Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 22 July 2024
Sec. Inflammation
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring Immune Cell Roles in Cardiac Repair and Remodeling View all 11 articles

Metagenomic analysis demonstrates distinct changes in the gut microbiome of Kawasaki diseases children

Linli HanLinli Han1Xu LiuXu Liu1Yue LanYue Lan2Yimin Hua*Yimin Hua1*Zhenxin Fan*Zhenxin Fan2*Yifei Li*Yifei Li1*
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Diseases and Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Background: Kawasaki disease (KD) has been considered as the most common required pediatric cardiovascular diseases among the world. However, the molecular mechanisms of KD were not fully underlined, leading to a confused situation in disease management and providing precious prognosis prediction. The disorders of gut microbiome had been identified among several cardiovascular diseases and inflammation conditions. Therefore, it is urgent to elucidate the characteristics of gut microbiome in KD and demonstrate its potential role in regulating intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) resistance and coronary artery injuries.

Methods: A total of 96 KD children and 62 controls were enrolled in the study. One hundred forty fecal samples had been harvested from KD patients, including individuals before or after IVIG treatment, with or without early coronary artery lesions and IVIG resistance. Fecal samples had been collected before and after IVIG administration and stored at −80°C. Then, metagenomic analysis had been done using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. After that, the different strains and functional differences among comparisons were identified.

Results: First, significant changes had been observed between KD and their controls. We found that the decrease of Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides uniformis, and Bacteroides ovatus and the increase of pathogenic bacteria Finegoldia magna, Abiotrophia defectiva, and Anaerococcus prevotii perhaps closely related to the incidence of KD. Then, metagenomic and responding functional analysis demonstrated that short-chain fatty acid pathways and related strains were associated with different outcomes of therapeutic efficacies. Among them, the reduction of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, the enrichment of Enterococcus faecalis and antibiotic resistance genes had been found to be involved in IVIG resistance of KD. Moreover, our data also revealed several potential pathogenetic microbiome of that KD patients with coronary artery lesions

Conclusion: These results strongly proved that distinct changes in the gut microbiome of KD and the dysfunction of gut microbiomes should be responsible for the pathogenesis of KD and significantly impact the prognosis of KD.

Introduction

Kawasaki disease (KD) has been considered as the most common required pediatric cardiovascular diseases among the world, with unknown illness cause (1). The lesions of coronary arteries, including coronary artery dilation, thrombosis, and aneurysms, which were secondary to KD, contributed to healthy conditions along all childhood, leading to high morbidities (2). Once it developed into a giant coronary aneurysm, it was highly associated with cardiac sudden death. Due to the limited understanding of the etiology of KD, the incidence of coronary artery injuries still remained as a level of 3%–5% among all KD patients, although several versions of guidelines have been issued to provide integrative management strategy for KD. Generally, acute and continuous inflammation attack was considered as the major pathophysiological changes in KD. So that, to underline the mechanisms of such inflammation attacks would benefit in attenuating the systematic injuries and reduce the risks of cardiac involvements. Due to severe inflammation attacks, multiple organ damages could be observed in part of KD cases, including gastrointestinal, kidney, lung, and nervous system injuries (3). According to previous researches, the incidence of coronary artery aneurysms could be reduced from 25% to approximately 4% by treating timely with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (4). However, the unexpected IVIG resistance prohibited its protective effectiveness to coronary artery (5, 6). At the same time, the elevated incidence of incomplete (atypical) KD also increased the difficulty in initially diagnosing KD, which had been supposed to be associated with enhanced inflammation attacks (7). Therefore, it was urgent to demonstrate the molecular mechanisms in inducing KD onsets. Moreover, the different regulating mechanisms between patients with or without coronary artery lesions, as well as IVIG resistance, were required to be addressed.

Recently, a series of studies presented that the dysregulation of gut microbes was related to many diseases, including cardiovascular diseases (8), diabetes (9), inflammatory bowel diseases (10), allergies (11), and cancers (12). It was identified that the impaired proportion of gut microbiota would induce metabolic hemostasis changing with unwilling metabolites accumulation, triggering inflammation activities. Thus, the dysregulation of gut microbiome had been proved to be tightly associated with autoimmune diseases and metabolic disorders. Moreover, some small sample size cohort studies of KD patients attempted to establish the relationship between gut microbiome and KD pathogenesis. A metagenomic analysis of 28 KD patients reported that the Ruminococcus bacteria and five Streptococcus species were recorded increasing during the acute and non-acute phase of KD, respectively (13). Another study based on 16S amplicon sequencing of five KD patients found that the Fusobacteria, Shigella, and Streptococcus were suppressed after immunoglobulin therapy (14). In animal studies, the use of probiotic Clostridium butyricum would significantly increase the abundance of bacteria, which produced short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in KD mouse models and alleviated coronary artery injuries and reduced inflammatory response (15).

Although the above researches provided an initial correlation of gut microbiome disorders with KD onset. However, all the published studies failed to demonstrate the evidences that gut microbiota should be responsible for coronary artery involvement and IVIG resistance in human cohorts. Moreover, the microbiome sequencing methods used in previous researches seem to remain as a lower convinced test effectiveness with a very limited sample size, lacked a satisfied clinical decision supporting. Herein, we enrolled connectively 96 KD patients and 62 healthy controls for metagenomic analysis. Also, the stool samples had been collected before and after IVIG administration, which was able to explore the changes of gut microbiome associated with IVIG. Moreover, the relative larger sample cohort provided enough cases to reveal the differences of gut microbiome in KD patients with and without coronary lesions. So that, this research carried a comprehensive analysis of KD via metagenomic analysis, which provided more essential understanding of gut microbiome in participating the molecular mechanisms in KD pathogenesis and prognosis.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (No. 2020–092). The participants involved in this research had been enrolled from the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University from August 2022 to June 2023. A total of 96 consecutive KD children (53 males/43 females, average aged 3.1 ± 2.3 years) and 62 volunteer controls (28 males/34 females, average aged 4.2 ± 2.9 years) had been included for stool samples collection, and 140 in total (Supplementary Table 1). The enrolled controls were age-appropriate and sex-matched healthy children who were totally absent from history of KD.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We used the following inclusion criteria to recruit candidates for further analysis: (1) all the patients should meet the diagnostic criteria for complete or incomplete diagnostic standards recommended by AHA (2017) for diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of KD, and the diagnosis should be confirmed by two physicians; (2) coronary artery aneurysms were identified during acute or subacute phase by echocardiography; (3) programmed questionnaires, basic essential information, clinical manifestation, results of hematological examinations, therapeutic procedure, and echocardiography results were well collected; (4) the age of included patients varied from 1 year to 10 years, which is the most popular age for KD onset, to easy balance the bias from high-risk ages; and (5) the characteristics of coronary arteries were evaluated neither by transthoracic echocardiography or transcatheter angiography. The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) patients demonstrated any cardiovascular malformation; (2) patients had been diagnosed with an autoimmune disease before KD onset; (3) patients had received anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication before KD onset; (4) patients underwent any cardiac surgery; (5) myocarditis had been suspected before KD; (6) glucocorticoids had been provided before IVIG; (7) monoclonal antibody, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α or interleukin (IL)-6 antibodies, was provided; (8) macrophage activation syndrome or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was diagnosed due to KD; (9) no available echocardiographic record within acute and subacute phases of KD.

Therapeutic procedure and coronary artery assessment

All patients with KD were treated with high-dose IVIG (2 g/kg given as a single intravenous infusion) combined with 30–50 mg/kg/day high-dose aspirin. Those with recrudescent or persistent fever for ≥36h after the end of the first dose of IVIG infusion were treated with a second dose of 2 g/kg IVIG. Methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg/day for 3 consecutive days) followed by oral prednisone tapered over 7 days would be considered after the second IVIG administration. IVIG resistance was defined as persistent or recurrent fever (temperature of ≥38.0°C orally) or other clinical signs of KD for at least 36h but not >7 days after the initial IVIG. The patients were discharged from the hospital after their temperature remained normal for >48h and hematological examination returned to normal values. All echocardiographs were performed by two well-trained pediatric physicians. The physicians involved in the examination of enrolled patients were blinded to the clinical manifestation of receivers. The first echocardiography was performed before IVIG administration. The second echocardiography was performed during the subacute phase or before hospital discharge. The dilations of coronary arteries were calculated by Z-score >2, according to AHA KD management guideline. Either first or second echocardiography assessments identified dilation of coronary artery would be treated as the patient with coronary artery injury.

Samples collection and metagenomic analysis

Sample collection

The fecal samples had been collected rapidly at the first day once a convinced diagnosis of KD reached, while following fecal samples would be collected at the 36th hour after initial IVIG administration. Thus, the fecal samples could be harvested before and after IVIG therapy. Before collection, the scope and methods were fully informed to patients’ parents by researchers. The children’s feces were collected only after their parents formally signed an informed consent to be participated in the study. Moreover, the parents could choose to provide feces either before or after IVIG administration, or both time points. All fecal samples were collected via sterile fecal sampler or disposable swab. The whole process was sterile and fast. After sampling, fecal samples were collected and frozen at −80°C for next step.

DNA extraction, assembly, functional prediction, and quantifcation of genes

First, the steps of DNA extraction and sequencing were as follows: the swabs or fecal sampler of total DNA was extracted using a Tiangen DNA Stool Mini Kit (Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China) and sent to Novogene (Beijing, China) for sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with a paired-end sequencing length of 150 bp. Second, in order to remove the adapters and low-quality raw reads, the Trimmomatic based on a four-base-wide sliding window was used by average quality per base >20 and minimum length 90 bp after sequencing (16). Then, to eliminate host contamination, Bowtie2 (17), as part of the KneadData pipeline (https://github.com/biobakery/kneaddata), was used to remove the people potential sequences with the human reference genome (assembly GRCh38). De-novo assembly of each metagenomic samples from the quality-filtered Illumina reads was separately performed using MEGAHIT (18) with the option “-t 96 –m 0.95 –min-contig-len 300.” After assembling, gene prediction was performed using Prodigal (19) with the option “-p meta –g 11.” Using CD-HIT (20) and setting the “-c 0.95-aS 0.90” option, a non-redundant gene set with a threshold of 95% similarity and 90% query sequence coverage was constructed. Quantification of the non-redundant genes in each metagenome was performed using Salmon (21) with the option “—meta.” Total abundance of all genes, which mapped to the same gene type, was determined to the total abundance of each gene type. The non-redundant genes were further translated into amino acid sequences, using DIAMOND (22) to select “–id 80% –query-cover 70% –evalue 1e-5” in the Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes (CAZy) database (23).

Metagenomic analysis

To further explore differences in species and function, the abundances of gene family and microbial metabolic pathway were assessed by using HUMANn3 (24) with the ChocoPhlAn and UniRef90 EC filtered databases (25), respectively, and were normalized by copies per million (CPMs). And then, the taxonomic labels of metagenomic sequences were assigned using Kraken2 (26) with the option “–use-mpa-style.” Taxon abundances were normalized by relative abundance. Species markers were identified by using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (27) (LDA >2). To understand species diversity and variability between groups in species level, the alpha (α) diversity and beta (β) diversity were, respectively, calculated by the QIIME2 diversity plugin (28) and the QIIME2 plugin DEICODE (29). Furthermore, the time series analysis was drawn by using Mfuzz R Package (30) to reflect how changes among different groups. And the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were quantified using ShortBRED (31). Differences in taxon, metabolic pathway abundances and ARGs were determined using LEfSe.

Results

Clinical parameters and sequencing data

A total of 96 KD children (53 males/43 females) and 62 controls (28 males/34 females) were enrolled in the study. One hundred forty fecal samples had been harvested from 95 KD patients before and after IVIG administration. Among them, 62 pieces of samples were collected from individuals before IVIG treatment (Bef-IVIG group), while 78 pieces of samples were collected after initial therapy (Aft-IVIG group). In order to further explore the relationship between the incidence of coronary artery injury before IVIG administration and intestinal microorganisms during acute KD, we retrieved the echocardiographic assessments of 62 KD patients with fecal samples collected before initial therapy. Therefore, there were 22 patients with early coronary artery lesions (CAL group), and 40 patients absent from such injuries (non-CAL group). In addition, among the 78 pieces of samples which were collected after IVIG administration, 21 samples from IVIG-resistant patients (IVIG-R group), and 57 samples from IVIG-sensitive patients (IVIG-S). According to the comparisons setup, the species annotation and functional annotation were performed in the fecal samples between healthy control group (Con), the KD disease group before and after IVIG treatment (Bef-IVIG/Aft-IVIG), the group with or without coronary artery injury (CAL/non-CAL), and the group with or without IVIG resistance (IVIG-R/IVIG-S), in order to identify the pathogenic microbiotic strains, which could induce the onset and prognosis of KD.

Differences in gut microbiota composition and function between the KD patients before and after treatment

In order to identify the crucial strains participating in the pathogenesis of KD disease and impacting its treatment, we systematically analyzed three sets of metagenomic data based on the time for fecal samples collection, as group control (healthy group), Bef-IVIG (KD patients before treatment) and Aft-IVIG (KD patients after treatment). The α-diversity (Shannon and Simpson indexes) in the Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups were significantly lower than that in the control group (Supplementary Figures S1A, S1B, p < 0.001), while there was no significant change between Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups (p > 0.05). We also performed Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA), and there was no significant difference between the three groups (Supplementary Figure S1C, p > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the dominant phyla in the Bef-IVIG group changed from Bacteroidetes (48.53%), Firmicutes (31.08%), and Proteobacteria (10.95%) to Firmicutes (36.06%), Bacteroidetes (32.41%), and Actinobacteria (13.91%). Moreover, the relative abundances of Firmicutes were increased further after IVIG treatment (Supplementary Figure S1D). At genus level, the relative abundances of Bacteroides in the Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups showed a large decrease compare to the control group, while the relative abundances of Bifidobacterium and Enterococcus in the Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups showed a large increase (Figure 1A). Notably, compare to the control group, the relative abundances of Finegoldia increased in the Bef-IVIG group and returned to the normal level compared to control group in the Aft-IVIG group. Moreover, Finegoldia magna as a member of Finegoldia, which was reported able to induce inflammation by activating neutrophils, showed a similar change (32). Moreover, the relative abundances of Akkermansia muciniphila (33), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (34), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (35), and Bacteroides ovatus (36), which reported as probiotics, were decreased in the Bef-IVIG group and returned to the control group level in the Aft-IVIG group (Figure 1B). Next, we performed differential analysis to demonstrate the differential microbes by using LEfSe. Consistent with the above results, Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and Bacteroides ovatus were recorded significantly decreased in the Bef-IVIG group (Figure 1C, p < 0.05). In addition, Enterococcus avium was significantly increased in the Bef-IVIG group and showed the highest LDA score (p < 0.05). Comparing to the Bef-IVIG group, Finegoldia magna was significantly decreased in the Aft-IVIG group and showed the highest LDA score (Figure 1D, p < 0.05).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Differences in gut microbiota composition between the KD patients before and after treatment. (A) The gut microbial composition in three groups at genus level. (B) The gut microbial composition in three groups at species level. (C) LEfSe analysis between control and Bef-IVIG groups. (D) LEfSe analysis between Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups. (E) Time series analysis in three groups.

To further demonstrate the change trend of differential microbes among control group, Bef-IVIG group and Aft-IVIG group, we performed time series analysis by using Mfuzz. As shown in Figure 1E, a total of six clusters were obtained. Among them, cluster 5 showed a reduction firstly from control to Bef-IVIG and then elevation from Bef-IVIG to Aft-IVIG, including Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides uniformis, and Bacteroides ovatus. On the contrary, cluster 6 showed an opposite trend of increase firstly from control to Bef-IVIG and then decrease from Bef-IVIG to Aft-IVIG, including Finegoldia magna, Abiotrophia defective, and Anaerococcus prevotii. These results meant that the increase of these pathogenic strains and the decrease of these beneficial bacteria in KD patients, while the decrease of pathogenic bacteria and the recovery of beneficial bacteria after treatment which like control group.

To compare the functional differences between the three groups, we performed functional annotation and differential analysis. A total of 87 pathways with significant differences were identified between control and Bef-IVIG groups, and 26 pathways with significant differences were identified between Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups (Supplementary Figures S2A, S2B). The results of time series analysis for all differential pathways showed four main trends, and 22 differential pathways were included in cluster 1, which showed a trend of decrease first and then increase from control to Bef-IVIG to Aft-IVIG, such as acetyl-CoA fermentation to butanoate II, superpathway of Clostridium acetobutylicum acidogenic fermentation, folate transformations III (E. coli), and biotin biosynthesis II (Figure 2A). And the heat map showed similar results (Figure 2B). Next, we investigated the alteration of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) between the three groups (Figure 2C). Compared to the control group, the abundance of carbohydrate esterases (CEs), glycosyl transferases (GTs), auxiliary activity enzymes (AA), and glycoside hydrolases (GH) families were significantly up-regulated in the Bef-IVIG group (p < 0.05). However, compared to the Bef-IVIG group, the abundance of AA, CBM, CE, GH, and GT all decreased in the Aft-IVIG group which same as control group, but only GT was significantly different from the Bef-IVIG group (Figure 2D, p < 0.05). These results showed that the carbohydrate metabolism pathway of the gut microbiota was more active in KD patients. In addition, the analysis result of ARGs showed that the abundance of AAC (6’)-Ii, efrA, eatAv, PC1 beta-lactamase (blaZ), and EC-19 were significantly upregulated in the Bef-IVIG group (Supplementary Figure S2C, p < 0.05). Compared to the Bef-IVIG group, the abundance of tetA(46), dfrF, and mdeA were significantly up-regulated after treatment (Supplementary Figure S2D, p < 0.05). But the number of ARGs was reduced in KD patients after treatment, indicating that the treatment had a certain effect.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Differences in gut microbiota function between the KD patients before and after treatment. (A) Time series analysis of KEGG pathways. (B) The differential KEGG pathways of cluster1. (C) The distribution of CAZy enzymes in each sample. (D) Differential analysis of gut microbial CAZy enzymes. CBMs, carbohydrate-binding module; GTs, glycosyl transferases; PLs, polysaccharide lyases; AA, auxiliary activity enzymes; GH, glycoside hydrolases; CE, carbohydrate esterases. *, **, *** means P< 0.05, P< 0.01, P< 0.005, respectively.

Differences in gut microbiota composition and function between the KD patients with or without coronary artery injury

As shown in Supplementary Figures S1EG, there was no significantly difference in microbial diversity and structure between the CAL (KD patients with coronary artery injury) and non-CAL groups (KD patients without coronary artery injury) (p > 0.05). The dominant phyla in the CAL group were Firmicutes (40.84%), Bacteroidetes (26.01%), and Actinobacteria (16.67%), while the dominant phyla in the non-CAL group were Bacteroidetes (37.21%), Firmicutes (34.14%), and Proteobacteria (12.05%) (Supplementary Figure S1H). At genus level, compare to the non-CAL group, Bacteroides showed a large decrease in the CAL group, and this difference was contributed by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron which was a probiotic (Figures 3A, B). Furthermore, nine microbes were identified as differential microbes, including Enterococcus avium, Enterobacter asburiae, Abiotrophia defective, and Lachnospiraceae bacterium GAM79 were significantly increased in the non-CAL group (Figure 3C, LDA>2, p < 0.05). And the abundance of Corynebacterium segmentosum, Corynebacterium aurimucosum, Blastococcus saxobsidens, Modestobacter marinus, and Geodermatophilus obscurus were significantly decreased in the non-CAL group (p < 0.05). We obtained nine differential pathways by the differential analysis between the two groups, and only superpathway of purine deoxyribonucleosides degradation was enriched in the CAL group (Figure 3D, p < 0.05). Compare to the non-CAL group, more ARGs up-regulated in the CAL group, including tet(D), sdrM, ANT(2)-Ia, EC-18, sdrM, dfrA14, arr-2, Enterococcus faecium liaR mutant conferring daptomycin resistance, and Enterococcus faecium liaS mutant conferring daptomycin resistance (Figure 3E, p < 0.05), which were different from control, Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG group. In addition, there was no significantly difference in all CAZy families between the two groups (Figure 3F, p > 0.05).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Differences in gut microbiota composition and function between the KD patients with or without coronary artery injury. (A) The gut microbial composition between CAL and non-CAL groups at genus level. (B) The gut microbial composition between CAL and non-CAL groups at species level. (C) LEfSe analysis of microbiota between CAL and non-CAL groups. (D) LEfSe analysis of KEGG pathways between CAL and non-CAL groups. (E) LEfSe analysis of ARGs between CAL and non-CAL groups. (F) Differential analysis of gut microbial CAZy enzymes between CAL and non-CAL groups. ns, not signficance.

The patients of IVIG resistance have different gut microbiota composition and function compared with non-IVIG resistance

There was no significantly difference in microbial diversity and structure between the IVIG resistance (IVIG-R) and non-IVIG resistance groups (IVIG-S) (Supplementary Figures S1I–K, p > 0.05). The dominant phyla in both IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria (Supplementary Figure S1L). Compared with IVIG-S groups, there were many differences at genus level, especially, the abundance of Bacteroides and Enterococcus were decreased significantly in the IVIG-R group, and this difference was contributed by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Enterococcus faecalis, respectively (Figures 4A, B), indicating that the accumulation of pathogenic bacteria Enterococcus faecalis and the reduct of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in KD maybe led to the resistance of IVIG. The LEfSe results showed that Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus vestibularis, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, and Streptococcus sp. FDAARGOS 192 were significantly increased in the IVIG-R group (Figure 4C, p < 0.05), which were all associated with endocarditis. This result showed that these pathogenic strains were also likely important factors leading to resistance to IVIG in KD patients. By KEGG analysis, only two pathways were identified as differential pathways between the two groups, including pentose phosphate pathway, which was riched in IVIG-S group and L-glutamine biosynthesis III which was riched in IVIG-R group (Figure 4D, p < 0.05). In total of 25 ARGs were significantly changed between the two groups, and 23 ARGs were significantly upregulated in the IVIG-R group (Figure 4E, p < 0.05), suggesting that the increase of ARGs was another reason of IVIG resistance in KD patients. Notably, we found that qacJ and tetX were distributed in most samples of the IVIG-S group, but none of the samples in the IVIG-R group contained the two ARGs (Figure 4F). There was no significantly difference in all CAZy families between the two groups (Supplementary Figure S2E, p > 0.05). These finds implied that the enrichment of pathogenic strains and ARGs in KD patients induced the complexity of treatment and ultimately aggravates the condition.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Differences in gut microbiota composition and function between the KD patients with or without IVIG resistance. (A) The gut microbial composition between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups at genus level. (B) The gut microbial composition between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups at species level. (C) LEfSe analysis of microbiota between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups. (D) LEfSe analysis of KEGG pathways between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups. (E) LEfSe analysis of ARGs between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups. (F) The distribution of differential ARGs in each sample.

Discussion

KD, an acute febrile systemic vasculitis in children, had already become the most common cause of acquired heart disease (4). Recently, the change of the gut microbiota had been observed among KD patients (13, 14, 37). However, poor study design and limited sample size failed to address its characteristics and its role in KD pathogenesis. In this work, we found that the dysregulation of gut strains and the changes of metabolic pathway were highly associated with KD through metagenomic analysis.

Several strains had been observed to be altered significantly during process of KD. Finegoldia magna, one Gram-positive anaerobic which colonized the skin and other non-sterile body surfaces, was closely related with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (38), endocarditis (39), infected foot ulcers (40), necrotising fasciitis (41), spinal intramedullary abscesses (42), and so on. As an important opportunistic pathogen, F. magna was thought to be some virulence factors to acts as an infectious agent. For example, the protein L, which presented the high affinity to bind immunoglobulin light chains, and SufA (subtilisin-like protease), which could degrade host defense proteins LL-37 and MIG/CXCL9. In addition, FAF (F. magna adhesion factor) mediated adhesion by binding to galectin 7 (a keratinocyte marker). Also, one report showed that F. magna strains ALB8 (coding protein FAF), 312 (coding protein L) and 505 (naturally lacking proteins for FAF and L) as well as their associated proteins all could active the neutrophils to induce the inflammation, which dependent on acting rearrangement, NADPH oxidases and the ERK1/2 pathway, showing the F. magna serving as an activator of neutrophils and involving in inflammatory responses. Enterococcus faecalis is a species of Enterococci bacteria typically found in the gastrointestinal tract, oral cavity, and vaginal tract. While E. faecalis is generally considered non-pathogenic in healthy individuals, it can opportunistically cause urinary tract infections, wound infections, bacteremia, endocarditis, and intra-abdominal and pelvic infections in immunocompromised individuals. Abiotrophia defectiva is a commensal strain present in the human oral cavity, intestine, and urinary tract (43). However, under conditions of compromised immunity, it may contribute to infectious endocarditis, often associated with serious complications such as spondylodiscitis and brain abscess (44). Additionally, Anaerococcus prevotii has been linked to septic arthritis and brain abscesses, while Streptococcus vestibularis has been implicated in schizophrenia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4549). Most of the pathogenic strains had been suspected to be involved in inflammation responses and severe infections. Thus, the identified strains might participate in the dysregulation of immune activities and inflammation attacks on KD onset.

In contrast to pathogenic strains, probiotics play a protective role in various diseases. Akkermansia muciniphila, emerging as a promising probiotic candidate, is renowned for its potential benefits in inflammatory bowel disease (33), obesity, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and lethal sepsis (50). This strain, known for its mucin-degrading capabilities, densely populates the intestinal epithelium. Studies involving 4-week administration of A. muciniphila in mice have indicated its role in promoting the proliferation of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and enhancing the differentiation of Paneth cells and goblet cells in the small intestine and colon, thereby contributing to intestinal homeostasis maintenance (51). Mechanistic research on A. muciniphila has revealed its involvement in immune regulation, maintenance of intestinal mucosal barrier function, regulation of intestinal dysbiosis, and inhibition of colonization by other pathogens in inflammatory bowel disease (33). Additionally, phospholipids from A. muciniphila’s cell membrane have been shown to preferentially induce the expression of certain inflammatory cytokines, thus modulating host immune homeostasis (52). Recent studies have introduced a novel tripeptide RKH derived from live A. muciniphila, which demonstrates the potential to alleviate sepsis-induced mortality and organ damage. RKH peptide exerts its effects by reducing inflammatory cell activation and the overproduction of proinflammatory factors, and by binding to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to modulate TLR4 signal transduction in immune cells (50).

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is recognized as one of the pivotal bacteria in the human gut microbiota, notable for its production of butyric acid (34) and its anti-inflammatory properties (53). Increasing evidence suggests that the abundance of F. prausnitzii is upregulated in various conditions including hyperlipidemia, prediabetes, type II diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and inflammatory bowel disease (5457). Consequently, F. prausnitzii has garnered significant attention as a promising next-generation probiotic. In the realm of antitumor applications, F. prausnitzii has demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–induced colitis, restoring gut microbial composition, and enhancing the antitumor activity of immunotherapy in murine models (58). Efforts to harness the potential of F. prausnitzii have led to the development of mixed cultures, isolated from the feces of healthy individuals. These mixed cultures have shown to increase the survival rate of F. prausnitzii and enhance butyrate production. Furthermore, strategies to mitigate F. prausnitzii’s sensitivity to oxygen have been explored, with oxygen tolerance experiments demonstrating efficacy. These findings have been corroborated in both animal and human studies, further supporting the potential therapeutic applications of F. prausnitzii (36). Bacteroides uniformis, a prominent member of the genus Bacteroides, plays a crucial role in both the gut and vaginal microbiomes. Recognized as a butyrate-producing bacterium, B. uniformis is generally associated with maintaining health (59, 60). A strain of B. uniformis (CECT 7771), isolated from the gut microbiota of infants, has undergone safety testing as a probiotic in mice (60) and is currently under consideration for clinical studies in humans (61). Notably, B. uniformis has been inversely correlated with serum LDL-C levels, which are implicated in the acceleration of atherosclerosis (62, 63). Additionally, specific strains of B. uniformis, such as PF-BaE8 and PF-BaE13, in collaboration with B. coprocola AS101, have demonstrated comprehensive anti-inflammatory properties and improvement in intestinal barrier function (64). Bacteroides ovatus, also recognized as a new generation probiotic (65), has been extensively investigated for its role in intestinal immunity (66), tumor treatment (67), and dietary fiber metabolism (68). Decreased abundances of B. ovatus in the gut have been observed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) complicated by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) compared to CAD patients without NAFLD (69). Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, one of the most abundant bacteria in the gut microbiome, colonizes the gel-like mucus layer of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and aids in the degradation of complex polysaccharides and the maturation of the host immune system (35, 70). Streptococcus salivarius, a symbiotic microorganism found in the digestive tract, skin, breast milk, and body fluids of humans, exhibits biosafety and a close relationship with Streptococcus thermophilus (71). Consequently, S. salivarius holds promise as a potential oral probiotic candidate (72). Thus, the reduction of probiotics would enhance the damages secondary to inflammation attacks from KD, which was considered to be tightly associated with KD onset and coronary artery injuries.

At the species level, the abundance of opportunistic pathogens Finegoldia magna, Abiotrophia defectiva, Anaerococcus prevotii, along with the probiotics Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides uniformis, and Bacteroides ovatus, exhibited differential regulation compared to the control group before IVIG treatment (Figures 1B, D). Remarkably, following IVIG treatment, the abundance of these strains reverted to levels comparable to those of healthy controls (Figure 1E, Supplementary Table 1). These findings suggest that the dysregulation of upregulated pathogens, which contribute to inflammation, and downregulated probiotics, which modulate inflammation, may be pivotal in the pathogenesis and treatment of KD. Moreover, the results underscore the complex interplay among these strains. Further analysis revealed a significant reduction in the abundance of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in KD patients with coronary artery injury compared to those without, independent of IVIG treatment. This finding suggests a potential role for B. thetaiotaomicron in coronary artery injury unrelated to IVIG treatment. Similarly, decreased abundance of B. thetaiotaomicron was associated with IVIG resistance in KD patients, coinciding with a significant increase in the pathogenic strain Enterococcus faecalis. These results highlight the potential significance of B. thetaiotaomicron in influencing therapeutic strategies and treatment outcomes in KD. Additionally, the presence of Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus vestibularis, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei appears to complicate the management of KD.

Biotin, also known as vitamin H or B7, serves as an essential cofactor for biotin-dependent enzymes involved in various biological processes, including gluconeogenesis, fatty acid synthesis, and amino acid metabolism (73). Deficiency in the intestinal stem cell (ISC)–specific biotin transporter, Smvt, has been shown to impair intestinal maintenance and ISC mitosis (74). Suboptimal circulating biotin levels have been observed in severe obesity, along with altered biotin-related gene expression in human adipose tissue, suggesting a link between severe obesity, bacterial biotin production, and host metabolism (75). However, biotin biosynthesis was found to be decreased in KD before IVIG treatment, indicating potential limitations in these biological processes in children with KD. Butyrate-producing bacteria play a critical role in maintaining gut homeostasis and epithelial integrity, with butyrate itself contributing to cardiovascular health by reducing blood pressure, improving ischemia-reperfusion injury, and decreasing the risk of CAD and atherosclerosis (76). Notably, the acetyl-coenzyme A pathway, a key pathway for butyrate synthesis, was downregulated in KD, suggesting a potential reduction in butyrate levels as a contributing factor in the development of the disease (77). Purine nucleotide degradation, which produces uric acid, has been associated with various syndromes, including immune deficiency, myopathy, kidney stones, hyperuricemia, and gout. The superpathway of purine deoxyribonucleosides degradation was enriched in KD patients with coronary artery injury, consistent with clinical manifestations such as anemia and hypoxia following coronary artery injury (78). L-glutamine (Gln) serves as a substrate for DNA, ATP, protein, and lipid synthesis, playing a crucial role in cardiovascular physiology and pathology by exerting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects (79). Supplementation with Gln has been shown to prevent cardiometabolic diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (80), ischemia-reperfusion injury (81), and heart failure (82). In KD patients with IVIG resistance, upregulation of L-glutamine biosynthesis III suggests activation of a protective mechanism to mitigate heart damage through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.

The carbohydrate-active enzymes database, which covers the data on their genetic, structural, mechanistic, and functional information is divided into six classes, named the glycoside hydrolases(GH), the glycosyl transferases (GT), the polysaccharide lyases (PL), the carbohydrate esterases (CE), the auxiliary active (AA), and the carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM) (23). And all the six classes had been measured among all involved analyses, and significant changes could be observed along with IVIG treatment. GTs as one of carbohydrate-active enzymes catalyze the activation of sugars in vivo to bind to different receptor molecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, oligosaccharides, lipids, and small molecules. The products of glycosylation have many biological functions. Moreover, protein O-GlcNAcylation has been found to be multiply involved in the progression of cardiovascular dysfunction which depends on the unique disease environment (83), including the heart failure, cardiac hypertrophy (84), diabetic heart disease (85), ischemia reperfusion injury (86), and pulmonary artery hypertension (87). In addition, other families of CAZh L-glutamine (Gln) serve as a substrate for DNA, ATP, protein, and lipid synthesis, playing a crucial role in cardiovascular physiology and pathology by exerting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Supplementation with Gln has been shown to prevent cardiometabolic diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and heart failure (88, 89). In KD patients with IVIG resistance, upregulation of L-glutamine biosynthesis III suggests activation of a protective mechanism to mitigate heart damage through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.

ARGs encode proteins or other molecular components present in the genomes of bacteria or other microorganisms, conferring resistance to antibiotics. Our analysis revealed significant upregulation of 23 ARGs in KD patients with IVIG resistance, underscoring the role of antibiotic resistance in the development of IVIG resistance. Among these ARGs, QacJ belongs to the multidrug-resistant transporter family, predominantly found in Staphylococcus species (90). Numerous reports have demonstrated the efficacy of immunoglobulin and its subclasses in treating Staphylococcus infections (91). Thus, even in KD patients without IVIG resistance, the enrichment of the qacJ resistance gene may not hinder the alleviation of KD symptoms with IVIG treatment. The tetX gene, which encodes a FAD- and NADPH-requiring oxidoreductase, confers resistance to tetracycline in strict anaerobic bacteria such as Bacteroides. Bacteroides fragilis, a member of the Bacteroides genus, relies on IgA responses to establish stable colonization in the gut, excluding exogenous competitors from occupying mucosal niches. Consequently, we observed enrichment of Bacteroides expressing tetX in the IVIG-resistant KD group. While both qacJ and tetX were present in the KD patients without IVIG resistance, strains harboring qacJ were susceptible to inhibition by IVIG treatment, whereas strains containing tetX were more prone to colonization despite IVIG treatment (92).

Conclusion

In our study, we observed a decrease in probiotic species such as Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides uniformis, and Bacteroides ovatus, alongside an increase in pathogenic bacteria including Finegoldia magna, Abiotrophia defectiva, and Anaerococcus prevotii, which may be closely associated with KD incidence. Treatment was shown to reverse the abundance of these strains, with Finegoldia magna appearing to be particularly influential. Additionally, compared to the untreated group, the short-chain fatty acid pathways associated with gut microbes were upregulated post-treatment, as revealed by KEGG analysis. Furthermore, we observed a reduction in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and an enrichment of Enterococcus faecalis and ARGs in KD patients, likely contributing to IVIG resistance. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, a probiotic reduced in KD, was found to play a crucial role in KD-induced coronary complications. Similarly, other pathogenic bacteria such as Enterococcus avium, Enterobacter asburiae, Abiotrophia defectiva, and Lachnospiraceae bacterium GAM79 appeared to have similar implications. These findings suggest that different gut strains may influence KD incidence, treatment responsiveness, and complication rates, highlighting a significant correlation between gut microbes and KD. Future experiments will be conducted to validate these findings.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: PRJNA1112983 (SRA).

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (NO. 2020-092). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

LH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft. XL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. YL: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. YH: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ZF: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YFL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270249). The funding did not participate in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1416185/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | (A) Alpha diversity estimates (Shannon index) in three groups. (B) Alpha diversity estimates (Simpson index) in three groups. (C) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) in three groups. (D) The gut microbial composition in three groups at phylum level. (E) Alpha diversity estimates (Shannon index) between CAL and non-CAL groups. (F) Alpha diversity estimates (Simpson index) between CAL and non-CAL groups. (G) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) between CAL and non-CAL groups. (H) The gut microbial composition between CAL and non-CAL groups at phylum level. (I) Alpha diversity estimates (Shannon index) between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups. (J) Alpha diversity estimates (Simpson index) between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups. (K) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups. (L) The gut microbial composition between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups at phylum level.

Supplementary Figure 2 | (A) LEfSe analysis of KEGG pathways between control and Bef-IVIG groups. (B) LEfSe analysis of KEGG pathways between Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups. (C) LEfSe analysis of ARGs between control and Bef-IVIG groups. (D) LEfSe analysis of ARGs between Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG groups. (E) Differential analysis of gut microbial CAZy enzymes between IVIG-R and IVIG-S groups.

Supplementary Table 1 | List of differential microbes among control, Bef-IVIG and Aft-IVIG group for six groups of time series analysis.

References

1. Rowley AH, Shulman ST. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of kawasaki disease. Front Pediatr. (2018) 6. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Tsuda E, Hashimoto S. Time course of coronary artery aneurysms in kawasaki disease. J Pediatr. (2020) 230:133–9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Marchesi A, Rigante D, Cimaz R, Ravelli A, Villani A. Revised recommendations of the Italian Society of Pediatrics about the general management of Kawasaki disease. Ital J Pediatr. (2021) 47:16. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-00962-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of kawasaki disease: A scientific statement for health professionals from the American heart association. Circulation. (2017) 135:e927–e99. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Shendre A, Wiener HW, Zhi D, Vazquez AI, Portman MA, Shrestha S. High-density genotyping of immune loci in Kawasaki disease and IVIG treatment response in European-American case-parent trio study. Genes Immun. (2014) 15:534–42. doi: 10.1038/gene.2014.47

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bar-Meir M, Kalisky I, Schwartz A, Somekh E, Tasher D. Prediction of resistance to intravenous immunoglobulin in children with kawasaki disease. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. (2018) 7:25–9. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piw075

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Li T, Feng J, Li N, Liu T. Correct identification of incomplete Kawasaki disease. J Int Med Res. (2021) 49:3000605211001712. doi: 10.1177/03000605211001712

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Witkowski M, Weeks TL, Hazen SL. Gut microbiota and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. (2020) 127:553–70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Vatanen T, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, Tripathi S, Arthur TD, Vehik K, et al. The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature. (2018) 562:589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0620-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lavelle A, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 17:223–37. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0258-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Filippis FD, Paparo L, Nocerino R, Gatta GD, Carucci L, Russo R, et al. Specific gut microbiome signatures and the associated pro-inflamatory functions are linked to pediatric allergy and acquisition of immune tolerance. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:5958. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26266-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gopalakrishnan V, Helmink BA, Spencer CN, Reuben A, Wargo JA. The influence of the gut microbiome on cancer, immunity, and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. (2018) 33:570–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kinumaki A, Sekizuka T, Hamada H, Kato K, Yamashita A, Kuroda M. Characterization of the gut microbiota of Kawasaki disease patients by metagenomic analysis. Front Microbiol. (2015) 6:824. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Khan I, Li XA, Law B, KI U, BQ P, Lei C, et al. Correlation of gut microbial compositions to the development of Kawasaki disease vasculitis in children. Future Microbiol. (2020) 15:591–600. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wang F, Qian F, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Cen J, Zhang J, et al. The reduced SCFA-producing gut microbes are involved in the inflammatory activation in Kawasaki disease. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1124118. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1124118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. (2014) 30:2114–20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. (2012) 9:357–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. (2015) 31:1674–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinf. (2010) 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. (2012) 28:3150–2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. (2017) 14:417–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. (2015) 12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. (2014) 42:D490–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Franzosa EA, McIver LJ, Rahnavard G, Thompson LR, Schirmer M, Weingart G, et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat Methods. (2018) 15:962–8. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0176-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Suzek BE, Huang H, McGarvey P, Mazumder R, Wu CH. UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics. (2007) 23:1282–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. (2014) 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. (2011) 12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. (2019) 37:852–7. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Martino C, Morton JT, Marotz CA, Thompson LR, Tripathi A, Knight R, et al. A novel sparse compositional technique reveals microbial perturbations. mSystems. (2019) 4:e00016–19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00016-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kumar L, EF M. Mfuzz: a software package for soft clustering of microarray data. Bioinformation. (2007) 2:5–7. doi: 10.6026/bioinformation

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kaminski J, Gibson MK, Franzosa EA, Segata N, Dantas G, Huttenhower C. High-specificity targeted functional profiling in microbial communities with shortBRED. PloS Comput Biol. (2015) 11:e1004557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Neumann A, Björck L, Frick IM. Finegoldia magna, an anaerobic gram-positive bacterium of the normal human microbiota, induces inflammation by activating neutrophils. Front Microbiol. (2020) 11:65. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Zheng M, Han R, Yuan Y, Xing Y, Zhang W, Sun Z, et al. The role of Akkermansia muciniphila in inflammatory bowel disease: Current knowledge and perspectives. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1089600. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1089600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Martín R, Rios-Covian D, Huillet E, Auger S, Khazaal S, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, et al. Faecalibacterium: a bacterial genus with promising human health applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev. (2023) 47:fuad039. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Martens EC, Chiang HC, Gordon JI. Mucosal glycan foraging enhances fitness and transmission of a saccharolytic human gut bacterial symbiont. Cell Host Microbe. (2008) 4:447–57. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Khan MT, Dwibedi C, Sundh D, Pradhan M, Kraft JD, Caesar R, et al. Synergy and oxygen adaptation for development of next-generation probiotics. Nature. (2023) 620:381–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06378-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Chen J, Yue Y, Wang L-T, Deng Z, Yuan Y, Zhao M, et al. Altered gut microbiota correlated with systemic inflammation in children with Kawasaki disease. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:14525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71371-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zou M, Yang Z, Fan Y, Gong L, Han Z, Ji L, et al. Gut microbiota on admission as predictive biomarker for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:988326. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.988326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Cobo F, Calatrava E, Navarro-Marí JM. Early prosthetic valve endocarditis due to finegoldia magna. Microbiol Insights. (2019) 12:1178636119876640. doi: 10.1177/1178636119876640

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Choi Y, Oda E, Waldman O, Sajda T, Beck C, Oh I. Next-generation sequencing for pathogen identification in infected foot ulcers. Foot Ankle Orthop. (2021) 6:24730114211026933. doi: 10.1177/24730114211026933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Begaj A, McLean RC, Bhaskar P. Finegoldia magna: a rare cause of necrotising fasciitis. BMJ Case Rep. (2020) 13:e235115. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-235115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Alsubaie S, Dolgum S, Binkhamis K, Alweijri I, Bugshan A, Alzamil F. Finegoldia magna causing intramedullary thoracic spinal cord abscess in an infant. Anaerobe. (2019) 56:57–60. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Senn L, Entenza JM, Greub G, Jaton K, Wenger A, Bille J, et al. Bloodstream and endovascular infections due to Abiotrophia defectiva and Granulicatella species. BMC Infect Dis. (2006) 6:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Washington ER, Carius BM, Dougherty C, Ashworth S. Abiotrophia defectiva triple threat: A rare case of infective spondylodiscitis, endocarditis, and brain abscess. Am J Emerg Med. (2024) 75:199.e1–.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Jacob A, Idikula MJ. Infective endocarditis by Abiotrophia defectiva presenting as acute coronary syndrome. Natl Med J India. (2022) 35:318. doi: 10.25259/NMJI_483_21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Jain S, Bui V, Spencer C, Yee L. Septic arthritis in a native joint due to Anaerococcus prevotii. J Clin Pathol. (2008) 61:775–6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.053421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Sasmanto S, Wasito EB. Odontogenic brain abscess due to Anaerococcus prevotii infections: A case report and review article. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2022) 97:107450. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Zhu F, Ju Y, Wang W, Wang Q, Guo R, Ma Q, et al. Metagenome-wide association of gut microbiome features for schizophrenia. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:1612. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15457-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Bowerman KL, Rehman SF, Vaughan A, Lachner N, Budden KF, Kim RY, et al. Disease-associated gut microbiome and metabolome changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:5886. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19701-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Xie S, Li J, Lyu F, Xiong Q, Gu P, Chen Y, et al. Novel tripeptide RKH derived from Akkermansia muciniphila protects against lethal sepsis. Gut. (2023) 73:78–91. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kim S, Shin YC, Kim TY, Kim Y, Lee YS, Lee SH, et al. Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila accelerates intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1–20. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1892441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Bae M, Cassilly CD, Liu X, Park SM, Tusi BK, Chen X, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila phospholipid induces homeostatic immune responses. Nature. (2022) 608:168–73. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04985-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Quévrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, Chain F, Marquant R, Tailhades J, et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn's disease. Gut. (2016) 65:415–25. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Fu J, Bonder MJ, Cenit MC, Tigchelaar EF, Maatman A, Dekens JA, et al. The gut microbiome contributes to a substantial proportion of the variation in blood lipids. Circ Res. (2015) 117:817–24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Wu H, Tremaroli V, Schmidt C, Lundqvist A, Olsson LM, Krämer M, et al. The gut microbiota in prediabetes and diabetes: A population-based cross-sectional study. Cell Metab. (2020) 32:379–90.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Loomba R, Seguritan V, Li W, Long T, Klitgord N, Bhatt A, et al. Gut microbiome-based metagenomic signature for non-invasive detection of advanced fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. (2019) 30:607. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, Lakhdari O, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Gratadoux JJ, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008) 105:16731–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804812105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Gao Y, Xu P, Sun D, Jiang Y, Lin XL, Han T, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abrogates intestinal toxicity and promotes tumor immunity to increase the efficacy of dual CTLA4 and PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Cancer Res. (2023) 83:3710–25. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-0605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Gauffin Cano P, Santacruz A, Moya Á, Sanz Y. Bacteroides uniformis CECT 7771 ameliorates metabolic and immunological dysfunction in mice with high-fat-diet induced obesity. PloS One. (2012) 7:e41079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. López-Almela I, Romaní-Pérez M, Bullich-Vilarrubias C, Benítez-Páez A, Gómez Del Pulgar EM, Francés R, et al. Bacteroides uniformis combined with fiber amplifies metabolic and immune benefits in obese mice. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1–20. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1865706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Gómez Del Pulgar EM, Benítez-Páez A, Sanz Y. Safety assessment of bacteroides uniformis CECT 7771, a symbiont of the gut microbiota in infants. Nutrients. (2020) 12:551. doi: 10.3390/nu12020551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Yan H, Qin Q, Chen J, Yan S, Li T, Gao X, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in patients with visceral obesity based on quantitative computed tomography. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:823262. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.823262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Luo J, Yang H, Song BL. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2020) 21:225–45. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Cuffaro B, Assohoun ALW, Boutillier D, Peucelle V, Desramaut J, Boudebbouze S, et al. Identification of new potential biotherapeutics from human gut microbiota-derived bacteria. Microorganisms. (2021) 9:565. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. O'Toole PW, Marchesi JR, Hill C. Next-generation probiotics: the spectrum from probiotics to live biotherapeutics. Nat Microbiol. (2017) 2:17057. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.57

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Yang C, Mogno I, Contijoch EJ, Borgerding JN, Aggarwala V, Li Z, et al. Fecal igA levels are determined by strain-level differences in bacteroides ovatus and are modifiable by gut microbiota manipulation. Cell Host Microbe. (2020) 27:467–75.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Ulsemer P, Henderson G, Toutounian K, Löffler A, Schmidt J, Karsten U, et al. Specific humoral immune response to the Thomsen-Friedenreich tumor antigen (CD176) in mice after vaccination with the commensal bacterium Bacteroides ovatus D-6. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2013) 62:875–87. doi: 10.1007/s00262-013-1394-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Han ND, Cheng J, Delannoy-Bruno O, Webber D, Terrapon N, Henrissat B, et al. Microbial liberation of N-methylserotonin from orange fiber in gnotobiotic mice and humans. Cell. (2022) 185:2495–509.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Hu X, Zhou R, Li H, Zhao X, Sun Y, Fan Y, et al. Alterations of gut microbiome and serum metabolome in coronary artery disease patients complicated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:805812. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.805812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Sonnenburg JL, Xu J, Leip DD, Chen CH, Westover BP, Weatherford J, et al. Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science. (2005) 307:1955–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1109051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Delorme C, Abraham AL, Renault P, Guédon E. Genomics of Streptococcus salivarius, a major human commensal. Infect Genet Evol. (2015) 33:381–92. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Wang Y, Li J, Zhang H, Zheng X, Wang J, Jia X, et al. Probiotic streptococcus salivarius K12 alleviates radiation-induced oral mucositis in mice. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:684824. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.684824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Tong L. Structure and function of biotin-dependent carboxylases. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2013) 70:863–91. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1096-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Neophytou C, Pitsouli C. Biotin controls intestinal stem cell mitosis and host-microbiome interactions. Cell Rep. (2022) 38:110505. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Belda E, Voland L, Tremaroli V, Falony G, Adriouch S, Assmann KE, et al. Impairment of gut microbial biotin metabolism and host biotin status in severe obesity: effect of biotin and prebiotic supplementation on improved metabolism. Gut. (2022) 71:2463–80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Hu T, Wu Q, Yao Q, Jiang K, Yu J, Tang Q. Short-chain fatty acid metabolism and multiple effects on cardiovascular diseases. Ageing Res Rev. (2022) 81:101706. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Vital M, Howe AC, Tiedje JM. Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta)genomic data. mBio. (2014) 5:e00889. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00889-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Fox IH. Metabolic basis for disorders of purine nucleotide degradation. Metabolism. (1981) 30:616–34. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(81)90142-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Durante W. The emerging role of l-glutamine in cardiovascular health and disease. Nutrients. (2019) 11:2092. doi: 10.3390/nu11092092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Piao L, Fang YH, Parikh K, Ryan JJ, Toth PT, Archer SL. Cardiac glutaminolysis: a maladaptive cancer metabolism pathway in the right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension. J Mol Med (Berl). (2013) 91:1185–97. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1064-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Bolotin G, Raman J, Williams U, Bacha E, Kocherginsky M, Jeevanandam V. Glutamine improves myocardial function following ischemia-reperfusion injury. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. (2007) 15:463–7. doi: 10.1177/021849230701500603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Wu C, Kato TS, Ji R, Zizola C, Brunjes DL, Deng Y, et al. Supplementation of l-alanyl-l-glutamine and fish oil improves body composition and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. (2015) 8:1077–87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Wang HF, Wang YX, Zhou YP, Wei YP, Yan Y, Zhang ZJ, et al. Protein O-GlcNAcylation in cardiovascular diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2023) 44:8–18. doi: 10.1038/s41401-022-00934-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Lunde IG, Aronsen JM, Kvaløy H, Qvigstad E, Sjaastad I, Tønnessen T, et al. Cardiac O-GlcNAc signaling is increased in hypertrophy and heart failure. Physiol Genomics. (2012) 44:162–72. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00016.2011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Kronlage M, Dewenter M, Grosso J, Fleming T, Oehl U, Lehmann LH, et al. O-glcNAcylation of histone deacetylase 4 protects the diabetic heart from failure. Circulation. (2019) 140:580–94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Ou W, Liang Y, Qin Y, Wu W, Xie M, Zhang Y, et al. Hypoxic acclimation improves cardiac redox homeostasis and protects heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury through upregulation of O-GlcNAcylation. Redox Biol. (2021) 43:101994. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101994

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Barnes JW, Tian L, Heresi GA, Farver CF, Asosingh K, Comhair SA, et al. O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine transferase directs cell proliferation in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. (2015) 131:1260–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013878

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Taylor ME, Drickamer K. Convergent and divergent mechanisms of sugar recognition across kingdoms. Curr Opin Struct Biol. (2014) 28:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Ficko-Blean E, Boraston AB. Insights into the recognition of the human glycome by microbial carbohydrate-binding modules. Curr Opin Struct Biol. (2012) 22:570–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Lekshmi M, Ammini P, Adjei J, Sanford LM, Shrestha U, Kumar S, et al. Modulation of antimicrobial efflux pumps of the major facilitator superfamily in Staphylococcus aureus. AIMS Microbiol. (2018) 4:1–18. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Chen X, Gula H, Pius T, Ou C, Gomozkova M, Wang LX, et al. Immunoglobulin G subclasses confer protection against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream dissemination through distinct mechanisms in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2023) 120:e2220765120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220765120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Donaldson GP, Ladinsky MS, Yu KB, Sanders JG, Yoo BB, Chou WC, et al. Gut microbiota utilize immunoglobulin A for mucosal colonization. Science. (2018) 360:795–800. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0926

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Kawasaki disease, metagenomic analysis, IVIG resistance, coronary artery lesions, diagnosis, prognosis

Citation: Han L, Liu X, Lan Y, Hua Y, Fan Z and Li Y (2024) Metagenomic analysis demonstrates distinct changes in the gut microbiome of Kawasaki diseases children. Front. Immunol. 15:1416185. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1416185

Received: 11 April 2024; Accepted: 28 June 2024;
Published: 22 July 2024.

Edited by:

Vinay Kumar, The Pennsylvania State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Dharmendra Bhatt, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States
Shivani Srivastava, Yale University, United States
Xiaoling Guo, Wenzhou Medical University, China

Copyright © 2024 Han, Liu, Lan, Hua, Fan and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yimin Hua, TmF0aGFuX2h1YUAxNjMuY29t; Zhenxin Fan, enhmYW5Ac2N1LmVkdS5jbg==; Yifei Li, bGl5Zndjc2hAc2N1LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.