94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Joseph H. Skarlupka1,2
Madison S. Cox1,3
Andrew J. Steinberger1,2
Dino L. Sbardellati4
Jennifer C. McClure5Derek M. Bickhart5,6
Andrew J. Scheftgen2Ibrahim Zuniga-Chaves2Luke A. Wolfe2Eric Paget2
Charles Skadron2Nithya Attipetty2
Garret Suen2*- 1Microbiology Doctoral Training Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- 2Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- 3Department of Allergy and Infectious Disease, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
- 4Microbiology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
- 5USDA Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI, United States
- 6Hendrix Genetics, Boxmeer, Netherlands
A Corrigendum on
Oral swabs as a proxy for direct ruminal microbiome sampling in Holstein dairy cows is correlated with sample color
by Skarlupka, J. H., Cox, M. S., Steinberger, A. J., Sbardellati, D. L., McClure, J. C., Bickhart, D. M., Scheftgen, A. J., Zuniga-Chaves, I., Wolfe, L. A., Paget, E., Skadron, C., Attipetty, N., and Suen, G. (2024). Front. Microbiol. 15:1466375. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1466375
In the published article, there was a mistake in a reference made in the Discussion. The statement “We also found that above a darkness score of 0.5, there was much less variability in the percentage of ASVs captured, with most swabs capturing upwards of 70% of the highly prevalent ruminal ASVs in the bacterial community, confirming our previous report (Edwards et al., 2023).” was incorrectly referenced.
The correct reference for the statement is “We also found that above a darkness score of 0.5, there was much less variability in the percentage of ASVs captured, with most swabs capturing upwards of 70% of the highly prevalent ruminal ASVs in the bacterial community, confirming our previous report (Young et al., 2020).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: buccal swab, oral community, rumen microbiota, swab color, bacteria, fungi
Citation: Skarlupka JH, Cox MS, Steinberger AJ, Sbardellati DL, McClure JC, Bickhart DM, Scheftgen AJ, Zuniga-Chaves I, Wolfe LA, Paget E, Skadron C, Attipetty N and Suen G (2024) Corrigendum: Oral swabs as a proxy for direct ruminal microbiome sampling in Holstein dairy cows is correlated with sample color. Front. Microbiol. 15:1501270. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1501270
Received: 24 September 2024; Accepted: 31 October 2024;
Published: 13 November 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Skarlupka, Cox, Steinberger, Sbardellati, McClure, Bickhart, Scheftgen, Zuniga-Chaves, Wolfe, Paget, Skadron, Attipetty and Suen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Garret Suen, Z3N1ZW5Ad2lzYy5lZHU=