Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Cell. Neurosci. , 27 February 2025

Sec. Non-Neuronal Cells

Volume 19 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2025.1575105

This article is part of the Research Topic Glial Cells in Homeostasis, Neurodevelopment, and Repair View all 9 articles

Editorial: Glial cells in homeostasis, neurodevelopment, and repair

  • 1Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
  • 2Dominique P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
  • 3Department of Medicine and Surgery, Libera Università Mediterranea ”Giuseppe Degennaro“, Casamassima, Italy

The widely accepted concept of the neurovascular unit suggests that proper brain function relies on dynamic communication and homeostatic signaling among neurons, glial cells, and vascular compartment. This Research Topic aims to deepen the understanding of the molecular mechanisms and functional dynamics of these cells, shedding light on brain homeostasis alterations caused by ischemic or traumatic injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, it seeks to give new insights into the development of effective therapeutic strategies.

Glial cells, including astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocytes, play crucial roles in regulating synaptic function, providing metabolic support, forming myelin sheaths for signal transduction, and contributing to the immune response of the central nervous system (CNS) (Liu et al., 2023). Additionally, they are key players in disease and post-traumatic recovery processes: microglia serve as the primary source of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Conti et al., 2020), astrocytes regulate synaptic homeostasis, permeability of the blood-brain-barrier to water and solutes and glial scar formation following injury (Chung et al., 2024; Sofroniew, 2009; Pekny et al., 2019), while oligodendrocytes influence signal conduction speed through changes in myelin thickness (Miyata, 2019).

The systematic review by Amlerova et al. summarizes the current knowledge on the complex molecular and cellular processes of reactive gliosis following traumatic brain injury (TBI), highlighting its dual role of providing neuroprotection but also being potentially harmful due to the release of growth factors and cytokines by reactive glia. Indeed, while reactive gliosis aids tissue repair, immune modulation and homeostasis, it can also exacerbate neuroinflammation and neurological deficits. Given that current therapies mainly address symptoms rather than targeting the molecular and cellular mechanisms of damage, the ability to modulate neuroinflammatory processes would be crucial to develop effective therapeutic approaches that balance their beneficial or detrimental effects. Glia-targeted treatments are currently promising, such as senolytic compounds that target senescent cells to improve cognition, and transcription factors used to reprogram astrocytes or NG2 glia and support post-injury neurogenesis.

Microglia are the major population of immune cells resident in the CNS and play a fundamental role in the response to injury, regulating neuroinflammation, clearing cellular debris and thereby providing neuroprotection (Kettenmann et al., 2011). Dysregulation of microglial activity is associated with several neurodevelopmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders (Hickman et al., 2018). The review by Bobotis et al. provides a comprehensive overview of established and emerging technologies to characterize the complex morphological and functional heterogeneity of microglia in homeostasis and disease. Innovative technologies, including single-cell transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses, have revealed that both astrocytes and microglia comprise heterogeneous cellular subpopulations with distinct genomic and functional characteristics that vary according to the physiological and pathological context and play major roles in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. Depending on the representation of specific glial subpopulations, tissue damage, regenerative processes, or delayed neurodegeneration after TBI may vary between nearby or remote areas and between different brain structures. Parallel to advances in microglial biology, the reviews by Bobotis et al. and by Amlerova et al. offer a broad discussion of emerging techniques of depletion and selective modulation of microglial activity as potential therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatric and autoimmune diseases.

Since neuronal regeneration is mostly limited following CNS injuries and diseases, glial cells have emerged as crucial targets for the development of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) aimed at improving clinical outcomes (Madadi and Sohn, 2024). Although many of these APIs demonstrate potential in vitro, when systemically delivered most APIs exhibit limited penetration through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB), making them ineffective. To address this Research Topic, nanomaterials have been engineered to transport APIs to their target sites, extend the release timeframe, and influence cellular behavior through their structural properties (Ciciriello et al., 2022). The review by Saksena et al. explores the latest advancements of both locally implanted nanomaterials and systemically administered nanoparticles developed for the delivery of APIs to CNS glia, highlights existing research gaps, and discusses future developments that could sustain this approach toward clinical applications. As many API-releasing nanomaterials remain focused on targeting neurons, further advancements in material engineering, BBB permeability, targeted delivery, controlled release, and immune response management are essential to establish nanomaterial-mediated API delivery to glia as a standard clinical approach. This review summarizes emerging strategies for delivering APIs to astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes using nanomaterials. Nanoparticle-based therapies present a non-invasive alternative for neurological conditions where direct implantation is not feasible, with optimization of nanoparticle composition, size, charge, and targeting mechanisms being crucial for effective brain penetration and glial modulation. In surgical interventions, nanomaterial-based therapies provide biophysical and biochemical cues to glial cells, stimulating bioactive responses that enhance neuronal repair and protection.

Optogenetics is a cutting-edge technique that combines genetic engineering with light-based stimulation to fine-tune neuronal activity (Towne and Thompson, 2016). This method relies on incorporating light-sensitive proteins, called opsins, into specific neurons or brain regions, enabling precise activation or inhibition through photostimulation. Through optogenetic manipulation, researchers can precisely control neuronal activity in both space and time, offering critical insights into neural circuits and brain function (Fernandez-Ruiz et al., 2022). Moreover, optogenetic treatment enhances neuronal excitability and synaptic responses, contributing to the maintenance of nervous system health. As a result, optogenetics holds significant potential for applications in neuroscience research. Hyung et al. reviews the optogenetic manipulation of different glial cell populations and its impact on the reciprocal neuro-glial interaction in neural repair. Since damaged neurons do not regenerate independently and rely on glial cells for structural and trophic support, the application of glial optogenetics appears to be a promising approach for nerve repair. Current research aims to determine whether modulation of glial cells via optogenetics can more effectively regulate neural function than direct neuronal activation, as well as to identify the optimal level of opsin gene expression required to stimulate glial cells and sustain the excitatory activity of neurons. However, several challenges remain, including assessing whether glial optogenetic modulation can correct nervous system dysfunction and assessing whether the effects of optogenetic activation are consistent in vitro, in vivo, and ultimately in clinical settings.

Advancements in stroke research, combined with progress in imaging technology, have paved the way for new approaches in managing acute ischemic stroke patients. Researchers in the field of stroke investigation are striving to uncover strategies that can prevent episodes of focal ischemia, enhance the quality of life for survivors, and mitigate premature mortality (Saceleanu et al., 2023; Herpich and Rincon, 2020). To succeed in this effort, it is imperative to broaden the perspective beyond the confines of primary injury sites and adopt a holistic approach, viewing the brain as an interconnected system where all components influence each other. Therefore, as highlighted by Koukalova et al. it is crucial to focus both on the ischemic core and on the adjacent, initially undamaged regions, which are susceptible to the development of secondary lesions that can manifest subtly and over time. In their literature review, Koukalova et al. provide an exhaustive description of the terms “ischemic core”, “penumbra” and “remote areas” specifically emphasizing the structural and functional changes that occur in regions distant from the primary site of focal ischemia and on the involvement of glia and the extracellular matrix. The processes that commonly affect the ischemic core and the penumbra are compared and the causes analyzed. Special attention is paid to the investigative approaches and the efficacy of therapies used in recent years for their anti-ischemic effect in remote areas of the lesion. Studying glial responses in these areas could lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying secondary neurodegeneration and new strategies to counteract it.

Astrocytic Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channels, along with Aquaporin 4 (AQP4), are believed to play a crucial role in cellular volume regulation (Pivonkova et al., 2018; Mola et al., 2021; Barile et al., 2023; Cibelli et al., 2024) and may influence the onset and severity of cerebral edema during ischemia (Chmelova et al., 2019; Sucha et al., 2022). The original research article by Hermanova et al. investigates the impact of AQP4 and TRPV4 channel deletion on astrocytic volume changes in response to three ischemia-mimicking insults. Their findings revealed that cortical astrocytes exhibited heterogeneous volume responses to pathological stimuli, with a high-responding astrocyte (HRA) subpopulation being affected more by the loss of AQP4, TRPV4, or both channels. While AQP4 deletion reduced swelling during oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD), TRPV4 deletion delayed its onset. Surprisingly, simultaneous deletion had minimal impact on volume regulation but impaired recovery after OGD. Additionally, knockout of these channels altered the expression of glutamate receptors and ion channels, suggesting broader molecular effects on cerebral edema beyond their direct role in volume regulation.

This Research Topic compiles new knowledge regarding the strategic role of glial cells in brain homeostasis, development, and recovery from neural injury while integrating optogenetic, physiological, molecular, and engineering investigative approaches to provide new insights into multiple areas of cellular neuroscience. Despite significant advances, many fundamental neuroscientific challenges remain unsolved. We hope that this Research Topic will support researchers in challenging existing paradigms, expanding the frontiers of neuroscience, and ultimately contributing to the development of novel and effective therapies in neurology.

Author contributions

AC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. DS: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. MM: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. PON Research and Innovation 2014–2020 DM1062/w2021 (FSE-REACT EU, Action IV.6) cofounded by the University of Bari Aldo Moro and the European Union to AC. POR Puglia 2014–2020-asse X-Action 10.4, Research for Innovation-REFIN to MM.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Barile, B., Mola, M. G., Formaggio, F., Saracino, E., Cibelli, A., Gargano, C. D., et al. (2023). AQP4-independent TRPV4 modulation of plasma membrane water permeability. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 17:1247761. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1247761

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chmelova, M., Sucha, P., Bochin, M., Vorisek, I., Pivonkova, H., Hermanova, Z., et al. (2019). The role of aquaporin-4 and transient receptor potential vaniloid isoform 4 channels in the development of cytotoxic edema and associated extracellular diffusion parameter changes. Eur. J. Neurosci. 50, 1685–1699. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, W. S., Baldwin, K. T., and Allen, N. J. (2024). Astrocyte regulation of synapse formation, maturation, and elimination. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 16:a041352. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041352

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cibelli, A., Mola, M. G., Saracino, E., Barile, B., Abbrescia, P., Mogni, G., et al. (2024). Aquaporin-4 and transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 balance in early postnatal neurodevelopment. Glia. 72, 938–959. doi: 10.1002/glia.24512

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciciriello, A. J., Surnar, B., Medy, G. D., Su, X., Dhar, S., and Dumont, C. M. (2022). Biomaterial-targeted precision nanoparticle delivery to the injured spinal cord. Acta Biomater. 152, 532–545. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Conti, P., Lauritano, D., Caraffa, A., Gallenga, C. E., Kritas, S. K., Ronconi, G., et al. (2020). Microglia and mast cells generate proinflammatory cytokines in the brain and worsen inflammatory state: suppressor effect of IL-37. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 875:173035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernandez-Ruiz, A., Oliva, A., and Chang, H. (2022). High-resolution optogenetics in space and time. Trends Neurosci. 45, 854–864. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.09.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Herpich, F., and Rincon, F. (2020). Management of acute ischemic stroke. Crit. Care Med. 48, 1654–1663. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004597

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hickman, S., Izzy, S., Sen, P., Morsett, L., and El Khoury, J. (2018). Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1359–1369. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0242-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kettenmann, H., Hanisch, U. K., Noda, M., and Verkhratsky, A. (2011). Physiology of microglia. Physiol. Rev. 91, 461–553. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Shen, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, X., Cepeda, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Interactions of glial cells with neuronal synapses, from astrocytes to microglia and oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Glia. 71, 1383–1401. doi: 10.1002/glia.24343

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Madadi, A. K., and Sohn, M. J. (2024). Advances in intrathecal nanoparticle delivery: targeting the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier for enhanced CNS drug delivery. Pharmaceuticals 17:1070. doi: 10.3390/ph17081070

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyata, S. (2019). Cytoskeletal signal-regulated oligodendrocyte myelination and remyelination. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1190, 33–42. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9636-7_3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mola, M. G., Saracino, E., Formaggio, F., Amerotti, A. G., Barile, B., Posati, T., et al. (2021). Cell volume regulation mechanisms in differentiated astrocytes. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 55, 196–212. doi: 10.33594/000000469

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pekny, M., Wilhelmsson, U., Tatlisumak, T., and Pekna, M. (2019). Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis-A new target in stroke? Neurosci. Lett. 689, 45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pivonkova, H., Hermanova, Z., Kirdajova, D., Awadova, T., Malinsky, J., Valihrach, L., et al. (2018). The contribution of TRPV4 channels to astrocyte volume regulation and brain edema formation. Neuroscience 394, 127–143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.10.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saceleanu, V. M., Toader, C., Ples, H., Covache-Busuioc, R. A., Costin, H. P., Bratu, B. G., et al. (2023). Integrative approaches in acute ischemic stroke: from symptom recognition to future innovations. Biomedicines 11:2617. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102617

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sofroniew, M. V. (2009). Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends Neurosci. 32, 638–647. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.08.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sucha, P., Hermanova, Z., Chmelova, M., Kirdajova, D., Camacho Garcia, S., Marchetti, V., et al. (2022). The absence of AQP4/TRPV4 complex substantially reduces acute cytotoxic edema following ischemic injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 16:1054919. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.1054919

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Towne, C., and Thompson, K. R. (2016). Overview on research and clinical applications of optogenetics. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 75:11. doi: 10.1002/cpph.13

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: glial cells, neurodevelopment, CNS homeostasis, water channels, ion channels, biomaterial

Citation: Cibelli A, Spray DC and Mola MG (2025) Editorial: Glial cells in homeostasis, neurodevelopment, and repair. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 19:1575105. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2025.1575105

Received: 11 February 2025; Accepted: 17 February 2025;
Published: 27 February 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Marie-Ève Tremblay, University of Victoria, Canada

Copyright © 2025 Cibelli, Spray and Mola. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Maria Grazia Mola, bW9sYUBsdW0uaXQ=; David C. Spray, ZGF2aWQuc3ByYXlAZWluc3RlaW5tZWQuZWR1

ORCID: Antonio Cibelli orcid.org/0000-0001-5689-9885
David C. Spray orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-5073
Maria Grazia Mola orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-9237

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more