Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 as an Important Contributor to the Pathophysiology of Depression

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are physiologically expressed in the central nervous system in neurons, astrocytes and microglia, and their aberrant elevation contributes to a number of diseases. Amongst the MMP members, MMP−9 has generated considerable attention because of its possible involvement in inflammatory responses, blood-brain barrier permeability, the regulation of perineuronal nets, demyelination, and synaptic long-term potentiation. Emerging evidence indicate an association between MMP−9 and the syndrome of depression. This review provides an updated and comprehensive summary of the probable roles of MMP−9 in depression with an emphasis on the mechanisms and potential of MMP−9 as a biomarker of depression.

Introduction

The MMPs constitute a large group of zinc-dependent endopeptidases which have the capability of cleaving protein constituents of the extracellular matrix; MMPs may also activate or inactivate particular signaling molecules including adhesion molecules, receptors and growth factors (1, 2). MMP family members are broadly categorized into the following groups of enzymes: collagenases, stromelysins, gelatinases, and membrane-type metalloproteinases (3, 4). They normally exist in an inactive pro-form and require conversion to their active forms (5, 6). The activity of MMPs is also controlled by endogenous inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) (7, 8), and an endogenous stimulator, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) (8, 9). In addition, plasmin can activate MMPs to degrade a range of extracellular matrix molecules (10–12). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) also contribute to MMP activity (13, 14) by activating the preforms of MMPs, or inducing expression of their mRNA through signaling via NF-κB (5).

Activated MMPs are implicated in many processes such as cell survival, signaling, angiogenesis, inflammation, and cell motility (4, 15). They may directly injure brain cells by means of processing death molecules, disrupting myelin, and perpetuating neuroinflammation (4–6).

Among MMP members, the most important may be MMP−9. It is implicated in the remodeling and stabilization of dendritic spines, pre and post-synaptic receptor dynamics, consolidation of long term potentiation, synaptic pruning and myelin formation (16–18). MMP-9 is also involved in the sprouting, pathfinding and regeneration of axons (4, 19). MMP-9 is normally expressed in barely detectable level in the brain but after an injury, it is strongly detected in many cell types including endothelial cells and infiltrated neutrophils (20, 21). MMP-9 (Gelatinase B) is induced after injury through factors such as the c-fos and c-june, immediate early genes and by the cytokines, TNF-α and interleukin-1β (4, 6).

Though the evidence on the deleterious effects of MMPs in neurological diseases is substantial (5, 6, 20), the roles of MMPs in depression remain limited. Recent studies have indeed linked MMP-9 and the symptomatology of depression (22, 23). The aim of this paper is to provide an updated and comprehensive review regarding the role of MMP-9 in the pathology of depression with an emphasis on the probablility that MMP-9 expression could be a potential biomarker of depression.

MMP-9, Neural Structure/Function and Depression

MMPs are important in the reaction of cells to their microenvironment. Both secreted and membrane-bound forms of MMPs are implicated in pericellular proteolysis (24). By the proteolytic degradation or remodeling of extracellular matrix proteins while simultaneously activating cell surface receptor ligands, MMPs affect the differentiation, survival, migration and proliferation of cells; axonal growth and pathfinding of axons are also controlled (25, 26). Thus, MMPs have important functions in wound healing and repair (5).

The extracellular matrix consists of three principal compartments in the CNS: the basement membrane that line blood vessels, perineuronal nets around certain population of neurons, and the interstitial matrix between neural cells (26). MMPs can determine the integrity of the basement membrane and thus the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via degradation of extracellular matrix and basement membrane components (7, 8). As a hallmark of brain trauma/stress injury, the disruption of the BBB is related to the increased permeability of damaged endothelial cells (27), facilitating the entry of inflammatory molecules into the brain. This increased neuroinflammation is thought to mediate, at least in part, the brain abnormalities as well as the cognitive decline in white and gray matter in individuals with bipolar disorder (28). By integrating human and animal data, Najjar et al. linked oxidative stress, endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling, low endothelial nitric oxide levels, and neuroinflammation to putative BBB and neurovascular abnormalities in major depressive disorder (29).

The perineuronal nets around many neurons form a physical structure enwrapping the cell soma and proximal processes, particularly around parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic neurons. The perineuronal net can constitute a barrier to the formation of new synaptic contacts (30, 31). In postnatal development, hyaluronan/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPG)-based extracellular matrix forms perineuronal nets that compartmentalize the neuronal surface, and restricts the surface mobility of integral membrane proteins, including glutamate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (32). Thus, perineuronal nets are involved in synaptic stabilization and limits synaptic plasticity (33). Very long-term memories such as fear conditioning are thought to be stored as hole patterns in the perineuronal net (34). Aberrant perineuronal signaling is proposed to induce CNS dysfunctions such as stroke, epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease (35).

Interestingly, some of the most effective treatments for mood disorders affect extracellular matrix molecules in perineuronal nets (32). In mice at postnatal 4–8 weeks, MMP-9 is inferred to impact cerebellar synaptic plasticity and perineuronal net remodeling, as MMP-9 activity is colocalized with synaptic markers and perineuronal nets (36, 37). MMP-9 decreases the integrity of perineuronal net around cortical neurons and this is associated with increased branching of input excitatory neurons while simultaneously lowering inhibitory input to these cortical neurons (38). Similarly, perineuronal net density around parvalbumin-expressing hippocampal interneurons is elevated in mice with social defeat-induced persistent stress disorder, which was abrogated by a 3-week antidepressant treatment (39). However, whether MMP-9 activity participates in the pathophysiology of depression through perineuronal net remodeling still needs more investigations.

The extension of multiple oligodendroglial branched processes toward axons is a significant event during the early stages of myelination; this prominent output of processes by oligodendrocytes likely requires remodeling of the extracellular matrix and participation of MMPs (40). Larsen et al. showed that an increase in MMP-12 and−9 in early postnatal development was beneficial to regulate myelinogenesis (41). As well, the involvement of MMPs in demyelination has been reported by several groups (42–44). Demyelination has also been reported in neuropsychiatric diseases such as depression and autism (45). If there is subsequent attempt at remyelination, the involvement of MMP-9 may be postulated.

Clinical studies report that cortical synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity is attenuated in major depressive disorders patients, which recover after remission (46). The enduring nature of LTP has been attributed, in part, to long-term structural remodeling of synaptic contacts. For example, growth of new dendritic spines, increased density or formation of multi-synapse boutons, and enlargement of spine heads have all been associated with enduring LTP (47, 48). Activated MMP-9 partially localizes to synapses and has been proposed to modulate hippocampal synapses through integrin receptors; in this regard, blocking integrin function prevents an MMP-9-mediated potentiation of synaptic signal strength (48, 49). Moreover, extracellular conversion of proBDNF to active mBDNF is fundamental for late-phase LTP, and this appears to be mediated by extracellular proteases including plasmin/tissue plasminogen activator and/or MMP-9 (50). These observations suggest strongly that MMP-9-related LTP formation may be linked with depression (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. The role of MMP-9 in the pathology of depression. MMP-9 is elevated in endothelial cells and neutrophils during inflammation. (A) Excessive MMP-9 is thought to be involved in demyelination associated with depression. (B) MMP-9 disrupts BBB through tight junction proteins or basement membrane degradation, which increases neuroinflammation and may be linked to depression or bipolar disorders with cognitive decline. (C) Activated MMP-9 localizes in part to synapses and is involved in synaptic pruning essential for longterm potentiation (LTP), and attenuation of cortical synaptic LTP-like plasticity; collectively, these are thought to contribute to depression. (D) MMP-9 remodels perineuronal nets that participate in synaptic stabilization and limit synaptic plasticity. Depression may occur when perineuronal net signaling is aberrant.

MMP-9 Gene Polymorphisms and Depression

MMP-9 gene functional polymorphisms may influence MMP-9 concentration, and MMP-9 activity highly depends on its expression level. The MMP-9 gene is located on chromosome 20q12.2–13.1, and it has three major polymorphisms in the untranslated, coding and promoter regions. Among these, the C-1562T (rs 3918242) polymorphism in the promoter region is of interest (51), because the promoter activity in driving gene expression is higher in the T-1562 allele than in the C-1562 allele (52). Galal et al. indicated that MMP-9 levels associated with CC genotype (C-1562T) polymorphism is significantly increased compared with CT genotype (51). Rybakowski et al. analyzed the functional-1562 C/T polymorphism genotype in a cohort of 416 patients with bipolar mood disorder and 558 healthy control subjects. T allele of the −1562 C/T polymorphism in the MMP-9 had a higher preponderance vs. the C allele in patients with bipolar mood disorder compared to healthy control subjects. Seventy five patients with bipolar disorder type II in a subgroup has much higher frequency of the T allele compared to the healthy group (53). In another study, Bobińska et al. examined 203 individuals suffering from depression and 99 healthy control individuals (54). The presence of the T-1702A polymorphism for MMP-9 elevates the risk of recurrent depression for the T allele and T/T genotype, whereas the A allele and A/A genotype decrease this recurrence. The C allele and C/C genotype of the C1562T MMP-9 polymorphism increase the risk of depression in midlife, while the T allele lowers this risk. In the case of a set of T/T-G/C genotypes of the MMP-9 TIMP-2G-418C and T-1702A polymorphisms, a higher incidence was also noted (54). These evidence support MMP-9 as a pathological mediator in depression. Further studies focusing on alterations of MMPs over the course of depression are warranted and required.

MMP-9 as a Biomarker for Depression

Besides gene polymorphisms, alteration of MMP-9 levels has also been reported in depressive patients (Table 1). Yoshida et al. enrolled 69 patients with major depressive disorder and 78 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals. Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels were significantly lower in patients with major depressive disorders than those in healthy individuals. In contrast, the serum levels of MMP-9 and proBDNF did not differ between patients and healthy subjects. Interestingly, these authors noted a positive correlation between the severity of depression and serum MMP-9 levels in patients with major depressive disorders. Increased MMP-9 expression was considered to be as a compensatory response to reduction of mature BDNF in patients with major depressive disorder (56).

TABLE 1

Table 1. MMP-9 as a potential biomarker for depression—results from clinical studies.

In another study, Domenici et al. reported that MMP-9 in serum was significantly higher in patients with major depressive disorders (n = 245) vs. controls (60). Rybakowski et al. performed a study on 54 in-patients with bipolar mood disorder and 29 control subjects. An increase of serum MMP-9 at the early stages of bipolar illness is found to accompany only the depressive episodes and not manic ones. Elevated levels of serum MMP-9 during depression in young patients may indicate that this phenomenon is a potential biochemical marker for the staging of bipolar disorder. The reason for the change in MMP-9 only at one stage of bipolar disorder is not known (61). Bobińska et al. examined a population comprised of 142 individuals suffering from depression and 100 control individuals. For all measured MMPs (MMP-9, MMP-2, MMP-7) and TIMP-2 in blood, increased gene expression was statistically more significant at the mRNA level in patients with depression as compared to control individuals (62). Domenici et al. conducted multiple analyte profiling of plasma samples from 245 depression patients and 254 controls. Increased MMP-9 levels, and to a lesser extent decreased MMP-2 levels, were documented in the depression group (55). In contrast, opposite observations have also been noted. Bobińska et al. reported decreased expression of transcripts and proteins of MMP-9, MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in blood in depression (63).

Some studies also reported no obvious correlation between MMP-9 level and depression. Platelet immunomodulatory and inflammatory properties are mediated through bioactive molecules mainly stored in cytoplasm and platelet granules. MMP-9 is found mainly in the cytosol of platelets. No group differences between major depressive disorders and controls were found for MMP-9 in platelets (58). Chiarani et al. recruited 20 patients with bipolar disorder and 20 control subjects that were matched for age and sex. They measured MMP levels in blood using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Pattern of MMP-9 expression has no difference between patients with bipolar disorder and control group (57). Large-scale multicenter studies are still necessary to analyse the role of MMP-9 as a contributor for depression.

Hemorrhagic transformation is exacerbated by thrombolytic therapy, which is a common complication of ischemic stroke. Jickling et al. proposed that early hemorrhagic transformation (<18 to 24 hours after stroke onset) is related to brain-derived MMP-2 and leukocyte-derived MMP-9 promotes BBB disruption and damage the neurovascular unit (64). It is proposed that the combination of tissue plasminogen activator along with an MMP-9 inhibitor can be beneficial in ischemic stroke (65). There are constitutively expressed MMPs that initiate the injury cascade early in the acute hypoxic/ischemic phase and inducible MMPs that perpetuate the damage over h and days (66). Thus, MMP-9 may be involved in the pathophysiologic process of stroke. Interestingly, there is emerging evidence of a bi-directional relationship between depression and cerebrovascular diseases, both of which are common conditions in older humans. In the first month after stroke, the frequency of post-stroke depression is highest, and remains high even several years later (67). Although MMP-9 may be involved in the pathophysiologic process of stroke and depression, whether it plays an important role in depression after stroke is uncertain. Furthermore, no evidence has been found to support the use of a particular biomarker for post-stroke depression (68).

Stress and MMP-9 Activity

Stress is a risk factor for the development of psychopathologies characterized by deregulated social behaviors and cognitive dysfunction. Using a blister chamber wound model on human forearm skin exposed to UV-B, Yanga et al. found that depressive symptoms were reliably related to modulation of either TIMP or MMP expression. Moreover, activation of the sympathetic–adrenal medullary and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axes can modulate levels of MMPs (69). In another depressive-like model, chronic mild stress decreased the concentration of the mature form of NGF and increased the active forms of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the rat hypothalamus. Activated MMP-9 and MMP-2 cleaved the mature but not the pro-form of NGF into biologically inactive products (70).

Similarly, MMP-9-related gelatinase activity was elevated in the hippocampal CA1 of chronic restraint-stressed rats. Consistently, intra-CA1 administration of an MMP-9 inhibitor during stress exposure prevented the development of stress-induced deficits in social memory, social exploration and CA1-dependent cognition (71). However, in prenatal stress induced depressive-like rat model, gelatin zymography showed no significant change of MMP-9 and MMP-2 activity of both sexes (72). Further studies are necessary to determine the link between underlying mechanisms of stress and MMP-9.

Antidepressants/Electro-Convulsive Therapy and MMP-9 Activity

Accumulated studies suggest that antidepressants may influence MMP-9 activity. For example, the antidepressant imipramine is reported to elevate the expression of MMPs to cleave perineuronal net proteins and affect inhibitory input to parvalbumin neurons in the hippocampus (37). Many antidepressants affect serotonergic neurotransmission and it is reported that stimulation of serotonin 5-HT7 receptor activated MMP-9 which cleaved the CD44 hyaluronan receptor on neurons leading to activation of the GTPase Cdc42; the authors proposed that this MMP-9-mediated pathway promoted synaptic pruning and impaired LTP, and caused reversal learning (73). Puscian et al. combined a study of neuronal plasticity in the central and basolateral amygdala with an automated assessment of motivation and learning in mice. They indicate that chronic treatment with fluoxetine in unstressed mice attenuated MMP-9-dependent plasticity in the central amygdala, while increasing perineuronal net-dependent plasticity in the basolateral amygdala (74). Alaiyed et al. reported that MMP-9 levels were elevated in prefrontal cortex of antidepressant-treated patients with major depressive disorders (38).

The clinical effects of lithium are well-understood, as it has been used in bipolar patients for over 60 years. Treatment of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with lithium (2.5 mM for 1 day) selectively increased the protein/enzymatic and transcript levels of MMP-9. It was further demonstrated that lithium promoted migration of MSCs by up-regulation of MMP-9 through GSK-3β inhibition in rodents (75).

The antidepressant amitriptyline is reported in astrocglial cells to evoke glial-derived neurtotrophic factor production through a mechanism that is independent of monoamines, via activation of a pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/o/MMP/fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)/FRS2α/ERK cascade (76). Whether amitriptyline affects MMP expression or enzymatic activity remains to be identified. Another study showed that treatment with amitriptyline elevated zymographic MMP-9 activity without changing MMP-9 transcripts in C6 cells, and that MMP-3 was necessary to activate MMP-9 (77, 78).

Shibasaki et al. analyzed serum obtained from 21 patients with major depressive disorders and 40 healthy controls. Serum levels of TIMPs and MMPs were quantified by ELISA. These levels did not significantly differ from those of the control group before electro-convulsive therapy (ECT), but MMP-9 level was significantly reduced after ECT. Moreover, a significant positive correlation was observed between Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores and MMP-9 level in the serum (79). Benekareddy et al. demonstrated that chronic and acute ECT differentially regulated the transcript levels of TIMPs 1-4 and MMP-2/9 in rodents, and that ECT also increased activity of MMP-2/9 in the hippocampus. Chronic and acute pharmacological antidepressants, on the other hand, altered the expression of TIMPs without any observed impact on hippocampal MMP-2/9 activity or expression (80).

MMP-9 Inhibitors and Depression

Based on it being an MMP-9 inhibitor and microglial activation blocker (81), the tetracycline antibiotic minocycline has been proposed for the treatment of depressive symptoms as well as negative symptoms in schizophrenia (82–84). It has been reported in rodents that minocycline reduced the effect of stress on working memory and neuronal activation, as well as microglial activation (37, 85). In the forced swimming test, minocycline produced antidepressant-like actions; subthreshold doses of both minocycline and desipramine in combination produced antidepressant-like actions (84, 86). In the testicular torsion/detorsion induced depression model and in the forced swimming test in rats, 160 mg/kg minocycline showed high antidepressant-like effect (84, 86). The nitric oxide/cGMP pathway was implicated in testicular torsion/detorsion-induced depressive-like behavior and minocycline had an antidepressant-like activity in this model (87). Repeated exposure to malathion leads to depressive-like behavior and minocycline significantly decreased immobility times in the tail suspension test and forced swimming test, associated with decreased hippocampal nitrite concentration (87). These investigations suggest an essential role for NO/cGMP pathway in antidepressant-like effect of minocycline in malathion-induced depressive-like behavior (88). Similarly, infusion of minocycline into the cerebral ventricle of learned helplessness rats induced antidepressant-like effects (89). Furthermore, in a rat model beginning 3 d before chronic unpredictable stress therapy and continuing through the behavioral testing period, chronic treatment with minocycline (120 mg/kg per day) prevented impairments of LTP induction and spatial memory (90). In another study, both chronic mild stressed rats or controls received twice intracerebroventricular injection of minocycline (160 μg) or vehicle. Minocycline was found to have neuroprotective effects through regulating energy metabolism and reducing oxidative damage in specific brain areas (91). In addition, chronic but not acute minocycline administration attenuated olfactory bulbectomized-induced depressive-like behavior (92, 93).

The above preclinical results are consistent with clinical studies. Soczynska et al. provided the rationale for organizing a randomized, controlled trial to examine the antidepressant properties of minocycline (94). Nettis et al. conducted a 4-week, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of minocycline (200 mg/d) added to antidepressant therapy in 39 patients selected for elevated levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP ≥ 1 mg/L); the authors found efficacy of add-on minocycline therapy in patients with major depressive disorder, but only in those with low grade inflammation defined as CRP ≥ 3 mg/L (95). In a 6-week, open-label study, 150 mg/day minocycline in combination with antidepressants (paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline) produced improvement in depression scores (96).

However, there are contradictory results concerning the antidepressant effects of minocycline. In C57BL/6 mice, minocycline (20–40 mg/kg, i.p.) did not cause anxiolytic - or antidepressant -like behavioral changes in contrast to mice treated with imipramine (20 mg/kg, depressive-like behavior) or diazepam (0.5 mg/kg, anxiety tests) (97). Furthermore, 266 patients were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib plus minocycline (n = 68), placebo plus minocycline (n = 66), placebo plus celecoxib (n = 66), or placebo plus placebo (n = 66). This double-blind, 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial indicated that decreases in HAMD-17 was not different for patients treated with celecoxib or minocycline (98). Similarly, Krynicki et al. conducted a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in 207 patients within 5 years of onset of schizophrenia, and found that minocycline did not affect any scores including depression and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (99).

Concluding Remarks

MMP-9 plays important roles in BBB integrity, perineuronal net remodeling, myelinogenesis, and synaptic physiology. Clinical studies suggest that MMP-9 gene polymorphisms are related to depressive symptoms, and altered MMP-9 levels are observed in depressed patients and in depressive-like animal models (51–54). It is to be noted that the literature on MMP-9 is more established for bipolar disorder rather than depression. Nonetheless, accumulated studies indicate that serum MMP-9 may be a novel therapeutic target and biomarker for depression (55–57, 60–63), although a cautionary note is that blood level of MMP-9 may not directly correlate with brain MMP-9 content. MMP-9 appears to be a target for classical antidepressant treatments and MMP-9 inhibitors possess potential therapeutic effects for depression.

In summary, we suggest MMP-9 to be an important factor in depression, not only as a therapeutic target but also as a biomarker in the condition.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing or revising of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The authors acknowledge operating grant support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82071331, 81870942, and 81520108011), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1312200) (MX), and from the Canadian Institutes of Health Sciences (VY).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CNS, central nervous system; MMP−9, Matrix metalloproteinase-9; PNNs, perineuronal nets; MMPs, Matrix metalloproteinases; TIMPs, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; EMMPRIN, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; LTP, long term potentiation; BM, basement membrane; BDNF, brain derived neurotrophic factor; BBB, Brain-blood barrier; TJPs, tight junction proteins; BD, bipolar disorder; CSPG, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; NGF, Nerve growth factor; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptors; HAMD, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.

References

1. McCawley, Matrisian L. Matrix metalloproteinases: they're not just for matrix anymore!. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2001) 13:534–40. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00248-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Verslegers M, Lemmens K, Van Hove I, Moons L. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and−9 as promising benefactors in development, plasticity and repair of the nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. (2013) 105:60–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Nelson A, Fingleton B, Rothenberg ML, Matrisian LM. Matrix metalloproteinases: biologic activity and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. (2000) 18:1135–49. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.5.1135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lattanzi S, Di Napoli M, Ricci S, Divani AA. Matrix metalloproteinases in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurotherapeutics. (2020) 17:484–96. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00839-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yong V, Power C, Forsyth P, Edwards DR. Metalloproteinases in biology and pathology of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2001) 2:502–11. doi: 10.1038/35081571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Rosenberg G. Matrix metalloproteinases in neuroinflammation. Glia. (2002) 39:279–91. doi: 10.1002/glia.10108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Łukaszewicz-Zajac M, Mroczko B, Słowik A. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). J Neural Transm. (2014) 121:1387–97. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1205-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ulbrich P, Khoshneviszadeh M, Jandke S, Schreiber S, Dityatev A. Interplay between perivascular and perineuronal extracellular matrix remodelling in neurological and psychiatric diseases. Eur J Neurosci. (2021) 53:3811–30. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ge H, Yuan W, Liu J, He Q, Ding S, Pu J, et al. Functional relevance of protein glycosylation to the pro-inflammatory effects of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) on monocytes/macrophages. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0117463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Castellino F, Plasmin. In: Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND, Woessner JF, editors. Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes. San Diego,CA: Academic Press (1998). p. 190–9.

Google Scholar

11. Indyk J, Chen ZL, Strickland S. Proteases and degradation of extracellular matrix in neurodegeneration. Fibrinol Proteol. (1999) 13:64–71. doi: 10.1016/S0268-9499(99)90081-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wu J, Heemskerk JWM, Baaten C. Platelet membrane receptor proteolysis: implications for platelet function. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 7:608391. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.608391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rajagopalan S, Meng XP, Ramasamy S, Harrison DG, Galis ZS. Reactive oxygen species produced by macrophage-derived foam cells regulate the activity of vascular matrix metalloproteinases in vitro. implications for atherosclerotic plaque stability. J Clin Invest. (1996) 98:2572–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI119076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kapoor C, Vaidya S, Wadhwan V, Kaur G, Pathak A. Seesaw of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). J Cancer Res Ther. (2016) 12:28–35. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.157337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. (2002) 2:161–74. doi: 10.1038/nrc745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Michaluk P, Wawrzyniak M, Alot P, Szczot M, Wyrembek P, Mercik K, et al. Influence of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 on dendritic spine morphology. J Cell Sci. (2011) 124:3369–80. doi: 10.1242/jcs.090852

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Magnowska M, Gorkiewicz T, Suska A, Wawrzyniak M, Rutkowska-Wlodarczyk I, Kaczmarek L, et al. Transient ECM protease activity promotes synaptic plasticity. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:27757. doi: 10.1038/srep27757

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Szepesi Z, Hosy E, Ruszczycki B, Bijata M, Pyskaty M, Bikbaev A, et al. Synaptically released matrix metalloproteinase activity in control of structural plasticity and the cell surface distribution of GluA1-AMPA receptors. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e98274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Reinhard S, Razak K, Ethell IM. A delicate balance: role of MMP-9 in brain development and pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. (2015) 9:280. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Romanic A, White RF, Arleth AJ, Ohlstein EH, Barone FC. Matrix metalloproteinase expression increases after cerebral focal ischemia in rats - inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9 reduces infarct size. Stroke. (1998) 29:1020–30. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.5.1020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Xue M, Yong VW. Matrix metalloproteinases in intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurol Res. (2008) 30:775–82. doi: 10.1179/174313208X341102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Beroun A, Mitra S, Michaluk P, Pijet B, Stefaniuk M, Kaczmarek L. MMPs in learning and memory and neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2019) 76:3207–28. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03180-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Vafadari B, Salamian A, Kaczmarek L. MMP-9 in translation: from molecule to brain physiology, pathology, and therapy. J Neurochem. (2016) 139(Suppl. 2):91–114. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Baker A, Edwards DR, Murphy G. Metalloproteinase inhibitors: biological actions and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Sci. (2002) 115:3719–27. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Watanabe N, Ikeda U. Matrix metalloproteinases and atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. (2004) 6:112–20. doi: 10.1007/s11883-004-0099-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lau LW, Cua R, Keough MB, Haylock-Jacobs S, Yong VW. Pathophysiology of the brain extracellular matrix: a new target for remyelination. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2013) 14:722–9. doi: 10.1038/nrn3550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Yang F, Zhao K, Zhang X, Zhang J, Xu B. ATP induces disruption of tight junction proteins via IL-1 beta-dependent MMP-9 activation of human blood-brain barrier in vitro. Neural Plast. (2016) 2016:8928530. doi: 10.1155/2016/8928530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Patel J, Frey BN. Disruption in the blood-brain barrier: the missing link between brain and body inflammation in bipolar disorder?. Neural Plast. (2015) 2015:708306. doi: 10.1155/2015/708306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Najjar S, Pearlman DM, Devinsky O, Najjar A, Zagzag D. Neurovascular unit dysfunction with blood-brain barrier hyperpermeability contributes to major depressive disorder: a review of clinical and experimental evidence. J Neuroinflammation. (2013) 10:142. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Soleman S, Filippov MA, Dityatev A, Fawcett JW. Targeting the neural extracellular matrix in neurological disorders. Neuroscience. (2013) 253:194–213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.08.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Deepa S, Carulli D, Galtrey C, Rhodes K, Fukuda J, Mikami T, et al. Composition of perineuronal net extracellular matrix in rat brain: a different disaccharide composition for the net-associated proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. (2006) 281:17789–800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600544200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pantazopoulos H, Berretta S. In sickness and in health: Perineuronal nets and synaptic plasticity in psychiatric disorders. Neural Plast. (2016) 2016:9847696. doi: 10.1155/2016/9847696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Albiñana E, Gutierrez-Luengo J, Hernández-Juarez N, Baraibar AM, Montell E, Vergés J, et al. Chondroitin sulfate induces depression of synaptic transmission and modulation of neuronal plasticity in rat hippocampal slices. Neural Plast. (2015) 2015:463854. doi: 10.1155/2015/463854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Tsien R. Very long-term memories may be stored in the pattern of holes in the perineuronal net. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2013) 110:12456–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310158110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Miao Q, Ye Q, Zhang XH. Perineuronal net, CSPG receptor and their regulation of neural plasticity. Sheng Li Xue Bao. (2014) 66:387–97.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Stamenkovic V, Stamenkovic S, Jaworski T, Gawlak M, Jovanovic M, Jakovcevski I, et al. The extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin-C and matrix metalloproteinases modify cerebellar structural plasticity by exposure to an enriched environment. Brain Struct Funct. (2017) 222:393–415. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1224-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Alaiyed S, Conant K. A Role for Matrix Metalloproteases in Antidepressant Efficacy. Front Mol Neurosci. (2019) 12:117. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Alaiyed S, McCann M, Mahajan G, Rajkowska G, Stockmeier CA, Kellar KJ, et al. Venlafaxine Stimulates an MMP-9-dependent increase in Excitatory/Inhibitory balance in a stress model of depression. J Neurosci. (2020) 40:4418–31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2387-19.2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Riga D, Kramvis I, Koskinen MK, van Bokhoven P, van der Harst JE, Heistek TS, et al. Hippocampal extracellular matrix alterations contribute to cognitive impairment associated with a chronic depressive-like state in rats. Sci Transl Med. (2017) 9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai8753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Sisková Z, Yong VW, Nomden A, van Strien M, Hoekstra D, Baron W. Fibronectin attenuates process outgrowth in oligodendrocytes by mislocalizing MMP-9 activity. Mol Cell Neurosci. (2009) 42:234–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Larsen P, DaSilva AG, Conant K, Yong VW. Myelin formation during development of the CNS is delayed in matrix metalloproteinase-9 and−12 null mice. J Neurosci. (2006) 26:2207–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1880-05.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Gorter RP, Baron W. Matrix metalloproteinases shape the oligodendrocyte (niche) during development and upon demyelination. Neurosci Lett. (2020) 729:134980. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. de Jong JM, Wang P, Oomkens M, Baron W. Remodeling of the interstitial extracellular matrix in white matter multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for remyelination (failure). J Neurosci Res. (2020) 98:1370–97. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Brkic M, Balusu S, Libert C, vandenbroucke RE. Friends or foes: matrix metalloproteinases and their multifaceted roles in Neurodegenerative diseases. Mediators Inflamm. (2015) 2015:620581. doi: 10.1155/2015/620581

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Fumagalli M, Lecca D, Abbracchio MP. CNS remyelination as a novel reparative approach to neurodegenerative diseases: the roles of purinergic signaling and the P2Y-like receptor GPR17. Neuropharmacology. (2016) 104:82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kuhn M, Mainberger F, Feige B, Maier JG, Mall V, Jung NH, et al. State-Dependent partial occlusion of cortical LTP-Like plasticity in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2016) 41:2794. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.97

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Szklarczyk A, Lapinska J, Rylski M, McKay RD, Kaczmarek L. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 undergoes expression and activation during dendritic remodeling in adult hippocampus. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:920–30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00920.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Wiera G, Mozrzymas JW. Extracellular Metalloproteinases in the plasticity of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Cells. (2021) 10. doi: 10.3390/cells10082055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Nagy V, Bozdagi O, Matynia A, Balcerzyk M, Okulski P, Dzwonek J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is required for hippocampal late-phase long-term potentiation and memory. J Neurosci. (2006) 26:1923–34. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4359-05.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Guo J, Ji Y, Ding Y, Jiang W, Sun Y, Lu B, et al. Pro-Peptide regulates dendritic spines via caspase-3. Cell Death Dis. (2016) 7:e2264. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Galal A, Fadel FI, Mokhtar E, Elshamaa MF, Elghoroury EA, Kamel S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 levels in children on hemodialysis: association with MMP-9 C-1562T gene polymorphism and vitamin D levels. Int J Biomed Sci. (2016) 12:95–104.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

52. Buraczynska K, Kurzepa J, Ksiazek A, Buraczynska M, Rejdak K. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) Gene Polymorphism in Stroke Patients. Neuromolecular Med. (2015) 17:385–90. doi: 10.1007/s12017-015-8367-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Rybakowski J. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9)-a mediating enzyme in cardiovascular disease, cancer, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol. (2009) 2009:904836. doi: 10.1155/2009/904836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Bobińska K, Szemraj J, Czarny P, Gałecki P. Role of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 in the development of recurrent depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. (2016) 205:119–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Domenici E, Willé DR, Tozzi F, Prokopenko I, Miller S, McKeown A, et al. Plasma protein biomarkers for depression and schizophrenia by multi analyte profiling of case-control collections. PLoS ONE. (2010) 5:e9166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Yoshida T, Ishikawa M, Niitsu T, Nakazato M, Watanabe H, Shiraishi T, et al. Decreased serum levels of mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), but not its precursor proBDNF, in patients with major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e42676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042676

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Chiarani F, Fries GR, Stertz L, Ceresér KM, Wyse AT, Kapczinski FP, et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in patients with bipolar disorder. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. (2013) 35:375–9. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Hüfner K, Koudouovoh-Tripp P, Kandler C, Hochstrasser T, Malik P, Giesinger J, et al. Differential changes in platelet reactivity induced by acute physical compared to persistent mental stress. Physiol Behav. (2015) 151:284–91. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Chandrasekaran V, Subramanian K, Kattimani S, Nandheesha H, Sarkar S, Penchilaiya V. Relationship between matrix metalloproteinase-9 and lifetime history of suicidal behavior in remitted patients with bipolar I disorder: a cross-sectional pilot study. Indian J Psychol Med. (2020) 42:200–2. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_320_19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Frye M, Nassan M, Jenkins GD, Kung S, Veldic M, Palmer BA, et al. Feasibility of investigating differential proteomic expression indepression: implications for biomarker development in mooddisorders. Transl Psychiatry. (2015) 5:e689. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Rybakowski J, Remlinger-Molenda A, Czech-Kucharska A, Wojcicka M, Michalak M, Losy J. Increased serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels in young patients during bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. (2013) 146:286–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Bobińska K, Szemraj J, Czarny P, Gałecki P. Expression and activity of metalloproteinases in depression. Med Sci Monit. (2016) 22:1334–41. doi: 10.12659/MSM.895978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Bobińska K, Szemraj J, Gałecki P, Talarowska M. The role of MMP genes in recurrent depressive disorders and cognitive functions. Acta Neuropsychiatr. (2016) 28:221–31. doi: 10.1017/neu.2015.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Jickling G, Liu D, Stamova B, Ander BP, Zhan X, Lu A, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke in animals and humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2014) 34:185–99. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Chaturvedi M, Kaczmarek L. Mmp-9 inhibition: a therapeutic strategy in ischemic stroke. Mol Neurobiol. (2014) 49:563–73. doi: 10.1007/s12035-013-8538-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Yang Y. Rosenberg GA. Matrix metalloproteinases as therapeutic targets for stroke. Brain Res. (2015) 1623:30–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Gothe F, Enache D, Wahlund LO, Winblad B, Crisby M, Lokk J, et al. Cerebrovascular diseases and depression: epidemiology, mechanisms and treatment. Panminerva Med. (2012) 54:161–70.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

68. PietraPedroso V, Rachid MA, Teixeira AL. Biomarkers in post-stroke depression. Curr Neurovasc Res. (2016) 13:63–73. doi: 10.2174/1567202613666160219120114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Yang E, Bane CM, MacCallum RC, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Malarkey WB, Glaser R. Stress-related modulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression. J Neuroimmunol. (2002) 133:144–50. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00270-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kucharczyk M, Kurek A, Detka J, Slusarczyk J, Papp M, Tota K, et al. Chronic mild stress influences nerve growth factor through a matrix metalloproteinase-dependent mechanism. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2016) 66:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.12.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. van der Kooij M, Fantin M, Rejmak E, Grosse J, Zanoletti O, Fournier C, et al. Role for MMP-9 in stress-induced downregulation of nectin-3 in hippocampal CA1 and associated behavioural alterations. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:4995. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Yeh C, Huang CC, Hsu KS. Prenatal stress alters hippocampal synaptic plasticity in young rat offspring through preventing the proteolytic conversion of pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to mature BDNF. J Physiol. (2012) 590:991–1010. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Bijata M, Labus J, Guseva D, Stawarski M, Butzlaff M, Dzwonek J, et al. Synaptic remodeling depends on signaling between serotonin receptors and the extracellular matrix. Cell Rep. (2017) 19:1767–82. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Puscian A, Winiarski M, Leski S, Charzewski L, Nikolaev T, Borowska J, et al. Chronic fluoxetine treatment impairs motivation and reward learning by affecting neuronal plasticity in the central amygdala. Br J Pharmacol. (2021) 178:672–88. doi: 10.1111/bph.15319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Chuang D, Wang Z, Chiu CT. GSK-3 as a target for lithium-induced neuroprotection against excitotoxicity in neuronal cultures and animal models of ischemic stroke. Front Mol Neurosci. (2011) 4:15. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Hisaoka-Nakashima K, Miyano K, Matsumoto C, Kajitani N, Abe H, Okada-Tsuchioka M, et al. Tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline-induced glial Cell line-derived neurotrophic factor production involves pertussis toxin-sensitive Gαi/o activation in astroglial cells. J Biol Chem. (2015) 290:13678–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.622415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Ragguett RM, Tamura JK, McIntyre RS. Keeping up with the clinical advances: depression. CNS Spectr. (2019) 24:25–37. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Abe H, Hisaoka-Nakashima K, Kajitani N, Okada-Tsuchioka M, Yano R, Itagaki K, et al. TakebayashiM. The expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA by antidepressants involves matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation in rat astroglial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2016) 479:907–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Shibasaki C, Takebayashi M, Itagaki K, Abe H, Kajitani N, Okada-Tsuchioka M, et al. Altered serum levels of matrix Metalloproteinase-2,−9 in response to Electroconvulsive therapy for mood disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2016) 19: 1–3. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Benekareddy M, Mehrotra P, Kulkarni VA, Ramakrishnan P, Dias BG, Vaidya VA. Antidepressant treatments regulate matrix metalloproteinases-2 and−9 (MMP-2/MMP-9) and tissue inhibitors of the metalloproteinases (TIMPS 1-4) in the adult rat hippocampus. Synapse. (2008) 62:590–600. doi: 10.1002/syn.20529

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Tan W, Bird LM. Angelman syndrome: current and emerging therapies in 2016. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. (2016) 172:384-401. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Husain M, Chaudhry IB, Rahman RR, Hamirani MM, Qurashi I, Khoso AB, et al. Minocycline as an adjunct for treatment resistant depressive symptoms: study protocolfor a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. (2015) 16:410. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0933-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Pae C, Marks DM, Han C, Patkar AA. Does minocycline have antidepressant effect?. Biomed Pharmacother. (2008) 62:308–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Rosenblat JD, McIntyre RS. Efficacy and tolerability of minocycline for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Affect Disord. (2018) 227:219–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Hinwood M, Morandini J, Day TA, Walker FR. Evidence that microglia mediate the neurobiological effects of chronic psychological stress on the medial prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. (2012) 22:1442–54. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Molina-Hernández M, Tellez-Alcántara NP, Pérez-García J, Olivera-Lopez JI, Jaramillo-Jaimes MT. Antidepressant-like actions of minocycline combined with several glutamate antagonists. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2008) 32:380–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Saravi S, Mousavi SE, Saravi SS, Dehpour AR. Minocycline Attenuates depressive-like behaviour induced by rat model of testicular torsion: involvement of nitric oxide pathway. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. (2016) 118:249–58. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12489

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Saeedi Saravi S, Amirkhanloo R, Arefidoust A, Yaftian R, Saeedi Saravi SS, Shokrzadeh M, et al. On the effect of minocycline on the depressive-like behavior of mice repeatedly exposed to malathion: interaction between nitric oxide and cholinergic system. Metab Brain Dis. (2016) 31:549–61. doi: 10.1007/s11011-015-9764-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Arakawa S, Shirayama Y, Fujita Y, Ishima T, Horio M, Muneoka K, et al. Minocycline produced antidepressant-like effects on the learned helplessness rats with alterations in levels of monoamine in the amygdala and no changes in BDNF levels in the hippocampus at baseline. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2012) 100:601–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Liu M, Li J, Dai P, Zhao F, Zheng G, Jing J, et al. Microglia activation regulates GluR1 phosphorylation in chronic unpredictable stress-induced cognitive dysfunction. Stress. (2015) 18:96–106. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2014.995085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Réus G, Abelaira HM, Maciel AL, Dos Santos MA, Carlessi AS, Steckert AV, et al. Minocycline protects against oxidative damage and alters energy metabolism parameters in the brain of rats subjected to chronic mild stress. Metab Brain Dis. (2015) 30:545–53. doi: 10.1007/s11011-014-9602-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Roman M, Irwin MR. Novel neuroimmunologic therapeutics in depression: a clinical perspective on what we know so far. Brain Behav Immun. (2020) 83:7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.09.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Burke N, Kerr DM, Moriarty O, Finn DP, Roche M. Minocycline modulates neuropathic pain behaviour and cortical M1-M2 microglial gene expression in a rat model of depression. Brain Behav Immun. (2014) 42:147–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.06.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Sisková Z, Yong VW, Nomden A, van Strien M, Hoekstra D, Baron W, et al. Novel therapeutic targets in depression: minocycline as a candidate treatment. Behav Brain Res. (2012) 235:302–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.07.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Nettis MA, Lombardo G, Hastings C, Zajkowska Z, Mariani N, Nikkheslat N, et al. Augmentation therapy with minocycline in treatment-resistant depression patients with low-grade peripheral inflammation: results from a double-blind randomised clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2021) 46:939–48. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00948-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Miyaoka T, Wake R, Furuya M, Liaury K, Ieda M, Kawakami K, et al. Minocycline as adjunctive therapy for patients with unipolar psychotic depression: an open-label study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2012) 37:222–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Vogt M, Mallien AS, Pfeiffer N, Inta I, Gass P, Inta D. Minocycline does not evoke anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res. (2016) 301:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Husain MI, Chaudhry IB, Khoso AB, Husain MO, Hodsoll J, Ansari MA, et al. Minocycline and celecoxib as adjunctive treatments for bipolar depression: a multicentre, factorial design randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. (2020) 7:515–27. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30138-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Krynicki CR, Dazzan P, Pariante CM, Barnes NM, Vincent RC, Roberts A, et al. Deconstructing depression and negative symptoms of schizophrenia; differential and longitudinal immune correlates, and response to minocycline treatment. Brain Behav Immun. (2021) 91:498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.10.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar