and can change their phenotype depending on the signals they receive from the microenvironment (67, 68).
The role of SCFAs in modulating the responses of ILCs has been investigated by several studies (69). In this context, due to their location along the gastrointestinal tract, ILC3s have been the most studied subset, with distinct observed results. For example, ILC3s from FFAR2 KO mice have a deficient response to fight against intestinal bacterial pathogens, as well as impaired proliferation (70–72), indicating a positive regulation of SCFAs on ILC3s function. Moreover, butyrate supplementation enhanced IL-22 production by ILCs via both HDAC inhibition and activation of FFAR3. The latter effect occurs through activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, a phenotype that support the integrity of the intestinal barrier and to ameliorate colitis (73). However, there are also reports describing inhibitory effects of butyrate on these cells. For example, butyrate can suppress RORγt+ ILC3s and their IL-22 expression in terminal ileal Peyer’s patches via HCAR2 activation (74), a receptor not expressed by ILC3s found in the colon (75).
Supporting effects of FFAR2 but suppressing effects by SCFAs have been described also for ILC2s (72). Butyrate administered either by oral or intranasal routes attenuate ILC2-driven inflammatory response in IL-33-and Alternaria alternata-induced allergic inflammation, with downregulation of GATA3 expression and ILC2 proliferation, reduction of type 2 cytokine production, and reduced overall airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness after allergen challenge (76). This suggests that butyrate as a potential therapeutic option for asthma conditions mostly due to its action on inhibiting HDACs (77). Butyrate has also been shown to inhibit pulmonary ILC2 functions by modulating their GATA3 expression and metabolism in vivo and in vitro, thus protecting against ILC2-driven airway hyperreactivity (78, 79).
The effects of butyrate/SCFAs on adaptive immune cells
T and B lymphocytes
Corroborating the anti-inflammatory and tolerogenic roles of butyrate as described above, early studies highlighted the ability of butyrate to promote IL-10 producing T regulatory (Tregs) cells in different organs, thus preventing inflammatory diseases (69). For instance, treatments with butyrate suppressed polarization of pulmonary Th9 cells, attenuating lung inflammation (80). However, chronic elevation of SCFAs levels in vivo has been shown to polarize the immune response toward Th1 and Th17, leading to the induction of pathological tissue inflammation (81). Butyrate, via HDAC inhibition, increases Foxp3 protein acetylation, resulting in higher Foxp3 levels in Treg cell culture (82). Also, administration of tributyrin, a pro-drug of butyrate, has been shown to reduce several metabolic and inflammatory alterations observed in high-fat diet fed mice (83–85). Tributyrin increased Treg numbers in adipose tissue of obese mice, an effect that was attributed to the activation of HCAR2 and which may be related to the reduction in inflammatory markers at this tissue (84).
In addition to the Treg-inducing effect of butyrate, at high concentrations this metabolite was shown to increase the expression of the transcription factor T-bet on T cells, resulting in IFN-γ production by Tregs and by conventional T cells (86). This dual response might not only depend on butyrate concentrations, but also on the overall conditions in the host. For example, immune tolerance is favored at steady state by SCFAs, with butyrate enhancing the production of IL-10 by Th1 cells via FFAR2 activation (87) elevating the production of IL-22 by CD4+ T cells (73), while effector T cell responses are triggered by these metabolites during active immune responses (69).
The effects of SCFAs also extend to CD8+ T cells, with butyrate increasing their expression of IFN-γ, granzyme B, and general cytotoxic function via HDAC inhibition (81), as well as optimizing memory CD8+ T cell generation and responses (49, 88, 89). Recent studies demonstrated that SCFAs also have regulatory effects on B cells enhancing plasma cell differentiation and boosting intestinal IgA and systemic IgG responses (84). Butyrate may favor tolerogenic responses by directly enhancing IL-10 producer’s regulatory B lymphocytes (B10) (69, 90), although contradictory phenotypes have been reported, with different doses of butyrate suppressing B10 cells, besides arguing that the previous stimulatory effects were observed due to secondary and indirect effects of this metabolite (91). Nonetheless, these new data reinforce a positive role of butyrate on B lymphocytes under steady state. For example, butyrate causes intrinsic epigenetic alterations on B cells, modulating class-switch DNA recombination and affecting the production of antibodies and autoantibodies, thus preventing harmful responses and helping to maintain the balanced communication between the microbiota and the host (92).
Effects of butyrate in distinct respiratory disease
Chronic respiratory diseases such as COPD, asthma, and lung fibrosis are among the top ten diseases that affect the respiratory system and are associated with high morbidity, creating a significant health burden. Scientific advances in the treatment of these diseases may reduce this burden and promote health. In the next section, we review the effects of SCFAs and butyrate on respiratory diseases focusing on human or murine studies (Table 1).
Table 1. In vitro and in vivo effects of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) on distinct pulmonary disorders.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cigarette smoke-induced chronic bronchitis with emphysema
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a group of progressive inflammatory conditions that lead to irreversible airflow limitation. The fact that we have only limited knowledge about these conditions negatively impacts prevention and treatment options. Tobacco smoking is a major risk factor that affects intestinal microbiota and may affect the production of SCFAs (88–90), but information regarding the effects of SCFAs on COPD is scarce in the literature. Recent studies have shown that COPD patients present impaired intestinal functions (93) besides demonstrating that mice develop elevated lung inflammation and decreased pulmonary functions after receiving microbial transplantation of feces obtained from COPD patients (94) evidencing the relationship between the gut and the lung environments.
Recently, a study in mice investigated the influence of dietary fibers in an experimental model of COPD. According to them, the consumption of a high-fiber diet modulated the diversity of gut microbiota and differentially impacted the generation of SCFAs, bile acids, and sphingolipids, which was associated with attenuated emphysema progression and reduced inflammatory pathology in cigarette smoking-exposed emphysema model (95). Based on the anti-inflammatory properties of butyrate, some studies have aimed to analyze the impact of dietary fibers consumption on the development of COPD in humans. Although with some limitations, these studies revealed that the intake of cereal fibers, and, to some extent, fibers from fruits and vegetables, is inversely associated with the risk of COPD in smokers (96–98). A role of the gut-liver-lung axis has been proposed to impact on smoking-related inflammation: bacterial SCFAs released in the gut, from fiber fermentation, attenuate the innate immune response in the liver, which in turn reduces the lung smoking-related inflammation, ameliorating the symptoms (99). Indeed, cigarette smoke (CS) is known to be the major cause of COPD, with a chronic daily exposure to CS for 6 months resulting in lung inflammation, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema in rodents (100).
Ingestion of a diet enriched in whey peptide was able to attenuate lung inflammation and elastase-induced emphysema in mice, an effect that might be related to increased production of SCFAs in the gut (101). In vitro, CS extract was shown to induce human embryonic lung fibroblasts to differentiate into myofibroblasts by causing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, a condition that is associated with fibrosis and that could be suppressed to some extent by the treatment with 4-phenyl butyric acid (4-PBA), a butyrate analog compound (102).
Lung fibrosis-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Among fibrotic disorders, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, which is a rapidly progressive and lethal fibrotic disease (103). Recent drugs such Pirfenidone and Nintedanib attenuate disease progression, but currently is no effective therapy for IPF. Limited data are available regarding SCFAs actions, but a recent study has shed some light on this. IPF is characterized by an excessive collagen matrix deposition and extracellular remodeling in a TGF-β dependent manner (104). TGF-β1 alters the metabolism and activates pulmonary fibroblasts, lowering their NADH and ATP levels, the NADH/NAD ratio and oxidative phosphorylation activity (105). Butyrate presented a potent antifibrotic effect by inhibiting mitochondrial elongation in TGF-β-treated pulmonary fibroblasts, increasing their mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP, NADH, and NADH/NAD ratio, affecting myofibroblast differentiation (105; Figure 3). Administration of bleomycin (BLM) has been used as a model of lung inflammation and fibrosis, allowing for investigation of the pathogenic pathways in experimental fibrosis (106–108). Butyrate attenuates BLM-induced lung fibrosis in rats. Animals receiving BLM in combination with butyrate presented a reduction in body weight loss and an improvement on the levels of inflammatory mediators and immune cells in their bronchoalveolar lavage compared to those receiving BLM alone, demonstrating a possible prophylactic role of this SCFA to certain conditions of pulmonary fibrosis (20, 109).
Figure 3. Effects of butyrate in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). IPF is a chronic, progressive, and fibrotic lung disease. Healthy tissue is replaced by an extracellular matrix (ECM) composed by collagen in a TGF-β dependent way. In this condition the alveolar architecture is compromised, leading to decreased lung compliance, disrupted gas exchange, and respiratory failure. TGF-β alters the metabolism and induces pulmonary fibroblasts differentiation, lowering their mitochondrial NADH, NADH/NAD, and ATP levels, as well as oxidative phosphorylation activity. Butyrate acts as a potent antifibrotic factor, restoring mitochondrial activity, and affecting myofibroblast differentiation. TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide + hydrogen; ATP, adenosine 5’-triphosphate.
Allergic asthma
Asthma is an airway chronic inflammatory disorder characterized as a heterogeneous disease. In this review, we focused on the allergic asthma, which is the most common type of this disease (110). Allergic asthma is also associated with sensitization to aeroallergens such as air pollution, bacteria, pollen and virus. The exposure to allergens induces airway epithelial injury and an inflammatory response (Figure 4). It is well-established in the literature that perturbations in the gut microbiota are linked to allergic asthma (14, 111). For instance, the use of antibiotics during pregnancy was found to be associated, in a dose-dependent way, with the severity of asthma in the offspring (108), and several studies have shown beneficial effects of soluble fiber intake and SCFA-producing probiotics for asthma inflammation throughout different stages of life (109, 110). In this sense, SCFAs may influence the development of asthma via epigenetic regulation of distinct immune cell populations (19).
Figure 4. Effects of butyrate in ameliorating allergic asthma. Allergic asthma is associated with sensitization to aeroallergens such as air pollution, bacteria, pollen, and viruses. Exposure to the allergen induces airway epithelial injury, triggering an inflammatory response with enhanced cytokine production and, consequently, airway hyper-responsiveness, narrowing, and mucus hyperplasia. Butyrate produced in the gut reaches the lungs through the bloodstream and regulates inflammatory cells through histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition, thus attenuating asthmatic symptoms and pulmonary damage. All figures were created with BioRender.com.
Animal studies have also supported the use of SCFAs, including butyrate, to ameliorate allergic asthma (46, 53, 112). More recently, an inverse relationship between asthma and the levels of fecal butyrate, the presence of producing-butyrate bacteria in the gut and the relative abundance of butyrate metabolism enzymes in infants was revealed (113). The lack of genes encoding enzymes for carbohydrate metabolization and butyrate production by the gut microbiota was also shown in infants who develop allergic sensitization later in life (56). Similarly, children with allergic asthma have reduced abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, which are known to induce the production of anti-inflammatory mediators through secretion of bacterial metabolites, including butyrate, in the gut microbiota (114). F. prausnitzii also presented anti-asthmatic effects in mice by modulating the gut microbiota and altering the levels of SCFAs (115). Other studies have shown that asthmatic children presented lower abundance of Faecalibacterium and Roseburia spp., reduced levels of fecal butyrate, and increased levels of mite-specific IgE (116). Even a direct intranasal intervention using butyrate showed a protective effect on airway inflammation and fibrosis during allergic asthma via HDAC inhibition (Figure 4; 77).
Despite the advances in the field, several important aspects regarding butyrate’s effect in asthma need to be addressed including the identification of its main cellular and molecular targets to prevent the development of asthma (i.e., pulmonary epithelium, resident, or non-resident immune cells) (117) and if butyrate treatment could work together with the other SCFAs (acetate and propionate) or conventional drugs to potentiate their beneficial effects. Since obesity is significantly associated with the development of asthma, worsening asthma symptoms, and leading to poor control of the disease (118) and butyrate attenuates some of the obesity associated alterations, it will be important in the future to investigate if this SCFA can be used for prevention or treatment of obesity-related asthma. Finally, considering that asthma is a heterogeneous disease, it is necessary to further investigate the role of butyrate in each type of inflammation involved with the diseases.
Lung cancer
Lung cancer is the most diagnosed cancer worldwide and it is implicated in 18.4% of the total cancer deaths (119). Dysbiosis is a common clinical finding in lung cancer patients, suggesting an important role of the gut and lung microbiota in pulmonary carcinogenesis (120, 121). Lung cancer patients present higher levels of Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Spirochaetes, and Lentisphaerae, and lower levels of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Verrucomicrobia in their lung and gut microbiota, respectively (120, 122), thus supporting the link between the imbalanced ratio of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with increased risk of cancer development (121, 123). Besides, distinct microbial signature has been described in lung tumor tissues compared to normal samples, with decreased alpha diversity and the presence of specific bacteria such as Veillonella and Streptococcus, which can be associated with local IL-17 responses and pro-tumorigenic environment (124).
The progression of lung cancer mediated by gut dysbiosis seems to involve mechanisms associated with genotoxicity, systemic inflammation and defective immunosurveillance (125). Furthermore, recent studies indicate that the gut microbiome has a potential to be a novel biomarker for predicting sensitivity and adverse reactions to immunotherapy in lung cancer patients (125). In this context, modulation of commensal microbiota has been shown to impact anti-lung cancer responses in mouse models, with administration of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation potentializing the effects of antitumoral drugs (125, 126). Moreover, it was suggested that the altered composition of the gut microbiota could lead to early resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors, and so, supplementation with bacterial members known to be reduced in lung cancer patients, such as Akkermansia muciniphila, could be an option to enhance the action of these inhibitors.
The antitumoral effects of intestinal microbiota metabolites, such as SCFAs, on the suppression of tumor growth, migration and invasion have been widely reported in in vivo and in vitro studies for several types of cancers. Despite that, studies related to lung cancer are significantly less common (96, 127). Nevertheless, butyrate treatment was shown to inhibit proliferation and migration of A549 human lung carcinoma epithelial cells in vitro by upregulation of miR-3935 expression (128). In another study, propionate treatment was able to induce cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis in the H1299 and H1703 human non-small cell lung carcinoma, besides regulating Survivin and p21 expression, thus suppressing proliferation of these lung cancer cells (129). Altogether, even though the use of SCFAs for therapeutic applications in lung cancer may be beneficial, further studies are necessary to establish and confirm the mechanisms involved in antitumor activity and define optimal doses and routes of administration.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Recent data suggest that butyrate inhibits experimental ARDS (71, 116, 117). Specifically, Liu et al. (113) reported that endotracheal administration of butyrate in a mouse LPS-induced acute lung injury model led to reduced IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and myeloperoxidase in the lung tissue and blood, and diminished TLR4 and NF-κB expression and alveolar wall injury, compared to the LPS treated control group. However, more mechanistic studies are required to increase our understanding of the butyrate effect through investigation of other models of ARDS including viral infection.
In a pertinent example, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, may lead to acute pneumonitis and typical ARDS and death in severe cases (115), caused by cytokine and chemokine overproduction (116). The recruitment and activation of neutrophils and other innate immune cells is a major feature of COVID-19 induced ARDS with the formation of extracellular traps, and damage of the respiratory barrier with edema (130–132). Thus, neutrophils and other myeloid cells are being explored as potential therapeutic targets (133).
The pathways involved in COVID-19 and severe influenza infection in terms of pathophysiology may be shared, but there are also differences between the infections caused by these two viruses (134). Investigations on the intestinal microbial composition and metabolites are of major interest in this case. Altered composition of microbiota has been reported to be correlated with severity of disease in infected hamsters (135) and reduced SCFA and L-isoleucine production in the gut of patients has also been identified (136). However, the treatment with different SCFA concentrations in human biopsies and intestinal epithelial cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 had no effect on production of antiviral and inflammatory mediators (137). These results indicate that the changes in intestinal SCFAs observed on patients with COVID-19 may not be relevant for SARS-CoV-2 effects in the intestine (137). In contrast, a study using a non-human primate model found that the composition and functional activity of the microbiota was altered (138). From these analyses, it is anticipated that altered microbiomes may affect the outcome of acute COVID infection and may be involved in long-COVID sequelae. More recently, one group demonstrated that treatments with a high-fiber diet containing pectin and/or with mix of SCFAs in the drinking water were both able to reduce the levels of SARS-COV-2 entry receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and, therefore, to reduce viral burdens in intranasal infection model using mice and hamsters (139). According to this study, treatments also increased immune adaptive responses via activation of FFAR2 and FFAR3 (but only in males), and reduced coagulation and platelet turnover by regulating the Sh2b3-Mpl axis (139). In this context, in depth analyses of metabolites including SCFAs may emerge a potential new therapeutic in the current and future pandemic.
Concluding remarks
This review focused on how the gut-lung axis acts on systemic immunity promoting the modulation of aspects related to pulmonary disorders. Butyrate is a key player in the microbiota regulation of immune cells functions. In general, this SCFA contributes to a proper immune response by stimulating key aspects of immunity including antibody production and the recruitment and activation of immune cells, while limiting harmful immune responses. However, butyrate’s effects are complex and context dependent. The beneficial impact of the intestinal microbiota and its metabolites on lung function and on the outcome of diseases such as asthma and COPD is primarily due to the reduction of local and systemic inflammation and, in this context, butyrate has been shown to be a key orchestrator of these responses. Due to the scarcity of effective therapies and considering the potential benefits of microbiota metabolites on respiratory function. Butyrate emerges as a promising agent for the development of therapeutic approaches applicable to pulmonary disorders. However, it should be noted that although studies in the gut-lung axis field are bringing new insights, it is still not possible to determine the best strategies for applications of SCFAs in the clinical management of lung diseases. The main limitations for this application are explained by the fact that most of the studies have been conducted in rodent models, which makes it difficult to extrapolate the data to the human context. In addition, studies performed on humans lack standardization regarding the delivery routes, concentrations of metabolites used, and strategies for modulating the intestinal microbiota. Thus, additional randomized controlled trials are necessary for a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in promoting better respiratory health mediated by the intestinal microbiota and its metabolites. The refinement of these studies may help to enable the use of microbiota metabolites in the clinical context of lung diseases. Finally, recent studies demonstrate that the same strategy used to modulate the lung-intestine axis (i.e., symbiotic, probiotic, or SCFAs) can have a different outcome on allergic airway disease in genetically different mice (110, 140). These findings indicate that the host genetics and its native microbiota are key aspects that need to be considered for the effective use of therapeutic tools that act in the lung-gut axis.
Limitation of this review
The present review does not address published data on the benefit of local or systemic administration SCFAs or butyrate on IBD, obesity, diabetes, neuro-inflammation, InflammAging, infections, or autophagy mediated processes.
Author contributions
BR and MV: conceptualization and supervision. RC, PC, and RM: writing – original draft preparation. All authors have editing, read, and agreed on the final version of this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by CNRS, University of Orleans, and European funding in Region Center-Val de Loire (FEDER TARGET-Ex No. EX016008), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, #2013/07607-8, and #2018/15313-8), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES).
Conflict of interest
Author RM was employed by IBR Inc.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. de Filippo C, Cavalieri D, di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2010) 107:14691–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005963107
2. Singh N, Gurav A, Sivaprakasam S, Brady E, Padia R, Shi H, et al. Activation of Gpr109a, receptor for niacin and the commensal metabolite butyrate, suppresses colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis. Immunity. (2014) 40:128–39. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.007
3. Zinöcker MK, Lindseth IA. The western diet–microbiome-host interaction and its role in metabolic disease. Nutrients. (2018) 10:365. doi: 10.3390/nu10030365
4. Christ A, Lauterbach M, Latz E. Western diet and the immune system: an inflammatory connection. Immunity. (2019) 51:794–811. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.09.020
5. Amazouz H, Roda C, Beydon N, Lezmi G, Bourgoin-Heck M, Just J, et al. Mediterranean diet and lung function, sensitization, and asthma at school age: the PARIS cohort. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. (2021) 32:1437–44. doi: 10.1111/pai.13527
6. Albouery M, Bretin A, Buteau B, Grégoire S, Martine L, Gambert S, et al. Soluble fiber inulin consumption limits alterations of the gut microbiota and hepatic fatty acid metabolism caused by high-fat diet. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1037. doi: 10.3390/nu13031037
7. Deehan EC, Yang C, Perez-Muñoz ME, Nguyen NK, Cheng CC, Triador L, et al. Precision microbiome modulation with discrete dietary fiber structures directs short-chain fatty acid production. Cell Host Microbe. (2020) 27:389–404.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.006
8. Reynolds A, Mann J, Cummings J, Winter N, Mete E, te Morenga L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet. (2019) 393:434–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9
9. Hanson C, Lyden E, Rennard S, Mannino DM, Rutten EPA, Hopkins R, et al. The relationship between dietary fiber intake and lung function in the national health and nutrition examination surveys. Ann Am Thorac Soc. (2016) 13:643–50. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-609OC
10. Noce A, Marrone G, di Daniele F, Ottaviani E, Jones GW, Bernini R, et al. Impact of gut microbiota composition on onset and progression of chronic non-communicable diseases. Nutrients. (2019) 11:1073. doi: 10.3390/nu11051073
11. Gill SK, Rossi M, Bajka B, Whelan K. Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 18:101–16. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00375-4
12. Myhrstad MCW, Tunsjø H, Charnock C, Telle-Hansen VH. Dietary fiber, gut microbiota, and metabolic regulation – current status in human randomized trials. Nutrients. (2020) 12:859. doi: 10.3390/nu12030859
13. le Bastard Q, Chapelet G, Javaudin F, Lepelletier D, Batard E, Montassier E. The effects of inulin on gut microbial composition: a systematic review of evidence from human studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2020) 39:403–13. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03721-w
14. Dang AT, Marsland BJ. Microbes, metabolites, and the gut–lung axis. Mucosal Immunol. (2019) 12:843–50. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0160-6
15. Enaud R, Prevel R, Ciarlo E, Beaufils F, Wieërs G, Guery B, et al. The gut-lung axis in health and respiratory diseases: a place for inter-organ and inter-kingdom crosstalks. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2020) 10:9. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00009
16. Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. (2016) 7:189–200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082
17. Ríos-Covián D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A, Gueimonde M, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Salazar N. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front Microbiol. (2016) 7:185. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00185
18. Macfarlane GT, Gibson GR, Beatty E, Cummings JH. Estimation of short-chain fatty acid production from protein by human intestinal bacteria based on branched-chain fatty acid measurements. FEMS Microbiol Lett. (1992) 101:81–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb05764.x
19. Yip W, Hughes MR, Li Y, Cait A, Hirst M, Mohn WW, et al. Butyrate shapes immune cell fate and function in allergic asthma. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:628453. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.628453
20. Kabel AM, Omar MS, Elmaaboud MAA. Amelioration of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in rats by valproic acid and butyrate: role of nuclear factor kappa-B, proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Int Immunopharmacol. (2016) 39:335–42. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.08.008
21. Siddiqui MT, Cresci GAM. The immunomodulatory functions of butyrate. J Inflamm Res. (2021) 14:6025–41. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S300989
22. Vital M, Karch A, Pieper DH. Colonic butyrate-producing communities in humans: an overview using omics data. mSystems. (2017) 2:e00130-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00130-17
23. Louis P, Flint HJ. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett. (2009) 294:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x
24. Louis P, Flint HJ. Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol. (2017) 19:29–41. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13589
25. Cantu-Jungles TM, Rasmussen HE, Hamaker BR. Potential of prebiotic butyrogenic fibers in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:663. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00663
26. Corrêa-Oliveira R, Fachi JL, Vieira A, Sato FT, Vinolo MAR. Regulation of immune cell function by short-chain fatty acids. Clin Transl Immunol. (2016) 5:e73. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.17
27. Blaak EE, Canfora EE, Theis S, Frost G, Groen AK, Mithieux G, et al. Short chain fatty acids in human gut and metabolic health. Benef Microbes. (2020) 11:411–55. doi: 10.3920/BM2020.0057
28. Salvi PS, Cowles RA. Butyrate and the intestinal epithelium: modulation of proliferation and inflammation in homeostasis and disease. Cells. (2021) 10:1775. doi: 10.3390/cells10071775
29. Sivaprakasam S, Bhutia YD, Yang S, Ganapathy V. Short-chain fatty acid transporters: role in colonic homeostasis. Compr Physiol. (2018) 8:299–314. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170014
30. Lee C, Kim BG, Kim JH, Chun J, Im JP, Kim JS. Sodium butyrate inhibits the NF-kappa B signaling pathway and histone deacetylation, and attenuates experimental colitis in an IL-10 independent manner. Int Immunopharmacol. (2017) 51:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.07.023
31. Liu P, Wang Y, Yang G, Zhang Q, Meng L, Xin Y, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in intestinal barrier function, inflammation, oxidative stress, and colonic carcinogenesis. Pharmacol Res. (2021) 165:105420. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105420
32. Gill RK, Saksena S, Alrefai WA, Sarwar Z, Goldstein JL, Carroll RE, et al. Expression and membrane localization of MCT isoforms along the length of the human intestine. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2005) 289:846–52. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00112.2005.-Recent
33. van der Hee B, Wells JM. Microbial regulation of host physiology by short-chain fatty acids. Trends Microbiol. (2021) 29:700–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.001
34. Brown AJ, Goldsworthy SM, Barnes AA, Eilert MM, Tcheang L, Daniels D, et al. The orphan G protein-coupled receptors GPR41 and GPR43 are activated by propionate and other short chain carboxylic acids. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:11312–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211609200
35. Yang T, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, Raizada MK. The gut microbiota and the brain-gut-kidney axis in hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2018) 14:442–56. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0018-2
36. Guldris SC, Parra EG, Amenós AC. Gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease. Nefrología. (2017) 37:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2017.01.017
37. Espírito Santo C, Caseiro C, Martins MJ, Monteiro R, Brandão I. Gut microbiota, in the halfway between nutrition and lung function. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1716. doi: 10.3390/nu13051716
38. Kamp ME, Shim R, Nicholls AJ, Oliveira AC, Mason LJ, Binge L, et al. G protein-coupled receptor 43 modulates neutrophil recruitment during acute inflammation. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0163750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163750
39. Dahlstrand Rudin A, Khamzeh A, Venkatakrishnan V, Basic A, Christenson K, Bylund J. Short chain fatty acids released by Fusobacterium nucleatum are neutrophil chemoattractants acting via free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFAR2). Cell Microbiol. (2021) 23:e13348. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13348
40. Corrêa RO, Vieira A, Sernaglia EM, Lancellotti M, Vieira AT, Avila-Campos MJ, et al. Bacterial short-chain fatty acid metabolites modulate the inflammatory response against infectious bacteria. Cell Microbiol. (2017) 19:1–14. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12720
41. Íñiguez-Gutiérrez L, Godínez-Méndez LA, Fafutis-Morris M, Padilla-Arellano JR, Corona-Rivera A, Bueno-Topete MR, et al. Physiological concentrations of short-chain fatty acids induce the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in vitro. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. (2020) 34:1–10. doi: 10.1177/2058738420958949
42. Zhang D, Frenette PS. Cross talk between neutrophils and the microbiota. Blood. (2019) 133:2168–77. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844555
43. Maslowski KM, Vieira AT, Ng A, Kranich J, Sierro F, Yu D, et al. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature. (2009) 461:1282–6. doi: 10.1038/nature08530
44. Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, Sprenger N, Ngom-Bru C, et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med. (2014) 20:159–66. doi: 10.1038/nm.3444
45. Chen J, Vitetta L. The role of butyrate in attenuating pathobiont-induced hyperinflammation. Immune Netw. (2020) 20:e15. doi: 10.4110/in.2020.20.e15
46. Sina C, Gavrilova O, Förster M, Till A, Derer S, Hildebrand F, et al. G protein-coupled receptor 43 is essential for neutrophil recruitment during intestinal inflammation. J Immunol. (2009) 183:7514–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900063
47. Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Pattaroni C, Lopez-Mejia IC, Riva E, Pernot J, et al. Dietary fiber confers protection against flu by shaping Ly6c- patrolling monocyte hematopoiesis and CD8+ T cell metabolism. Immunity. (2018) 48:992–1005.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.022
48. Schulthess J, Pandey S, Capitani M, Rue-Albrecht KC, Arnold I, Franchini F, et al. The short chain fatty acid butyrate imprints an antimicrobial program in macrophages. Immunity. (2019) 50:432–45.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018
49. Cleophas MCP, Ratter JM, Bekkering S, Quintin J, Schraa K, Stroes ES, et al. Effects of oral butyrate supplementation on inflammatory potential of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells in healthy and obese males. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:775. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37246-7
50. Russo E, Giudici F, Fiorindi C, Ficari F, Scaringi S, Amedei A. Immunomodulating activity and therapeutic effects of short chain fatty acids and tryptophan post-biotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2754. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02754
51. Goverse G, Molenaar R, Macia L, Tan J, Erkelens MN, Konijn T, et al. Diet-derived short chain fatty acids stimulate intestinal epithelial cells to induce mucosal tolerogenic dendritic cells. J Immunol. (2017) 198:2172–81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600165
52. Kaisar MMM, Pelgrom LR, van der Ham AJ, Yazdanbakhsh M, Everts B. Butyrate conditions human dendritic cells to prime type 1 regulatory T cells via both histone deacetylase inhibition and G protein-coupled receptor 109A signaling. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01429
53. Cait A, Hughes MR, Antignano F, Cait J, Dimitriu PA, Maas KR, et al. Microbiome-driven allergic lung inflammation is ameliorated by short-chain fatty acids. Mucosal Immunol. (2018) 11:785–95. doi: 10.1038/mi.2017.75
54. Tan J, McKenzie C, Vuillermin PJ, Goverse G, Vinuesa CG, Mebius RE, et al. Dietary fiber and bacterial SCFA enhance oral tolerance and protect against food allergy through diverse cellular pathways. Cell Rep. (2016) 15:2809–24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.047
55. Zhang H, Du M, Yang Q, Zhu MJ. Butyrate suppresses murine mast cell proliferation and cytokine production through inhibiting histone deacetylase. J Nutr Biochem. (2016) 27:299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.09.020
56. van Hung T, Suzuki T. Dietary fermentable fiber reduces intestinal barrier defects and inflammation in colitic mice1-3. J Nutr. (2016) 146:1970–9. doi: 10.3945/JN.116.232538
57. Wang CC, Wu H, Lin FH, Gong R, Xie F, Peng Y, et al. Sodium butyrate enhances intestinal integrity, inhibits mast cell activation, inflammatory mediator production and JNK signaling pathway in weaned pigs. Innate Immun. (2018) 24:40–6. doi: 10.1177/1753425917741970
58. Folkerts J, Redegeld F, Folkerts G, Blokhuis B, van den Berg MPM, de Bruijn MJW, et al. Butyrate inhibits human mast cell activation via epigenetic regulation of FcεRI-mediated signaling. Allergy. (2020) 75:1962–74. doi: 10.1111/all.14254
59. Theiler A, Bärnthaler T, Platzer W, Richtig G, Peinhaupt M, Rittchen S, et al. Butyrate ameliorates allergic airway inflammation by limiting eosinophil trafficking and survival. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2019) 144:764–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.002
60. McBrien CN, Menzies-Gow A. The biology of eosinophils and their role in asthma. Front Med (Lausanne). (2017) 4:93. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00093
61. O’Mahony L. Short-chain fatty acids modulate mast cell activation. Allergy. (2020) 75:1847–8. doi: 10.1111/all.14313
62. Artis D, Spits H. The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature. (2015) 517:293–301. doi: 10.1038/nature14189
63. Kim BS, Artis D. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2015) 7:a016337. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016337
64. Cella M, Fuchs A, Vermi W, Facchetti F, Otero K, Lennerz JKM, et al. A human natural killer cell subset provides an innate source of IL-22 for mucosal immunity. Nature. (2009) 457:722–5. doi: 10.1038/nature07537
65. Orimo K, Tamari M, Saito H, Matsumoto K, Nakae S, Morita H. Characteristics of tissue–resident ILCs and their potential as therapeutic targets in mucosal and skin inflammatory diseases. Allergy. (2021) 76:3332–48. doi: 10.1111/all.14863
66. Kim CH. Control of lymphocyte functions by gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids. Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:1161–71. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00625-0
67. Chun E, Lavoie S, Fonseca-Pereira D, Bae S, Michaud M, Hoveyda HR, et al. Metabolite-sensing receptor Ffar2 regulates colonic group 3 innate lymphoid cells and gut immunity. Immunity. (2019) 51:871–84.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.09.014
68. Fachi JL, Sécca C, Rodrigues PB, de Mato FCP, di Luccia B, Felipe J, et al. Acetate coordinates neutrophil and ILC3 responses against C. difficile through FFAR2. J Exp Med. (2020) 217:jem.20190489. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190489
69. Sepahi A, Liu QY, Friesen L, Kim CH. Dietary fiber metabolites regulate innate lymphoid cell responses. Mucosal Immunol. (2021) 14:317–30. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-0312-8
70. Yang W, Yu T, Huang X, Bilotta AJ, Xu L, Lu Y, et al. Intestinal microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids regulation of immune cell IL-22 production and gut immunity. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:4457. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18262-6
71. Kim SH, Cho BH, Kiyono H, Jang YS. Microbiota-derived butyrate suppresses group 3 innate lymphoid cells in terminal ileal Peyer’s patches. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:3980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02729-6
72. Bhatt B, Zeng P, Zhu H, Sivaprakasam S, Li S, Xiao H, et al. Gpr109a limits microbiota-induced IL-23 production to constrain ILC3-mediated colonic inflammation. J Immunol. (2018) 200:2905–14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701625
73. Thio CLP, Chi PY, Lai ACY, Chang YJ. Regulation of type 2 innate lymphoid cell–dependent airway hyperreactivity by butyrate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 142:1867–83.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.032
74. Islam R, Dash D, Singh R. Intranasal curcumin and sodium butyrate modulates airway inflammation and fibrosis via HDAC inhibition in allergic asthma. Cytokine. (2022) 149:155720. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155720
75. Li N, Liu XX, Hong M, Huang XZ, Chen H, Xu JH, et al. Sodium butyrate alleviates LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice via inhibiting HMGB1 release. Int Immunopharmacol. (2018) 56:242–8. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.01.017
76. Lewis G, Wang B, Shafiei Jahani P, Hurrell BP, Banie H, Aleman Muench GR, et al. Dietary fiber-induced microbial short chain fatty acids suppress ILC2-dependent airway inflammation. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:251. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02051
77. de Souza Vieira R, Castoldi A, Basso PJ, Hiyane MI, Saraiva Câmara NO, Almeida RR. Butyrate attenuates lung inflammation by negatively modulating Th9 cells. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:67. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00067
78. Park J, Goergen CJ, HogenEsch H, Kim CH. Chronically elevated levels of short-chain fatty acids induce T cell-mediated ureteritis and hydronephrosis. J Immunol. (2016) 196:2388–400. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502046
79. Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, Deroos P, et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. (2013) 504:451–5. doi: 10.1038/nature12726
80. Nguyen TD, Prykhodko O, Hållenius FF, Nyman M. Effects of monobutyrin and tributyrin on liver lipid profile, caecal microbiota composition and SCFA in high-fat diet-fed rats. J Nutr Sci. (2017) 6:e51. doi: 10.1017/jns.2017.54
81. Sato FT, Yap YA, Crisma AR, Portovedo M, Murata GM, Hirabara SM, et al. Tributyrin attenuates metabolic and inflammatory changes associated with obesity through a GPR109A-dependent mechanism. Cells. (2020) 9:2007. doi: 10.3390/cells9092007
82. Vinolo MAR, Rodrigues HG, Festuccia WT, Crisma AR, Alves VS, Martins AR, et al. Tributyrin attenuates obesity-associated inflammation and insulin resistance in high-fat-fed mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 303:272–82. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00053.2012.-The
83. Kespohl M, Vachharajani N, Luu M, Harb H, Pautz S, Wolff S, et al. The microbial metabolite butyrate induces expression of Th1- associated factors in cD4+ T cells. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1036. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01036
84. Sun M, Wu W, Chen L, Yang W, Huang X, Ma C, et al. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote Th1 cell IL-10 production to maintain intestinal homeostasis. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:355. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05901-2
85. Luu M, Weigand K, Wedi F, Breidenbend C, Leister H, Pautz S, et al. Regulation of the effector function of CD8+ T cells by gut microbiota-derived metabolite butyrate. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:14430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32860-x
86. Bachem A, Makhlouf C, Binger KJ, de Souza DP, Tull D, Hochheiser K, et al. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote the memory potential of antigen-activated CD8+ T cells. Immunity. (2019) 51:285–97.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.002
87. Zhang H, Tang K, Ma J, Zhou L, Liu J, Zeng L, et al. Ketogenesis-generated β-hydroxybutyrate is an epigenetic regulator of CD8+ T-cell memory development. Nat Cell Biol. (2020) 22:18–25. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0440-0
88. Rosser EC, Piper CJM, Matei DE, Blair PA, Rendeiro AF, Orford M, et al. Microbiota-derived metabolites suppress arthritis by amplifying Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor activation in regulatory B cells. Cell Metab. (2020) 31:837–51.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.03.003
89. Daïen CI, Tan J, Audo R, Mielle J, Quek LE, Krycer JR, et al. Gut-derived acetate promotes B10 cells with antiinflammatory effects. JCI Insight. (2021) 6:e144156. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.144156
90. Gavelin HM, Dong C, Minkov R, Bahar-Fuchs A, Ellis KA, Lautenschlager NT, et al. Combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with and without cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev. (2021) 66:101232. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101232
91. Capurso G, Lahner E. The interaction between smoking, alcohol and the gut microbiome. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. (2017) 31:579–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.10.006
92. Zeller I, Malovichko MV, Hurst HE, Renaud DE, Scott DA. Cigarette smoke reduces short chain fatty acid production by a Porphyromonas gingivalis clinical isolate. J Periodontal Res. (2019) 54:566–71. doi: 10.1111/jre.12660
93. Kirschner SK, Deutz NEP, Jonker R, Olde Damink SWM, Harrykissoon RI, Zachria AJ, et al. Intestinal function is impaired in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Nutr. (2021) 40:2270–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.010
94. Li N, Dai Z, Wang Z, Deng Z, Zhang J, Pu J, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. (2021) 22:274. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01872-z
95. Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Marsland B. The gut-liver-lung axis: modulation of the innate immune response and its possible role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2016) 54:161–9. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0250PS
96. He S, Li L, Sun S, Zeng Z, Lu J, Xie L. A novel murine chronic obstructive pulmonary disease model and the pathogenic role of microRNA-21. Front Physiol. (2018) 9:503. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00503
97. Tomoda K, Kubo K, Dairiki K, Yamaji T, Yamamoto Y, Nishii Y, et al. Whey peptide-based enteral diet attenuated elastase-induced emphysema with increase in short chain fatty acids in mice. BMC Pulm Med. (2015) 15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0059-2
98. Song M, Peng H, Guo W, Luo M, Duan W, Chen P, et al. Cigarette smoke extract promotes human lung myofibroblast differentiation by the induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Respiration. (2019) 98:347–56. doi: 10.1159/000502099
99. Lynch JP, Belperio JA. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. 2nd ed. In: Baughman R, du Bois R editors. Diffuse Lung Disease: A Practical Approach. New York, NY: Springer (2012). p. 171–94. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9771-5_10
100. Duffield JS, Lupher M, Thannickal VJ, Wynn TA. Host responses in tissue repair and fibrosis. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. (2013) 8:241–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-163930
101. Lee HY, Nam S, Kim MJ, Kim SJ, Back SH, Yoo HJ. Butyrate prevents tgf-β1-induced alveolar myofibroblast differentiation and modulates energy metabolism. Metabolites. (2021) 11:258. doi: 10.3390/metabo11050258
102. Gasse P, Riteau N, Charron S, Girre S, Fick L, Pétrilli V, et al. Uric acid is a danger signal activating NALP3 inflammasome in lung injury inflammation and fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2009) 179:903–13. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200808-1274OC
103. Riteau N, Gasse P, Fauconnier L, Gombault A, Couegnat M, Fick L, et al. Extracellular ATP is a danger signal activating P2X7 receptor in lung inflammation and fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2010) 182:774–83. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0359OC
104. Gasse P, Riteau N, Vacher R, Michel ML, Fautrel A, di Padova F, et al. IL-1 and IL-23 mediate early IL-17A production in pulmonary inflammation leading to late fibrosis. PLoS One. (2011) 6:e23185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023185
105. Park HJ, Jeong OY, Chun SH, Cheon YH, Kim M, Kim S, et al. Butyrate improves skin/lung fibrosis and intestinal dysbiosis in bleomycin-induced mouse models. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:1–21. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052765
106. Holgate ST, Wenzel S, Postma DS, Weiss ST, Renz H, Sly PD. Asthma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2015) 1:15025. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.25
107. Russell SL, Gold MJ, Willing BP, Thorson L, McNagny KM, Finlay BB. Perinatal antibiotic treatment affects murine microbiota, immune responses and allergic asthma. Gut Microbes. (2013) 4:158–64. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23567
108. Alhasan MM, Cait AM, Heimesaat MM, Blaut M, Klopfleisch R, Wedel A, et al. Antibiotic use during pregnancy increases offspring asthma severity in a dose-dependent manner. Allergy. (2020) 75:1975–86. doi: 10.1111/all.14234
109. Williams LM, Scott HA, Wood LG. Soluble fibre as a treatment for inflammation in asthma. J Nutr Intermed Metab. (2019) 18:100108. doi: 10.1016/j.jnim.2019.100108
110. Casaro MB, Thomas AM, Mendes E, Fukumori C, Ribeiro WR, Oliveira FA, et al. A probiotic has differential effects on allergic airway inflammation in A/J and C57BL/6 mice and is correlated with the gut microbiome. Microbiome. (2021) 9:134. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01081-2
111. Marsland BJ. Influences of the microbiome on the early origins of allergic asthma. Ann Am Thorac Soc. (2013) 10:S165–9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201305-118AW
112. Chiu CY, Cheng ML, Chiang MH, Kuo YL, Tsai MH, Chiu CC, et al. Gut microbial-derived butyrate is inversely associated with IgE responses to allergens in childhood asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. (2019) 30:689–97. doi: 10.1111/pai.13096
113. Liu J, Chang G, Huang J, Wang Y, Ma N, Roy AC, et al. Sodium butyrate inhibits the inflammation of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice by regulating the toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor κb signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem. (2019) 67:1674–82. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06359
114. Ni YF, Wang J, Yan XL, Tian F, Zhao JB, Wang YJ, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor, butyrate, attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Respir Res. (2010) 11:33. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-33
115. Lu S, Huang X, Liu R, Lan Y, Lei Y, Zeng F, et al. Comparison of COVID-19 induced respiratory failure and typical ARDS: similarities and differences. Front Med. (2022) 9:829771. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.829771
116. Chen R, Lan Z, Ye J, Pang L, Liu Y, Wu W, et al. Cytokine storm: the primary determinant for the pathophysiological evolution of COVID-19 deterioration. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:589095. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.589095
117. Verstegen REM, Kostadinova AI, Merenciana Z, Garssen J, Folkerts G, Hendriks RW, et al. Dietary fibers: effects, underlying mechanisms and possible role in allergic asthma management. Nutrients. (2021) 13:4153. doi: 10.3390/nu13114153
118. Peters U, Dixon AE, Forno E. Obesity and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:1169–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.004
119. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
120. Mao Q, Jiang F, Yin R, Wang J, Xia W, Dong G, et al. Interplay between the lung microbiome and lung cancer. Cancer Lett. (2018) 415:40–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.036
121. Zheng Y, Fang Z, Xue Y, Zhang J, Zhu J, Gao R, et al. Specific gut microbiome signature predicts the early-stage lung cancer. Gut Microbes. (2020) 11:1030–42. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1737487
122. Zhang W-Q, Zhao S-K, Luo J-W, Dong X-P, Hao Y-T, Li H, et al. Alterations of fecal bacterial communities in patients with lung cancer. Am J Transl Res. (2018) 10:3171–85.
123. Liu F, Li J, Guan Y, Lou Y, Chen H, Xu M, et al. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is associated with tumor biomarkers in lung cancer. Int J Biol Sci. (2019) 15:2381–92. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.35980
124. Birla P, Shaikh FY. De- “bug”-ing the microbiome in lung cancer. Cancer Metast Rev. (2022) 41:335–46. doi: 10.1007/s10555-022-10036-4
125. Liu X, Cheng Y, Zang D, Zhang M, Li X, Liu D, et al. The role of gut microbiota in lung cancer: from carcinogenesis to immunotherapy. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:720842. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.720842
126. Gui QF, Lu HF, Zhang CX, Xu ZR, Yang YM. Well-balanced commensal microbiota contributes to anti-cancer response in a lung cancer mouse model. Genet Mol Res. (2015) 14:5642–51. doi: 10.4238/2015.May.25.16
127. Tian Y, Xu Q, Sun L, Ye Y, Ji G. Short-chain fatty acids administration is protective in colitis-associated colorectal cancer development. J Nutr Biochem. (2018) 57:103–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.03.007
128. Xiao X, Cao Y, Chen H. Profiling and characterization of microRNAs responding to sodium butyrate treatment in A549 cells. J Cell Biochem. (2018) 119:3563–73. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26547
129. Kim K, Kwon O, Ryu TY, Jung CR, Kim J, Min JK, et al. Propionate of a microbiota metabolite induces cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in lung cancer. Mol Med Rep. (2019) 20:1569–74. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10431
130. Veras FP, Pontelli MC, Silva CM, Toller-Kawahisa JE, de Lima M, Nascimento DC, et al. SARS-CoV-2-triggered neutrophil extracellular traps mediate COVID-19 pathology. J Exp Med. (2020) 217:e20201129. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201129
131. Pastorek M, Dúbrava M, Celec P. On the origin of neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:821007. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.821007
132. Seren S, Derian L, Keles I, Guillon A, Lesner A, Gonzalez L, et al. Proteinase release from activated neutrophils in mechanically ventilated patients with non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pneumonia. Eur Respir J. (2021) 57:2003755. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03755-2020
133. Blanch-Ruiz MA, Ortega-Luna R, Gómez-García G, Martínez-Cuesta MÁ, Álvarez Á. Role of neutrophil extracellular traps in covid-19 progression: an insight for effective treatment. Biomedicines. (2022) 10:31. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010031
134. Paget C, Trottein F. COVID-19 and flu: conserved or specific immune signature? Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:245–6. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00595-3
135. Sencio V, Machelart A, Robil C, Benech N, Hoffmann E, Galbert C, et al. Alteration of the gut microbiota following SARS-CoV-2 infection correlates with disease severity in hamsters. Gut Microbes. (2022) 14:2018900. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.2018900
136. Zhang F, Wan Y, Zuo T, Yeoh YK, Liu Q, Zhang L, et al. Prolonged impairment of short-chain fatty acid and L-isoleucine biosynthesis in gut microbiome in patients with COVID-19. Gastroenterology. (2022) 162:548–61.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.013
137. Pascoal LB, Rodrigues PB, Genaro LM, Gomes AB, dos SP, Toledo-Teixeira DA, et al. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids do not interfere with SARS-CoV-2 infection of human colonic samples. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1–9. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1874740
138. Sokol H, Contreras V, Maisonnasse P, Desmons A, Delache B, Sencio V, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in nonhuman primates alters the composition and functional activity of the gut microbiota. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1–19. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1893113
139. Brown JA, Sanidad KZ, Lucotti S, Lieber CM, Cox RM, Ananthanarayanan A, et al. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Gut Microbes. (2022) 14:2105609. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2105609
140. Fukumori C, Casaro MB, Thomas AM, Mendes E, Ribeiro WR, Crisma AR, et al. Maternal supplementation with a synbiotic has distinct outcomes on offspring gut microbiota formation in A/J and C57BL/6 mice, differentially affecting airway inflammatory cell infiltration and mucus production. J Funct Foods. (2019) 61:103496. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103496
141. Jang YO, Kim OH, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Yun S, Lim SE, et al. High-fiber diets attenuate emphysema development via modulation of gut microbiota and metabolism. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:7008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86404-x
142. Jang YO, Lee SH, Choi JJ, Kim DH, Choi JM, Kang MJ, et al. Fecal microbial transplantation and a high fiber diet attenuates emphysema development by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis. Exp Mol Med. (2020) 52:1128–39. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0469-y
143. Szmidt MK, Kaluza J, Harris HR, Linden A, Wolk A. Long-term dietary fiber intake and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study of women. Eur J Nutr. (2020) 59:1869–79. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02038-w
Keywords: lung-gut axis, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), butyrate, inflammation, pulmonary disorders
Citation: Corrêa RO, Castro PR, Moser R, Ferreira CM, Quesniaux VFJ, Vinolo MAR and Ryffel B (2022) Butyrate: Connecting the gut-lung axis to the management of pulmonary disorders. Front. Nutr. 9:1011732. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1011732
Received: 04 August 2022; Accepted: 29 September 2022;
Published: 20 October 2022.
Edited by:
Laurence Macia, The University of Sydney, AustraliaReviewed by:
Wei Huang, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, ChinaSergio Perez-Burillo, Public University of Navarre, Spain
Alissa Cait, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Copyright © 2022 Corrêa, Castro, Moser, Ferreira, Quesniaux, Vinolo and Ryffel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marco Aurélio Ramirez Vinolo, bXZpbm9sb0B1bmljYW1wLmJy; Bernhard Ryffel, YmVybmhhcmQucnlmZmVsQGNucnMtb3JsZWFucy5mcg==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship