Shuyi Tian
Mengqing Zou- The Fourth Clinical College of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, China
Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO)-induced posterior circulation ischemic stroke.
Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute BAO, using an updated meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared the efficacy and safety of EVT with and without IVT in the treatment of acute BAO ischemic stroke. The extracted data included sample size, patient age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0–2 and 0–3, mortality rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
Results: Five studies that included a total of 1,578 patients (594 IVT + EVT vs. 984 EVT), met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that bridging IVT was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a 90-day mRS score of 0–2 (41% vs. 34%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09–1.68, p = 0.006). Furthermore, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVT + EVT group than in the direct EVT group (25% vs. 30%; OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.89, p = 0.003), with low heterogeneity observed (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.78). However, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the rates of sICH (5% vs. 6%; OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52–1.39, p = 0.53), SAH (3% vs. 3%; OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.39–2.22, p = 0.87), perforation (2% vs. 3%; OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.26–1.95, p = 0.51), and dissection (3% vs. 2%; OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.13–7.14, p = 0.98).
Conclusion: Bridging IVT in conjunction with EVT was associated with better functional outcomes and reduced mortality rates in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to BAO compared to EVT alone, without an increased risk of sICH, SAH, perforation, and dissection. In addition, the benefit of bridging IVT to EVT appeared to be more pronounced in European patients than in Asian patients compared to EVT alone. However, the conclusions of this study are not definitive and require validation through large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to draw more robust conclusions.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024531363.
1 Introduction
Acute BAO-induced stroke is one of the most severe neurological conditions, accounting for 1%–4% of all acute ischemic strokes, and is characterized by high rates of disability and mortality (1–3). The reported mortality rate for patients with untreated or non-intervened BAO ranges from 80% to 95% (4). Rapid diagnosis and restoration of blood flow are crucial for a favorable prognosis in patients with BAO. Early vascular recanalization and salvage of the ischemic penumbra are key components in the treatment of BAO (5).
Several studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of MT for treating posterior circulation ischemic stroke caused by acute BAO (6). Recent RCTs have provided clarity on the treatment of patients with BAO-induced acute ischemic stroke (AIS), demonstrating that EVT combined with optimal pharmacotherapy, including IVT, is superior to optimal pharmacotherapy alone in improving functional outcomes within 24 h of symptom onset (7, 8). Thrombolytics facilitate clot dissolution or dislodgement, thereby increasing clot retrieval and recanalization success rates (9). However, thrombolytic therapy may elevate the risk of bleeding and complicate EVT by rendering clots more difficult to access, potentially complicating the surgical procedure (10). The efficacy and safety of administering thrombolytic agents prior to thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke remain uncertain (11).
Currently, no RCTs have directly compared the outcomes of bridging IVT prior to EVT vs. EVT alone in patients with acute BAO. Guo et al. (12) found no significant differences in 90-day functional outcome, the likelihood of sICH, or mortality rates between patients receiving bridging IVT before EVT and those receiving direct EVT. More recently, Maïer et al. (13) conducted a propensity score matching analysis, concluding that EVT yielded similar neurological outcomes to IVT combined with EVT, with a comparable safety profile. However, these studies were limited by small sample sizes and patient heterogeneity. Cai et al. (14) conducted a meta-analysis comparing endovascular thrombectomy with and without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute BAO, but this study included heterogeneous populations and lacked strict inclusion criteria. Consequently, we conducted an updated meta-analysis with more stringent literature screening and well-defined inclusion criteria to compare the outcomes of direct EVT vs. IVT combined with EVT.
In 2022, Lee et al. (15) published a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of MT with and without bridging IVT in patients with acute BAO. This meta-analysis indicated that bridging IVT was associated with lower 90-day mortality rates compared to direct MT, particularly in patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), who were more likely to benefit from bridging IVT in terms of better functional outcomes. Subsequently, two new studies on the same topic were published in 2023 (12, 13). However, the conclusions of these studies differed from those of Lee’s meta-analysis. Therefore, we present a pooled analysis and evidence update comparing the clinical outcomes of MT with and without bridging IVT in patients with acute BAO.
2 Methods
This evidence-based analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 statement (16). This study was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024531363).
2.1 Literature search
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science to identify English-language studies published through February 2024 that compared the efficacy and safety of thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion. The search included both synonyms and related terms, using the following keywords: “thrombectomy,” “intravenous thrombolysis,” “basilar artery,” and “stroke.” The detailed search strategy is provided in Supplementary Table 1.
2.2 Eligibility criteria
Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) they involved adult patients who experienced an acute BAO ischemic stroke; (2) they evaluated the efficacy and safety of EVT with or without IVT, with IVT administered within 4.5 h according to standard criteria for eligible patients; (3) they reported at least one of the following outcomes: a mRS score of 0–2 at 90 days, mortality, sICH, a mRS score of 0–3 at 90 days, or SAH; (4) they used a primary study design that was either interventional or observational. Reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, conference abstracts, pediatric articles, unpublished articles, replies, editorial comments, studies without sufficient data, and unrelated topics were excluded from the analysis. Non-English language articles were also excluded.
2.3 Data extraction
Data extraction was independently performed by two investigators (ST and MZ), with any disagreements resolved by a third investigator (LG) to reach a final decision. To ensure standardization and consistency, data were extracted according to a predefined pro forma that included the following variables: first author, publication year, study period, region, study design, sample size, age, male, follow-up, hypertension, admission NIHSS, onset to puncture (OTP), mRS scores of 0–2 at 90 days, mortality, sICH, mRS scores of 0–3 at 90 days, and SAH. In cases of discrepancies or missing data, the corresponding authors were contacted to obtain complete information.
2.4 Quality assessment
The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). A score of 7–9 on this scale was considered indicative of high-quality studies. Two investigators (ST and DL) independently evaluated the quality and evidence level of the eligible studies, resolving any disagreements by discussion. Full details of the assessment are provided in Supplementary Table 2.
2.5 Statistical analysis
This study used Review Manager 5.4.1 to perform statistical analyses, using OR values to compare binary variables. All results were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-squared (χ2) test (Cochran’s Q) and the inconsistency index (I2) (17). A p value of <0.05 or an I2 > 50% indicated significant heterogeneity. A random-effects model evaluated OR for significant heterogeneity (p value <0.05 or I2 > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used for non-significant heterogeneity. Moreover, one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of individual studies on the overall results for outcomes showing significant heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed both visually and quantitatively using funnel plots generated in Review Manager 5.4.1, where significant asymmetry suggested potential bias. Egger’s regression test was also performed to quantitatively analyze funnel plot asymmetry, which shows statistically significant publication bias with a p value of <0.05.
2.6 Subgroup design
We also used Review Manager 5.4.1 to perform subgroup analyses based on the study design and geographical region of the included studies. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for four primary outcomes: mortality, mRS scores of 0–2 at 90 days, sICH, and modified treatment in cerebral ischemia (mTICI) grades 2b-3. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the p value and inconsistency index (I2). A p value of less than 0.05 or an I2 greater than 50% indicated significant heterogeneity.
3 Results
3.1 Literature search and patient baseline characteristics
Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart of the literature search and selection process. A systematic literature search yielded 825 relevant articles from PubMed (n = 184), Embase (n = 339), Cochrane (n = 23), and Web of Science (n = 279). After removing duplicates, 272 articles remained for further review. Of these, 14 publications underwent a full-text review, and ultimately, five studies (12, 13, 18–20) that compared EVT bridging IVT with direct EVT in 1578 BAO stroke patients (594 EVT + IVT vs. 984 EVT) met the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. Of these, three (13, 19, 20) were prospective cohort studies, while two (12, 18) were retrospective cohort studies. The studies included in the analysis ranged from 2011 to 2021. Data were collected across large-volume neuro-intervention centers in seven countries: China, Germany, Sweden, Singapore, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom. In the IVT + EVT group, the number of patients included in the EVT + IVT group ranged from 69 to 166, while in the EVT group, it ranged from 118 to 298. The estimated age of the patients was between 60 and 70 years. Baseline data did not significantly differ between the two groups. Further details of the included studies are provided in Table 1. The quality of the eligible studies was assessed using the NOS (Supplementary Table 2). All patients were followed up for 90 days.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the systematic search and selection process.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the included studies.
3.2 Good functional outcome: mRS score of 0–2 at 90 days
Data on the mRS score of 0–2 at 90 days were synthesized from five studies comprising a total of 1,578 patients (594 IVT + EVT vs. 984 EVT) (12, 13, 18–20). A pooled analysis demonstrated that bridging IVT significantly improved the 90-day mRS scores of 0–2 (IVT + EVT 241/594 [41%] vs. EVT 331/984 [34%]; OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09–1.68, p = 0.006) (Figure 2A). A visual assessment using a funnel plot suggested a slight publication bias (Figure 3A). However, Egger’s test for publication bias was not statistically significant (p = 0.722).
Figure 2. Forest plots of perioperative outcomes. (A) mRS 0–2 at 90 days, (B) mortality, (C) mTICI 2b-3, (D) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (E) subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), (F) perforations, and (G) dissections.
Figure 3. Funnel plots of (A) mRS 0–2 at 90 days, (B) mortality, (C) mTICI 2b-3, and (D) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).
3.3 Mortality
Mortality analysis was performed in five studies involving a total of 1,578 patients (594 IVT + EVT vs. 984 EVT) (12, 13, 18–20). The pooled analysis indicated a significantly higher mortality in the direct EVT group (IVT + EVT 148/594 [25%] vs. EVT 293/984 [30%]; OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.89, p = 0.003) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.78) (Figure 2B). Funnel plots revealed a slight publication bias (Figure 3B), while Egger’s test detected no statistically significant publication bias (p = 0.952).
3.4 Successful revascularization: mTICI 2b-3
Four studies involving 1,112 patients (428 IVT + EVT vs. 684 EVT) were included in the analysis (12, 13, 18, 19). Pooled results demonstrated similar mTICI 2b-3 rates between bridging IVT to EVT and direct EVT groups (IVT + EVT 360/428 [84%] vs. EVT 562/684 [82%]; OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.59–1.62, p = 0.94), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 52%, p = 0.10) (Figure 2C). No statistically significant publication bias was detected by Egger’s test (p = 0.498), nor was any visually evident in the funnel plot (Figure 3C).
3.5 Safety outcomes
This analysis found no significant difference in safety results between the two groups. Five studies on sICH involving 1,534 patients (577 IVT + EVT vs. 957 EVT) were included in the analysis (12, 13, 18–20). The evidence showed similar sICH rates between the two groups (IVT + EVT 26/577 [5%] vs. EVT 54/957 [6%]; OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.52–1.39, p = 0.53) without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.53) (Figure 2D) or statistically (Egger’s test, p = 0.064) or visually (Figure 3D) evident publication bias. Two studies on SAH involving 728 patients (265 IVT + EVT vs. 463 EVT) were included in the analysis (18, 20). Two studies on perforations involving 596 patients (166 IVT + EVT vs. 430 EVT) were included in the analysis (13, 20). Two studies on dissections involving 740 patients (310 IVT + EVT vs. 430 EVT) were included in the analysis (13, 20). Rates of SAH (IVT + EVT 8/265 [3%] vs. EVT 15/463 [3%]; OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.39–2.22, p = 0.87) (Figure 2E), perforations (IVT + EVT 5/280 [2%] vs. EVT 12/430 [3%]; OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.26–1.95, p = 0.51) (Figure 2F), and dissections (IVT + EVT 6/230 [3%] vs. EVT 10/430 [2%]; OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.13–7.14, p = 0.98) (Figure 2G) did not significantly differ between the two groups.
3.6 Sensitivity analyses
We conducted single sensitivity analyses for mortality, 90-day mRS score 0–2, mTICI 2b-3, and sICH to evaluate each individual study’s influence on the combined OR through one-by-one exclusion. Sensitivity analyses revealed constant combined ORs after excluding any individual study for mortality (Figure 4B), mTICI 2b-3 (Figure 4C), and sICH (Figure 4D). However, excluding the data from Nappini et al. (20) (95% CI 0.98–1.66) and Nie et al. (19) (95% CI 0.99–1.59) rendered the 90-day mRS 0–2 difference (Figure 4A) insignificant from significant. Consequently, insufficient evidence supports bridging IVT therapy providing better functional outcomes than direct EVT therapy.
Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis of (A) mRS 0–2 at 90 days, (B) mortality, (C) mTICI 2b-3, and (D) sICH.
3.7 Subgroup analysis
Regarding the design and region of the included studies, we conducted the subgroup analysis in Table 2. All three prospective studies confirmed that bridging IVT prior to EVT was associated with better functional outcomes and lower mortality than direct EVT in acute basilar artery occlusion ischemic stroke patients, which is consistent with our overall analysis. A pooled subgroup analysis of European patients confirmed that 90-day mortality rates favored bridging IVT to EVT [OR = 0.63 (95% CI 0.44–0.90); p < 0.05], and bridging IVT was associated with better functional outcomes [OR = 1.40 (95% CI 1.03–1.90); p < 0.05]. However, no significant difference existed between the two groups in the Asian population.
Table 2. Subgroup analysis of IVT + EVT vs. EVT for acute basilar artery occlusion ischemic stroke.
4 Discussion
Acute BAO is a rare but potentially catastrophic condition. Earlier studies have demonstrated that early recanalization of occluded arteries in acute stroke is associated with a good functional prognosis (21). Currently, revascularization therapy forms include IVT, arterial thrombolysis, MT, stent implantation, or combination therapy (22). EVT is a well-established approach for acute ischemic stroke. Several studies have analyzed conflicting results on the efficacy of bridging IVT vs. direct MT; some have reported similar results (23–25), while other studies have shown that bridging IVT therapy has a better functional outcome (26). However, the majority of the analyses in these articles were based on anterior circulation strokes, not specifically studying acute BAO. The benefit of bridging IVT before EVT in BAO patients remains uncertain, and the optimal clinical treatment for acute BAO requires clarification.
This study found that bridging IVT prior to EVT improved 90-day functional outcomes and reduced mortality in BAO patients. No significant difference existed in vascular revascularization rate or safety prognosis between the two groups. However, this result may be limited by the sample size, resulting in type II errors. Sensitivity analysis indicated that when the data of Nappini et al. (20) and Nie et al. (19) were excluded, the heterogeneity for 90-day mRS score 0–2 disappeared, suggesting that these studies accounted for the majority of the heterogeneity. This result may be due to the large number of patients in the study by Nappini et al. (20). At present, there are few studies on endovascular therapy (EVT) with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute BAO. Only five studies were included in this meta-analysis after our rigorous screening. It is expected that more new RCTs will appear in the future to solve this heterogeneity problem. Moreover, among all included studies, Egger’s test was not statistically significant.
In our subgroup analysis, prospective studies confirmed that bridging IVT prior to EVT was associated with better functional outcomes and lower mortality than direct EVT in patients, which is consistent with our overall analysis. Prospective studies are generally more accurate than retrospective studies due to the inherent limitations of the retrospective and observational nature of the included studies. Furthermore, we found that European patients benefited more from bridging IVT than Asian patients. Relevant epidemiological studies have shown that intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) accounts for 10–15% of ischemic strokes in European patients, but ICAD causes 54% of ischemic strokes in Asian populations (27, 28).
Some studies have demonstrated that there are racial differences in the prevalence, severity, site of onset, pathogenesis, and prognosis of ICAD. These differences may be attributed, at least in part, to the configuration of risk factors that vary between groups (29–31). Pathophysiological studies have shown that atherosclerosis is the deposition of cholesterol in the arterial wall to form atherosclerotic plaques. A simplified model of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis begins with endothelial dysfunction and the accumulation of cholesterol particles in the arterial wall (32, 33). Shear stress affects the function of endothelial cells, and the hemodynamic environment, which is normally characterized by low wall shear and peripheral wall tension, promotes the development of atherosclerosis. Wall tension serves to compensate for non-laminar flow patterns (34). As arteries stiffen from prolonged compression, especially in hypertensive patients, the wall tension that compensates for non-laminar flow patterns may become fatigued. This may contribute to the development of intracranial atherosclerotic disease as hypertension, smoking, and obesity—which are risk factors that may mediate endothelial cell dysfunction by affecting shear forces—are more prevalent in Asian populations (30, 34). These risk factors may potentially mediate endothelial cell dysfunction by affecting shear forces, which could result in variations in disease development among patients of different ethnic groups (29, 30). In this study population, the differences in treatment outcomes between the two groups may also be due to ethnicity and genetic factors, as along with other factors such as underlying disease, risk factors, and lifestyle (other influencing factors not included in the baseline comparison). However, there is currently no clear evidence to suggest that European subjects are more suitable candidates for bridging therapy than Asian subjects for BAO treatment.
In recent years, three high-quality studies on BAO treatment in China—ATTENTION, BAOCHE, and BEST trials, and one European study—BASICS trial (7, 8, 35, 36), have been published. Comparative analysis revealed lower IVT usage before EVT in the ATTENTION (31%), BAOCHE (14%), and BEST (27%) trial EVT groups compared to the BASICS trial (78.6%) (7, 8, 35, 36). However, the 90-day mRS 0–2 functional independence rate in the EVT group remained numerically similar between the ATTENTION, BAOCHE, and BASICS trials. Due to differences in sample size, among other factors, this analysis cannot explain the discrepancy between the good prognosis in the BASICS trial and the similarity observed in the Chinese trials.
Studies have shown that direct EVT is no less effective than bridging therapy within 4.5 h of onset in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) combined with precirculatory large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (37). However, few studies have compared IVT + EVT and direct EVT in patients with acute posterior circulation BAO. Bridging EVT therapy after IVT in LVO offers potential advantages, including early thrombus fragmentation, microvascular reperfusion, and enhanced recanalization (37–39). Posterior circulation occlusion is significantly associated with distal embolization during thrombectomy, where bridging tissue plasminogen activators may partially ameliorate this situation, resulting in better outcomes (40, 41).
Nappini et al. (20) showed that patients with direct EVT and IVT + EVT had similar rates of recurrence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 3-month functional outcomes, but patients treated with IVT + EVT within the first 6 h had a better prognosis. More recently, Siow et al. (18) also found similar good mobility rates (3-month mRS 0–3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality in patients treated with EVT alone and IVT + EVT. Consistent with this meta-analysis result, bridging IVT before EVT has potential risks and benefits. Currently, no exact evidence-based medicine or standardized clinical guidelines prove IVT + EVT’s overwhelming advantage over direct EVT in acute posterior circulation BAO. Individualized treatment options for patients with acute BAO need exploration, and larger randomized studies are needed to provide more evidence.
The included studies in this meta-analysis had inherent limitations due to their retrospective and observational nature. Given the included studies’ observational nature, the decision to perform IVT before EVT was not random, resulting in significant allocation bias and residual unmeasured confounders that may have affected the results. In addition, only five studies were included after a rigorous systematic literature search, providing an overall small sample size and potentially insufficient statistical power to detect significant efficacy results. Large-scale, precise, prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up are needed to further compare the two therapeutic approaches’ good functional outcomes, mortality, and complications in patients with acute BAO.
5 Conclusion
This meta-analysis found that bridging IVT was associated with better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates in patients with BAO-induced AIS compared to direct EVT, without increasing rates of sICH, SAH, perforation, and dissection. European patients benefited more from bridging IVT to EVT than Asian patients did from EVT alone. However, due to heterogeneity and potential bias, the conclusion of this study is not stable, and the level of evidence is low. Neurologists should choose the most appropriate treatment according to the patient’s specific situation. Large randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether bridging IVT indeed provides more benefits over direct EVT in BAO.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
ST: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. DL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. CW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. QL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Project of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (f00049).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1433158/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Ritvonen, J, Sairanen, T, Silvennoinen, H, Virtanen, P, Salonen, O, Lindsberg, PJ, et al. Outcomes and long-term mortality after basilar artery occlusion-a cohort with up to 20 Years' follow-up. Eur J Neurol. (2021) 28:816–22. doi: 10.1111/ene.14628
2. Alemseged, F, Nguyen, TN, Alverne, FM, Liu, XF, Schonewille, WJ, and Nogueira, RG. Endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion. Stroke. (2023) 54:1127–37. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.122.040807
3. Shen, D, Cai, X, Zhu, Q, Heizhati, M, Hu, J, Song, S, et al. Increased stress hyperglycemia ratio at hospital admission in stroke patients are associated with increased in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Diabetol Metab Syndr. (2024) 16:69. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01303-1
4. Lee, YY, Yoon, W, Kim, SK, Baek, BH, Kim, GS, Kim, JT, et al. Acute basilar artery occlusion: differences in characteristics and outcomes after endovascular therapy between patients with and without underlying severe atherosclerotic stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol. (2017) 38:1600–4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5233
5. Shore, TH, Harrington, TJ, Faulder, K, and Steinfort, B. Endovascular therapy in acute basilar artery occlusion: a retrospective single-Centre Australian analysis. J Med Imag Radiat Oncol. (2019) 63:33–9. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12825
6. Luo, G, Mo, D, Tong, X, Liebeskind, DS, Song, L, Ma, N, et al. Factors associated with 90-day outcomes of patients with acute posterior circulation stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy. World Neurosurg. (2018) 109:e318–28. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.171
7. Tao, C, Nogueira, RG, Zhu, Y, Sun, J, Han, H, Yuan, G, et al. Trial of endovascular treatment of acute basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med. (2022) 387:1361–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206317
8. Jovin, TG, Li, C, Wu, L, Wu, C, Chen, J, Jiang, C, et al. Trial of thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med. (2022) 387:1373–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207576
9. Behme, D, Kabbasch, C, Kowoll, A, Dorn, F, Liebig, T, Weber, W, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis facilitates successful recanalization with stent-retriever mechanical Thrombectomy in middle cerebral artery occlusions. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2016) 25:954–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.007
10. Ren, Y, Churilov, L, Mitchell, P, Dowling, R, Bush, S, and Yan, B. Clot migration is associated with intravenous thrombolysis in the setting of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2018) 49:3060–2. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.118.022751
11. Goyal, M, Menon, BK, van Zwam, WH, Dippel, DWJ, Mitchell, PJ, Demchuk, AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00163-x
12. Guo, M, Yue, C, Yang, J, Hu, J, Guo, C, Peng, Z, et al. Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. (2023) 16:794–800. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020361
13. Maïer, B, Finitsis, S, Mazighi, M, Lapergue, B, Marnat, G, Sibon, I, et al. Thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolytics in basilar artery occlusion. Ann Neurol. (2023) 94:596–604. doi: 10.1002/ana.26720
14. Cai, L, Wang, L, Campbell, BCV, Wu, Y, Abdalkader, M, Alemseged, F, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. (2024) 271:3039–49. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12353-w
15. Lee, KS, Siow, I, Zhang, JJ, Syn, NL, Gillespie, CS, Yuen, LZ, et al. Bridging thrombolysis improves survival rates at 90 days compared with direct mechanical Thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of 1096 patients. J Neurointerv Surg. (2023) 15:1039–45. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019510
16. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al. The Prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. (2021) 18:e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
17. Higgins, JPT, and Thompson, SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. (2002) 21:1539–58. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
18. Siow, I, Tan, BYQ, Lee, KS, Ong, N, Toh, E, Gopinathan, A, et al. Bridging thrombolysis versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in stroke due to basilar artery occlusion. J Stroke. (2022) 24:128–37. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.02082
19. Nie, X, Wang, D, Pu, Y, Wei, Y, Lu, Q, Yan, H, et al. Endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion. Stroke Vascular Neurol. (2022) 7:190–9. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-001242
20. Nappini, S, Arba, F, Pracucci, G, Saia, V, Caimano, D, Limbucci, N, et al. Bridging versus direct endovascular therapy in basilar artery occlusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2021) 92:956–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325328
21. Asadi, H, Dowling, R, Yan, B, Wong, S, and Mitchell, P. Advances in endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Intern Med J. (2015) 45:798–805. doi: 10.1111/imj.12652
22. Mattle, HP, Arnold, M, Lindsberg, PJ, Schonewille, WJ, and Schroth, G. Basilar artery occlusion. Lancet Neurol. (2011) 10:1002–14. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70229-0
23. Coutinho, JM, Liebeskind, DS, Slater, L-A, Nogueira, RG, Clark, W, Dávalos, A, et al. Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol. (2017) 74:268. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5374
24. Bellwald, S, Weber, R, Dobrocky, T, Nordmeyer, H, Jung, S, Hadisurya, J, et al. Direct mechanical intervention versus bridging therapy in stroke patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke. (2017) 48:3282–8. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.018459
25. Kaesmacher, J, Mordasini, P, Arnold, M, López-Cancio, E, Cerdá, N, Boeckh-Behrens, T, et al. Direct mechanical thrombectomy in Tpa-ineligible and-eligible patients versus the bridging approach: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:20–7. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013834
26. Maingard, J, Shvarts, Y, Motyer, R, Thijs, V, Brennan, P, O'Hare, A, et al. Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy with and without bridging thrombolysis for acute large vessel occlusion ischaemic stroke. Intern Med J. (2019) 49:345–51. doi: 10.1111/imj.14069
27. Ding, Y, Geng, X, Nouh, A, Lee, N, Mazaris, P, Shweikeh, F, et al. Spanning from the west to east: an updated review on endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Aging Dis. (2017) 8:196–202. doi: 10.14336/ad.2016.0807
28. de Havenon, A, Zaidat, OO, Amin-Hanjani, S, Nguyen, TN, Bangad, A, Abbasi, M, et al. Large vessel occlusion stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease: identification, medical and interventional treatment, and outcomes. Stroke. (2023) 54:1695–705. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.122.040008
29. Krasteva, MP, Lau, KK, Mordasini, P, Tsang, ACO, and Heldner, MR. Intracranial atherosclerotic Stenoses: pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors and current therapy options. Adv Ther. (2020) 37:1829–65. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01291-4
30. White, H, Boden-Albala, B, Wang, C, Elkind, MSV, Rundek, T, Wright, CB, et al. Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. Circulation. (2005) 111:1327–31. doi: 10.1161/01.Cir.0000157736.19739.D0
31. Gardener, H, Sacco, RL, Rundek, T, Battistella, V, Cheung, YK, and Elkind, MSV. Race and ethnic disparities in stroke incidence in the northern Manhattan study. Stroke. (2020) 51:1064–9. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.028806
32. Battistella, V, and Elkind, M. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Eur J Neurol. (2014) 21:956–62. doi: 10.1111/ene.12385
33. Evans, NR, Tarkin, JM, Chowdhury, MM, Warburton, EA, and Rudd, JHF. Pet imaging of atherosclerotic disease: advancing plaque assessment from anatomy to pathophysiology. Curr Atheroscler Rep. (2016) 18:30. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0584-3
34. Dolan, JM, Kolega, J, and Meng, H. High Wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: a review. Ann Biomed Eng. (2012) 41:1411–27. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0695-0
35. Langezaal, LCM, van der Hoeven, E, Mont'Alverne, FJA, de Carvalho, JJF, Lima, FO, Dippel, DWJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med. (2021) 384:1910–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030297
36. Schonewille, WJ. Favorable outcomes in endovascular therapy for basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med. (2022) 387:1428–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2210737
37. Desilles, J-P, Loyau, S, Syvannarath, V, Gonzalez-Valcarcel, J, Cantier, M, Louedec, L, et al. Alteplase reduces downstream microvascular thrombosis and improves the benefit of large artery recanalization in stroke. Stroke. (2015) 46:3241–8. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.010721
38. Mueller, L, Pult, F, Meisterernst, J, Heldner, MR, Mono, ML, Kurmann, R, et al. Impact of intravenous thrombolysis on recanalization rates in patients with stroke treated with bridging therapy. Eur J Neurol. (2017) 24:1016–21. doi: 10.1111/ene.13330
39. Fjetland, L, Kurz, KD, Roy, S, and Kurz, MW. Evaluation of the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator pretreatment in acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusions treated with the direct bridging approach. Is it worth the effort? Eur J Neurol. (2014) 22:322–7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12569
40. Yeo, LLL, Holmberg, A, Mpotsaris, A, Söderman, M, Holmin, S, Kuntze Söderqvist, A, et al. Posterior circulation occlusions may be associated with distal emboli during thrombectomy. Clin Neuroradiol. (2018) 29:425–33. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0679-z
Keywords: thrombectomy, intravenous thrombolysis, basilar artery, stroke, endovascular therapy (EVT)
Citation: Tian S, Zou M, Li D, Zhou H, Wang C, Liu Q and Gao L (2024) Efficacy and safety of thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 15:1433158. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1433158
Edited by:
Slaven Pikija, University Hospital Salzburg, AustriaReviewed by:
Xintian Cai, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaYin Huang, Sichuan University, China
Hubert Lee, Trillium Health Partners, Canada
Copyright © 2024 Tian, Zou, Li, Zhou, Wang, Liu and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lianbo Gao, bGJnYW9AY211LmVkdS5jbg==