Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Nutr., 08 June 2021
Sec. Food Chemistry
This article is part of the Research Topic Non-thermal Technologies View all 7 articles

Non-thermal Technologies for Food Processing

  • 1Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India
  • 2Department of Physics, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India

Food is subjected to various thermal treatments during processes to enhance its shelf-life. But these thermal treatments may result in deterioration of the nutritional and sensory qualities of food. With the change in the lifestyle of people around the globe, their food needs have changed as well. Today's consumer demand is for clean and safe food without compromising the nutritional and sensory qualities of food. This directed the attention of food professionals toward the development of non-thermal technologies that are green, safe, and environment-friendly. In non-thermal processing, food is processed at near room temperature, so there is no damage to food because heat-sensitive nutritious materials are intact in the food, contrary to thermal processing of food. These non-thermal technologies can be utilized for treating all kinds of food like fruits, vegetables, pulses, spices, meat, fish, etc. Non-thermal technologies have emerged largely in the last few decades in food sector.

Introduction

Food quality is a great concern when processing food for preservation. Conventional food preservation processes expose food to a very high temperature, which no doubt reduces the contamination or microbial load from food, but it also results in some undesirable changes in food, such as loss of nutritional components that are temperature-sensitive, change in the texture of food due to heat, and changes in the organoleptic characteristics of food (1). In thermal processing, food is exposed to heat for a long duration of time, which causes observable changes in food and results in the production of low-grade food (2, 3). The thermal techniques used for preservation result in the formation of chemical toxicants in food that are carcinogenic and harm the human body (4, 5). The amount and the type of toxicants formed also depend on the type of thermal method used for cooking food. Microwave cooking and deep fat frying result in the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines, which can even cause mutagenic changes in the body (5, 6). Thermal treatment can also cause loss of water from food, oxidation of lipids, and changes in the composition of fatty acids. Barbequing of meat causes loss of meat juices that mainly contain saturated lipids stored in the form of adipose tissue, leading to a decrease in saturated fatty acid and an increase in polyunsaturated fatty acid in the final product. The presence of polyunsaturated fatty acid makes the final product more susceptible to lipid oxidation and decreases the quality of product, imparting an off-flavor with a reduced mouthfeel (7). But now, consumers' awareness regarding food safety has increased and they demand food free from microorganism and with high nutritional qualities and excellent mouthfeel. This led food professionals to search for a better alternative, like non-thermal treatments. In non-thermal processing, food is exposed to ambient temperature for a very limited period of time, i.e., for ~l min or less, which causes no change in the nutritional composition of food, the texture remains intact, and the mouthfeel is not lost (810). The rise in consumer demand for fresh food with longer shelf-life and good sensory qualities led to extensive research in the field of non-thermal treatment of food (11). Thermal technologies that require huge energy consumption and produce low-grade food can be fully or partly replaced by the consumer-, environment-, and pocket-friendly (since they are economical) non-thermal technologies for food processing and preservation (1214). Various non-thermal food processing treatments came into light since the last few decades, which included pulsed electric field, cold plasma, ultrasonication, microwave, supercritical technology, etc. These non-thermal treatments unmask food to treatment conditions for a fraction of seconds, which results in the reduction of the microbial load in food with an increase in shelf-life, with good sensory and textural characteristics (15, 16). The preservation effect of non-thermal technologies is more than that of thermal technologies because there is no chance for the formation of any undesirable products/by-products in food or on the surface of food since it is not exposed to higher temperatures (17). Pulsed electric field is an extensively used non-thermal processing treatment in the food sector. It is mostly exploited for liquid food including fruit juices, alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic beverages, etc. It can be directly applied on the entire fruit. It damages the cell wall of microorganisms, leading to the death of microbes and the reduction of the microbial load (18). The intensity of pulse and pulse width play important roles in microbial reduction in food exposed to pulse electric field treatment (19). Non-thermal treatment can also arrest the activity of enzymes, leading to the spoilage of fruits and vegetables. Cold plasma technology is extensively used to enhance the physiological properties of proteins and carbohydrates in food, so that they can be used in numerous applications in food processing. Gaseous cold plasma processing has been used for improving the cooking and textural properties of food grains (20, 21). It also inactivates the microbes present on the surface of the food product. Cold plasma treatment time plays an important role in achieving the desired results (2224). Ultrasonication is an energy-efficient non-thermal treatment usually used for the intensification of processes like synthesis, extraction, and preservation of food and allied products. Ultrasonication duty cycle and exposure time have positive effects on food. A perfect combination of duty cycle and exposure time can be utilized in developing safe and nutritious food with ultrasonication (25, 26). Other technologies such as ultra-pressure treatment and irradiation are also exploited in the food processing sector to achieve food safety with minimal or no loss of the nutritional, textural, and organoleptic characteristics of food (27, 28). These non-thermal treatments result in a decrease of the microbial load by altering the structure of the membranes in bacterial cells and unfolding of the helical structure of the DNA of the genetic material of microbial cells, leading to the death of microbial cells in a short period of time. Apart from the reduction of the microbial load, these non-thermal treatments are also used for the extraction of bioactives from plant and animal sources having nutraceutical food application for the intensified synthesis of the nutraceutical components, dehydration, for enhancing the physical and chemical properties of food constituents, etc. (2935). In spite of the many advantages of these non-thermal technologies in the food sector, they are rarely used in food industries and remain at laboratory scale only. There is a great need for the understanding of the construction and workings of these non-thermal technologies and their action on food. There is enough scientific literature available on these technologies. The present review focuses on the recent status of non-thermal techniques in food processing industries to enhance the quality of food products, the effects of these non-thermal techniques on food components, instrumentation used for these non-thermal techniques with a focus on the limitations of these techniques for large-scale production and how they could be overcome, and the future prospects of these techniques in food processing industries. This comprehensive review will definitely help food scientists and technologists working in the field of non-thermal technology since non-thermal treatment is gaining research interest due to its numerous merits over thermal techniques.

Non-Thermal Technologies

Ultrasonication

Theory

Ultrasonication is an emerging non-thermal technology in the food sector, but it is already a well-established technique in other processing sectors (36). In simple words, ultrasound is a sound wave bearing certain frequency that is more than the normal human hearing frequency, i.e., above 20 kHz (37). When ultrasonic waves oscillate through the medium, they generate many expansion and compression effects in the medium. There is a formations of small cavities due to the presence of air. The cavities formed grow to a desired size and then collapse. When these cavities collapse, they generate both a large amount of energy and local hot spots, and thus there is an increase in heat and mass transfer rates (38). Ultrasonication is used to speed up the chemical synthesis of organic compounds and increase the yield of reaction because the ultrasonication effect results in enhanced heat and mass transfer. Ultrasonication is used with different frequencies, which are classified as low-frequency, medium-frequency, and high-frequency ultrasonication, with frequency ranges of 20 kHz–100 kHz, 100 kHz−1 MHz, and 1 MHz–100 MHz, respectively (39). Low-frequency ultrasonication produces large shear forces in the medium, whereas high-frequency ultrasonication produces less shear forces in the medium. The medium frequency results in the formation of radical species, and this frequency range is considered to be optimum for various sonochemical-assisted process, but the formation of chemical radicals can bring about undesirable changes in food, such as oxidative changes in lipids and proteins (40). Ultrasonication is done using an ultrasonic horn, which is dipped in the liquid solution or juice and is treated with certain treatment frequency. Ultrasonication can be done using an ultrasonic bath, in which the food material or packaged food is kept and the sound waves are generated in a bath that creates ultrasound effect and brings about desired changes in food (41).

Applications

In food processing, frequency in the range of 20 kHz–100 kHz is used for the extraction of bioactives, emulsification, cooking, debittering, intensified synthesis, etc. Jadhav et al. (42) reported on the synthesis of designer lipids using sonication as an excellent alternative for intensified yield. The authors reported a maximum yield of 92% in 6 h of reaction. Due to the increase in energy, there is a generation of high-energy spots that increase the rate of mass transfer, and the reaction is completed in a shorter period of time. Ultrasonication-assisted synthesis is rapid compared to the conventional synthesis process (43). Ultrasound also assists the interfacial transfer of molecules, which enhances the efficiency of the process of extraction of bioactives from plant and animal sources. The extraction process not only increases the yield of the extraction process but also improves the physical and chemical properties of the extracted compound. One such recent study by Sun et al. (44) reported that protein extracted using ultrasonication showed superior properties in terms of the size of the particle, emulsification power, and structure. Ultrasonication-extracted particles with small particle size and larger α helix structure have improved emulsifying power when treated with sonication for 30 min at 20 kHz. Cheila et al. (45) designated ultrasonication as a greener approach for the extraction of bioactives from the leaves of velame. Ultrasound increased the yield of extracted bioactives to 94% in 39.5 min using indirect ultrasonication. Ultrasound has been proven to be an intensified extraction process for the extraction of oil from olive fruit, soybean, and flaxseed (46, 47). It is also employed for the extraction of bioactives from different parts of plants, fruits, and vegetables (4851). Ultrasonic-assisted filtration process is also very effective and is of importance to dairy and beverage industries. In cheese making, the membrane filtration process is used for the complete separation of milk protein from other milk solids (52). Ultrasonication also aids in the processes of freezing, drying, and thawing of food products (5355). Mothibe et al. (56) used ultrasonication as a preliminary processing step before the dehydration of apples and reported that the drying time was reduced and the dried apple had a good texture with less water activity. The authors reported that treatment at 25 kHz and time of 15 min showed good results. As the treatment time increased, there was more loss of soluble solids from apple. The ultrasound-assisted process not only decreases the drying time but also enhances and retains the texture after rehydration. Rehydration refers to the absorption of moisture by the dried food (57). Tao et al. (58) showed that ultrasound-rehydrated white cabbage showed a higher rate of rehydration compared to the untreated sample. Similar studies were reported for the rehydration of carrot and green pepper (59, 60). It is also used as a pretreatment for convective drying and freeze drying (61, 62). Ultrasonication is also effective for the preservation of food products by using brine solution. Carcel et al. (63) reported on the use of ultrasound in the treatment of pork loin with a brine solution; ultrasound was applied to this solution. The authors reported that the ultrasound-assisted brine sample has more concentration of brine in it with good color and texture of pieces of pork loin compared to the untreated sample. Ultrasonication is also beneficial for the process of degassing in carbonated beverages and is a good replacement for the processes of pasteurization and sterilization in the reduction of microbial load in food and food products (26). Ultrasound has successfully proven its potential in the food sector in various critical areas like food preservation, extraction, intensified synthesis, and improvement of the physical and chemical properties of food. The very limited technical information about ultrasonication and consumer awareness about ultrasonic-processed food have been the hindrance in the commercialization of this process in food industries. However, the treatment must be studied on bulk food to understand its effect so that it can be implemented at industrial scale.

Cold Plasma Technology

Theory

Plasma is the fourth state of matter after solid, liquid, and gas. The term plasma was used by Langmuir in the year 1925 (64). An increase in the kinetic energy of solids leads to the heating up of molecules, and there is phase transformation from solid to liquid, further increasing the energy of liquid and converting liquid to gas. The increase in energy causes disintegration in the intermolecular structure. When the energy of gases crosses a certain value, it results in the ionization of gas molecules (65). Ionization of gas molecules gives rise to plasma. Hence, it is known as the fourth state of matter. Basically, plasma treatment is divided into two types: thermal plasma and cold plasma (non-thermal). Thermal plasma produces huge energy by utilizing high temperature. Cold plasma is a non-thermal treatment that works in the temperature range 25–65°C (66). When gas is ionized, free radicals (ions, electrons, etc.) are formed. The composition of the plasma reactive species largely depends on the composition of gas which is ionized (67). The gases commonly used for the generation of plasma include argon, helium, oxygen, nitrogen, and air (68). These gases are subjected to any of the types of energy like thermal, electrical, magnetic field, etc., to generate plasma containing positive ions, negative ions, and reactive species like ozone and singlet oxygen (O) (69). Based on the nature of plasma, it has found various applications in the fields of chemistry, chemical engineering, textile, electronics, surface coating, and pharmaceuticals and in food sectors (70). In the food sector, cold plasma can be used for the reduction of the microbial load in food or on the surface of food, enhancing the physical and chemical properties of food constituents like lipids and proteins, and for the sterilization of food processing equipment, inactivation of food spoilage enzymes, treatment of food packaging material, and treatment of wastewater (71). Cold plasma is produced at near ambient temperature and does not depend on high temperature for microbial inactivation. Since the temperature used is ambient, there are no chances of thermal damage to heat-sensitive food material (16).

Applications

Microbial inactivation in cold plasma is due to the effect of reactive species on the microbial cell. Reactive species damage the DNA of cells, induce oxidation in protein, and damage the cellular components of microbes, causing cell death (72). Lin et al. (73) have reported that cold nitrogen plasma shows inhibitory action on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium biofilms formed on the outer surface of an egg shell. The sample was treated at 600 W for 2 min, which reduced the catabolic and anabolic activities of the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium by 82.2%. Devi et al. (74) showed 97.9% and 99.3% reductions in the growth of fungal species such as Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus, respectively, on the ground nut surface when treated at 60 W plasma power. In the food sector, atmospheric pressure cold plasma is used in combination with other gases like helium, argon, etc. Recently, Bang et al. (75) reported on the combination of antimicrobial washing and in-package cold plasma treatment to mandarin oranges for reduction of the microbial load. Treatment at 26 and 27 kV for 1–4 min inactivated Penicillium digitatum. The combined effect of washing with an antimicrobial solution and cold plasma treatment reduced the load of P. digitatum in the package without affecting the texture, sensory, and nutritional qualities of the oranges. The treated oranges showed a decrease in ripening damage compared to the untreated oranges. Liao et al. (76) reported the use of cold atmospheric pressure-activated water or plasma-activated ice as a cold storage medium for seafood. Shrimps stored in plasma-activated water showed longer shelf-life due to bacterial inactivation, and there was no observable change in the texture of shrimps. The total volatile base nitrogen value for shrimps stored in plasma-treated ice was lower than 20 mg/100 g on the ninth day, which was higher than the 30 mg/100 g for shrimps stored in untreated water or ice. Cold plasma treatment is also effective against the pathogenic microbes present in food and processed food products. One such recent study reported by Gan et al. (77) showed the effectiveness of cold plasma against Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the juice of chokeberries. The authors reported that treatment of 4 min decreased the loads of E. coli and S. cerevisiae by 2.27 and 1.23 log CFU/ml, respectively. The treatment was seen to be more effective against the inactivation of E. coli compared to S. cerevisiae. Similar studies on the inactivation of E. coli were also reported by Shah et al. (78). Cold plasma is also used for disinfection of the surfaces of food processing equipment to remove the microbial load before the processing of food. Hou et al. (79) investigated the effect of atmospheric pressure cold plasma on bacterial inactivation and the quality of blueberry juice. There was a decrease in the load of Bacillus spp. in juice with exposure to cold plasma for 6 min by 7.2 log CFU/ml. The short exposure time resulted in good color and bioactive component retention in juice. Similar results were reported for the preservation of fresh tomato juice (80), cloudy apple juice (81), and apple, tomato, orange, sour cheery nectar (82), and whey grape (83) juice. It is also used for the preservation of meat and related products by reducing their microbial load. Roh et al. (84) studied the effect of cold plasma treatment of 3.5 min against pathogenic microbes in chicken breast. The treatment resulted in decreases in the loads of E. coli by 3.9 log CFU/g of chicken, Listeria monocytogenes by 3.5 log CFU/g, and Tulane virus by 2.2 CFU/g of chicken. Similar results were reported for the inactivation of Salmonella in chicken breast (68, 85, 86) and the microbial load in sea snail (87). The technology is also used for enhancing the physical and chemical properties of food constituents (16, 23). This technology also finds application in enhancing the physical and chemical properties of carbohydrates and proteins in order to increase their functionality and application in food. In the recently published research by Jahromi et al. (88), sodium caseinate in granular form was subjected to 10-kHz treatment for 0, 2.5, 5, and 10 min. With the increase in treatment time, the physical and chemical properties were enhanced. The hydrophilicity of protein increased due to unfolding of the protein structure. Water solubility increased from 20.6 to 30.28%. Tensile strength increased from 5.04 to 7.17 MPa for the 10-min treatment and decreased to 4.73 MPa at 15 min. The effect of cold plasma especially on milk protein is reported by Sharma et al. (89). Cold plasma contains various reactive species, and it is found that these reactive species may trigger the process of lipid oxidation during storage. Gao et al. (90) reported that cold plasma treatment at 70 kV for 180 s triggers the oxidation of lipids during storage. The thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) value increased to 2.48 from 1.43 mg MDA/kg when stored at refrigeration temperature for 5 days, which was 0.37 mg MDA/kg for the control sample of chicken patties. In the TBARS assay, malondialdehyde (MDA) is measured. MDA is a by-product resulting from the process of lipid peroxidation. This MDA reacts with thiobarbituric acid and forms a pink chromogen, known as TBARS. This oxidative degradation of lipids in food can be controlled by altering the treatment conditions, such as the exposure of food to plasma for a short duration of time or the addition of antioxidants in food to overcome these disadvantages of cold plasma on lipids in food. Food containing higher lipid levels can be exposed for a shorter time to cold plasma compared to food with a low lipid content (91, 92).

Supercritical Technology

Theory

Supercritical technology makes use of supercritical fluids, which are considered as a good replacement for organic solvents used in various operations (93). When a fluid is heated beyond its critical temperature and critical pressure, it attains a supercritical state and is referred to as a supercritical fluid. The supercritical fluid shows some properties of gas and some properties of liquid. It shows density like liquids and diffusivity and viscosity like gas (35). Supercritical fluid shows enhanced properties similar to liquid, and hence it can be used as a solvent with an increased rate of mass transfer during the extraction of bioactives from various plant and animal sources. The properties of fluids can be altered with changes in temperature and pressure. Many fluids are used for supercritical operations, but carbon dioxide finds special attention as an excellent supercritical fluid in the food processing sector because it can achieve a supercritical state at a modest temperature and pressure (31.1°C and 7.4 MPa, respectively). Supercritical fluids are extensively used in food industries for extraction, microbial inactivation, enhancement of mass transfer in synthesis, etc. Among all the applications, the supercritical technology is extensively employed for extraction purposes.

Applications

Supercritical carbon dioxide is used for the purpose of extraction since it is non-toxic and can be separated from the final product without much effort (94). Natural bioactives that are extracted are sensitive to temperature and oxygen. In the presence of carbon dioxide, the supercritical extraction temperature is very low and there is no chance of the presence of oxygen; hence, the quality of the extracted material is high and can be used as a functional ingredient in various nutraceutical formulations. Recent studies reported by Lefebvre et al. (95) showed that supercritical carbon dioxide is effectively utilized as an excellent tool for the selective extraction of antioxidants from rosemary. The temperature and pressure of CO2 were 25°C and 20 MPa, respectively, which were ideal and did not affect the purity of the extracted products. Santos et al. (96) investigated the extraction of bioactives from feijoa leaves using supercritical and pressurized liquid extraction. The authors reported that pressurized extraction gave more yield of antioxidant and antibacterial components, but these extracted components were not effective in their function, while supercritical extraction of antioxidant and antibacterial components at 55°C and 30 MPa showed higher effectiveness against pathogenic bacteria including E. coli. The technique is also used for the extraction of functional and nutraceutical ingredients from microalgae (97), oil from fruit seeds (98101), oil from olives (102), oil from ginger (103), extraction of corn germ oil and green coffee oil (104, 105), essential oil extraction (106, 107), and extraction of bioactives such as carotenoids, lycopene, astaxanthin, anthocyanins, and quercetin (108110), which can be used as components in nutraceutical formulations. Extraction using supercritical carbon dioxide has been common for many years in the food processing industry. Apart from this, supercritical technology is also used for reducing the microbial load in food. Since the operating temperature in supercritical treatment is low, the original characteristics of food, along with its organoleptic characteristics, is retained (111). Supercritical fluid treatment reduces the pH of bacterial cell, which leads to the rupture or bursting of cells and the inactivation of bacterial enzymes that are responsible for catabolism and anabolism; thus, the bacterial cell dies and reduces the load of microbes in food and related products (112). It is extensively used for the preservation of fresh agricultural products including fruits, vegetables, and their juices (113). Bertolini et al. (114) studied the effect of supercritical carbon dioxide on the decrease of microbial load in pomegranate juice and compared it to traditional pasteurization and high-pressure processing. The authors reported that supercritical-treated juice showed bacterial growth below the detection level after storage for 28 days. The total phenolic content increased by 22%, but it decreased in traditional pasteurization by 15%. The antioxidant activity of the phenolic components was more in supercritical-treated juice compared to that in high-pressure processing and traditional pasteurization. Similar results were reported for the preservation of coconut water (115), sports drink (116), and liquid food (117). Supercritical fluids are also used for the preservation of ground meat. Yu and Iwahashi (118) treated ground beef with high-pressure carbon dioxide at 1 MPa pressure for 26 h and found a reduction in the microbial load. The critical review of the literature showed that the supercritical technology has bright prospects in the food processing sector not only for extraction but also for the preservation and enhancement of the physiological properties of food constituents to be used as functional ingredients in functional and nutraceutical formulations.

Irradiation

Theory

Gamma rays with high energy, X-rays, and high-speed electrons are approved irradiations to be used in food processing industries. Radionuclide 60CO and 137Cs producing gamma rays are used for the production of elevated energy photons. X-rays with energies up to 5 MeV are used in the food processing sector. High-speed electrons with energy of 10 MeV are used in food industries for various applications (119). Irradiation effects are achieved without an increase in the temperature of food. Since the temperature of food is not raised, there is no chance of damage to the components in food that are sensitive to heat (120). The penetration ability of a high-speed 10-MeV electron is up to 39 mm deep in food with high moisture content. X-rays and gamma rays can reach deep into the food material (119, 121). These radiations result in the unfolding of DNA and damage to the nucleic acid, and the ionization of water molecules results in oxidative damage to the microbial cells; thus, there is reduction in the microbial load of food (122).

Applications

Irradiation is mostly employed in the food processing sector for the preservation of food products. It is effective against pathogenic microbes including E. coli, Staphylococcus, and Salmonella (123, 124). Changing the intensity of irradiations shows more intense effects on the inactivation of microbes in food. Irradiation is also used in the preservation of meat for several days. Ready-to-cook chicken stored for 15 days treated with gamma radiations of intensities 0, 1.5, 3, and 4.5 kGy showed excellent result for the inactivation of L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Salmonella typhimurium, with D10 values of 0.680, 0.397, and 0.601, respectively. The ready-to-eat chicken showed good sensory and textural characteristics even after 15 days of storage (125). Irradiation technology also enhances keeping qualities of food and keeping food fresh by the inactivation of microbes causing foodborne diseases (126). It has been found that the use of irradiation scan results in some undesirable changes in food if treated at high irradiation doses, mostly seen in food like meat whose color and lipids are the main defining factors and a slight change in color and lipids may lead to rejection by consumers (127). It is also seen in cereals and food grains (128). Thus, to achieve the desired inactivation in food with no or little change in the food composition and processed food products, irradiation is usually done with a low dose, and the irradiation effect is combined with the use of antimicrobial agents (129). Irradiation is successfully used for achieving microbial inactivation, like the microbial load in fresh pasta (130) and for enhancing the physical and chemical properties of food, such as those of wheat (131), garlic bulbs (132), grape juice (133), mangosteen fruit (134), apple juice (135), etc. Despite the many advantages of irradiation technology mostly in food preservation, consumer acceptability of irradiation-processed food is low because of the wrong perception of the word “irradiation.” For a non-food technologist, irradiation is the generation of some carcinogens in food, as the word is similar to “radiation therapy” (122). Low consumer acceptance is the great hindrance in the development of this technology in the food industry. Changing the views of consumers and encouraging them to buy irradiated food could be solutions for the development of this technique, and designing simpler and reliable instrumentation and overcoming the myths about this technology among consumers will greatly influence the market of irradiated food in the coming years.

Pulsed Electric Field

Theory

Pulsed electric field (PEF) is an emerging non-thermal technology and finds various applications in the food sector. The growing demand for safe food with nutritional qualities has influence on the use of pulsed electric field in the food sector. In pulsed electric field, a pulse of high field intensity is applied to food for a very short duration of time (19). Usually, for the treatment of food, the field intensity is from 25 to 85 kV/cm, and the exposure time is a few milliseconds or nanoseconds. Since food is exposed to pulsed electric field for a very short duration of time, there is no chance of heating; hence, undesirable changes in food due to high temperature are eliminated (18). In the early 1950s, PEF was used for preservation by inactivating microbes. Since then, it has developed a lot in recent years and has been widely used for microbial inactivation in food. A typical PEF device consists of a food treatment chamber, a control system, and a pulse generation unit. The food is kept in the treatment chamber in between two electrodes generally made of stainless steel (136). Pulsed electric field is generally used for liquid food or semi-solid food that can flow easily (137). There is a damage to the cell membrane of microbes due to the high field intensity. Hydrogen peroxide is found in a PEF-treated sample, and it brings about oxidative changes in the cell lipids and protein of the bacterial cell, which also inactivates the metabolic enzymes, thus causing cell death (138). The efficiency of PEF in reducing microbial load largely depends on the intensity of field applied, the total exposure time, temperature, and energy.

Applications

PEF is extensively employed for increasing the shelf-life of food by decreasing the microbial load. A recently published study by Preetha et al. (139) showed that PEF with an intensity of 5.6 W/cm2 was effective against E. coli in flowable food like pineapple and orange juice and coconut water, with decreases in the E. coli load of 4.5, 4, and 5.3 log CFU/ml juice respectively. Similar results with moderate PEF intensity are also effective for microbial inactivation in fruit juices (140). Microbial cells that are larger in size are exposed to PEF easily, but smaller microbial cells may resist the treatment and remain unaffected (141). Apart from microbial inactivation, PEF is also effective in the deactivation of food spoilage enzymes. Similar studies are reported for the inactivation of enzymes in apple and carrot juice (142) and pine nut (143). López-Gámez et al. (144) investigated PEF treatment of 580 J/kg on carrot, which showed enhanced anabolism for the production of phenolic compounds over a storage period of 36 h. PEF is also extensively used in the extraction of bioactives from many natural sources. A recent study was reported by Käferböck et al. (145) on the extraction of functional components from microalgae using PEF with a frequency of 300 Hz and pulse width of 4–32 μs. The PEF treatment resulted in enhanced extraction of the functional components with high purity, which can be used for their nutraceutical application in food industries without purification. A similar study for extraction from the microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis is reported by Gateau et al. (146). Other studies were on extraction from apple peels (147), cyanobacteria (148), tomato (149), and from cinnamon (150). Apart from the known application of PEF in microbial inactivation, extraction, and physiochemical changes, nowadays, PEF is also employed for unit operations like dehydration and freezing. Liu et al. (151) reported on PEF with an intensity of 0.6 kV/cm and exposure time of 0.1 s that resulted in a decrease in the drying time of carrot by 55% at 25°C and 33% at 90°C. The PEF-treated sample showed good textural properties and color after rehydration compared to the untreated sample. PEF pretreatment before the drying operation results in enhancing the vitamin and mineral contents in food (152). It is also used in the freezing of food and improves the quality of food during the thawing process (153). PEF treatment leads to an improvement in the coefficient of diffusion for water before drying, reduces the time required for freezing and drying food, and maintains the quality of rehydrated and thawed food for a longer period. PEF is also employed for enhancing the physical and chemical properties of major food components such as polysaccharides, proteins, etc. (154156), and for the modification of potato starch (157) and the properties of oat flour (158). PEF also enhances the rate of reaction; because of the high intensity, there is an enhanced heat transfer, which increases mass transfer in the esterification (159) and chelation (160) reactions. The numerous good effects of PEF on food products make it a good non-thermal treatment method. There is a need for the development of high-strength PEF instrumentation for commercial application.

High Hydrostatic Pressure

Theory

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) utilizes a very common medium, i.e., water, to apply the pressure on the product to be treated. HHP can bring about a significant decimal decrease in the population of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, yeast, and mold and helps in food preservation for a longer duration. The reduction in microbial load depends on the pressure and temperature during treatment. It largely depends on the type of food processed. Food, when subjected to HHP treatment, undergoes high pressure for a short duration of time. The pressure applied to food during treatment is in the range of 200–700 MPa (161). The quality in terms of nutritional components, sensory, and texture of HHP-processed food is excellent since the food is exposed to treatment conditions for a very short period of time (162). It is found that the HHP treatment is more effective against eukaryotes, Gram-negative bacteria, protozoa, and parasites than yeast and mold, which are inactivated at much higher pressure (163). The instrumentation required for HHP is very simple and easy to operate. It consists of a pressure compartment in which food is kept and water is introduced into the chamber; food is then pressurized using this water (164). Thus, HHP-treated food shows fresh-like attributes since there is no intervention of high temperature and chemical additives. Pressure of 350–450 MPa is sufficient for the inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria, yeast, and mold at room temperature, but to inactivate Gram-positive bacteria, pressure more than 1,100 MPa is required (165). The high pressure results in damage to the cell membrane of microbial cells, which changes the permeability of the microbial cell wall and membranes. The coiled protein structure breaks and there is destruction to microbial cell enzymes, which alter the metabolic pathways; finally, the microbial cell dies, leading to a decrease in the microbial population in food (161).

Applications

HHP treatment has been proven to be efficient in the inactivation of microbes in a wide range of food products, including processed fruits, meat and meat products, and dairy products, which serve as an excellent medium for microbial growth. The recently published study by Bulut and Karatzas (166) investigated the effectiveness of HHP against E. coli in liquid food. Orange juice was stored at −80°C, and then HHP treatment was applied to the juice with pressure of 250 MPa for 900 s. The HHP treatment reduced the microbial load by 4.88, 4.15, and 4.61 log CFU/ml for orange juice with pH 3.2, 4.5, and 5.8, respectively. Cap et al. (167) investigated a decrease in Salmonella spp. load in meat using HHP treatment. The HH pressure of 500 MPa for 60 s was enough to inactivate the Salmonella spp. in a chicken breast sample without any effect on the organoleptic and sensory attributes of chicken. Cava et al. (168) showed that dry cured sausage can be preserved for more than 60 days with inactivation of L. monocytogenes by 3.2 log CFU/g with HHP treatment of 600 MPa for 480 s. There was no oxidative damage to the lipids and proteins in food up to 60 days. HHP has no effect on the oxidation of lipids; thus, it does not contribute to the development of rancidity in food. de Jesus et al. (169) reported that HHP is not only effective in the reduction of the microbial load but it can also be effectively utilized for the extraction of antioxidant, anthocyanin, and phenolic compounds with various nutraceutical properties in food. Similar studies on extraction were reported from tomato waste (170), pomace of grapes (171), red microalgae (172), egg yolk (173), and from gooseberry juice (110). HHP also enhances the physical and chemical properties of fermented juices and increases bioactives in the fermented juice (174). HHP is also effective in the preservation of human breast milk (175, 176). It is also beneficial for intensifying the technical and functional properties of milk proteins for their increased application in various functional and nutraceutical foods (177). HHP has been the potential treatment not only for bacterial inactivation but also for the extraction and enhancement of antioxidant, phenolic, bioactive, and functional components from various sources, suggesting its application potential in various nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, health, food, and related industries. There are many technical obstacles in building the HHP units that are feasible for the treatment of high-volume food, and hence there are very few or no HHP-treated food available in the market today.

Pulsed Ultraviolet Technology

Theory

Ultraviolet technology is a very economical, non-thermal technology. It is basically used to reduce the microbial load on the surface of food materials that are indirectly exposed to radiation, which are grouped as UV-A in the electromagnetic spectrum in range of 320–400 nm, UV-B in the range of 280–320 nm, and UV-C in the range of 200–280 nm (178). When food is exposed to UV-C, with 200–280 nm, these short wavelengths are absorbed by the microbial cell nucleic acids. These absorbed photons cause the breakage of the bond and interlinking between thymine and pyrimidine of different strands and the formation of dimers of pyrimidine. These dimers prevent DNA transcription and translation, thus leading to the malfunctioning of the genetic material, which causes microbial cell death (179). The photons of UV-A and UV-B result in the destruction of the cellular membranes, proteins of microbial cells, and other cellular organelles, which causes death of the microorganisms present in food (180).

Applications

Pulsed UV technology is among the most popular non-thermal technologies in the food processing sector. Owing to its economical nature, it is also being experimented on a pilot scale for the inactivation of microbes. A recent study by Fenoglio et al. (181) on a pilot-scale UV inactivation of pathogenic microbes showed that the intensity of UV-C with 390 mJ/cm2 leads to the inactivation of pathogenic bacteria in fruit juices, with log reductions of 6.3 for Lactobacillus plantarum, 5.1 log CFU for E. coli, and 5.5 for S. cerevisiae. Similar studies on the inactivation of microorganisms in fruit juices are reported in apple juice (182), orange juice (183), and cantoloupe melon juice (184). Ultraviolet inactivation is also extensively used for the inactivation of microbes present in milk and milk products (185). Ultraviolet radiation also shows useful effects on the chemical and physical properties of food. Kumar et al. (186) showed that UV-C radiation with 254 nm was able to enhance the physical and chemical properties of protein from wheat. Therefore, it can be used for many applications in food industries. Recent studies have shown that ultraviolet treatment of fresh fruits and vegetables (after harvesting) not only results in microbial inactivation but also increases the antioxidant content and enhances its activity (187). UV treatment is also used for the reduction of toxins in food (188). With many positive effects on food, there are some studies reported in the literature which showed that high-dose UV treatment can lead to a decrease in the color of food and adversely affects the texture of solid food (189). All food products have different textures with uneven and rough surfaces, so the ability of radiation to reach inside the food material may be reduced, decreasing the efficiency of the inactivation process. Thus, to increase the efficiency of the process and achieve higher inactivation, non-thermal processes are usually coupled or antibacterial agents are used along with UV treatment (190, 191). Due to its simple operation, UV is one of the well-established non-thermal processing technologies adopted by food processing industries to produce food with longer shelf-life. The effect of UV can be more intensified if the process is coupled with other processes to bring about desired changes.

Ozone

Theory

Ozone, chemically written as O3, contains three molecules of oxygen. It is a colorless gas with a typical odor. It is formed when molecular oxygen (O2) combines with singlet O. Ozone is denser in gas form than air. Ozone is a very reactive gas, and it is very much unstable and cannot be stored and needs to be produced on the spot when needed. Ozone is extensively employed as an effective antibacterial against many bacteria in food. It can be used in gas form or it can be mixed with water to form ozonated water. There are many ways by which ozone causes microbial cell death. Ozone alters the permeability of cells by damaging the microbial cell membranes. Ozone is also known to damage the structure of proteins, leading to the malfunctioning of microbial enzymes, which affects the metabolic activity and finally results in microbial cell death (192, 193).

Applications

Gimenez et al. (194) reported on the effectiveness of ozone against L. monocytogenes present in meat. Treatment of 280 mg O3/m3 for 5 h with pulse of ozone passed after 10 min for 30 min duration was effective, but an increase in the treatment time showed a change in color and oxidative damage to the lipids present in meat. Thus, to reduce the exposure time of ozone, it is combined with other treatments of food additives in order to enhance its effectiveness without any damage to food. Such studies were reported for the inactivation of Salmonella (195) and spoilage microorganisms (196). Ozone treatment of fruits after harvest enhances their physical, chemical, and textural properties with a reduction in the microbial load when stored in modified atmosphere packaging for 15 days (197). It is extensively used in the reduction of microbes in fruit juices (198200). Ozone treatment is also effective in the inactivation of toxins present in food (193). There are many research reports in the literature proving the potential of ozone in the food sector, but these studies are on a laboratory scale and are not commercialized. Ozone is used in the industry for the disinfection of processing equipment. It is a very reactive molecule that reacts with many components in food, leading to undesirable changes. It also induces oxidation in food lipids; thus, it can be used in combination with other techniques. There is a need for thorough studies regarding the doses of ozone in order to reduce undesirable changes in food and to improve its acceptability. Efforts are required to increase consumer acceptability of ozone-treated food, which will force the food industry to adopt this technology to process food and market ozone-treated food.

Conclusion

Non-thermal treatments are among the most focused research areas in the food sector due to consumer demands for safe and nutritious food free from microbes. The food product is exposed to non-thermal treatment for a very short period of time and food is treated at ambient temperature. Since the exposure time is short and the temperature is low, there are no chances of damage to heat-sensitive nutritional components in food, no damage to the food texture, and no chances of the formation of any toxic compound in food due to heat. Thus, with non-thermal treatments, consumers get fresh processed food with high nutrition and good color and flavor. But there are two sides of the coin: with advantages come some disadvantages as well. If food is exposed for a longer period or treated at a higher intensity, these non-thermal technologies may lead to some undesirable changes in food, such as oxidation of lipids and loss of color and flavor. But these technologies have many advantages compared to thermal processing. Additionally, the development of equipment to process food in bulk using non-thermal technology, understanding the proper mechanisms, development of processing standards using non-thermal treatments, and clarifying consumer myths and misunderstanding about these technologies will be helpful in the promotion of non-thermal technologies in the food sector. Once these limitations are properly overcome in a planned manner, non-thermal technologies will have a broader scope for development and commercialization in food processing industries, delivering safe and nutritious food with good color and mouthfeel to consumers.

Author Contributions

RD: conceptualization, skeleton of the manuscript, and reviewing/editing. UA: correction of draft and editing. HJ: preparation of draft and making corrections as per suggestions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

HJ received a DST Inspire Fellowship to carry out research work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We happily acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for providing DST-Inspire fellowship for research work.

References

1. Hernández-Hernández HM, Moreno-Vilet L, Villanueva-Rodríguez SJ. Current status of emerging food processing technologies in Latin America: novel non-thermal processing. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2019) 58:102233. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102233

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Pereira RN, Vicente AA. Environmental impact of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies in food processing. Food Res Int. (2010) 43:1936–43. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Iqbal A, Murtaza A, Hu W, Ahmad I, Ahmed A, Xu X. Activation and inactivation mechanisms of polyphenol oxidase during thermal and non-thermal methods of food processing. Food Bioprod Process. (2019) 117:170–82. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2019.07.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Oz E. Effects of smoke flavoring using different wood chips and barbecuing on the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic aromatic amines in salmon fillets. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0227508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227508

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Oz F, Kizil M, Çelik T. Effects of different cooking methods on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in goose meat. J Food Process Preserv. (2016) 40:1047–53. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12685

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Babaoglu AS, Karakaya M, Öz F. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in beef and lamb kokorec: effects of different animal fats. Int J Food Prop. (2017) 20:1960–70. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2016.1225761

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Oz E. The impact of fat content and charcoal types on quality and the development of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic aromatic amines formation of barbecued fish. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2021) 56:954–64. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14748

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Birmpa A, Sfika V, Vantarakis A. Ultraviolet light and Ultrasound as non-thermal treatments for the inactivation of microorganisms in fresh ready-to-eat foods. Int J Food Microbiol. (2013) 167:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Beyrer M, Pina-Perez MC, Martinet D, Andlauer W. Cold plasma processing of powdered Spirulina algae for spore inactivation and preservation of bioactive compounds. Food Control. (2020) 118:107378. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107378

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Pizarro-Oteíza S, Briones-Labarca V, Pérez-Won M, Uribe E, Lemus-Mondaca R, Cañas-Sarazúa R, et al. Enzymatic impregnation by high hydrostatic pressure as pretreatment for the tenderization process of Chilean abalone (Concholepas concholepas). Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 65:102451. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102451

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Frewer LJ, Bergmann K, Brennan M, Lion R, Meertens R, Rowe G, et al. Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2011) 22:442–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Jan A, Sood M, Sofi SA, Norzom T. Non-thermal processing in food applications: a review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2017) 2:171–80.

Google Scholar

13. Jadhav H, Annapure U. Greener route for intensified synthesis of Tricaprylin using Amberlyst-15. J Chem Sci. (2021) 133:1. doi: 10.1007/s12039-020-01869-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Choi MS, Jeon EB, Kim JY, Choi EH, Lim JS, Choi J, et al. Impact of non-thermal dielectric barrier discharge plasma on Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus and quality of dried blackmouth angler (Lophiomus setigerus). J Food Eng. (2020) 278:109952. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.109952

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Choudhary R, Bandla S. Ultraviolet pasteurization for food industry. Int J Food Sci Nutr Eng. (2012) 2:12–5. doi: 10.5923/j.food.20120201.03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Thirumdas R, Sarangapani C, Annapure US. Cold plasma: a novel non-thermal technology for food processing. Food Biophys. (2014) 10:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11483-014-9382-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Thirumdas R, Sarangapani C, Barba FJ. Pulsed electric field applications for the extraction of compounds and fractions (fruit juices, winery, oils, by-products, etc.). In: Barba FJ, Parniakov O, Wiktor A, editors. Pulsed Electric Fields to Obtain Healthier and Sustainable Food for Tomorrow. Spain: INC (2020). p. 227–46. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816402-0.00010-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Vorobiev E, Lebovka N. Pulsed electric field in green processing and preservation of food products. In: Chemat F, Vorobiev E, editors. Green Food Processing Techniques. France: Elsevier Inc. (2019). p. 403–30. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815353-6.00015-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Niu D, Zeng XA, Ren EF, Xu FY, Li J, Wang MS, et al. Review of the application of pulsed electric fields (PEF) technology for food processing in China. Food Res Int. (2020) 137:109715. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Thirumdas R, Saragapani C, Ajinkya MT, Deshmukh RR, Annapure US. Influence of low pressure cold plasma on cooking and textural properties of brown rice. Innovat Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2016)37:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.08.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Thirumdas R, Trimukhe A, Deshmukh RR, Annapure US. Functional and rheological properties of cold plasma treated rice starch. Carbohydr Polym. (2017) 157:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Cui H, Yang X, Abdel-Samie MA, Lin L. Cold plasma treated phlorotannin/Momordica charantia polysaccharide nanofiber for active food packaging. Carbohydr Polym. (2020) 239:116214. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Bulbul VJ, Bhushette PR, Zambare RS, Deshmukh RR, Annapure US. Effect of cold plasma treatment on Xanthan gum properties. Polym Test. (2019) 79:106056. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Deng LZ, Tao Y, Mujumdar AS, Pan Z, Chen C, Yang XH, et al. Recent advances in non-thermal decontamination technologies for microorganisms and mycotoxins in low-moisture foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 106:104–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Natarajan S, Ponnusamy V. A review on the applications of ultrasound in food processing. Mater Today Proc. (2020) 10:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.516

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bhargava N, Mor RS, Kumar K, Sharanagat VS. Advances in application of ultrasound in food processing: a review. Ultrason Sonochem. (2021) 70:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Tsevdou M, Gogou E, Taoukis P. High hydrostatic pressure processing of foods. In: Taoukis P, editor. Green Food Processing Techniques. France: Elsevier Inc. (2019). p. 87–137. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815353-6.00004-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Roberts PB. Irradiation of foods | processing technology. Encycl Food Sci Nutr. (2003) 19:3390–6. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00655-6

CrossRef Full Text

29. Ohlsson T, Bengtsson N. Minimal processing of foods with non-thermal methods. In: Bengtsson N, editor. Minimal Processing Technologies in the Food Industries. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited (2002). p. 34–60. doi: 10.1533/9781855736795.24

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chen P, Deng S, Cheng Y, Lin X, Metzger L, Ruan R. Non-thermal food pasteurization processes: an introduction. In: Doona CJ, Kustin K, Feeherry FE, editor. Case Studies in Novel Food Processing Technologies. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited (2010). p. 1–18. doi: 10.1533/9780857090713.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Rifna EJ, Singh SK, Chakraborty S, Dwivedi M. Effect of thermal and non-thermal techniques for microbial safety in food powder: recent advances. Food Res Int. (2019) 126:108654. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Hati S, Patel M, Yadav D. Food bioprocessing by non-thermal plasma technology. Curr Opin Food Sci. (2018) 19:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Terefe NS, Janakievski F, Glagovskaia O, Stockmann R. Forward osmosis: an emerging non-thermal concentration technology for liquid foods. In: Stockmann R, editor. Reference Module in Food Science. Cambridge: Elsevier (2019). p. 1–8.

34. Mazzutti S, Pedrosa RC, Salvador Ferreira SR. Green processes in foodomics. In: Salvador Ferreira SR, editor. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Bioactives. Reference Module in Food Science. Cambridge: Elsevier (2020). p. 1–19. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22816-3

CrossRef Full Text

35. Brunner G. Supercritical fluids: technology and application to food processing. J Food Eng. (2005) 67:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.060

CrossRef Full Text

36. Chemat F, Zill-E-Huma, Khan MK. Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrason Sonochem. (2011) 18:813–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.11.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Mason TJ, Cintas P. Sonochemistry. Handb Green Chem Technol. (2007) 2021:372–96. doi: 10.1002/9780470988305.ch16

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Bhangu SK, Ashokkumar M. Theory of sonochemistry. Top Curr Chem. (2016) 374:1–28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54271-3_1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Mason TJ, Chemat F, Ashokkumar M. Power ultrasonics for food processing. In: Ashokkumar M, editor. Power Ultrasonics: Applications of High-Intensity Ultrasound. Cambridge: Elsevier Ltd. (2015). p. 815–43. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-028-6.00027-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Delmas H, Barthe L. Ultrasonic mixing, homogenization, and emulsification in food processing and other applications. In: Gallego J, Karl F, Juan A, editors. Power Ultrasonics: Applications of High-Intensity Ultrasound. Cambridge: Elsevier Ltd. (2015). p. 757–91. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-028-6.00025-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Li W, Gamlath CJ, Pathak R, Martin GJO, Ashokkumar M. Ultrasound – the physical and chemical effects integral to food processing. In: Knoerzer K, Juliano P, Smithers G, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Cambridge (2021). p. 329–58. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22679-6

CrossRef Full Text

42. Jadhav HB, Gogate PR, Waghmare JT, Annapure US. Intensified synthesis of palm olein designer lipids using sonication. Ultrason Sonochem. (2021) 73:105478. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Jadhav HB, Annapure U. Process intensification for synthesis of triglycerides of capric acid using green approaches. J Indian Chem Soc. (2021) 98:100030. doi: 10.1016/j.jics.2021.100030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sun X, Zhang W, Zhang L, Tian S, Chen F. Molecular and emulsifying properties of arachin and conarachin of peanut protein isolate from ultrasound-assisted extraction. Lwt. (2020) 132:109790. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Cheila CB, dos Anjos GL, Nóbrega RSA, da S. Magaton A, de Miranda FM, Dias F. Greener ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive phenolic compounds in Croton heliotropiifolius Kunth leaves. Microchem J. (2020) 159:105525. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105525

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Cavallo C, Carlucci D, Carfora V, Caso D, Cicia G, Clodoveo ML, et al. Innovation in traditional foods: a laboratory experiment on consumers' acceptance of extra-virgin olive oil extracted through ultrasounds. NJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci. (2020) 92:100336. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2020.100336

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Juliano P, Bainczyk F, Swiergon P, Supriyatna MIM, Guillaume C, Ravetti L, et al. Extraction of olive oil assisted by high-frequency ultrasound standing waves. Ultrason Sonochem. (2017) 38:104–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.02.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Iftikhar M, Zhang H, Iftikhar A, Raza A, Begum N, Tahamina A, et al. Study on optimization of ultrasonic assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from rye bran. Lwt. (2020) 134:110243. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110243

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Qin L, Yu J, Zhu J, Kong B, Chen Q. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polyphenol from the seeds of Allium senescens L. and its antioxidative role in Harbin dry sausage. Meat Sci. (2021) 172:108351. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wu L, Li L, Chen S, Wang L, Lin X. Deep eutectic solvent-based ultrasonic-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from Moringa oleifera L. leaves: optimization, comparison and antioxidant activity. Sep Purif Technol. (2020) 247:117014. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Martínez-Ramos T, Benedito-Fort J, Watson NJ, Ruiz-López II, Che-Galicia G, Corona-Jiménez E. Effect of solvent composition and its interaction with ultrasonic energy on the ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from Mango peels (Mangifera indica L.). Food Bioprod Process. (2020) 122:41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2020.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Saxena A, Tripathi BP, Kumar M, Shahi VK. Membrane-based techniques for the separation and purification of proteins: an overview. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. (2009) 145:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2008.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Chow R, Blindt R, Chivers R, Povey M. A study on the primary and secondary nucleation of ice by power ultrasound. Ultrasonics. (2005) 43:227–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Miles CA, Morley MJ, Rendell M. High power ultrasonic thawing of frozen foods. J Food Eng. (1999) 39:151–9. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00155-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Cheng XF, Zhang M, Adhikari B. Effect of ultrasonically induced nucleation on the drying kinetics and physical properties of freeze-dried strawberry. Dry Technol. (2014) 32:1857–64. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2014.952741

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Mothibe KJ, Zhang M, Mujumdar AS, Wang YC, Cheng X. Effects of ultrasound and microwave pretreatments of apple before spouted bed drying on rate of dehydration and physical properties. Dry Technol. (2014) 32:1848–56. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2014.952381

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Tian Y, Zhao Y, Huang J, Zeng H, Zheng B. Effects of different drying methods on the product quality and volatile compounds of whole shiitake mushrooms. Food Chem. (2016) 197:714–22. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Tao Y, Han M, Gao X, Han Y, Show PL, Liu C, et al. Applications of water blanching, surface contacting ultrasound-assisted air drying, and their combination for dehydration of white cabbage: drying mechanism, bioactive profile, color and rehydration property. Ultrason Sonochem. (2019) 53:192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ricce C, Rojas ML, Miano AC, Siche R, Augusto PED. Ultrasound pre-treatment enhances the carrot drying and rehydration. Food Res Int. (2016) 89:701–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Szadzińska J, Łechtańska J, Kowalski SJ, Stasiak M. The effect of high power airborne ultrasound and microwaves on convective drying effectiveness and quality of green pepper. Ultrason Sonochem. (2017) 34:531–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Rojas ML, Augusto PED, Cárcel JA. Ethanol pre-treatment to ultrasound-assisted convective drying of apple. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 61:102328. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Prosapio V, Norton I. Simultaneous application of ultrasounds and firming agents to improve the quality properties of osmotic + freeze-dried foods. Lwt. (2018) 96:402–10. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.05.068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Cárcel JA, Benedito J, Bon J, Mulet A. High intensity ultrasound effects on meat brining. Meat Sci. (2007) 76:611–9. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.01.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Irving L. Oscillations in ionized gases. Sci. Am. (1948) 178:50–3. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0552-50

CrossRef Full Text

65. Luo QZ, D'Angelo N, Merlino RL. Shock formation in a negative ion plasma. Phys Plasmas. (1998) 5:2868–70. doi: 10.1063/1.873007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Niemira BA. Cold plasma decontamination of foods *. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. (2012) 3:125–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101132

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Alves Filho EG, de Brito ES, Rodrigues S. Effects of cold plasma processing in food components. In: Bermudez-Aguirre D, editor. Advances in Cold Plasma Applications for Food Safety and Preservation. Washington, DC: Elsevier Inc. (2019). p. 253–68. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814921-8.00008-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Keener KM, Misra NN. Future of cold plasma in food processing. In: Cullen PJ, Schluter O, editors. Cold Plasma in Food and Agriculture: Fundamentals and Applications. Washington, DC: Elsevier Inc. (2016). p. 343–60. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801365-6.00014-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Misra NN, Roopesh MS. Cold plasma for sustainable food production and processing. In: Vorobiev E, Chemat F, editors. Green Food Processing Techniques. France: Elsevier Inc. (2019). p. 431–53. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815353-6.00016-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Roth JR, Nourgostar S, Bonds TA. The one atmosphere uniform glow discharge plasma (OAUGDP) - a platform technology for the 21st century. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. (2007) 35:233–50. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2007.892711

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Chizoba Ekezie FG, Sun DW, Cheng JH. A review on recent advances in cold plasma technology for the food industry: current applications and future trends. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2017) 69:46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Phan KTK, Phan HT, Brennan CS, Phimolsiripol Y. Nonthermal plasma for pesticide and microbial elimination on fruits and vegetables: an overview. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2017) 52:2127–37. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13509

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Lin L, Liao X, Li C, Abdel-Samie MA, Cui H. Inhibitory effect of cold nitrogen plasma on Salmonella Typhimurium biofilm and its application on poultry egg preservation. Lwt. (2020) 126:109340. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109340

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Devi Y, Thirumdas R, Sarangapani C, Deshmukh RR, Annapure US. Influence of cold plasma on fungal growth and aflatoxins production on groundnuts. Food Control. (2017) 77:187–91. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Bang IH, Lee ES, Lee HS, Min SC. Microbial decontamination system combining antimicrobial solution washing and atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge cold plasma treatment for preservation of mandarins. Postharvest Biol Technol. (2020) 162:111102. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.111102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Liao X, Su Y, Liu D, Chen S, Hu Y, Ye X, et al. Application of atmospheric cold plasma-activated water (PAW) ice for preservation of shrimps (Metapenaeus ensis). Food Control. (2018) 94:307–14. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Gan Z, Feng X, Hou Y, Sun A, Wang R. Cold plasma jet with dielectric barrier configuration: investigating its effect on the cell membrane of E. coli and S. cerevisiae and its impact on the quality of chokeberry juice. Lwt. (2021) 136:110223. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110223

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Shah U, Ranieri P, Zhou Y, Schauer CL, Miller V, Fridman G, et al. Effects of cold plasma treatments on spot-inoculated Escherichia coli O157:H7 and quality of baby kale (Brassica oleracea) leaves. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2019) 57:102104. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.12.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Hou Y, Wang R, Gan Z, Shao T, Zhang X, He M, et al. Effect of cold plasma on blueberry juice quality. Food Chem. (2019) 290:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Starek A, Pawłat J, Chudzik B, Kwiatkowski M, Terebun P, Sagan A, et al. Evaluation of selected microbial and physicochemical parameters of fresh tomato juice after cold atmospheric pressure plasma treatment during refrigerated storage. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:8407. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44946-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Illera AE, Chaple S, Sanz MT, Ng S, Lu P, Jones J, et al. Effect of cold plasma on polyphenol oxidase inactivation in cloudy apple juice and on the quality parameters of the juice during storage. Food Chem X. (2019) 3:100049. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2019.100049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Dasan BG, Boyaci IH. Effect of cold atmospheric plasma on inactivation of Escherichia coli and physicochemical properties of apple, orange, tomato juices, and sour cherry nectar. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2018) 11:334–43. doi: 10.1007/s11947-017-2014-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Amaral GV, Silva EK, Costa ALR, Alvarenga VO, Cavalcanti RN, Esmerino EA, et al. Whey-grape juice drink processed by supercritical carbon dioxide technology: Physical properties and sensory acceptance. Lwt. (2018) 92:80–6. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Roh SH, Oh YJ, Lee SY, Kang JH, Min SC. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Tulane virus in processed chicken breast via atmospheric in-package cold plasma treatment. Lwt. (2020) 127:109429. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109429

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Roh SH, Lee SY, Park HH, Lee ES, Min SC. Effects of the treatment parameters on the efficacy of the inactivation of Salmonella contaminating boiled chicken breast by in-package atmospheric cold plasma treatment. Int J Food Microbiol. (2019) 293:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.12.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Moutiq R, Misra NN, Mendonça A, Keener K. In-package decontamination of chicken breast using cold plasma technology: microbial, quality and storage studies. Meat Sci. (2020) 159:107942. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Lin HM, Zhang S, Zheng RS, Miao JY, Deng SG. Effect of atmospheric cold plasma treatment on ready-to-eat wine-pickled Bullacta exarata. Lwt. (2020) 120:108953. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108953

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Jahromi M, Niakousari M, Golmakani MT, Ajalloueian F, Khalesi M. Effect of dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric cold plasma treatment on structural, thermal and techno-functional characteristics of sodium caseinate. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 66:102542. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102542

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Sharma S, Singh RK. Cold plasma treatment of dairy proteins in relation to functionality enhancement. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 102:30–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Gao Y, Zhuang H, Yeh HY, Bowker B, Zhang J. Effect of rosemary extract on microbial growth, pH, color, and lipid oxidation in cold plasma-processed ground chicken patties. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2019) 57:102168. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.05.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Sarangapani C, Ryan Keogh D, Dunne J, Bourke P, Cullen PJ. Characterisation of cold plasma treated beef and dairy lipids using spectroscopic and chromatographic methods. Food Chem. (2017) 235:324–33. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Gavahian M, Chu YH, Mousavi Khaneghah A, Barba FJ, Misra NN. A critical analysis of the cold plasma induced lipid oxidation in foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2018) 77:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Temelli F, Saldaña MDA, Comin L. Application of supercritical fluid extraction in food processing. In: Pawliszyn J, editor. Comprehensive Sampling and Sample Preparation. Vol. 4. Washington: Elsevier. (2012). p. 415–40. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381373-2.00142-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

94. Deotale SM, Dutta S, Moses JA, Anandharamakrishnan C. Advances in supercritical carbon dioxide assisted sterilization of biological matrices. In: Knoerzer K, Juliano P, Smithers G, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Cambridge (2021). p. 660–77. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22932-6

CrossRef Full Text

95. Lefebvre T, Destandau E, Lesellier E. Sequential extraction of carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and pigments (carotenoids and chlorophylls) from Rosemary by online supercritical fluid extraction-supercritical fluid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. (2020) 1639:461709. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

96. Santos PH, Kammers JC, Silva AP, Vladimir J. Antioxidant and antibacterial compounds from feijoa leaf extracts obtained by pressurized liquid extraction and supercritical fluid extraction. Food Chem. (2020) 344:128620. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Molino A, Mehariya S, Di Sanzo G, Larocca V, Martino M, Leone GP, et al. Recent developments in supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds from microalgae: role of key parameters, technological achievements and challenges. J CO2 Util. (2020) 36:196–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.11.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Pavlić B, Pezo L, Marić B, Tukuljac LP, Zeković Z, Solarov MB, et al. Supercritical fluid extraction of raspberry seed oil: experiments and modelling. J Supercrit Fluids. (2020) 157:104687. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.104687

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Priyanka, Khanam S. Selection of suitable model for the supercritical fluid extraction of carrot seed oil: a parametric study. Lwt. (2020) 119:108815. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108815

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Santos OV, Lorenzo ND, Souza ALG, Costa CEF, Conceição LRV, Lannes SC da S, et al. CO2 supercritical fluid extraction of pulp and nut oils from Terminalia catappa fruits: thermogravimetric behavior, spectroscopic and fatty acid profiles. Food Res Int. (2020) 139:109814. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Ferrentino G, Giampiccolo S, Morozova K, Haman N, Spilimbergo S, Scampicchio M. Supercritical fluid extraction of oils from apple seeds: process optimization, chemical characterization and comparison with a conventional solvent extraction. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 64:102428. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102428

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Al-Otoom A, Al-Asheh S, Allawzi M, Mahshi K, Alzenati N, Banat B, et al. Extraction of oil from uncrushed olives using supercritical fluid extraction method. J Supercrit Fluids. (2014) 95:512–8. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.10.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Salea R, Veriansyah B, Tjandrawinata RR. Optimization and scale-up process for supercritical fluids extraction of ginger oil from Zingiber officinale var. Amarum. J Supercrit Fluids. (2017) 120:285–94. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2016.05.035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Rebolleda S, Rubio N, Beltrán S, Sanz MT, González-Sanjosé ML. Supercritical fluid extraction of corn germ oil: study of the influence of process parameters on the extraction yield and oil quality. J Supercrit Fluids. (2012) 72:270–7. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2012.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. De Oliveira PMA, De Almeida RH, De Oliveira NA, Bostyn S, Gonçalves CB, De Oliveira AL. Enrichment of diterpenes in green coffee oil using supercritical fluid extraction - characterization and comparison with green coffee oil from pressing. J Supercrit Fluids. (2014) 95:137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.08.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Priyanka, Khanam S. Influence of operating parameters on supercritical fluid extraction of essential oil from turmeric root. J Clean Prod. (2018) 188:816–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Fornari T, Vicente G, Vázquez E, García-Risco MR, Reglero G. Isolation of essential oil from different plants and herbs by supercritical fluid extraction. J Chromatogr A. (2012) 1250:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.04.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Pinto D, De La Luz Cádiz-Gurrea M, Sut S, Ferreira AS, Leyva-Jimenez FJ, Dall'acqua S, et al. Valorisation of underexploited Castanea sativa shells bioactive compounds recovered by supercritical fluid extraction with CO2: a response surface methodology approach. J CO2 Util. (2020) 40:101194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101194

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Gallego R, Bueno M, Herrero M. Sub- and supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds from plants, food-by-products, seaweeds and microalgae – an update. TrAC - Trends Anal Chem. (2019) 116:198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.04.030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Torres-Ossandón MJ, Vega-Gálvez A, López J, Stucken K, Romero J, Di Scala K. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing and supercritical fluid extraction on bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of Cape gooseberry pulp (Physalis peruviana L.). J Supercrit Fluids. (2018) 138:215–20. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2018.05.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Koubaa M, Mhemdi H, Fages J. Recovery of valuable components and inactivating microorganisms in the agro-food industry with ultrasound-assisted supercritical fluid technology. J Supercrit Fluids. (2018) 134:71–9. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Spilimbergo S, Bertucco A. Non-thermal bacteria inactivation with dense CO2. Biotechnol Bioeng. (2003) 84:627–38. doi: 10.1002/bit.10783

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Silva EK, Meireles MAA, Saldaña MDA. Supercritical carbon dioxide technology: a promising technique for the non-thermal processing of freshly fruit and vegetable juices. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 97:381–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Bertolini FM, Morbiato G, Facco P, Marszałek K, Pérez-Esteve É, Benedito J, et al. Optimization of the supercritical CO2 pasteurization process for the preservation of high nutritional value of pomegranate juice. J Supercrit Fluids. (2020) 164:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104914

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Cappelletti M, Ferrentino G, Spilimbergo S. Supercritical carbon dioxide combined with high power ultrasound: an effective method for the pasteurization of coconut water. J Supercrit Fluids. (2014) 92:257–63. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.06.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Cappelletti M, Ferrentino G, Endrizzi I, Aprea E, Betta E, Corollaro ML, et al. High pressure carbon dioxide pasteurization of coconut water: a sport drink with high nutritional and sensory quality. J Food Eng. (2015) 145:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.08.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Smigic N, Djekic I, Tomic N, Udovicki B, Rajkovic A. The potential of foods treated with supercritical carbon dioxide (sc-CO2) as novel foods. Br Food J. (2019) 121:815–34. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0168

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Yu T, Iwahashi H. Conversion of waste meat to resources by enzymatic reaction under high pressure carbon dioxide conditions. High Press Res. (2019) 39:367–73. doi: 10.1080/08957959.2019.1593406

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Farkas J. Irradiation for better foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2006) 17:148–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Bashir K, Jan K, Kamble DB, Maurya VK, Jan S, Swer TL. History, status and regulatory aspects of gamma irradiation for food processing. In: Knoerzer K, Juliano P, Smithers G, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Cambridge (2021). p. 101–7. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.23051-5

CrossRef Full Text

121. Jan K, Bashir K, Maurya VK. Gamma irradiation and food properties. In: Knoerzer K, Juliano P, Smithers G, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Cambridge (2021). p. 41–60. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.23052-7

CrossRef Full Text

122. Castell-Perez ME, Moreira RG. Irradiation and consumers acceptance. In: Knoerzer K, Juliano P, Smithers G, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Cambridge (2021). p. 122–35. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815781-7.00015-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Robichaud V, Bagheri L, Aguilar-Uscanga BR, Millette M, Lacroix M. Effect of ⋎-irradiation on the microbial inactivation, nutritional value, and antioxidant activities of infant formula. Lwt. (2020) 125:109211. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Gaougaou G, Shankar S, Liot Q, Constant P, Déziel E, Lacroix M. Gamma irradiation triggers a global stress response in Escherichia coli O157:H7 including base and nucleotides excision repair pathways. Microb Pathog. (2020) 149:104342. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Fallah AA, Siavash Saei-Dehkordi S, Rahnama M. Enhancement of microbial quality and inactivation of pathogenic bacteria by gamma irradiation of ready-to-cook Iranian barbecued chicken. Radiat Phys Chem. (2010) 79:1073–8. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Shalaby AR, Anwar MM, Sallam EM, Emam WH. Quality and safety of irradiated food regarding biogenic amines: Ras cheese. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2016) 51:1048–54. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Li C, He L, Jin G, Ma S, Wu W, Gai L. Effect of different irradiation dose treatment on the lipid oxidation, instrumental color and volatiles of fresh pork and their changes during storage. Meat Sci. (2017) 128:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Bashir K, Jan K, Aggarwal M. Thermo-rheological and functional properties of gamma-irradiated wholewheat flour. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2017) 52:927–35. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13356

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Ghabraie M, Vu KD, Tnani S, Lacroix M. Antibacterial effects of 16 formulations and irradiation against Clostridium sporogenes in a sausage model. Food Control. (2016) 63:21–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.11.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Cassares M, Sakotani NL, Kunigk L, Vasquez PAS, Jurkiewicz C. Effect of gamma irradiation on shelf life extension of fresh pasta. Radiat Phys Chem. (2020) 174:108940. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108940

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Bhat NA, Wani IA, Hamdani AM, Masoodi FA. Effect of gamma-irradiation on the thermal, rheological and antioxidant properties of three wheat cultivars grown in temperate Indian climate. Radiat Phys Chem. (2020) 176:108953. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108953

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Sharma P, Sharma SR, Dhall RK, Mittal TC, Bhatia S. Physio-chemical behavior of γ-irradiated garlic bulbs under ambient storage conditions. J Stored Prod Res. (2020) 87:101629. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101629

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Carvalho Mesquita T, Evangelista Vasconcelos Schiassi MC, Maria Teixeira Lago A, Careli-Gondim Í, Mesquita Silva L, de Azevedo Lira N, et al. Grape juice blends treated with gamma irradiation evaluated during storage. Radiat Phys Chem. (2020) 168:108570. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108570

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Syauqi A, Dadang D, Harahap IS, Indarwatmi M. Gamma irradiation against mealybug Dysmicoccus lepelleyi (Betrem) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on mangosteen fruit (Garcinia mangostana L.) as a quarantine treatment. Radiat Phys Chem. (2020) 179:108954. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108954

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Lim JS, Ha JW. Effect of acid adaptation on the resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to X-ray irradiation in apple juice. Food Control. (2021) 120:107489. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107489

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Arshad RN, Abdul-Malek Z, Munir A, Buntat Z, Ahmad MH, Jusoh YMM, et al. Electrical systems for pulsed electric field applications in the food industry: an engineering perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 104:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Aadil RM, Zeng XA, Ali A, Zeng F, Farooq MA, Han Z, et al. Influence of different pulsed electric field strengths on the quality of the grapefruit juice. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2015) 50:2290–6. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.12891

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Barba FJ, Parniakov O, Pereira SA, Wiktor A, Grimi N, Boussetta N, et al. Current applications and new opportunities for the use of pulsed electric fields in food science and industry. Food Res Int. (2015) 77:773–98. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Preetha P, Pandiselvam R, Varadharaju N, Kennedy ZJ, Balakrishnan M, Kothakota A. Effect of pulsed light treatment on inactivation kinetics of Escherichia coli (MTCC 433) in fruit juices. Food Control. (2021) 121:107547. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107547

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Timmermans RAH, Mastwijk HC, Berendsen LBJM, Nederhoff AL, Matser AM, Van Boekel MAJS, et al. Moderate intensity Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) as alternative mild preservation technology for fruit juice. Int J Food Microbiol. (2019) 298:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Toepfl S, Heinz V, Knorr D. High intensity pulsed electric fields applied for food preservation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. (2007) 46:537–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2006.07.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Mannozzi C, Rompoonpol K, Fauster T, Tylewicz U, Romani S, Rosa MD, et al. Influence of pulsed electric field and ohmic heating pretreatments on enzyme and antioxidant activity of fruit and vegetable juices. Foods. (2019) 8:247. doi: 10.3390/foods8070247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Liang R, Zhang Z, Lin S. Effects of pulsed electric field on intracellular antioxidant activity and antioxidant enzyme regulating capacities of pine nut (Pinus koraiensis) peptide QDHCH in HepG2 cells. Food Chem. (2017) 237:793–802. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. López-Gámez G, Elez-Martínez P, Martín-Belloso O, Soliva-Fortuny R. Pulsed electric fields affect endogenous enzyme activities, respiration and biosynthesis of phenolic compounds in carrots. Postharvest Biol Technol. (2020) 168:111284. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111284

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Käferböck A, Smetana S, de Vos R, Schwarz C, Toepfl S, Parniakov O. Sustainable extraction of valuable components from Spirulina assisted by pulsed electric fields technology. Algal Res. (2020) 48:101914. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2020.101914

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Gateau H, Blanckaert V, Veidl B, Burlet-Schiltz O, Pichereaux C, Gargaros A, et al. Application of pulsed electric fields for the biocompatible extraction of proteins from the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. Bioelectrochemistry. (2021) 137:107588. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107588

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Wang L, Boussetta N, Lebovka N, Vorobiev E. Cell disintegration of apple peels induced by pulsed electric field and efficiency of bio-compound extraction. Food Bioprod Process. (2020) 122:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2020.03.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Chittapun S, Jonjaroen V, Khumrangsee K, Charoenrat T. C-phycocyanin extraction from two freshwater cyanobacteria by freeze thaw and pulsed electric field techniques to improve extraction efficiency and purity. Algal Res. (2020) 46:101789. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2020.101789

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Pataro G, Carullo D, Falcone M, Ferrari G. Recovery of lycopene from industrially derived tomato processing by-products by pulsed electric fields-assisted extraction. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 63:102369. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102369

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Pashazadeh B, Elhamirad AH, Hajnajari H, Sharayei P, Armin M. Optimization of the pulsed electric field -assisted extraction of functional compounds from cinnamon. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. (2020) 23:101461. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Liu C, Pirozzi A, Ferrari G, Vorobiev E, Grimi N. Impact of pulsed electric fields on vacuum drying kinetics and physicochemical properties of carrot. Food Res Int. (2020) 137:109658. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Rybak K, Samborska K, Jedlinska A, Parniakov O, Nowacka M, Witrowa-Rajchert D, et al. The impact of pulsed electric field pretreatment of bell pepper on the selected properties of spray dried juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 65:102446. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102446

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Li J, Shi J, Huang X, Zou X, Li Z, Zhang D, et al. Effects of pulsed electric field on freeze-thaw quality of Atlantic salmon. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 65:102454. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102454

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Zhang F, Tian M, Du M, Fang T. Enhancing the activity of pectinase using pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment. J Food Eng. (2017) 205:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Dong M, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Han M, Wang P, Xu X, et al. Physicochemical and structural properties of myofibrillar proteins isolated from pale, soft, exudative (PSE)-like chicken breast meat: effects of pulsed electric field (PEF). Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 59:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102277

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Zhu F. Modifications of starch by electric field based techniques. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2018) 75:158–69. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Chen BR, Wen QH, Zeng XA, Abdul R, Roobab U, Xu FY. Pulsed electric field assisted modification of octenyl succinylated potato starch and its influence on pasting properties. Carbohydr Polym. (2020) 254:117294. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Duque SMM, Leong SY, Agyei D, Singh J, Larsen N, Oey I. Understanding the impact of Pulsed Electric Fields treatment on the thermal and pasting properties of raw and thermally processed oat flours. Food Res Int. (2020) 129:108839. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Lin ZR, Zeng XA, Yu SJ, Sun DW. Enhancement of ethanol-acetic acid esterification under room temperature and non-catalytic condition via pulsed electric field application. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2012) 5:2637–45. doi: 10.1007/s11947-011-0678-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Zhang ZH, Han Z, Zeng XA, Wang MS. The preparation of Fe-glycine complexes by a novel method (pulsed electric fields). Food Chem. (2017) 219:468–76. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Van Loey IA, Smout C, Hendrickx M. High hydrostatic pressure technology in food preservation. In: Zeuthen P, Bogh-Sorensen L, editors. Food Preservation Techniques. Cambridge (2003). p. 428–48. doi: 10.1533/9781855737143.3.428

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Huang HW, Hsu CP, Wang CY. Healthy expectations of high hydrostatic pressure treatment in food processing industry. J Food Drug Anal. (2020) 28:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2019.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Rendueles E, Omer MK, Alvseike O, Alonso-Calleja C, Capita R, Prieto M. Microbiological food safety assessment of high hydrostatic pressure processing: a review. LWT - Food Sci Technol. (2011) 44:1251–60. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. González-Cebrino F, Durán R, Delgado-Adámez J, Contador R, Ramírez R. Changes after high-pressure processing on physicochemical parameters, bioactive compounds, and polyphenol oxidase activity of red flesh and peel plum purée. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2013) 20:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.07.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Daher D, Le Gourrierec S, Pérez-Lamela C. Effect of high pressure processing on the microbial inactivation in fruit preparations and other vegetable based beverages. Agric. (2017) 7:1–18. doi: 10.3390/agriculture7090072

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Bulut S, Karatzas KAG. Inactivation of Escherichia coli K12 in phosphate buffer saline and orange juice by high hydrostatic pressure processing combined with freezing. Lwt. (2021) 136:110313. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110313

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Cap M, Paredes PF, Fernández D, Mozgovoj M, Vaudagna SR, Rodriguez A. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on Salmonella spp inactivation and meat-quality of frozen chicken breast. Lwt. (2020) 118:108873. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108873

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Cava R, García-Parra J, Ladero L. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure processing and storage temperature on food safety, microbial counts, colour and oxidative changes of a traditional dry-cured sausage. Lwt. (2020) 128:109462. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. de Jesus ALT, Cristianini M, dos Santos NM, Maróstica Júnior MR. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on the microbial inactivation and extraction of bioactive compounds from açaí (Euterpe oleracea Martius) pulp. Food Res Int. (2020) 130:108856. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108856

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Ninčević Grassino A, Ostojić J, Miletić V, Djaković S, Bosiljkov T, Zorić Z, et al. Application of high hydrostatic pressure and ultrasound-assisted extractions as a novel approach for pectin and polyphenols recovery from tomato peel waste. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 64:102424. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102424

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Cascaes Teles AS, Hidalgo Chávez DW, Zarur Coelho MA, Rosenthal A, Fortes Gottschalk LM, Tonon RV. Combination of enzyme-assisted extraction and high hydrostatic pressure for phenolic compounds recovery from grape pomace. J Food Eng. (2020) 288:110128. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110128

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Suwal S, Perreault V, Marciniak A, Tamigneaux É, Deslandes É, Bazinet L, et al. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure and polysaccharidases on the extraction of antioxidant compounds from red macroalgae, Palmaria palmata and Solieria chordalis. J Food Eng. (2019) 252:53–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.02.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Naderi N, Pouliot Y, House JD, Doyen A. High hydrostatic pressure effect in extraction of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) from egg yolk and granule fractions. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2017) 43:191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.08.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

174. Rios-Corripio G, Welti-Chanes J, Rodríguez-Martínez V, Guerrero-Beltrán JÁ. Influence of high hydrostatic pressure processing on physicochemical characteristics of a fermented pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) beverage. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 59:102249. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102249

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Malinowska-Pańczyk E. Can high hydrostatic pressure processing be the best way to preserve human milk? Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 101:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Rocha-Pimienta J, Martillanes S, Ramírez R, Garcia-Parra J, Delgado-Adamez J. Bacillus cereus spores and Staphylococcus aureus sub. aureus vegetative cells inactivation in human milk by high-pressure processing. Food Control. (2020) 113:107212. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107212

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Carullo D, Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Ferrari G. Changes of structural and techno-functional properties of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treated whey protein isolate over refrigerated storage. Lwt. (2020) 137:110436. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110436

CrossRef Full Text

178. Popović V, Koutchma T, Pagan J. Emerging applications of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes for foods and beverages. In: Knoerzer K, Muthukumarappan K, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Voctoria (2021). p. 335–44. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22667-X

CrossRef Full Text

179. Guerrero-Beltrán JÁ, Ochoa-Velasco CE. Ultraviolet-C light technology and systems for preservation of fruit juices and beverages. In: Knoerzer K, Muthukumarappan K, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Voctoria (2021). p. 210–26. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22937-5

CrossRef Full Text

180. Koutchma T, Bissonnette S, Popović V. An update on research, development and implementation of UV and pulsed light technologies for nonthermal preservation of milk and dairy products. In: Knoerzer K, Muthukumarappan K, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Voctoria (2021). p. 256–76. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22680-2

CrossRef Full Text

181. Fenoglio D, Ferrario M, Schenk M, Guerrero S. Effect of pilot-scale UV-C light treatment assisted by mild heat on E. coli, L. plantarum and S. cerevisiae inactivation in clear and turbid fruit juices. storage study of surviving populations. Int J Food Microbiol. (2020) 332:108767. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

182. Xiang Q, Fan L, Zhang R, Ma Y, Liu S, Bai Y. Effect of UVC light-emitting diodes on apple juice: inactivation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii and determination of quality. Food Control. (2020) 111:107082. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107082

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

183. Ferreira TV, Mizuta AG, de Menezes JL, Dutra TV, Bonin E, Castro JC, et al. Effect of ultraviolet treatment (UV–C) combined with nisin on industrialized orange juice in Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores. Lwt. (2020) 133:109911. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109911

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

184. Fundo JF, Miller FA, Mandro GF, Tremarin A, Brandão TRS, Silva CLM. UV-C light processing of Cantaloupe melon juice: evaluation of the impact on microbiological, and some quality characteristics, during refrigerated storage. Lwt. (2019) 103:247–52. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.01.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

185. Delorme MM, Guimarães JT, Coutinho NM, Balthazar CF, Rocha RS, Silva R, et al. Ultraviolet radiation: an interesting technology to preserve quality and safety of milk and dairy foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 102:146–54. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

186. Kumar A, Rani P, Purohit SR, Rao PS. Effect of ultraviolet irradiation on wheat (Triticum aestivum) flour: study on protein modification and changes in quality attributes. J Cereal Sci. (2020) 96:103094. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2020.103094

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

187. Dyshlyuk L, Babich O, Prosekov A, Ivanova S, Pavsky V, Chaplygina T. The effect of postharvest ultraviolet irradiation on the content of antioxidant compounds and the activity of antioxidant enzymes in tomato. Heliyon. (2020) 6:e03288. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

188. Zhu Y, Koutchma T. UV light technology for mycotoxins reduction in foods and beverages. In: Knoerzer K, Muthukumarappan K, editors. Innovative Food Processing Technologies. Voctoria (2021). p. 398–415. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22686-3

CrossRef Full Text

189. Orlowska M, Koutchma T, Grapperhaus M, Gallagher J, Schaefer R, Defelice C. Continuous and pulsed ultraviolet light for nonthermal treatment of liquid foods. Part 1: effects on quality of fructose solution, apple juice, and milk. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2013) 6:1580–92. doi: 10.1007/s11947-012-0779-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

190. Jeon MJ, Ha JW. Inactivating foodborne pathogens in apple juice by combined treatment with fumaric acid and ultraviolet-A light, and mechanisms of their synergistic bactericidal action. Food Microbiol. (2020) 87:103387. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

191. Mehta D, Sharma N, Bansal V, Sangwan RS, Yadav SK. Impact of ultrasonication, ultraviolet and atmospheric cold plasma processing on quality parameters of tomato-based beverage in comparison with thermal processing. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2019) 52:343–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.01.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

192. Oner ME, Demirci A. Ozone for food decontamination: theory and applications. In: Lelieveld H, Gabric D, Holah J, editors. Handbook of Hygiene Control in the Food Industry: Second Edition. Cambridge: Elsevier Ltd (2016). p. 491–501. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100155-4.00033-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

193. Tiwari BK, Brennan CS, Curran T, Gallagher E, Cullen PJ, O' Donnell CP. Application of ozone in grain processing. J Cereal Sci. (2010) 51:248–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.01.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

194. Giménez B, Graiver N, Giannuzzi L, Zaritzky N. Treatment of beef with gaseous ozone: physicochemical aspects and antimicrobial effects on heterotrophic microflora and listeria monocytogenes. Food Control. (2021) 121:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107602

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

195. Mohammad Z, Kalbasi-Ashtari A, Riskowski G, Juneja V, Castillo A. Inactivation of Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from the surface of alfalfa seeds and sprouts by combined antimicrobial treatments using ozone and electrolyzed water. Food Res Int. (2020) 136:109488. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109488

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

196. Taiye Mustapha A, Zhou C, Wahia H, Amanor-Atiemoh R, Otu P, Qudus A, et al. Sonozonation: enhancing the antimicrobial efficiency of aqueous ozone washing techniques on cherry tomato. Ultrason Sonochem. (2020) 64:105059. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

197. Pinto L, Palma A, Cefola M, Pace B, D'Aquino S, Carboni C, et al. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and gaseous ozone pre-packaging treatment on the physico-chemical, microbiological and sensory quality of small berry fruit. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2020) 26:100573. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100573

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

198. Patil S, Valdramidis VP, Cullen PJ, Frias J, Bourke P. Inactivation of Escherichia coli by ozone treatment of apple juice at different pH levels. Food Microbiol. (2010) 27:835–40. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

199. Choi MR, Liu Q, Lee SY, Jin JH, Ryu S, Kang DH. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in apple juice with gaseous ozone. Food Microbiol. (2012) 32:191–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

200. Porto E, Alves Filho EG, Silva LMA, Fonteles TV, do Nascimento RBR, Fernandes FAN, et al. Ozone and plasma processing effect on green coconut water. Food Res Int. (2020) 131:109000. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: food preservation, pulse electric field, ultrasound, cold plasma, microwave, high pressure processing, irradiation

Citation: Jadhav HB, Annapure US and Deshmukh RR (2021) Non-thermal Technologies for Food Processing. Front. Nutr. 8:657090. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.657090

Received: 22 January 2021; Accepted: 26 April 2021;
Published: 08 June 2021.

Edited by:

Antonio Morata, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain

Reviewed by:

Fatih Öz, Atatürk University, Turkey
Liliana Gonçalves Fidalgo, Instituto Politécnico de Beja, Portugal

Copyright © 2021 Jadhav, Annapure and Deshmukh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rajendra R. Deshmukh, rr.deshmukh@ictmumbai.edu.in; rajedeshmukh@rediffmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.