Xiaoxuan Tang1,2
Qiaoyuan Li
Tingting Huang
Jue Ling
Yumin Yang- 1Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Jiangsu Clinical Medicine Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China
- 2Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, China
The immune system is essential in the process of nerve repair after injury. Successful modulation of the immune response is regarded as an effective approach to improving treatment outcomes. T cells play an important role in the immune response of the nervous system, and their beneficial roles in promoting regeneration have been increasingly recognized. However, the diversity of T-cell subsets also delivers both neuroprotective and neurodegenerative functions. Therefore, this review mainly discusses the beneficial impact of T-cell subsets in the repair of both peripheral nervous system and central nervous system injuries and introduces studies on various therapies based on T-cell regulation. Further discoveries in T-cell mechanisms and multifunctional biomaterials will provide novel strategies for nerve regeneration.
Introduction
Human nerves are divided into two main types: the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and the central nervous system (CNS), including the brain and spinal cord (1–3). PNS and CNS injuries are often caused by traffic accidents, natural disasters, war damage, and iatrogenic side effects of surgery (4). Due to the complexity of the pathological process and poor regrowth capacity, nerve injury becomes one of the most serious traumas and usually causes long-term disability and death in humans. Severe damage to the central nervous system can even lead to paralysis, seriously affecting the physical and mental health of individuals and causing significant social and economic problems (5). Unfortunately, despite much effort being made to address this urgent clinical need, effective treatments for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) are still elusive (6–8).
In the early clinical treatment of nerve injury, allografting was considered one of the most effective ways to bridge the injury gap, as it elicits a foreign body immune response to avoid graft failure (9, 10). Therefore, it is generally believed that inflammation is detrimental to the repair of nerve damage, and efforts have been made to reduce or eliminate the immune response by using immunosuppressive agents (11–13). However, as research has progressed, it found that the immune response to CNS/PNS injury can be both neuroprotective and neurodestructive (14–16).
Therefore, in the clinical management of treating neurotrauma, it is of paramount importance to be able to expand the immune response that promotes tissue repair while inhibiting excessive inflammation that leads to further damage (17). At present, research on the immune system and the repair of nerve injury mainly focuses on macrophages (18, 19). For instance, in the early stage of nerve injury, phagocytes represented by macrophages are rapidly recruited to the injury site and activated. During inflammation, immunostimulatory phenotype (M1) macrophages remove myelin debris and pathogens through phagocytosis and autophagy to promote nerve growth (20). Then, anti-inflammatory immunosuppressive (M2) macrophages can secrete immunoregulatory cytokines such as interleukin 14 (IL-4), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and interleukin 13 (IL-13), which promote angiogenesis and matrix formation (21). However, although T cells are regarded as important members involved in the immune response of the tissue repair process, relatively few studies have focused on how T cells affect nerve regeneration. Thus, this review mainly discusses the role of T cells in the repair of nerve injury and introduces studies on the treatment of nerve injury by regulating T cells.
T Cells in Nerve Injury
T cells are a heterogeneous cell population, and there are various classification methods. According to the difference in cell surface differentiation antigen (CD), they can be divided into two main subgroups, CD4+ and CD8+ (22). Additionally, gamma-delta (γδ) T cells are another subset of T cells that can facilitate the inflammatory responses of lymphoid and myeloid lineages, especially in the initial immune responses (23). The inflammatory response is essential in the whole pathological process of nerve regeneration, and CD4+ T cells, such as T helper cells and regulatory T cells, are significant in the adaptive immunity of nerve repair (24, 25).
Th Cells in the Pathological Process After Injury
T helper (Th) cells have been widely recognized as one of the essential members of both innate and adaptive immune responses, which also contribute to neutrophilic inflammation, remyelination, and neuropathic pain after nerve injury (26–28). Th cells can be divided into several subsets, such as type I Th (Th1) cells, type II Th (Th2) cells, and type 17 Th (Th17) cells (26). Generally, Th1 cells secrete interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) to activate M1 macrophages in acute inflammatory responses, whereas Th2 cells produce anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13 to promote M2 polarization of macrophages to improve repair (29). Lymphocyte polarization from the Th1 to Th2 phenotype during nerve regeneration improves functional recovery and myelination (30). In mechanical lesions of the CNS or stroke, a systemic Th2 shift is important in immunomodulation to facilitate regeneration and prevent autoimmune disease by downregulating Th1- or Th17-driven cellular immune responses (31).
Remyelination
In PNS injuries, Wallerian degeneration occurs at a very early stage after injury, which then triggers a cascade of inflammatory responses to clear debris and alter the microenvironment to support axon regrowth in the peripheral nerve (32). Although T cells only infiltrate the injured sites by 3 days after injury, these cells can produce various cytokines to shift the later phase of the immune response, and both Th1 and Th2 cells have been reported to promote typical nerve regeneration (33). For CNS injuries, increasing evidence has shown that Th cells initially infiltrate into the cerebrospinal meninges during immune responses in the CNS (34). Remyelination of newborn or sparing axons is essential for nerve function recovery (35). The myelination of Schwann cells or oligodendrocytes on regenerated axons can facilitate electrical impulses and secrete neurotrophic factors to promote axon repair (28, 36). In fact, evidence has indicated that Th cells may significantly modulate the remyelination process. For instance, in vitro studies have shown that the supernatants of Th1 or Th17 cells are cytotoxic to human fetal oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) and reduce the differentiation of OPCs into cells via proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or astrocyte-derived CXCL10 (37). Furthermore, Baxi’s study demonstrated that both Th1 and Th17 cells infiltrated into the CNS of mice with demyelinating disease, which inhibited endogenous remyelination in the CNS by secreting IFN-γ and interleukin 17 (IL-17) (38). These studies have shown that Th1 and Th17 appear to inhibit the remyelination process to hinder functional recovery.
Neuropathic Pain
Many clinical data have shown that Th cells are also important in neuropathic pain after injury (39). Recent studies have indicated increased numbers of Th1 or Th17 cells in patients with neuropathic pain, which are also positively correlated with pain intensity (40, 41). Further studies revealed that the ratio of inflammatory Th17 cells to Treg cells was significantly reduced in patients with chronic neuropathic pain (42). To date, there is still no consensus on the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain. Further studies on the mechanism of T cells and neuropathic pain have shown that the peripheral enzymatic activity of cathepsin S is essential for the antigen-specific activation of CD4+ T cells after peripheral nerve injury, and then the activated T cells infiltrate into the spinal cord and secrete IFN-γ to reactivate microglia to contribute to the development of neuropathic pain (43). Hartlehnert’s study demonstrated that Schwann cells expressed MHC-II molecules to activate Th cells, which further promoted posttraumatic axonal loss and neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury (44). In addition, Treg cells can also infiltrate and proliferate into the injury site and suppress the Th1 response via IL-10 signaling to inhibit the development of neuropathic pain (45).
Treg Cells in the Pathological Process After Injury
Regulatory T cells (Treg cells) are also a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes, which are characterized by the cell surface markers CD4 and CD25 and the transcription factor forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3) (46, 47). By suppressing the activation of other immune cells, Treg cells can maintain immune homeostasis and mediate immune tolerance in the inflammatory response.
Immunosuppression
Since excessive neuroinflammation can hinder axonal regeneration and functional recovery after nerve injuries, the immunosuppressive properties of Treg cells have been considered to improve the healing process (48). Zhou’s study indicated that Treg cells have a strong capacity to modulate immune responses in the brain by promoting the anti-inflammatory phenotype polarization of microglia and macrophages via IL-10 after intracerebral hemorrhage-induced injury (49). Li’s clinical study found that the levels of circulating Tregs in survival were significantly higher than those in nonsurvival TBI patients (50). Cao’s study found increased levels of Treg cells in the CNS of mice with TBI treated with fingolimod, which contributed to functional recovery, brain edema, and blood–brain barrier (BBB) healing (51). Moreover, Treg cells can not only suppress the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase 9 from neutrophils but also inhibit the production of CC-chemokine ligand 2 from endothelial cells to protect the blood–brain barrier after stroke (52).
Remyelination and Neuroprotection
In addition to immunosuppression, Treg cells also have other functions in CNS pathology, such as promoting remyelination and facilitating neuroprotection. In a stroke model, Saino’s study indicated that Treg cells enhanced the migration of neural progenitors and the neurogenesis process to improve functional recovery after stroke (53). Wang’s study showed that administration of Treg cells into the mouse brain increased the proliferation of neural stem cells through IL-10 after ischemic stroke (54). Dombrowski found that Treg cells also promoted the differentiation of OPCs to further facilitate remyelination in the central nervous system by producing cellular communication network Factor 3 (CCN3) (55). In addition, recent studies have shown that Treg cells also promote the polarization of macrophages in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to accelerate axon regeneration and inhibit neuropathic pain after traumatic peripheral injury (Figure 1) (56). In contrast, Schwartz’s group found that depletion of Treg cells enhances the spontaneous T-cell-dependent protective response to facilitate neuronal survival after CNS axonal injury, which indicates that future therapies with controllable immunosuppression capacity are necessary to achieve a balance between neuroprotection and avoiding autoimmune disease (57, 58).
Figure 1 The neuroprotective and neurodestructive impacts of T-cell subsets in CNS/PNS nerve injury. Generally, Th2 cells and Treg cells produce anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 or IL-10 to promote nerve repair, whereas Th1 and Th17 cells produce IFN-γ or IL-17 to boost acute inflammatory responses.
However, despite substantial evidence supporting the beneficial effects of Treg cells for nerve repair, some studies have also reported their detrimental effects. For example, Baruch’s report indicated that immunosuppression of phagocytes by Treg cells impaired plaque clearance in an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) mouse model (59). Meanwhile, Kleinschnitz’s study showed that the depletion of Treg cells could reduce stroke lesion volume and improve neurological function (60). Nevertheless, the differences between the effects of Treg cells in nerve injury indicate the dynamic roles held by Treg cells in different stages of the repair process and the complexities of Treg cell interactions with other immune or nerve cells in the microenvironment, where a deeper understanding should be made in future studies (Table 1).
Table 1 Summary of therapies based on T cells modulation for nerve repair.
T Cell-Mediated Therapies for Nerve Injuries
Thermal, mechanical, chemical, or ischemic damage to the CNS or PNS results in neuronal loss and neuronal dysfunction, usually accompanied by sensorimotor impairment, which alters the quality of life of patients (61–64). For peripheral nerve injury, autologous transplantation is still the gold standard at present; however, there are limitations such as limited donor sources and mismatching structure/size (65, 66). Therefore, developing bioengineered artificial nerves becomes inevitable. In the past few decades, based on the development of biomedical materials, the use of artificial nerve grafts to repair damaged peripheral nerves has been extensively studied and has achieved remarkable results in repairing short-distance peripheral nerve transection injuries (67, 68). However, the effective repair of long-distance peripheral injuries using artificial nerve grafts remains a great challenge (69–72). For CNS injury, the current strategies are even limited to achieving desirable nerve repair and functional recovery (73–75). In addition to therapies that directly promote rapid axon growth, recent studies have focused on creating a favorable microenvironment at injury sites by regulating the immune response (76–78).
As the effect of T cells on nerve regeneration has been gradually explored, strategies for T-cell modulation have started to draw the attention of researchers (79, 80). For instance, by local injection of plasmids into the epineurium of injured rat sciatic nerve for upregulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), Ruslan’s team found that the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 12 (IL-12) were significantly reduced in peripheral blood, while the levels of epidermal growth factor, interleukin 2 (IL-2), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and presumably secreted factor (RANTES) were greatly increased after 7 days post-injection of plasmid to promote angiogenesis and sciatic nerve regeneration (81). The capacity of mesenchymal stem cells to successfully regulate the immune response has been demonstrated in medical fields such as tissue regeneration and autoimmune diseases (82–84). For nerve regeneration, Aline’s team found that the levels of Treg cells significantly increased in the blood, lymph nodes, and neural infiltrating cells after administration of human Wharton’s glia-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hWJ-MSCs) to the injury site of the sciatic nerve. Meanwhile, the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 were significantly upregulated in the lymph nodes and nerves of HWJ-MSC-treated mice to improve functional recovery due to hWJ-MSC-induced Treg cell development to regulate the balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the injured sciatic nerve (85).
For central nerve injury, Laura’s team found that transplantation of human neural stem cells (hNSCs) into a mouse model of demyelination experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis during the chronic phase achieved successful remyelination and neuroinflammation suppression by increasing central Treg cells, demonstrating that Treg cells can directly interact with stem and progenitor cells within tissues to promote central nerve regeneration (86). In Sun’s research, rapid recruitment of γδ T cells into the injury site within 24 hours along with high expression of the inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ was found to impair recovery after SCI, where treatment with anti-Vγ4, anti–IFN-γ, or anti–TNF-α antibodies effectively improved functional recovery (87). Ma’s study demonstrated that adoptive transfer of bone marrow-derived M2 macrophages after SCI significantly decreased spinal cord lesion volume and improved locomotor function recovery in rats. The M2 macrophages infiltrated into the injured sites and produced anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β to increase the Th2 cell fraction to support nerve repair (88). Moreover, to prevent the development of multiple sclerosis after CNS damage, Villoslada’s team used recombinant human NGF to treat CNS inflammation and demyelination in EAE. NGF treatment reduced the production of interferon-γ and increased the production of interleukin 10 in the CNS, achieving a shift toward Th2 responses to promote myelin repair (89, 90).
Clinically, biomedical nerve grafts are usually required for repairing traumatic nerve defects. Recent studies have found that the behavior of T cells plays an important role in nerve defect repair using acellular nerve grafts (ANAs). Deng’s study found that insufficient accumulation of T cells within long-scale ANAs resulted in reduced expression of both IFN-γ and IL-4, which may limit functional recovery and nerve regeneration across the ANAs (91, 92). To further improve the efficacy of nerve repair using peripheral nerve allografts, Bushman’s team locally injected Treg cells around peripheral nerve allografts by encapsulating them in a degradable hydrogel of polyethylene glycol norbornene. Treg cells were released from the hydrogel and infiltrated the graft within 14 days, suppressed the host immune response, and promoted nerve regeneration in rats (93). These studies indicate that localized delivery of neutralizing antibodies or Treg cells to modulate the immune microenvironment combined with nerve grafts can be an effective strategy for nerve defect repair.
Future Perspectives
Desirable nerve repair and functional recovery of traumatic nerve injuries remain great challenges in the clinic, and the immune response is essential in the pathological process of neural regeneration. However, there is a certain need for a deeper understanding of cellular immunity in the nervous system and how T cells contribute to the immune response after injury, especially in exploring the roles of different T-cell subsets at various stages of the repair process. Significantly, several achievements have been made for effectively modulating T cells in the immune response using biomaterials, stem cells, antibodies, or immunosuppressive drugs. The combination of biomedical scaffolds with cell therapy or spatiotemporal delivery of immunomodulators/cytokines/chemokines can provide great opportunities, which can be facilitated by further research into immunology.
Author Contributions
XT and JL drafted the main body of this manuscript. YY modified the manuscript. QL, TH, HZ, and XC helped with the manuscript editing and discussions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Project No: 31830028) and Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Center.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Varadarajan SG, Hunyara JL, Hamilton NR, Kolodkin AL, Huberman AD. Central Nervous System Regeneration. Cell (2022) 185(1):77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.029
2. Gu X, Chen X, Tang X, Zhou Z, Huang T, Yang Y, et al. Pure-Silk Fibroin Hydrogel With Stable Aligned Micropattern Toward Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Nanotechnol Rev (2021) 10(1):10–9. doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2021-0002
3. Shen H, Xu B, Yang C, Xue W, You Z, Wu X, et al. A DAMP-Scavenging, IL-10-Releasing Hydrogel Promotes Neural Regeneration and Motor Function Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury. Biomaterials (2022) 280:121279. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121279
4. Gu X, Ding F, Yang Y, Liu J. Construction of Tissue Engineered Nerve Grafts and Their Application in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Prog Neurobiol (2011) 93(2):204–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.11.002
5. Hu X, Chen H, Xu H, Wu Y, Wu C, Jia C, et al. Role of Pyroptosis in Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries. Int J Biol Sci (2020) 16(12):2042–50. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45467
6. Habtemariam S. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms of Neuroprotection by Ursolic Acid: Addressing Brain Injury, Cerebral Ischemia, Cognition Deficit, Anxiety, and Depression. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2019) 2019:8512048. doi: 10.1155/2019/8512048
7. The Lancet N. The Future Research Path of Traumatic Brain Injury. Lancet Neurol (2022) 21(4):295. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00089-8
8. Hutson TH, Di Giovanni S. The Translational Landscape in Spinal Cord Injury: Focus on Neuroplasticity and Regeneration. Nat Rev Neurol (2019) 15(12):732–45. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0280-3
9. Wofford KL, Shultz RB, Burrell JC, Cullen DK. Neuroimmune Interactions and Immunoengineering Strategies in Peripheral Nerve Repair. Prog Neurobiol (2022) 208:102172. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102172
10. Barnes R, Bacsich P, Wyburn GM, Kerr AS. A Study of the Fate of Nerve Homografts in Man. Br J Surg (1946) 34:34–41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18003413306
11. Marmor L, Miner R, Foster J. Experimental Prevention of Nerve Homograft Rejection by Use of Immunosuppressive Drugs. J Neurosurg (1967) 27(5):415–8. doi: 10.3171/jns.1967.27.5.0415
12. Marmor L. Peripheral Nerve Grafts. Clin Neurosurg (1970) 17:126–41. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/17.CN_suppl_1.126
13. Pollard J, Fitzpatrick L. A Comparison of the Effects of Irradiation and Immunosuppressive Agents on Regeneration Through Peripheral Nerve Allografts: An Ultrastructural Study. Acta Neuropathol (1973) 23(2):166–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00685770
14. Profyris C, Cheema SS, Zang D, Azari MF, Boyle K, Petratos S. Degenerative and Regenerative Mechanisms Governing Spinal Cord Injury. Neurobiol Dis (2004) 15(3):415–36. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.11.015
15. Ide C. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Neurosci Res (1996) 25(2):101–21. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(96)01042-5
16. Serpe CJ, Coers S, Sanders VM, Jones KJ. CD4+ T, But Not CD8+ or B, Lymphocytes Mediate Facial Motoneuron Survival After Facial Nerve Transection. Brain Behav Immun (2003) 17(5):393–402. doi: 10.1016/S0889-1591(03)00028-X
17. Jones KJ, Serpe CJ, Byram SC, Deboy CA, Sanders VM. Role of the Immune System in the Maintenance of Mouse Facial Motoneuron Viability After Nerve Injury. Brain Behav Immun (2005) 19(1):12–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.05.004
18. De La Rosa-Reyes V, Duprey-Diaz MV, Blagburn JM, Blanco RE. Retinoic Acid Treatment Recruits Macrophages and Increases Axonal Regeneration After Optic Nerve Injury in the Frog Rana Pipiens. PloS One (2021) 16(11):e0255196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255196
19. An N, Yang J, Wang H, Sun S, Wu H, Li L, et al. Mechanism of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury Repair Through Macrophage Polarization. Cell Biosci (2021) 11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00554-z
20. Mokarram N, Dymanus K, Srinivasan A, Lyon JG, Tipton J, Chu J, et al. Immunoengineering Nerve Repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America (2017) 114(26):E5077–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705757114
21. Zhang B, Su Y, Zhou J, Zheng Y, Zhu D. Toward a Better Regeneration Through Implant-Mediated Immunomodulation: Harnessing the Immune Responses. Adv Sci (2021) 8(16):2100446. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100446
22. Sun B, Zhang Y. Overview of Orchestration of CD4+ T Cell Subsets in Immune Responses. Adv Exp Med Biol (2014) 841:1–13. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9487-9_1
23. Wo J, Zhang F, Li Z, Sun C, Zhang W, Sun G. The Role of Gamma-Delta T Cells in Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Front Immunol (2020) 11:580304. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.580304
24. Tang X, Chen X, Zhang S, Gu X, Wu R, Huang T, et al. Silk-Inspired In Situ Hydrogel With Anti-Tumor Immunity Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy for Melanoma and Infected Wound Healing. Adv Funct Mater (2021) 31(17):2101320. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202101320
25. Evans FL, Dittmer M, de la Fuente AG, Fitzgerald DC. Protective and Regenerative Roles of T Cells in Central Nervous System Disorders. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2171. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02171
26. O'Shea JJ, Paul WE. Mechanisms Underlying Lineage Commitment and Plasticity of Helper CD4+ T Cells. Science (2010) 327(5969):1098–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1178334
27. Ley K. The Second Touch Hypothesis: T Cell Activation, Homing and Polarization. F1000Res (2014) 3:37. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.3-37.v1
28. Berret E, Barron T, Xu J, Debner E, Kim EJ, Kim JH. Oligodendroglial Excitability Mediated by Glutamatergic Inputs and Nav1.2 Activation. Nat Commun (2017) 8(1):557. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00688-0
29. Bombeiro AL, Lima BHM, Bonfanti AP, Oliveira ALR. Improved Mouse Sciatic Nerve Regeneration Following Lymphocyte Cell Therapy. Mol Immunol (2020) 121:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.03.003
30. Bombeiro AL, Pereira B, Bonfanti AP, Oliveira A. Immunomodulation by Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment Improves Mouse Sciatic Nerve Regeneration. Brain Res Bull (2020) 160:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.04.005
31. Hendrix S, Nitsch R. The Role of T Helper Cells in Neuroprotection and Regeneration. J Neuroimmunol (2007) 184(1-2):100–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.11.019
32. Chen P, Piao X, Bonaldo P. Role of Macrophages in Wallerian Degeneration and Axonal Regeneration After Peripheral Nerve Injury. Acta Neuropathol (2015) 130(5):605–18. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1482-4
33. Gaudet AD, Popovich PG, Ramer MS. Wallerian Degeneration: Gaining Perspective on Inflammatory Events After Peripheral Nerve Injury. J Neuroinflamm (2011) 8:110. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-110
34. Kipnis J. Multifaceted Interactions Between Adaptive Immunity and the Central Nervous System. Science (2016) 353(6301):766–71. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2638
35. Chen X, Tang X, Wang Y, Gu X, Huang T, Yang Y, et al. Silk-Inspired Fiber Implant With Multi-Cues Enhanced Bionic Microenvironment for Promoting Peripheral Nerve Repair. Mater Sci Eng: C (2022) 135:112674. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2022.112674
36. Tang X, Gu X, Huang T, Chen X, Zhou Z, Yang Y, et al. Anisotropic Silk-Inspired Nerve Conduit With Peptides Improved the Microenvironment for Long-Distance Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. ACS Macro Lett (2021) 10(12):1501–9. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00533
37. Moore CS, Cui QL, Warsi NM, Durafourt BA, Zorko N, Owen DR, et al. Direct and Indirect Effects of Immune and Central Nervous System-Resident Cells on Human Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cell Differentiation. J Immunol (2015) 194(2):761–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401156
38. Baxi EG, DeBruin J, Tosi DM, Grishkan IV, Smith MD, Kirby LA, et al. Transfer of Myelin-Reactive Th17 Cells Impairs Endogenous Remyelination in the Central Nervous System of Cuprizone-Fed Mice. J Neurosci (2015) 35(22):8626–39. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3817-14.2015
39. Moalem-Taylor G, Baharuddin B, Bennett B, Krishnan AV, Huynh W, Kiernan MC, et al. Immune Dysregulation in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):8218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08123-6
40. Russo MA, Fiore NT, van Vreden C, Bailey D, Santarelli DM, McGuire HM, et al. Expansion and Activation of Distinct Central Memory T Lymphocyte Subsets in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. J Neuroinflamm (2019) 16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1449-9
41. Tian P, Ma X-l, Wang T, Ma J-X, Yang X. Correlation Between Radiculalgia and Counts of T Lymphocyte Subsets in the Peripheral Blood of Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation. Orthopaedic Surg (2009) 1(4):317–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2009.00052.x
42. Luchting B, Rachinger-Adam B, Heyn J, Hinske LC, Kreth S, Azad SC. Anti-Inflammatory T-Cell Shift in Neuropathic Pain. J Neuroinflamm (2015) 12:12. doi: 10.1186/s12974-014-0225-0
43. Zhang X, Wu Z, Hayashi Y, Okada R, Nakanishi H. Peripheral Role of Cathepsin S in Th1 Cell-Dependent Transition of Nerve Injury-Induced Acute Pain to a Chronic Pain State. J Neurosci (2014) 34(8):3013–22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3681-13.2014
44. Hartlehnert M, Derksen A, Hagenacker T, Kindermann D, Schäfers M, Pawlak M, et al. Schwann Cells Promote Post-Traumatic Nerve Inflammation and Neuropathic Pain Through MHC Class II. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):12518. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12744-2
45. Davoli-Ferreira M, de Lima K, Fonseca M, Guimarães R, Gomes F, Cavallini M, et al. Regulatory T Cells Counteract Neuropathic Pain Through Inhibition of the Th1 Response at the Site of Peripheral Nerve Injury. Pain (2020) 161(8):1730–43. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001879
46. Togashi Y, Shitara K, Nishikawa H. Regulatory T Cells in Cancer Immunosuppression - Implications for Anticancer Therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2019) 16(6):356–71. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0175-7
47. Savage PA, Klawon DEJ, Miller CH. Regulatory T Cell Development. Annu Rev Immunol (2020) 38:421–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-100219-020937
48. Hu X, Leak RK, Thomson AW, Yu F, Xia Y, Wechsler LR, et al. Promises and Limitations of Immune Cell-Based Therapies in Neurological Disorders. Nat Rev Neurol (2018) 14(9):559–68. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0028-5
49. Zhou K, Zhong Q, Wang YC, Xiong XY, Meng ZY, Zhao T, et al. Regulatory T Cells Ameliorate Intracerebral Hemorrhage-Induced Inflammatory Injury by Modulating Microglia/Macrophage Polarization Through the IL-10/GSK3beta/PTEN Axis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2017) 37(3):967–79. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16648712
50. Li M, Lin YP, Chen JL, Li H, Jiang RC, Zhang JN. Role of Regulatory T Cell in Clinical Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury. Chin Med J (2015) 128(8):1072–8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.155094
51. Gao C, Qian Y, Huang J, Wang D, Su W, Wang P, et al. A Three-Day Consecutive Fingolimod Administration Improves Neurological Functions and Modulates Multiple Immune Responses of CCI Mice. Mol Neurobiol (2017) 54(10):8348–60. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0318-0
52. Mao L, Li P, Zhu W, Cai W, Liu Z, Wang Y, et al. Regulatory T Cells Ameliorate Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Induced Brain Haemorrhage After Stroke. Brain (2017) 140(7):1914–31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx111
53. Saino O, Taguchi A, Nakagomi T, Nakano-Doi A, Kashiwamura S, Doe N, et al. Immunodeficiency Reduces Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Apoptosis and Enhances Neurogenesis in the Cerebral Cortex After Stroke. J Neurosci Res (2010) 88(11):2385–97. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22410
54. Wang J, Xie L, Yang C, Ren C, Zhou K, Wang B, et al. Activated Regulatory T Cell Regulates Neural Stem Cell Proliferation in the Subventricular Zone of Normal and Ischemic Mouse Brain Through Interleukin 10. Front Cell Neurosci (2015) 9:361. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00361
55. Dombrowski Y, O'Hagan T, Dittmer M, Penalva R, Mayoral SR, Bankhead P, et al. Regulatory T Cells Promote Myelin Regeneration in the Central Nervous System. Nat Neurosci (2017) 20(5):674–80. doi: 10.1038/nn.4528
56. Chen H, Jiang L, Zhang D, Chen J, Luo X, Xie Y, et al. Exploring the Correlation Between the Regulation of Macrophages by Regulatory T Cells and Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Front Neurosci (2022) 16:813751. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.813751
57. Kipnis J, Mizrahi T, Hauben E, Shaked I, Shevach E, Schwartz M. Neuroprotective Autoimmunity: Naturally Occurring CD4+ CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Suppress the Ability to Withstand Injury to the Central Nervous System. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99(24):15620–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232565399
58. Schwartz M. Helping The Body To Cure Itself: Immune Modulation By Therapeutic Vaccination For Spinal Cord Injury. J Spinal Cord Med (2016) 26(sup1):S6–S10. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2003.11753719
59. Baruch K, Rosenzweig N, Kertser A, Deczkowska A, Sharif AM, Spinrad A, et al. Breaking Immune Tolerance by Targeting Foxp3(+) Regulatory T Cells Mitigates Alzheimer's Disease Pathology. Nat Commun (2015) 6:7967. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8967
60. Kleinschnitz C, Kraft P, Dreykluft A, Hagedorn I, Gobel K, Schuhmann MK, et al. Regulatory T Cells are Strong Promoters of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Mice by Inducing Dysfunction of the Cerebral Microvasculature. Blood (2013) 121(4):679–91. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-426734
61. Valente LA, Begg LR, Filiano AJ. Updating Neuroimmune Targets in Central Nervous System Dysfunction. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2019) 40(7):482–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.04.013
62. Li F, Sami A, Noristani HN, Slattery K, Qiu J, Groves T, et al. Glial Metabolic Rewiring Promotes Axon Regeneration and Functional Recovery in the Central Nervous System. Cell Metab (2020) 32(5):767–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.015
63. Lopez-Silva TL, Cristobal CD, Edwin Lai CS, Leyva-Aranda V, Lee HK, Hartgerink JD. Self-Assembling Multidomain Peptide Hydrogels Accelerate Peripheral Nerve Regeneration After Crush Injury. Biomaterials (2021) 265:120401. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120401
64. Zhao Y, Liang Y, Ding S, Zhang K, Mao HQ, Yang Y. Application of Conductive PPy/SF Composite Scaffold and Electrical Stimulation for Neural Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials (2020) 255:120164. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120164
65. Evans GR. Challenges to Nerve Regeneration. Semin Surg Oncol (2000) 19(3):312–8. doi: 10.1002/1098-2388(200010/11)19:3<312::AID-SSU13>3.0.CO;2-M
66. Heath CA, Rutkowski GE. The Development of Bioartificial Nerve Grafts for Peripheral-Nerve Regeneration. Trends Biotechnol (1998) 16(4):163–8. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01165-7
67. Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE. Management of Nerve Gaps: Autografts, Allografts, Nerve Transfers, and End-to-Side Neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol (2010) 223(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.031
68. Gu X, Ding F, Williams DF. Neural Tissue Engineering Options for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Biomaterials (2014) 35(24):6143–56. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064
69. Yi S, Xu L, Gu X. Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction. Exp Neurol (2019) 319:112761. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.05.016
70. Chen SY, Liu S, Zhang LL, Han Q, Liu HQ, Shen JH, et al. Construction of Injectable Silk Fibroin/Polydopamine Hydrogel for Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury. Chem Eng J (2020) 399:125795. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125795
71. Li G, Zheng T, Wu L, Han Q, Lei Y, Xue L, et al. Bionic Microenvironment-Inspired Synergistic Effect of Anisotropic Micro-Nanocomposite Topology and Biology Cues on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Sci Adv (2021) 7(28):eabi5812. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi5812
72. Dong X, Liu S, Yang Y, Gao S, Li W, Cao J, et al. Aligned Microfiber-Induced Macrophage Polarization to Guide Schwann-Cell-Enabled Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Biomaterials (2021) 272:120767. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120767
73. Man WT, Yang SH, Cao Z, Lu JJ, Kong XD, Sun XD, et al. A Multi-Modal Delivery Strategy for Spinal Cord Regeneration Using a Composite Hydrogel Presenting Biophysical and Biochemical Cues Synergistically. Biomaterials (2021) 276:120971. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120971
74. Chiang MY, Cheng HW, Lo YC, Wang WC, Chang SJ, Cheng CH, et al. 4D Spatiotemporal Modulation of Biomolecules Distribution in Anisotropic Corrugated Microwrinkles via Electrically Manipulated Microcapsules Within Hierarchical Hydrogel for Spinal Cord Regeneration. Biomaterials (2021) 271:120762. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120762
75. Tsarouchas TM, Wehner D, Cavone L, Munir T, Keatinge M, Lambertus M, et al. Dynamic Control of Proinflammatory Cytokines Il-1 Beta and Tnf-Alpha by Macrophages in Zebrafish Spinal Cord Regeneration. Nat Commun (2018) 9:4670. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07036-w
76. Li J, Jiang X, Li H, Gelinsky M, Gu Z. Tailoring Materials for Modulation of Macrophage Fate. Adv Mater (2021) 33(12):e2004172. doi: 10.1002/adma.202004172
77. Xu C, Chang YK, Wu P, Liu K, Dong XZ, Nie AM, et al. Two-Dimensional-Germanium Phosphide-Reinforced Conductive and Biodegradable Hydrogel Scaffolds Enhance Spinal Cord Injury Repair. Adv Funct Mater (2021) 31(41):2104440. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202104440
78. Bi YH, Duan WX, Chen J, You T, Li SY, Jiang W, et al. Neutrophil Decoys With Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Oxidative Properties Reduce Secondary Spinal Cord Injury and Improve Neurological Functional Recovery. Adv Funct Mater (2021) 31(34):2102912. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202102912
79. Chen Q, Shine HD. Neuroimmune Processes Associated With Wallerian Degeneration Support Neurotrophin-3-Induced Axonal Sprouting in the Injured Spinal Cord. J Neurosci Res (2013) 91(10):1280–91. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23257
80. Yuan X, Yuan W, Ding L, Shi M, Luo L, Wan Y, et al. Cell-Adaptable Dynamic Hydrogel Reinforced With Stem Cells Improves the Functional Repair of Spinal Cord Injury by Alleviating Neuroinflammation. Biomaterials (2021) 279:121190. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121190
81. Masgutov R, Zeinalova A, Bogov A, Masgutova G, Salafutdinov I, Garanina E, et al. Angiogenesis and Nerve Regeneration Induced by Local Administration of Plasmid Pbud-Covegf165-Cofgf2 Into the Intact Rat Sciatic Nerve. Neural Regenerat Res (2021) 16(9):1882–9. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.306090
82. Park YJ, Niizuma K, Mokin M, Dezawa M, Borlongan CV. Cell-Based Therapy for Stroke: Musing With Muse Cells. Stroke (2020) 51(9):2854–62. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030618
83. Rui K, Hong Y, Zhu QG, Shi XF, Xiao F, Fu HL, et al. Olfactory Ecto-Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Murine Sjogren's Syndrome by Modulating the Function of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cell Mol Immunol (2021) 18(2):440–51. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00587-3
84. Tian J, Rui K, Hong Y, Wang XH, Xiao F, Lin X, et al. Increased GITRL Impairs the Function of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Exacerbates Primary Sjogren Syndrome. J Immunol (2019) 202(6):1693–703. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801051
85. Wang AYL, Loh CYY, Shen HH, Hsieh SY, Wang IK, Lee CM, et al. Human Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Mediated Sciatic Nerve Recovery Is Associated With the Upregulation of Regulatory T Cells. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21(17):6310. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176310
86. McIntyre LL, Greilach SA, Othy S, Sears-Kraxberger I, Wi B, Ayala-Angulo J, et al. Regulatory T Cells Promote Remyelination in the Murine Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model of Multiple Sclerosis Following Human Neural Stem Cell Transplant. Neurobiol Dis (2020) 140:104868. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104868
87. Sun GD, Yang SX, Cao GC, Wang QH, Hao JL, Wen Q, et al. Gamma dT Cells Provide the Early Source of IFN-Gamma to Aggravate Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury. J Exp Med (2018) 215(2):521–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170686
88. Ma SF, Chen YJ, Zhang JX, Shen L, Wang R, Zhou JS, et al. Adoptive Transfer of M2 Macrophages Promotes Locomotor Recovery in Adult Rats Sfter Spinal Cord Injury. Brain Behav Immun (2015) 45:157–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.11.007
89. Villoslada P, Hauser SL, Bartke I, Unger J, Heald N, Rosenberg D, et al. Human Nerve Growth Factor Protects Common Marmosets Against Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by Switching the Balance of T Helper Cell Type 1 and 2 Cytokines Within the Central Nervous System. J Exp Med (2000) 191(10):1799–806. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.10.1799
90. Raposo C, Schwartz M. Glial Scar and Immune Cell Involvement in Tissue Remodeling and Repair Following Acute CNS Injuries. Glia (2014) 62(11):1895–904. doi: 10.1002/glia.22676
91. Pan D, Hunter DA, Schellhardt L, Jo S, Santosa KB, Larson EL, et al. The Accumulation of T Cells Within Acellular Nerve Allografts is Length-Dependent and Critical for Nerve Regeneration. Exp Neurol (2019) 318:216–31. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.05.009
92. Pan D, Hunter DA, Schellhardt L, Fuchs A, Halevi AE, Snyder-Warwick AK, et al. T Cells Modulate IL-4 Expression by Eosinophil Recruitment Within Decellularized Scaffolds to Repair Nerve Defects. Acta Biomater (2020) 112:149–63. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.009
Keywords: T cells, immune response, nerve regeneration, neuroinflammation, nerve injury
Citation: Tang X, Li Q, Huang T, Zhang H, Chen X, Ling J and Yang Y (2022) Regenerative Role of T Cells in Nerve Repair and Functional Recovery. Front. Immunol. 13:923152. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.923152
Received: 19 April 2022; Accepted: 06 June 2022;
Published: 05 July 2022.
Edited by:
Ke Rui, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, ChinaReviewed by:
Xinfu Zhang, Dalian University of Technology, ChinaFan Xiao, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Copyright © 2022 Tang, Li, Huang, Zhang, Chen, Ling and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jue Ling, amwyMDE2QG50dS5lZHUuY24=; Yumin Yang, eWFuZ3ltQG50dS5lZHUuY24=