Elena Yunda
Mareike Gutensohn
Madeleine Ramstedt
Erik Björn- Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Introduction: Mercury (Hg) is a major environmental pollutant that accumulates in biota predominantly in the form of methylmercury (MeHg). Surface-associated microbial communities (biofilms) represent an important source of MeHg in natural aquatic systems. In this work, we report MeHg formation in biofilms of the iron-reducing bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens.
Methods: Biofilms were prepared in media with varied nutrient load for 3, 5, or 7 days, and their structural properties were characterized using confocal laser scanning microscopy, cryo-scanning electron microscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.
Results: Biofilms cultivated for 3 days with vitamins in the medium had the highest surface coverage, and they also contained abundant extracellular matrix. Using 3 and 7-days-old biofilms, we demonstrate that G. sulfurreducens biofilms prepared in media with various nutrient load produce MeHg, of which a significant portion is released to the surrounding medium. The Hg methylation rate constant determined in 6-h assays in a low-nutrient assay medium with 3-days-old biofilms was 3.9 ± 2.0 ∙ 10−14 L ∙ cell−1 ∙ h−1, which is three to five times lower than the rates found in assays with planktonic cultures of G. sulfurreducens in this and previous studies. The fraction of MeHg of total Hg within the biofilms was, however, remarkably high (close to 50%), and medium/biofilm partitioning of inorganic Hg (Hg(II)) indicated low accumulation of Hg(II) in biofilms.
Discussion: These findings suggest a high Hg(II) methylation capacity of G. sulfurreducens biofilms and that Hg(II) transfer to the biofilm is the rate-limiting step for MeHg formation in this systems.
1. Introduction
Methylmercury (MeHg) is a neurotoxic compound that is formed as a result of methylation of divalent inorganic mercury (Hg(II)) by microorganisms carrying the genes hgcA and hgcB (Parks et al., 2013; Regnell and Watras, 2019). The formation of MeHg occurs in oxygen-depleted zones of wetlands (Tjerngren et al., 2012; Liem-Nguyen et al., 2021), sediments (Jonsson et al., 2014; de Oliveira et al., 2015; Bigham et al., 2017; Jones et al., 2020), rice paddy soils (Qin et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021) and fresh-and marine water columns (Capo et al., 2020). The bioaccumulation, trophic transfer efficiency and very low elimination rate lead to a biomagnification of MeHg in aquatic food webs and potentially exposure of wildlife and humans to elevated MeHg concentrations (Tollefson and Cordle, 1986; Orihel et al., 2007). Metagenome research (Podar et al., 2015; Capo et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 2020), sequencing studies (Bravo et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2021) and experimental incubations (Gilmour et al., 2013; Bravo et al., 2018) have revealed diverse bacterial communities to be responsible for Hg methylation including sulfate-reducing bacteria, iron-reducing bacteria, and methanogens. Several bacterial isolates were used as model organisms in studies of mechanistic principles of Hg methylation covering the aspects of Hg speciation in the medium (Schaefer et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2014, 2018; Isaure et al., 2020), its coordination environment on bacterial cell membranes (Song et al., 2020; Thomas et al., 2020) and the microbial uptake of Hg (Schaefer et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2014; Szczuka et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020), among others. These works allowed for significant advancements in understanding which factors control the rate and amount of MeHg formation. Yet the still existing inaccuracy of predictive models for MeHg formation in the environment suggests that further developments in the experimental designs are necessary.
One experimental challenge in mechanistic studies of Hg methylation is to control the speciation of Hg and the metabolic state of microorganisms. Both these factors can contribute to changes in the rate of MeHg formation (Goñi-Urriza et al., 2015). Many studies have adopted a two-step experimental protocol, in which the growth of bacterial cells in a suitable nutritive medium is followed by washing and resuspending a certain number of cells in a nutrient-poor and chemically defined assay buffer for an incubation period of several hours (Schaefer et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2014, 2018, 2020; Szczuka et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2021). These conditions allow chemical speciation and cell MeHg concentration to be monitored while the growth of cells and metabolic changes are fairly limited. Furthermore, the homogeneity in properties and functions of bacterial cells in a culture is an important assumption for normalization of values of MeHg formation rate per cell. Hence, laboratory experiments were conducted almost exclusively (Lin and Jay, 2007; Lin et al., 2013) on planktonic cell cultures. In contrast, in natural environments microorganisms are predominantly present in aggregated communities called biofilms (Flemming and Wuertz, 2019). In sediments and aquifers, for example, the number of cells in biofilms is estimated to be 100–1,000 times higher than that of unattached cells (Flemming and Wuertz, 2019).
Biofilms are distinct from planktonic cells due to the presence of an accumulated extracellular matrix that links cells and shapes the structure of the biofilm (Flemming et al., 2016). The matrix is composed of polymeric substances enabling accumulation of various substances from the bulk medium surrounding the biofilm, as well as substances produced by bacterial cells or that are a result of cell degradation within the biofilm volume. Several field studies reported MeHg and Hg(II) accumulation in freshwater biofilms grown in rivers (Dominique et al., 2007; Dranguet et al., 2017; Leclerc et al., 2021), creeks (Olsen et al., 2016; Schwartz et al., 2019), and lakes (Leclerc et al., 2015; Bouchet et al., 2018), and biofilms represent a MeHg source for macroinvertebrates and fish (Dominique et al., 2007; Cremona et al., 2009). Biofilms can accumulate low-molecular-weight thiol compounds (Leclerc et al., 2015; Bouchet et al., 2018), some of which are known to promote microbial Hg uptake and methylation (Schaefer and Morel, 2009). However, there are noteworthy few mechanistic studies of Hg methylation in controlled laboratory experiments on biofilms from bacterial isolates. One laboratory study reported 10 times higher Hg methylation rates in biofilms compared to planktonic cultures of a sulfate-reducing bacterium (Lin and Jay, 2007), and this result was suggested to be due to metabolic differences between the two cultures (Lin et al., 2013). It is clear that understanding the processes controlling Hg availability and methylation in biofilms is important and will require controlled studies on biofilms of model organisms.
Iron-reducing bacteria are important members of Hg-methylating communities in natural environments (Bravo et al., 2018; Leclerc et al., 2021) and one common bacterium used to study mechanisms of MeHg formation in laboratory settings is Geobacter sulfurreducens (Kerin et al., 2006; Schaefer and Morel, 2009; Schaefer et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2015; Si et al., 2015; Qian et al., 2016; Thomas et al., 2020). Geobacter species generally play an important role in the biogeochemistry of many environments due to their capacity to grow on abundant minerals containing iron or manganese, and interact with other trace metals such as uranium or vanadium (Cologgi et al., 2014; Yan et al., 2022). The use of G. sulfurreducens enables relatively good control of Hg speciation and its availability for cellular uptake, because it is incapable of sulfate reduction, thus, minimizing the formation of sulfides during the assay (Schaefer and Morel, 2009). Notably, G. sulfurreducens forms biofilms in a variety of settings including iron minerals (Reguera et al., 2007; Wilkins et al., 2007; Downie et al., 2018; Newsome et al., 2018), poised electrodes (Steidl et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017; Chadwick et al., 2019), and glass (Reguera et al., 2007; Klimes et al., 2010; Cologgi et al., 2014; Richter et al., 2017), making it a promising model organism for studying Hg methylation in bacterial biofilms.
The overall purpose of this work was to establish optimal conditions for Hg methylation assays with G. sulfurreducens biofilms and to quantify Hg methylation and partitioning in these systems. Structural changes in G. sulfurreducens biofilms were monitored as a function of growth conditions and Hg(II) methylation rate and partitioning of MeHg and Hg(II) were determined in selected biofilm assays. Biofilms were prepared in media with varied nutrient load by addition of yeast extract or a mixture of vitamins for 3, 5, or 7 days, followed by exposure to Hg(II). The yeast extract is known to promote cell growth in G. sulfurreducens planktonic cultures (Coppi et al., 2001), and it was added to investigate whether this rich medium also promotes the growth of cells in a biofilm form. Vitamins are commonly used in preparation of nutritive media in studies of G. sulfurreducens biofilms (Reguera et al., 2007; Cologgi et al., 2014), but are usually not present in standard nutritive media in Hg methylation studies. Using these two amendments we thus aimed to investigate what conditions allow abundant biofilm growth together with the capacity to methylate Hg. The biochemical composition and structural properties of the biofilms were examined using infrared spectroscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy and cryo-scanning electron microscopy. By carefully analyzing several structural characteristics of biofilms, as well as methylation of Hg(II) and partitioning of Hg(II) and MeHg in biofilms, we contribute to the advancement of the mechanistic understanding of Hg(II) transformations in environmental systems and pave the way for future studies of Hg methylation in G. sulfurreducens biofilms.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Bacterial strain and culture conditions
Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA (ATCC 51573) was purchased from DSMZ (Germany) and used in all experiments. The bacterial growth was routinely maintained as a liquid culture under N2 atmosphere at 30°C and pH 6.8. The growth medium (hereafter called standard nutritive medium) contained 10 mM sodium acetate, 40 mM sodium fumarate, 10 mM MOPS, 5.6 mM NH4Cl, 1.3 mM KCl, 0.2 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM MgSO4, 8.8 μM CaCl2, 0.05 mM NaH2PO4, 1% (v/v) Wolfe’s trace metals solution containing 10 times lower concentration of CuSO4, 0.6 μM Na2SeO3, and 1 μg/mL resazurin (Schaefer and Morel, 2009). Resazurin was used as an indicator of the redox status of the medium containing bacterial cells. The growth of bacterial cultures was monitored using optical density measurements of cultures at 660 nm (UV-1201 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu). The late-exponential-phase cultures were obtained within 40–44 h after bacterial inoculation (1%–2%) into the fresh standard nutritive medium (Supplementary Figure S1a).
2.2. Set-up for biofilm formation
The late-exponential-phase cultures were diluted in three different nutritive media containing vertically placed acid-washed (15% HCl) glass substrates with the surface area of ~4 × 1 cm2, prepared by cutting microscopy slides (ABAA000001##02E, Thermo Scientific). The starting optical density of bacterial cultures used for the biofilm growth was ~0.02 and the volume of the nutritive media was 15 mL. The nutritive media used were (i) standard nutritive medium, (ii) standard nutritive medium amended with yeast extract (1 g/L, Merck), or (iii) standard nutritive medium amended with vitamins mixture (1% v/v, MD-VS™, ATCC). The standard nutritive medium composition was selected based on previous studies and has been optimized for G. sulfurreducens Hg methylation assays (Schaefer and Morel, 2009; Schaefer et al., 2011). Biofilms were cultivated for 3, 5, or 7 days, in static conditions and in dark at 30°C. When biofilms were cultivated for 5 or 7 days, every other day ~7 mL of the nutritive medium was carefully replaced with the fresh corresponding medium using N2-filled syringe to support continuing bacterial growth, as schematically presented in Supplementary Figure S1b. The range of conditions for biofilm formation experiments was selected based on earlier research of G. sulfurreducens biofilms grown on glass (Reguera et al., 2007; Cologgi et al., 2014), as well as a study of Hg methylation by biofilms in laboratory settings (Lin and Jay, 2007).
2.3. Biofilm morphology
Morphological properties of biofilms were studied using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Biofilms were carefully rinsed twice by dipping glass slides into cell-free nutritive media. The nutritive medium (100 μL) containing 1.5 μL of SYTO 9 stock solution, prepared by 10-fold dilution of SYTO 9 dye (3.34 mM in DMSO, Invitrogen) in 0.9% (w/v) NaCl, was spread on top of the glass slide with the biofilm. Biofilms were stained in dark for 15 min, followed by removal of dye excess by dipping slides in cell-free nutritive media. Glycerol solution (50% in milli-Q water) was used to mount glass cover slips on top of the biofilms for subsequent observation with the microscope. Images were recorded every 1.74 μm along the biofilm height using a DIC 20X (NA 0.75) objective of a Nikon A1R confocal microscope controlled by Nikon NIS Elements interface. The percent of the surface covered with bacteria was determined using a function of manual threshold adjustment in Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012) on two-dimensional images representing maximal intensity projections. The structural parameters of biofilms were calculated using BiofilmQ software following segmentation of three-dimensional biofilm images in cubes (pseudo-cells) with the side length of 1.87 μm after semi-manual threshold adjustment (Hartmann et al., 2021). The resulted number of pseudo-cells per image field was used for estimation of the approximate number of bacterial cells in biofilms (Hartmann et al., 2021) in Hg methylation assays after adjustment of the value to the surface area of the glass slides. The estimation of cell number was made with the assumption that the two sides of the glass slides were equally covered with the biomass since the slides were placed vertically during the incubation. In addition, cell numbers were estimated assuming that biomass distribution recorded in the images is representative of full glass slide area. Four to seven images collected on samples from two separate experiments were used for the analysis of structural parameters of biofilms. Biofilms biomass was estimated as a ratio of biofilms biovolume (sum of all segmented cubes) to the substrate surface area. The roughness of biofilms was determined as the mean of the difference between local thickness (one cube area) and mean thickness of the biofilm divided by mean thickness of the biofilm (Hartmann et al., 2021). Statistically significant changes were determined using the Student’s t-test in Microsoft Excel.
2.4. Examination of biofilm extracellular matrix
Biofilms were prepared as described above, except that ~1 × 1 cm2 glass slides were placed in 6 mL of the nutritive medium for cultivation. Prior the analysis, biofilms were rinsed by dipping the glass slides twice into the assay buffer (the assay buffer was the same as for Hg methylation assay, but not amended with Hg), plunged into liquid nitrogen slush, sublimated in vacuo for 30 min at-90°C, and coated with a thin layer of platinum. Imaging was performed on a Carl Zeiss Merlin field-emission cryogenic scanning electron microscope (cryo-FESEM), fitted with a Quorum Technologies PP3000T cryo preparation system. Images were taken at-140°C using secondary electron detectors at an accelerating voltage of 3 kV and a probe current of 50 pA. The images presented are representative from a series recorded on duplicate samples.
2.5. Biochemical composition of biofilms
Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was used to characterize molecular composition of biofilms. Biofilms were scraped off the glass slides using pipette tips and placed on the diamond crystal in the ATR accessory of the Bruker Vertex 80v FTIR spectrometer. Each spectrum was recorded by collecting 100 scans between 4,000 and 700 cm−1. The resolution of the single beam was 4 cm−1. The absorbance scale of the spectra correspond to log (Rreference/Rsample), where R is the internal reflectance. A spectrum of cell-free medium was used as a reference for the biofilm spectra. Spectra were processed to remove water vapor contribution and baseline-corrected at 3,580, 2,750, 1,800, and 900 cm−1 in OPUS 7.8 software.
2.6. Hg methylation assay
In a glovebox maintained under N2 atmosphere (Saffron Scientific Equipment Ltd., North Yorkshire, United Kingdom), biofilms were carefully rinsed twice as described above and introduced into 6 mL of the assay buffer containing 100 nM Hg(II), prepared by dilution of 5 mM Hg(NO3)2 stock solution (28941-100ML-F, Fluka). The assay buffer contained 1 mM acetate, 1 mM fumarate, 10 mM MOPS, 0.1 mM NH4Cl, 1.3 mM KCl, 0.15 mM MgSO4, 5 mM NaH2PO4, 0.17 mM NaCl, and 1 mg/L resazurin (Schaefer et al., 2014). The assay buffer was pre-equilibrated with Hg(II) for ~1 h before incubation with biofilms. The assays were carried out at 30°C in dark in acid-cleaned glass vials covered with Teflon stoppers and sealed with crimps. After 6 h of incubation, samples were collected and spiked with Me200Hg or 200Hg for quantification by isotope dilution analysis of MeHg and total Hg, respectively. Inorganic Hg was determined by subtraction of MeHg from total Hg. Analyses were performed on biofilm and biofilm-surrounding media samples. Samples of the medium surrounding biofilms were prepared by taking 1 mL aliquot of the solution surrounding a glass slide with the biofilm, after which the glass slide was carefully extracted from the vial for collecting the biofilm sample. Biofilms were scraped off the glass slides into 1 mL of the assay buffer using inoculating loops and vortexed before splitting the samples in two for MeHg and total Hg analyses. Biofilms and media collected for MeHg analyses were processed for 24 h under alkaline conditions by addition (1:10 v/v) of 25% (w/v) NaOH, whereas samples collected for total Hg quantification were treated with BrCl following the EPA 1631E method (Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. EPA-821-R-02-019, 2002). Samples were stored at −20°C until analysis. If not stated otherwise, three replicate samples were prepared and statistically significant difference between conditions was determined using the Student’s t-test in Microsoft Excel.
Separately from biofilm experiments, Hg methylation assays were performed with G. sulfurreducens planktonic cultures in vials of the same volume and with the same assay medium as for biofilm experiments. Planktonic cultures used for the assay were grown until late-exponential phase in the standard nutritive medium amended with the vitamins mixture (1% v/v), washed twice with the assay buffer and transferred to the assay buffer amended with 100 nM Hg(II) at the OD of ~0.01. The conditions of the assay and the quantification of MeHg and total Hg were identical to biofilm assays. Hg(II) associated with cells was determined by subtraction of MeHg from total Hg values that were obtained by calculating the difference of corresponding values for samples of bacterial suspensions and samples that were filtered prior to the analysis.
2.7. Total Hg and MeHg analyses
MeHg concentration in biofilms and biofilm-surrounding media was determined using thermal desorption gas chromatography−ICPMS (TD-100 Markes – GC 7890B Agilent – ICP-MS 7700 Agilent) after adjustment of samples pH to ~4.5 using 5 M HCl and 2 M CH3COONH4. Samples were derivatized with NaB(C2H5)4, purged with N2 and trapped on Tenax adsorbent. Total Hg concentration was determined using CETAC HGX-200 cold vapor system coupled with ICPMS (8900 Agilent) after sample neutralization with NH2OH∙HCl and online Hg(II) reduction with SnCl2 (Adediran et al., 2019).
3. Results and discussion
In a first pilot study, Hg methylation assays were performed using 7-day-old biofilms cultivated in three different media, i.e., (i) standard nutritive medium, (ii) standard nutritive medium amended with yeast extract, and (iii) standard nutritive medium amended with vitamins mixture (as described further in the Materials and methods section). It was found that all biofilms produced MeHg with on average ~ 8% of the added Hg(II) transformed into MeHg over a time period of 24 h (Figure 1). This result shows that all studied nutritive media support the growth of biofilms with cells capable of Hg methylation. Furthermore, the fraction of MeHg associated with biofilms was from 7 to 20% of the total produced MeHg for the three different cultivated biofilms. The substantial portion of MeHg in the medium surrounding biofilms supports the notion that G. sulfurreducens exports MeHg from the intracellular cell compartments during methylation assays (Schaefer et al., 2011).
Figure 1. Percentage of MeHg produced from 100 nM added Hg, determined in biofilms and surrounding media, after 0 or 24 h of incubation with Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms grown for 7 days in standard nutritive medium (“standard medium”), in standard nutritive medium amended with yeast extract (“yeast”), or standard nutritive medium amended with vitamins mixture (“vitamins”). Control represents samples without Hg addition. Bars represent MeHg produced of which the gray part represent MeHg in the surrounding medium and the black part MeHg in the biofilm. Each bar represents one experimental replica.
To get a better understanding of biofilm growth patterns and the evolution of structural properties as a function of time, CLSM images of biofilms cultivated for 3, 5, or 7 days in the three nutritive media were taken (Figure 2). After 3 days of growth in standard nutritive medium, cells could be seen dispersed in a ~17 μm thick layer covering ~32% of the substrate surface (Figures 2A,J). Within this layer, sphere-shaped cell colonies were distributed. Colony formation in biofilms is one strategy utilized by bacteria to optimize access to nutrients (Stoodley et al., 2002), while its multilayer structure is likely associated with the presence of extracellular matrix binding the cells (Karatan and Watnick, 2009). In 5- and 7-day-old biofilms, the appearance of colonies was less distinct (Figures 2B,C). The variation in colony morphology did not promote a significant change in biofilm roughness or thickness, but the surface coverage and biomass were lower in 7-day-old biofilms (Figure 2J). The size of colonies was on average larger in biofilms grown with yeast extract for 3 days (Figure 2D), but the biomass decreased after 5 days of growth, which was reflected by a decrease of colony size in older biofilms (Figures 2E,F). It should be noted that three-dimensional structures loosely associated with glass surfaces were observed by naked eye when biofilms were grown in medium with yeast extract for 7 days. These structures were weakly bound to surfaces and, thus, were easily washed off during sample handling following biofilm growth. The large bacterial clusters associated with glass surfaces were also observed in medium with vitamins. They were clearly visible in CLSM images (Figures 2H,I), which indicates a higher strength of attachment when grown in presence of vitamins. Indeed, these enhanced interactions with the substrate surface may explain the higher biofilm content in the 3-day-old biofilm grown in medium with vitamins, where ~85% of the surface was covered by bacteria (Figures 2G,J). Overall, the CLSM results suggest that higher nutrient content does not promote a significant increase in biofilm biomass.
Figure 2. CLSM images of biofilms cultivated in (A-C) standard nutritive medium, (D-F) standard nutritive medium amended with yeast extract, and (G-I) standard nutritive medium amended with vitamins mixture for (A,D,G) three, (B,E,H) five or (C,F,I) 7 days with (j) corresponding structural parameters. The lines indicate statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) for samples prepared in the same medium, or cultivated for the same number of days.
Structural parameters of 3-day-old biofilms grown with vitamins were remarkably consistent with those reported previously for a biofilm of the same age and cultivated in a similarly composed medium (Cologgi et al., 2014). The surface coverage, biomass, and mean thickness found in our work were 86 ± 10%, 8.9 ± 5.2 μm3/μm2, and 19 ± 7 μm, while those reported by Cologgi et al. (2014) were 92 ± 7%, 10.6 ± 3.3 μm3/μm2, and 14 ± 4 μm. However, the roughness of biofilms in this work was lower than in the work of Cologgi et al. (0.1 ± 0.04 and 0.24 ± 0.06, respectively).
To image the extracellular matrix at a higher spatial resolution, a 3-day-old biofilm grown in the medium with vitamins was observed using cryo-SEM. Figures 3A,B shows that the overall structure of the biofilm is formed by cell colonies homogeneously distributed over the surface, in agreement with the CLSM results. As shown in Figure 3C, the colonies appeared to be fairly porous, perhaps to enable storage and transport of bacterial metabolites and nutrients (Quan et al., 2022). Bacterial colonies, as well as individual cells, were clearly enveloped in extracellular material (Figures 3D–F). Furthermore, ~100–300 nm large matrix-associated bundles were detected in some places of the biofilm (Figures 3D,E). The evidence of abundant extracellular matrix is in accordance with previous studies that have demonstrated extracellular substances linking G. sulfurreducens cells in biofilms (Rollefson et al., 2011; Cologgi et al., 2014).
Figure 3. Cryo-SEM images showing extracellular matrix surrounding (A,B) colonies and (D-F) individual cells, as well as (C) an example of cell organization in a colony, of 3-day-old G. sulfurreducens biofilm grown in standard nutritive medium amended with vitamins.
We pursued the study of Hg methylation using 3-day-old biofilms prepared in medium with vitamin mixture since these conditions resulted in the highest surface coverage of biofilm. MeHg and Hg(II) were quantified both in biofilms and in surrounding media after 6 h of incubation with 100 nM Hg(II). Similar to the pilot assays with 7-day-old biofilms, ~8% of the initially added Hg(II) was methylated (Figure 4A). Using the average estimated cell number from CLSM, (2.0 ± 1.1) ∙ 109 cells in the biofilm, the Hg methylation rate constant was calculated and found to be km = (3.9 ± 2.0) ∙ 10−14 L ∙ cell−1 ∙ h−1. This result is comparable to the study of biofilms of a sulfate-reducing bacterium (Lin and Jay, 2007; 3.0 ∙ 10−13 L ∙ cell−1 ∙ h−1, as recalculated from per-day value), although MeHg was quantified only in media surrounding the biofilms in that study. Furthermore, the km value determined for G. sulfurreducens biofilms in our study is ~20% of the Hg methylation rate constant obtained in G. sulfurreducens planktonic cultures after 6 h of incubation in the medium of the same composition as for biofilm assays, km = (2.6 ± 0.3) ∙ 10−13 L ∙ cell−1 ∙ h−1. Previously reported Hg methylation rate constants in planktonic culture assays with G. sulfurreducens vary depending on for example the type of added ligands, particularly low-molecular-weight thiols (Schaefer et al., 2011; Adediran et al., 2019). The km value found for biofilms in our study is ~20% and 40% of km values reported previously for planktonic cells for one-and two-hour-long assays without thiols addition ((2.1 ± 0.7)∙ 10−13 L ∙ cell−1 ∙ h−1 (Schaefer et al., 2014) and (1.0 ± 0.4) ∙ 10−13 L ∙ cell−1 ∙ h−1 (Schaefer et al., 2011), respectively). We therefore conclude that in the minimal nutritive conditions of the assay medium G. sulfurreducens biofilms methylate Hg at a lower rate compared to planktonic cultures, albeit within the same order of magnitude.
Figure 4. Percentage of (A) MeHg produced from 100 nM added Hg, determined in biofilms and surrounding media, after 0 or 6 h of incubation with G. sulfurreducens biofilms grown for 3 days in standard nutritive medium amended with vitamins mixture, and (B) Hg(II) present in biofilms and surrounding media at the same assays. Error bars indicate standard deviation obtained from three replicates.
It should be noted that no cell detachment was observed during the assay (OD660 ≤ 0.003 of the medium surrounding biofilms after 6-h incubation). This means that all MeHg produced can be attributed to the activity of bacterial cells in the biofilms and not to planktonic cells. In biofilms, bacterial cells can vary in metabolic state depending on their location due to differences in the microenvironment of each cell. For example, lower nutrient availability and accumulation of cell metabolites can lead to a slower growth rate and death of cells in the inner and bottom parts of the biofilm (Mah and O’Toole, 2001; Karatan and Watnick, 2009). Therefore, it is possible that not all cells in the biofilm participate in Hg methylation to the same extent. Furthermore, considering Hg(II) diffusion into the biofilm, it is likely that the cells at the top of the biofilms are more exposed to Hg(II) and may be more active in methylation. Interestingly, we found low accumulation of Hg(II) in biofilms. While the partitioning coefficient “cells/medium” at 6 h of incubation for MeHg was equal to 0.41 ± 0.16, the corresponding partitioning for Hg(II) was only 0.10 ± 0.02 (Figure 4B). The low concentration of Hg(II) in biofilms could be explained by a slow mass transfer of Hg(II) into the biofilm, in comparison with planktonic cell cultures. Indeed, the partitioning coefficient “cells/medium” for Hg(II) in planktonic cultures was consistently higher compared to biofilm assays (0.61 ± 0.18 and 0.75 ± 0.41 after 2 and 6 h of incubation for planktonic cells, compared to 0.039 ± 0.001 and 0.10 ± 0.02 after 2 and 6 h for biofilms). In planktonic cultures cells are distributed more homogeneously in solution, allowing exposure to Hg(II) from every direction, which may explain higher amount of Hg(II) associated with planktonic G. sulfurreducens cells.
The fraction of MeHg of total Hg in the biofilm was noteworthy high, close to 50% (2.5% and 3.3% of initially added Hg was found in biofilms as MeHg and Hg(II), respectively, Figures 4A,B). For comparison, the proportion of MeHg to total Hg was reported to be <1% in biofilms grown on artificial substrata in reservoirs of a Hg-contaminated river (Dranguet et al., 2017), <0.1% in an industrially contaminated freshwater creek (Schwartz et al., 2019), 11%–18% in a river affected by run-of-river power plants and artificial wetlands (Leclerc et al., 2021), as well as 12% and 57% in plant-associated biofilms in lake Titicaca (Bouchet et al., 2018). Experiments with planktonic cell cultures of G. sulfurreducens have previously shown that MeHg is not accumulated inside cells (Schaefer et al., 2011). Hence, we hypothesize that in our study MeHg in biofilms was associated with bacterial cell walls and with the biofilm matrix. The high fraction of MeHg of total Hg in biofilms reflects a remarkably high capacity of Hg methylation by G. sulfurreducens cells in biofilm systems. Together with the low partitioning of Hg(II) to biofilm cells these results suggest that Hg methylation in biofilms is rate-limited by the mass transfer of Hg(II) into the biofilm.
It should be noted that a substantial decrease of Hg(II) in the medium was observed during the methylation assays (Figure 4B). Hg(II) loss could occur due to Hg(II) adsorption on glass vial walls and microbial Hg reduction. This would also affect the overall mass balance of total Hg and may explain why only 44% was recovered after 6 h. Previous studies have reported an abundance of redox active proteins (cytochromes) in the extracellular matrix of G. sulfurreducens biofilms (Rollefson et al., 2011; Steidl et al., 2016). Furthermore, a correlation has been shown between abundance of cytochromes and Hg reduction rates (Lin et al., 2014; Qian et al., 2016). It is thus possible that Hg(II) reduction and methylation were two competing processes upon Hg(II) entering into the biofilm. In previous studies with G. sulfurreducens planktonic cultures the extent of Hg reduction decreased by the adsorption of Hg onto bacterial cell wall surfaces, particularly via binding to thiol groups (Hu et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014). Since Hg(II) did not accumulate in the biofilm significantly but its loss in the system was high, one could assume high reduction relative to cell adsorption of Hg. Thiol groups are present on the bacterial cell wall, but they could also be accumulated in the extracellular matrix of the biofilm. This could particularly be expected for G. sulfurreducens biofilms, since its planktonic counterparts can produce up to ~50 nM of extracellular low molecular mass thiols compounds within 6 h at 1.1 × 108 cells mL−1 under the same nutritive conditions of the assay medium as used in this study (Adediran et al., 2019). It will thus be highly interesting to investigate both Hg reduction and possible thiol production and accumulation in G. sulfurreducens biofilms in future studies.
Finally, since changes in the physiological state of the microorganism may affect the rate of MeHg formation (Goñi-Urriza et al., 2015), we investigated biochemical composition of biofilms in the beginning and at the end of the 6 h methylation assay using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. This method is particularly sensitive to relative changes in the amounts of major biochemical compounds such as proteins, polysaccharides, nucleic acids and lipids, which can be monitored at native state. Nonetheless, some specific metabolic changes can also be detected upon changes in the cell environment. For example, in G. sulfurreducens planktonic cultures we observed significant variation in relative amounts of energy-reserve compounds and nucleic acids during Hg methylation assays that were consistent with changes in cell density (Gutensohn et al., unpublished data). The ATR-FTIR spectra of biofilms showed that relative amounts of proteins (indicated by amide I and amide II bands), nucleic acids (νaPO2−, νsPO2−, δCH), lipids (CH2, CH3) and polysaccharides (νCO, C–O–C, P–O–C, R–O–P–O–R′) were similar at both time points (Bremer and Geesey, 1991; Stuart, 2004; Yunda and Quilès, 2019; Figure 5). Furthermore, the stable relative content of nucleic acids, indicated mainly by the bands at 1240–1220 cm−1, suggests that the cell number in biofilms likely remained unchanged throughout the assay. Hence, in accordance with the design of the assay, the experimental conditions allowed limiting cells growth and strong changes in cells physiology.
Figure 5. ATR-FTIR spectra of biofilms in (a) the beginning, 20 min, and (b) the end, 6 h, of Hg methylation assay. Stars indicate slight contribution of bands corresponding to MOPS buffer (Supplementary Figure S2) in spectra of biofilms.
4. Conclusion
In this work, we demonstrate that G. sulfurreducens biofilms prepared in media with various nutrient load produce MeHg, from which a significant portion is released in the surrounding medium. The addition of vitamins during the growth allowed for significantly higher biofilm surface coverage 3 days of cultivation, compared to other media investigated. The biofilm formed was characterized by generally high rate of MeHg formation, although this value was three to five times lower than the rates of MeHg formation in assays with G. sulfurreducens planktonic cultures found in our and previous works. The percent of Hg(II) associated with cells in the biofilm was notably lower than the values found for planktonic cultures, while the fraction of MeHg of total Hg in the biofilm was remarkably high. The high fraction of MeHg in biofilms and low Hg(II) accumulation in biofilms suggest that G. sulfurreducens rapidly transforms Hg(II) into MeHg once Hg(II) reaches the biofilm.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
The study was designed and planned by EY, MR, and EB. The experimental work was performed by EY, with the contribution from MG. Data analysis was performed and the first draft of the manuscript was compiled by EY. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The Kempe Foundation is acknowledged for funding (JCK-1917).
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Umeå Centre for Electron Microscopy (UCEM) and the Biochemical Imaging Center Umeå (BICU), both part of the National Microscopy Infrastructure, NMI (VR-RFI 2019-00217) for analyses and for providing technical assistance in CLSM, as well as EM. The infrared spectroscopy measurements were performed at the ViSp platform at Umeå University. We thank Irene Martinez Carrasco and Cheng Choo Lee for support with CLSM and cryo-SEM, respectively.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1079000/full#supplementary-material
References
Adediran, G. A., Liem-Nguyen, V., Song, Y., Schaefer, J. K., Skyllberg, U., and Björn, E. (2019). Microbial biosynthesis of thiol compounds: implications for speciation, cellular uptake, and methylation of hg(II). Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 8187–8196. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01502
Bigham, G. N., Murray, K. J., Masue-Slowey, Y., and Henry, E. A. (2017). Biogeochemical controls on methylmercury in soils and sediments: implications for site management. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 13, 249–263. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1822
Bouchet, S., Goñi-Urriza, M., Monperrus, M., Guyoneaud, R., Fernandez, P., Heredia, C., et al. (2018). Linking microbial activities and low-molecular-weight thiols to Hg methylation in biofilms and periphyton from high-altitude tropical lakes in the Bolivian Altiplano. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 9758–9767. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01885
Bravo, A. G., Peura, S., Buck, M., Ahmed, O., Mateos-Rivera, A., Herrero Ortega, S., et al. (2018). Methanogens and iron-reducing bacteria: the overlooked members of mercury-methylating microbial communities in boreal lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e01774–e01718. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01774-18
Bremer, P. J., and Geesey, G. G. (1991). An evaluation of biofilm development utilizing non-destructive attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biofouling 3, 89–100. doi: 10.1080/08927019109378165
Capo, E., Bravo, A. G., Soerensen, A. L., Bertilsson, S., Pinhassi, J., Feng, C., et al. (2020). Deltaproteobacteria and Spirochaetes-like bacteria are abundant putative mercury methylators in oxygen-deficient water and marine particles in the Baltic Sea. Front. Microbiol. 11:574080. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.574080
Chadwick, G. L., Jiménez Otero, F., Gralnick, J. A., Bond, D. R., and Orphan, V. J. (2019). NanoSIMS imaging reveals metabolic stratification within current-producing biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 20716–20724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912498116
Cologgi, D. L., Speers, A. M., Bullard, B. A., Kelly, S. D., and Reguera, G. (2014). Enhanced uranium immobilization and reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 6638–6646. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02289-14
Coppi, M. V., Leang, C., Sandler, S. J., and Lovley, D. R. (2001). Development of a genetic system for Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 3180–3187. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.3180-3187.2001
Cremona, F., Hamelin, S., Planas, D., and Lucotte, M. (2009). Sources of organic matter and methylmercury in littoral macroinvertebrates: a stable isotope approach. Biogeochemistry 94, 81–94. doi: 10.1007/s10533-009-9309-9
de Oliveira, D. C. M., Correia, R. R. S., Marinho, C. C., and Guimarães, J. R. D. (2015). Mercury methylation in sediments of a Brazilian mangrove under different vegetation covers and salinities. Chemosphere 127, 214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.009
Dominique, Y., Maury-Brachet, R., Muresan, B., Vigouroux, R., Richard, S., Cossa, D., et al. (2007). Biofilm and mercury availability as key factors for mercury accumulation in fish (Curimata cyprinoides) from a disturbed Amazonian freshwater system. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26, 45–52. doi: 10.1897/05-649R.1
Downie, H. F., Standerwick, J. P., Burgess, L., Natrajan, L. S., and Lloyd, J. R. (2018). Imaging redox activity and Fe(II) at the microbe-mineral interface during Fe(III) reduction. Res. Microbiol. 169, 582–589. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.05.012
Dranguet, P., Le Faucheur, S., Cosio, C., and Slaveykova, V. I. (2017). Influence of chemical speciation and biofilm composition on mercury accumulation by freshwater biofilms. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 19, 38–49. doi: 10.1039/C6EM00493H
Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Steinberg, P., Rice, S. A., and Kjelleberg, S. (2016). Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
Flemming, H.-C., and Wuertz, S. (2019). Bacteria and archaea on earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 247–260. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9
Gilmour, C. C., Podar, M., Bullock, A. L., Graham, A. M., Brown, S. D., Somenahally, A. C., et al. (2013). Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 11810–11820. doi: 10.1021/es403075t
Goñi-Urriza, M., Corsellis, Y., Lanceleur, L., Tessier, E., Gury, J., Monperrus, M., et al. (2015). Relationships between bacterial energetic metabolism, mercury methylation potential, and hgcA/hgcB gene expression in Desulfovibrio dechloroacetivorans BerOc1. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 13764–13771. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4273-5
Hartmann, R., Jeckel, H., Jelli, E., Singh, P. K., Vaidya, S., Bayer, M., et al. (2021). Quantitative image analysis of microbial communities with BiofilmQ. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 151–156. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00817-4
Hu, H. Y., Lin, H., Zheng, W., Rao, B., Feng, X. B., Liang, L. Y., et al. (2013). Mercury reduction and cell-surface adsorption by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10922–10930. doi: 10.1021/es400527m
Isaure, M.-P., Albertelli, M., Kieffer, I., Tucoulou, R., Petrel, M., Gontier, E., et al. (2020). Relationship between Hg speciation and Hg methylation/demethylation processes in the sulfate-reducing bacterium Pseudodesulfovibrio hydrargyri: evidences from HERFD-XANES and Nano-XRF. Front. Microbiol. 11:584715. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.584715
Jones, D. S., Johnson, N. W., Mitchell, C. P. J., Walker, G. M., Bailey, J. V., Pastor, J., et al. (2020). Diverse communities of hgcAB+ microorganisms methylate mercury in freshwater sediments subjected to experimental sulfate loading. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 14265–14274. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02513
Jonsson, S., Skyllberg, U., Nilsson, M. B., Lundberg, E., Andersson, A., and Björn, E. (2014). Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota. Nat. Commun. 5:4624. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5624
Karatan, E., and Watnick, P. (2009). Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 310–347. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00041-08
Kerin, E. J., Gilmour, C. C., Roden, E., Suzuki, M. T., Coates, J. D., and Mason, R. P. (2006). Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7919–7921. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01602-06
Klimes, A., Franks, A. E., Glaven, R. H., Tran, H., Barrett, C. L., Qiu, Y., et al. (2010). Production of pilus-like filaments in Geobacter sulfurreducens in the absence of the type IV pilin protein PilA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 310, 62–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02046.x
Leclerc, M., Harrison, M. C., Storck, V., Planas, D., Amyot, M., Walsh, D. A., et al. (2021). Microbial diversity and mercury methylation activity in periphytic biofilms at a run-of-river hydroelectric dam and constructed wetlands. mSphere 6:e00021. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00021-21
Leclerc, M., Planas, D., and Amyot, M. (2015). Relationship between extracellular low-molecular-weight thiols and mercury species in natural lake periphytic biofilms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7709–7716. doi: 10.1021/es505952x
Li, D.-B., Huang, Y.-X., Li, J., Li, L.-L., Tian, L.-J., and Yu, H.-Q. (2017). Electrochemical activities of Geobacter biofilms growing on electrodes with various potentials. Electrochim. Acta 225, 452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.146
Liem-Nguyen, V., Skyllberg, U., and Björn, E. (2021). Methylmercury formation in boreal wetlands in relation to chemical speciation of mercury (II) and concentration of low molecular mass thiols. Sci. Total Environ. 755:142666. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142666
Lin, C.-C., and Jay, J. A. (2007). Mercury methylation by planktonic and biofilm cultures of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6691–6697. doi: 10.1021/es062304c
Lin, T. Y., Kampalath, R. A., Lin, C.-C., Zhang, M., Chavarria, K., Lacson, J., et al. (2013). Investigation of mercury methylation pathways in biofilm versus planktonic cultures of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 5695–5702. doi: 10.1021/es400079n
Lin, H., Lu, X., Liang, L., and Gu, B. (2015). Thiol-facilitated cell export and desorption of methylmercury by anaerobic bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2, 292–296. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00209
Lin, H., Morrell-Falvey, J. L., Rao, B., Liang, L., and Gu, B. (2014). Coupled mercury–cell sorption, reduction, and oxidation on methylmercury production by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 11969–11976. doi: 10.1021/es502537a
Mah, T.-F. C., and O’Toole, G. A. (2001). Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol. 9, 34–39. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2
Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-R-02-01919 (2002). Washington DC.
Newsome, L., Lopez Adams, R., Downie, H. F., Moore, K. L., and Lloyd, J. R. (2018). NanoSIMS imaging of extracellular electron transport processes during microbial iron(III) reduction. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94:fiy104. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy104
Olsen, T. A., Brandt, C. C., and Brooks, S. C. (2016). Periphyton biofilms influence net methylmercury production in an industrially contaminated system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10843–10850. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01538
Orihel, D. M., Paterson, M. J., Blanchfield, P. J., Bodaly, R. A., and Hintelmann, H. (2007). Experimental evidence of a linear relationship between inorganic mercury loading and methylmercury accumulation by aquatic biota. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 4952–4958. doi: 10.1021/es063061r
Parks, J. M., Johs, A., Podar, M., Bridou, R., Hurt, R. A., Smith, S. D., et al. (2013). The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 339, 1332–1335. doi: 10.1126/science.1230667
Peterson, B. D., McDaniel, E. A., Schmidt, A. G., Lepak, R. F., Janssen, S. E., Tran, P. Q., et al. (2020). Mercury methylation genes identified across diverse anaerobic microbial guilds in a eutrophic sulfate-enriched lake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15840–15851. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05435
Podar, M., Gilmour, C. C., Brandt, C. C., Soren, A., Brown, S. D., Crable, B. R., et al. (2015). Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Sci. Adv. 1:e1500675. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500675
Qian, C., Johs, A., Chen, H., Mann, B. F., Lu, X., Abraham, P. E., et al. (2016). Global proteome response to deletion of genes related to mercury methylation and dissimilatory metal reduction reveals changes in respiratory metabolism in Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. J. Proteome Res. 15, 3540–3549. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00263
Qin, C., Du, B., Yin, R., Meng, B., Fu, X., Li, P., et al. (2020). Isotopic fractionation and source appointment of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in a paddy ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 14334–14342. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03341
Quan, K., Hou, J., Zhang, Z., Ren, Y., Peterson, B. W., Flemming, H.-C., et al. (2022). Water in bacterial biofilms: pores and channels, storage and transport functions. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 48, 283–302. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.1962802
Regnell, O., and Watras, C. J. (2019). Microbial mercury methylation in aquatic environments: a critical review of published field and laboratory studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4–19. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02709
Reguera, G., Pollina, R. B., Nicoll, J. S., and Lovley, D. R. (2007). Possible nonconductive role of Geobacter sulfurreducens pilus nanowires in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 189, 2125–2127. doi: 10.1128/JB.01284-06
Richter, L. V., Franks, A. E., Weis, R. M., and Sandler, S. J. (2017). Significance of a posttranslational modification of the PilA protein of Geobacter sulfurreducens for surface attachment, biofilm formation, and growth on insoluble extracellular electron acceptors. J. Bacteriol. 199:e00716. doi: 10.1128/JB.00716-16
Rollefson, J. B., Stephen, C. S., Tien, M., and Bond, D. R. (2011). Identification of an extracellular polysaccharide network essential for cytochrome anchoring and biofilm formation in Geobacter sulfurreducens. J. Bacteriol. 193, 1023–1033. doi: 10.1128/JB.01092-10
Schaefer, J. K., and Morel, F. M. M. (2009). High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Nat. Geosci. 2, 123–126. doi: 10.1038/ngeo412
Schaefer, J. K., Rocks, S. S., Zheng, W., Liang, L., Gu, B., and Morel, F. M. M. (2011). Active transport, substrate specificity, and methylation of Hg(II) in anaerobic bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 8714–8719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105781108
Schaefer, J. K., Szczuka, A., and Morel, F. M. M. (2014). Effect of divalent metals on Hg(II) uptake and methylation by bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 3007–3013. doi: 10.1021/es405215v
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schwartz, G. E., Olsen, T. A., Muller, K. A., and Brooks, S. C. (2019). Ecosystem controls on methylmercury production by periphyton biofilms in a contaminated stream: implications for predictive modeling. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 38, 2426–2435. doi: 10.1002/etc.4551
Si, Y., Zou, Y., Liu, X., Si, X., and Mao, J. (2015). Mercury methylation coupled to iron reduction by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Chemosphere 122, 206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.054
Song, Y., Adediran, G. A., Jiang, T., Hayama, S., Björn, E., and Skyllberg, U. (2020). Toward an internally consistent model for Hg(II) chemical speciation calculations in bacterium–natural organic matter–low molecular mass thiol systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8094–8103. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01751
Steidl, R. J., Lampa-Pastirk, S., and Reguera, G. (2016). Mechanistic stratification in electroactive biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens mediated by pilus nanowires. Nat. Commun. 7:12217. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12217
Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D. G., and Costerton, J. W. (2002). Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 187–209. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705
Stuart, B. H. (2004). Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications. Chichester, West Sussex, England; Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley.
Szczuka, A., Morel, F. M. M., and Schaefer, J. K. (2015). Effect of thiols, zinc, and redox conditions on Hg uptake in Shewanella oneidensis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7432–7438. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00676
Thomas, S. A., Mishra, B., and Myneni, S. C. B. (2020). Cellular mercury coordination environment, and not cell surface ligands, influence bacterial methylmercury production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 3960–3968. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05915
Thomas, S. A., Rodby, K. E., Roth, E. W., Wu, J., and Gaillard, J.-F. (2018). Spectroscopic and microscopic evidence of biomediated HgS species formation from Hg(II)–cysteine complexes: implications for Hg(II) bioavailability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 10030–10039. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01305
Thomas, S. A., Tong, T., and Gaillard, J.-F. (2014). Hg(II) bacterial biouptake: the role of anthropogenic and biogenic ligands present in solution and spectroscopic evidence of ligand exchange reactions at the cell surface. Metallomics 6, 2213–2222. doi: 10.1039/c4mt00172a
Tjerngren, I., Meili, M., Björn, E., and Skyllberg, U. (2012). Eight boreal wetlands as sources and sinks for methyl mercury in relation to soil acidity, C/N ratio, and small-scale flooding. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 8052–8060. doi: 10.1021/es300845x
Tollefson, L., and Cordle, F. (1986). Methylmercury in fish: a review of residue levels, fish consumption and regulatory action in the United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 68, 203–208. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8668203
Wang, Y., Janssen, S. E., Schaefer, J. K., Yee, N., and Reinfelder, J. R. (2020). Tracing the uptake of Hg(II) in an iron-reducing bacterium using mercury stable isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 7, 573–578. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00409
Wang, J., Shaheen, S. M., Jing, M., Anderson, C. W. N., Swertz, A.-C., Wang, S.-L., et al. (2021). Mobilization, methylation, and demethylation of mercury in a paddy soil under systematic redox changes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 10133–10141. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07321
Wilkins, M. J., Wincott, P. L., Vaughan, D. J., Livens, F. R., and Lloyd, J. R. (2007). Growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens on poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxyhydroxide coatings. Geomicrobiol J. 24, 199–204. doi: 10.1080/01490450701457121
Xu, J., Liem-Nguyen, V., Buck, M., Bertilsson, S., Björn, E., and Bravo, A. G. (2021). Mercury methylating microbial community structure in boreal wetlands explained by local physicochemical conditions. Front. Environ. Sci. 8:518662. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.518662
Yan, G., Sun, X., Dong, Y., Gao, W., Gao, P., Li, B., et al. (2022). Vanadate reducing bacteria and archaea may use different mechanisms to reduce vanadate in vanadium contaminated riverine ecosystems as revealed by the combination of DNA-SIP and metagenomic-binning. Water Res. 226:119247. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119247
Keywords: methylmercury, biofilms, Geobacter sulfurreducens , mercury methylation, methylation rate
Citation: Yunda E, Gutensohn M, Ramstedt M and Björn E (2023) Methylmercury formation in biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Front. Microbiol. 14:1079000. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1079000
Edited by:
Shungui Zhou, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, ChinaReviewed by:
Alexander Johs, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE), United StatesBaogang Zhang, China University of Geosciences, China
Copyright © 2023 Yunda, Gutensohn, Ramstedt and Björn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Erik Björn, ✉ ZXJpay5iam9ybkB1bXUuc2U=