Situational crime analysis of poaching within Territorial Use Rights Fisheries (TURFs)
- 1Doctorado en Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
- 2Centro de Investigación en Dinámica de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL), Valdivia, Chile
- 3Instituto Milenio en Socio-Ecología Costera (SECOS), Santiago, Chile
- 4Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile
- 5Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
A Corrigendum on
Situational crime analysis of poaching within Territorial Use Rights Fisheries (TURFs)
By Vallejos T, Nahuelhual L, Gelcich S and Oyanedel R (2024). Front. Mar. Sci. 11:1419800. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1419800
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. TURFs location site is incorrectly named “Carelmpau” instead of “Carelmapu”. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appear below.
Figure 1. Main TURFs locations (blue circles) where interviews with local actors were conducted in Los Lagos region, Chile.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. The version of Figure 4 currently published is a draft version. The order of the Crime Script Stages is incorrect and does not align with the stages depicted in Figure 3. Additionally, the list of Situational Crime Precipitators is incomplete, as the published image is cut off at the “Conflicts” factor, omitting several key factors discussed in later sections of the article, such as: Limited access, TURFs surrender, and Economic disparity. The corrected Figure 4 and its caption appear below.
Figure 4. Number of extracted narratives divided by crime script stages. Left, colored by source of the narratives. Center, colored by situational precipitators of crime specific factors. Factors are grouped by precipitator category, prompt factors in green colors; permission factors in red colors; provocation factors in yellow colors; and pressure factor in grey. Right, colored by situational crime prevention category. “Only descriptive” stands for narratives that didn’t fall into any SPC or SCP category, however useful during CSA.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: illegal fishing, management areas, crime process, small-scale fisheries, environmental crime
Citation: Vallejos T, Nahuelhual L, Gelcich S and Oyanedel R (2024) Corrigendum: Situational crime analysis of poaching within Territorial Use Rights Fisheries (TURFs). Front. Mar. Sci. 11:1516781. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1516781
Received: 24 October 2024; Accepted: 25 October 2024;
Published: 11 November 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Vallejos, Nahuelhual, Gelcich and Oyanedel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tomás Vallejos, dG8udmFsbGVqb3NAZ21haWwuY2w=