A correction has been applied to this article in:
Corrigendum: ACKR2: An Atypical Chemokine Receptor Regulating Lymphatic Biology
Ornella Bonavita
Valeria Mollica Poeta
Elisa Setten
Matteo Massara
Raffaella Bonecchi- 1Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy
- 2Department of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Rozzano, Italy
- 3Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
The lymphatic system plays an important role in the induction of the immune response by transporting antigens, inflammatory mediators, and leukocytes from peripheral tissues to draining lymph nodes. It is emerging that lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) are playing an active role in this context via the expression of chemokines, inflammatory mediators promoting cell migration, and chemokine receptors. Particularly, LECs express atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs), which are unable to promote conventional signaling and cell migration while they are involved in the regulation of chemokine availability. Here, we provide a summary of the data on the role of ACKR2 expressed by lymphatics, indicating an essential role for this ACKRs in the regulation of the inflammation and the immune response in different pathological conditions, including infection, allergy, and cancer.
Introduction
Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors
Chemokines are small chemotactic cytokines secreted by different cell types (e.g., immune cells, cancer cells, and endothelial cells) mainly involved in the regulation of immune cell migration during routine immune surveillance, inflammation, and development (1). According to the position of conserved cysteine residues in their N-terminus, chemokines are classified into four subfamilies: CXC, CX3C, CC, and C (2). In addition, they can be classified, on the basis of the conditions during which they are produced, in homeostatic or inflammatory chemokines (3, 4). Homeostatic chemokines (e.g., CCL19, CCL20, and CCL21) are constitutively produced and regulate leukocytes migration in basal conditions. Inflammatory chemokines (e.g., CXCL8, CCL2, and CCL3) are produced under pathological conditions, and they can act as secondary mediators induced by primary pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-1 and TNF-α. Inflammatory chemokines actively participate in the inflammatory response attracting immune cells to the site of injury. Beyond their unequivocal role in regulating leukocyte recruitment, other activities, such as regulation of angiogenesis, fibrosis, proliferation, homeostasis, and cancer cell dissemination, have been attributed to chemokines (5–8).
The specific effects of chemokines on their target cells are mediated by chemokine receptors, members of a family of 7-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (1). Chemokine receptors have a highly conserved structure, consisting of a single polypeptide chain with three intracellular and extracellular loops, an external N-terminus domain essential for the specificity of ligand binding, and an intracellular carboxy-terminus that, in concert with other motifs, such as the Asp–Arg–Tyr–Leu–Ala–Ile–Val (DRYLAIV) motif between the third transmembrane domain and the second intracellular loop, is involved in receptor signaling. As a general rule, chemokine binding to the receptor causes conformational changes that trigger intracellular signaling pathways involved in cell activation and migration toward increasing chemokine gradients (9). Depending on the type of chemokine they bind, chemokine receptors can be classified as CXCR, CCR, CX3CR, or XCR1.
Beyond canonical chemokine receptors, a smaller family of atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) has been identified (10). These receptors are called atypical because they share structural features with canonical chemokine receptors and bind ligands with high affinity, yet, they are not able to induce cell migration. Indeed, these receptors have an altered DRYLAIV motif and, differently from the canonical chemokine receptors, upon chemokine engagement, they do not induce any GPCR signaling. Rather, ACKRs internalize and transport chemokines to the degradative compartment, modulating chemokine concentration and bioavailability. The family of ACKRs includes four receptors named according to the new nomenclature: ACKR1 (previously called DARC), ACKR2 (D6), ACKR3 (CXCR7), and ACKR4 (CCX-CKR) (11).
Role of Chemokine and Chemokine Receptor Expression in Lymphatic Function
Chemokine and chemokine receptors expressed by lymphatic vessels (LVs) have been mainly studied in the context of leukocyte traffic. Indeed, the lymphatic system represents an important transport network for leukocytes, in particular antigen-presenting cells that migrate, through afferent LVs, from the periphery to the lymph nodes (LNs). This trafficking is mainly dictated by CCL21. CCL21 is constitutively expressed by LEC and can be upregulated by inflammatory stimuli, such as TNF-α, which induce the release of CCL21 intracellular stores (12). CCL21 promotes the recruitment of CCR7-positive dendritic cells (DCs) but also of neutrophils and T cells to draining LNs (13–15).
Interestingly, lymphatics produce many other chemokines in a stimulus-specific manner, indicating that they can fine-tune leukocyte recruitment (16). CXCL12 and CX3CL1 were found to induce DC migration to LNs (17, 18) while the function of other inflammatory chemokines produced by inflamed LEC, such as CCL2 and CXCL8, is not fully understood (12, 19).
Besides, in keeping with chemokine receptor expression on cancer cells, leukocyte-like homing toward LVs and LNs plays an important role in promoting cancer cell migration and metastasis. For example, CCR7-positive cancer cells metastasize to LNs where CCL19 and CCL21, the ligands for CCR7, are produced (20).
In addition to producing chemokines, lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) express canonical chemokine receptors. Primary culture of murine LEC was found to be positive for the expression of CCR5, CCR9, CXCR4, and CXCR6, whereas they weakly expressed CCR4, CCR6, CCR8, CCR10, CXCR3, and CX3CR1 (21). The function of these receptors expressed by LEC is still unknown, with the exception of CXCR4 that has a role in promoting lymphangiogenesis, similar to its angiogenic role in vascular endothelial cells (21).
Interestingly, LECs express ACKRs: ACKR1 is expressed by human podoplanin low LECs (22); ACKR2 by many human tissues on afferent lymphatic (23); ACKR3 by human LECs, with restricted expression in the tonsil and kidney and increased expression during renal allograft rejection (24); and finally, ACKR4 is expressed by LEC in the LN capsule (25, 26). Here, we are summarizing data on the expression and role of ACKR2 by LECs. Increasing evidence suggests a crucial role for this receptor in the regulation of inflammation and immune response (12, 27).
ACKR2/D6
The atypical chemokine receptor ACKR2, also known as D6 or CCBP2, is a highly promiscuous receptor capable of binding the majority of inflammatory CC-chemokines (28). Initially, according to its “atypical” features, it was assumed that ACKR2 was a non-signaling chemokine receptor. However, it was later demonstrated that not only is ACKR2 capable of internalization and scavenging of its ligands but that it also activates a β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathway, promoting receptor internalization and recycling to the cell membrane (29, 30).
ACKR2 Expression by Lymphatics
ACKR2 is expressed by trophoblasts in the placenta, by some leukocytes (31), and by LECs. Indeed, Nibbs et al., in a seminal paper (23), demonstrated that within non-inflamed tissues, human LECs, but not vascular endothelial cells, express ACKR2. Moreover, they found that the receptor was expressed on a subset of lymphatics, thus suggesting the existence of functional heterogeneity within the lymphatic vasculature. Specifically, ACKR2 expression was found in human skin sections only in afferent LVs, both in regions near the epidermis but also deeper within the dermis. ACKR2 was found in small lymphatics in the villi of small and large intestine and in the lamina propria mucosae of colon and large collective lymphatics located in the muscular layer. The appendix also showed ACKR2-positive lymphatics in lymphoid tissue of lamina propria and in the lamina muscolaris externa. ACKR2 was also detected in other secondary lymphoid organs such as tonsils, spleen, and LNs on sinus-like channels and vessels in the parafollicular areas of the tonsils and the red pulp of the spleen. ACKR2 was not detected in heart, kidney, liver, skeletal muscle, brain, cerebellum, pancreas, prostate, and thyroid, whereas it was found in liver, lung, and placenta, but not on LECs (23).
The regulation of ACKR2 expression in LECs was only studied in vitro using human dermal LECs. McKimmie et al. found that ACKR2 is upregulated by the lymphangiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor-D, by the immunosuppressive cytokine transforming growth factor-β, and by the inflammatory mediators IL-6, type-I IFNs, and IFN-γ. On the contrary, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1α induced a significant downregulation of ACKR2 (32).
The Function of ACKR2 Expressed by LECs
Extensive evidence indicates that ACKR2 is involved in the regulation of chemokine levels around afferent LVs and in the removal of chemokines from inflamed tissues, thus acting as scavenger and “gatekeeper” by limiting the access, the interaction, and the inappropriate accumulation of inflammatory leukocytes in the lymphatic system, in particular in the subcapsular sinus region of LNs (33, 34).
McKimmie et al. observed a variable expression of ACKR2 on individual cutaneous LVs and a biased distribution toward the luminal face of the LECs, thus suggesting an involvement of ACKR2 in suppressing inflammatory leukocyte binding to lymphatic endothelial surfaces (32). Specifically, they demonstrated that ACKR2 contributes to the efficiency of antigen presentation of DCs, which is crucial in maintaining immune surveillance. Indeed, ACKR2, by scavenging pro-inflammatory chemokines, suppresses inflammatory chemokine binding to the LEC surface, thus increasing the availability and contributing to selective presentation of CCR7 ligands that attract CCR7+ mature DCs (32).
Recently, it was found that ACKR2 regulates LV density, competing with the canonical chemokine receptor CCR2 for the binding of CCL2, a chemokine produced in the skin during inflammation that drains into the LNs where it induces monocyte infiltration (Figure 1). By immunostaining of LV networks, Lee et al. found that Ackr2−/− mice displayed an increased LV density in the ears, diaphragms, and popliteal LNs in resting and regenerative conditions, compared to WT mice. Further investigation on E15.5 embryonic mice showed the presence of macrophages in proximity of developing LVs and involved in developmental lymphangiogenic processes. These macrophages, recruited by CCL2 and phenotyped as CD11bhigh F4/80low Lyve-1+, were significantly higher in Ackr2−/− mice whereas they were reduced in Ccr2−/− mice. Together, this evidence demonstrated that ACKR2 and CCR2 reciprocally regulate macrophage proximity to LVs and contribute to control lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory conditions. Accordingly, Ackr2−/− mice displayed relatively inefficient antigen presentation (35).
FIGURE 1
Figure 1. Role of ACKR2 expression on lymphatic vessels. ACKR2 expression on lymphatic endothelial cells, by scavenging inflammatory CC chemokines, shapes functional gradients promoting appropriate leukocyte recruitment into inflamed tissues, regulates their trafficking into lymph nodes, and controls lymphatic vessel density.
Insights into Lymphatic ACKR2 Expression and Function During Disease
Several studies using ACKR2-deficient mice or human samples have demonstrated an important role of ACKR2 expressed by LVs in inflammatory conditions and in cancer. The general emerging picture is that ACKR2 acts as a negative regulator of inflammation, but contrasting results were published on its role in the control of adaptive immune responses and in autoimmune disease development.
The Role of Lymphatic ACKR2 Expression in Inflammation
Using murine models of cutaneous inflammation, such as phorbol ester skin painting and subcutaneous injection of complete Freund’s adjuvant, it was demonstrated that Ackr2−/− mice develop an exacerbated inflammatory response with increased necrotic areas, angiogenesis, and a significantly higher leukocyte infiltration compared to WT mice (36–38). In both models, ACKR2 promoted the resolution of cutaneous inflammation by chemokine clearance.
The cutaneous lesions developing in ACKR2-deficient mice after phorbol ester skin painting resemble human psoriasiform pathology, indicating a possible role of ACKR2 in the control of this pathology (36). Using a psoriasis-like skin inflammation model induced by imiquimod, it has been shown that localized inflammation and IFN-γ induce the upregulation of ACKR2 in remote tissues that control the spread of psoriasiform inflammation inhibiting T cell epidermal influx (39). Similar results were found in psoriatic patient lesions in which ACKR2 is highly expressed in the surrounding skin in comparison with healthy controls, while it is downregulated in lesional and perilesional sites (36, 37, 40).
Several papers have also described an important role for ACKR2 expressed by lung LVs in the regulation of pulmonary inflammation. ACKR2 expression is upregulated in the LVs and in alveolar macrophages in the lung of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In this context, the increased expression of ACKR2 could regulate the trafficking of leukocytes from the lungs to draining LNs (41, 42). ACKR2 was also found on LECs in lungs and LNs from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (43). Ackr2−/− mice infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis show reduced survival, compared to WT mice, due to an increased number of lung and LN-infiltrating mononuclear cells and an abnormal production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and CC chemokines (43). Interestingly, inhibition of inflammatory chemokines in Ackr2−/− mice led to less controlled growth of M. tuberculosis, indicating that ACKR2 has an important role also in immune activation. The role of ACKR2 in the lung was also studied in an allergen-induced airway disease model. Allergen-challenged ACKR2-deficient mice had more lung inflammation compared to WT counterparts, having more DCs, T cells, and eosinophils in the lung parenchyma and more eosinophils in airways. Surprisingly, ACKR2-deficient mice had reduced airway responses to methacholine compared to WT mice, indicating that ACKR2 has opposing effects on allergic inflammation and airway reactivity (44).
Contrasting results have been published on the role of ACKR2 expressed by LVs in intestinal inflammation. ACKR2 is overexpressed by LVs in the gut in inflammatory bowel disease, and it was found to have a protective role in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mouse model (45). Indeed, Ackr2−/− mice have increased levels of inflammatory chemokines and infiltrating leukocytes, and increased intestinal inflammation, weight loss, and disease activity index, compared to WT mice (45). On the contrary, using the same murine model of intestinal inflammation, reduced clinical symptoms and tissue pathology in response to DSS in ACKR2 deficient were observed compared to WT mice. This protection is due to increased secretion of IL-17A by γδ-T cells in the lamina propria (46).
The role of ACKR2 in autoimmune diseases is also debated. ACKR2-deficient mice were described to be protected from the development of an experimental model of autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) due to impaired migration of DCs and inhibition of T cell priming (47). More recently, using the same EAE model, it was described that ACKR2-deficient mice are not protected from the development of the disease but, on the contrary, they develop worse clinical symptoms compared to WT mice due to increased innate B cell-dependent production of IL-17 (48). Finally, in a murine model of graft versus host disease, we have found that ACKR2-deficient mice are protected from the development of the disease due to increased number of inflammatory monocytes with enhanced immunosuppressive activity (49).
In conclusion, ACKR2 expressed by LVs has an anti-inflammatory function by clearing chemokines present in inflamed tissues. This activity promotes the migration of DC to LN through LVs that is necessary for the induction of the adaptive response but that can be detrimental in autoimmune diseases. Conflicting phenotypes published could possibly be explained by the fact that ACKR2 is also controlling IL-17 production, a critical cytokine for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.
The Role of LV ACKR2 in Cancer and Metastasis
In human cancer lesions, ACKR2 was found to be expressed by peritumoral LVs in oral squamous cell carcinomas and in colon cancer. Accordingly, murine models of inflammation-induced cancer in the skin and in the gut revealed that ACKR2 protects mice from the development of tumors by dampening inflammation (38, 45).
ACKR2 was found to be protective in cancer progression also when expressed by tumor cells, by inhibiting inflammatory chemokines and protumoral leukocyte infiltration. ACKR2 is expressed by vascular tumors with lymphatic origin or differentiation (23) and is highly expressed by Kaposi’s sarcoma spindle cells (32, 50–52). In this latter tumor, we have found that ACKR2 expression is downregulated in more aggressive tumors by the activation of the KRAS/BRAF/ERK pathway, thus unleashing chemokine-mediated macrophage recruitment and their acquisition of an M2-like phenotype that sustains angiogenesis and tumor growth (52, 53).
ACKR2 was also found to be expressed in human breast cancer, and its expression predicts relapse-free survival (RFS) (54) while it is inversely correlated with axillary lymph node metastasis (55). Of note, a functional non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism of ACKR2 is associated with lymph node metastasis and RFS in breast cancer, indicating that the expression and function of ACKR2 in the host could also affect tumor progression (54, 56).
In conclusion, while it is clear that in inflammation-induced cancer ACKR2 expression by tumor cells inhibits cancer progression by decreasing macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis, further studies are necessary to understand the exact nature of the role of ACKR2 expressed by the host and how it can affect tumor progression and metastasis.
Concluding Remarks
Lymphatic vessels have been traditionally considered as an inert drainage system, which passively transports fluids, proteins, and leukocytes. However, an increasing number of studies show that lymphatics play a much more active role, especially in the context of inflammation and ongoing immune responses. The expression of chemokine and chemokine receptors by LECs can be seen as evidence in support of an active role for lymphatics in regulating immunity. By the expression of ACKRs, LECs create and shape functional gradients of chemokines and modulate leukocyte recruitment. Moreover, they avoid inappropriate accumulation of chemokines and immune cells into inflamed tissues.
Here, we reported data demonstrating the essential role of ACKR2, expressed by LECs, in regulating chemokine concentration and leukocyte migration. This promotes the resolution of inflammatory responses in different pathological conditions including infection, allergy, and cancer. This evidence enables the speculation that ACKR2 could be considered as a potential therapeutic target to be induced in order to attenuate inflammation, e.g., during psoriasis and lung infection.
Even if the role of ACKR2 in inflammatory conditions has been clarified, further experimental studies are required to better understand its role in tumors. In this context, although an inverse correlation between ACKR2 expression and tumor stage was observed, it is unclear whether this correlation can be utilized as a clinical prognostic marker. Another challenging issue yet to be resolved is to understand whether ACKR2 could be a putative target for cancer immunotherapy. Indeed, it remains to be investigated if the activity of ACKR2 on lymphatics promotes or inhibits adaptive immune responses and whether ACKR2, by shaping chemokine gradients, can influence cancer cell dissemination to metastatic organs.
Author Contributions
All the authors have contributed to this review by writing and critically evaluating the literature.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
Research activities in the laboratory are supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research.
References
1. Griffith JW, Sokol CL, Luster AD. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol (2014) 32:659–702. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145
2. Bacon K, Baggiolini M, Broxmeyer H, Horuk R, Lindley I, Mantovani A, et al. Chemokine/chemokine receptor nomenclature. J Interferon Cytokine Res (2002) 22:1067–8. doi:10.1089/107999002760624305
3. Mantovani A. The chemokine system: redundancy for robust outputs. Immunol Today (1999) 20:254–7. doi:10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01469-3
4. Le Y, Zhou Y, Iribarren P, Wang J. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: their manifold roles in homeostasis and disease. Cell Mol Immunol (2004) 1:95–104.
5. Butcher EC, Picker LJ. Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science (1996) 272:60–6. doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.60
6. Balkwill F. Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer (2004) 4:540–50. doi:10.1038/nrc1388
7. Strieter RM, Burdick MD, Gomperts BN, Belperio JA, Keane MP. CXC chemokines in angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev (2005) 16:593–609. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.04.007
8. Broxmeyer HE. Chemokines in hematopoiesis. Curr Opin Hematol (2008) 15:49–58. doi:10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f29012
9. Schwartz TW, Frimurer TM, Holst B, Rosenkilde MM, Elling CE. Molecular mechanism of 7TM receptor activation – a global toggle switch model. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol (2006) 46:481–519. doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141218
10. Mantovani A, Bonecchi R, Locati M. Tuning inflammation and immunity by chemokine sequestration: decoys and more. Nat Rev Immunol (2006) 6:907–18. doi:10.1038/nri1964
11. Bachelerie F, Graham GJ, Locati M, Mantovani A, Murphy PM, Nibbs R, et al. New nomenclature for atypical chemokine receptors. Nat Immunol (2014) 15:207–8. doi:10.1038/ni.2812
12. Aebischer D, Iolyeva M, Halin C. The inflammatory response of lymphatic endothelium. Angiogenesis (2014) 17:383–93. doi:10.1007/s10456-013-9404-3
13. Beauvillain C, Cunin P, Doni A, Scotet M, Jaillon S, Loiry ML, et al. CCR7 is involved in the migration of neutrophils to lymph nodes. Blood (2011) 117:1196–204. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-11-254490
14. Forster R, Braun A, Worbs T. Lymph node homing of T cells and dendritic cells via afferent lymphatics. Trends Immunol (2012) 33:271–80. doi:10.1016/j.it.2012.02.007
15. Russo E, Teijeira A, Vaahtomeri K, Willrodt AH, Bloch JS, Nitschke M, et al. Intralymphatic CCL21 promotes tissue egress of dendritic cells through afferent lymphatic vessels. Cell Rep (2016) 14:1723–34. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.048
16. Vigl B, Aebischer D, Nitschke M, Iolyeva M, Rothlin T, Antsiferova O, et al. Tissue inflammation modulates gene expression of lymphatic endothelial cells and dendritic cell migration in a stimulus-dependent manner. Blood (2011) 118:205–15. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-12-326447
17. Kabashima K, Shiraishi N, Sugita K, Mori T, Onoue A, Kobayashi M, et al. CXCL12-CXCR4 engagement is required for migration of cutaneous dendritic cells. Am J Pathol (2007) 171:1249–57. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2007.070225
18. Johnson LA, Jackson DG. The chemokine CX3CL1 promotes trafficking of dendritic cells through inflamed lymphatics. J Cell Sci (2013) 126:5259–70. doi:10.1242/jcs.135343
19. Mancardi S, Vecile E, Dusetti N, Calvo E, Stanta G, Burrone OR, et al. Evidence of CXC, CC and C chemokine production by lymphatic endothelial cells. Immunology (2003) 108:523–30. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01613.x
20. Irino T, Takeuchi H, Matsuda S, Saikawa Y, Kawakubo H, Wada N, et al. CC-chemokine receptor CCR7: a key molecule for lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer (2014) 14:291. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-291
21. Zhuo W, Jia L, Song N, Lu XA, Ding Y, Wang X, et al. The CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine pathway: a novel axis regulates lymphangiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res (2012) 18:5387–98. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0708
22. Wick N, Haluza D, Gurnhofer E, Raab I, Kasimir MT, Prinz M, et al. Lymphatic precollectors contain a novel, specialized subpopulation of podoplanin low, CCL27-expressing lymphatic endothelial cells. Am J Pathol (2008) 173:1202–9. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.080101
23. Nibbs RJ, Kriehuber E, Ponath PD, Parent D, Qin S, Campbell JD, et al. The beta-chemokine receptor D6 is expressed by lymphatic endothelium and a subset of vascular tumors. Am J Pathol (2001) 158:867–77. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64035-7
24. Neusser MA, Kraus AK, Regele H, Cohen CD, Fehr T, Kerjaschki D, et al. The chemokine receptor CXCR7 is expressed on lymphatic endothelial cells during renal allograft rejection. Kidney Int (2010) 77:801–8. doi:10.1038/ki.2010.6
25. Heinzel K, Benz C, Bleul CC. A silent chemokine receptor regulates steady-state leukocyte homing in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104:8421–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608274104
26. Malhotra D, Fletcher AL, Astarita J, Lukacs-Kornek V, Tayalia P, Gonzalez SF, et al. Transcriptional profiling of stroma from inflamed and resting lymph nodes defines immunological hallmarks. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:499–510. doi:10.1038/ni.2262
27. Bonecchi R, Graham GJ. Atypical chemokine receptors and their roles in the resolution of the inflammatory response. Front Immunol (2016) 7:224. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00224
28. Bonecchi R, Locati M, Galliera E, Vulcano M, Sironi M, Fra AM, et al. Differential recognition and scavenging of native and truncated macrophage-derived chemokine (macrophage-derived chemokine/CC chemokine ligand 22) by the D6 decoy receptor. J Immunol (2004) 172:4972–6. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4972
29. Bonecchi R, Borroni EM, Anselmo A, Doni A, Savino B, Mirolo M, et al. Regulation of D6 chemokine scavenging activity by ligand- and Rab11-dependent surface up-regulation. Blood (2008) 112:493–503. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-08-108316
30. Borroni EM, Cancellieri C, Vacchini A, Benureau Y, Lagane B, Bachelerie F, et al. Beta-arrestin-dependent activation of the cofilin pathway is required for the scavenging activity of the atypical chemokine receptor D6. Sci Signal (2013) 6:1–11. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2003627
31. Lee KM, Nibbs RJ, Graham GJ. D6: the ’crowd controller’ at the immune gateway. Trends Immunol (2013) 34:7–12. doi:10.1016/j.it.2012.08.001
32. McKimmie CS, Singh MD, Hewit K, Lopez-Franco O, Le Brocq M, Rose-John S, et al. An analysis of the function and expression of D6 on lymphatic endothelial cells. Blood (2013) 121:3768–77. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-04-425314
33. Nibbs R, Graham G, Rot A. Chemokines on the move: control by the chemokine “interceptors” Duffy blood group antigen and D6. Semin Immunol (2003) 15:287–94. doi:10.1016/j.smim.2003.08.006
34. Locati M, Torre YM, Galliera E, Bonecchi R, Bodduluri H, Vago G, et al. Silent chemoattractant receptors: D6 as a decoy and scavenger receptor for inflammatory CC chemokines. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev (2005) 16:679–86. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.05.003
35. Lee KM, Danuser R, Stein JV, Graham D, Nibbs RJ, Graham GJ. The chemokine receptors ACKR2 and CCR2 reciprocally regulate lymphatic vessel density. EMBO J (2014) 33:2564–80. doi:10.15252/embj.201488887
36. Jamieson T, Cook DN, Nibbs RJ, Rot A, Nixon C, Mclean P, et al. The chemokine receptor D6 limits the inflammatory response in vivo. Nat Immunol (2005) 6:403–11. doi:10.1038/ni1182
37. Martinez de la Torre Y, Locati M, Buracchi C, Dupor J, Cook DN, Bonecchi R, et al. Increased inflammation in mice deficient for the chemokine decoy receptor D6. Eur J Immunol (2005) 35:1342–6. doi:10.1002/eji.200526114
38. Nibbs RJ, Gilchrist DS, King V, Ferra A, Forrow S, Hunter KD, et al. The atypical chemokine receptor D6 suppresses the development of chemically induced skin tumors. J Clin Invest (2007) 117:1884–92. doi:10.1172/JCI30068
39. Shams K, Wilson GJ, Singh M, Van Den Bogaard EH, Le Brocq ML, Holmes S, et al. Spread of psoriasiform inflammation to remote tissues is restricted by the atypical chemokine receptor ACKR2. J Invest Dermatol (2016) 137:85–94. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.039
40. Singh MD, King V, Baldwin H, Burden D, Thorrat A, Holmes S, et al. Elevated expression of the chemokine-scavenging receptor D6 is associated with impaired lesion development in psoriasis. Am J Pathol (2012) 181:1158–64. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.06.042
41. Bazzan E, Saetta M, Turato G, Borroni EM, Cancellieri C, Baraldo S, et al. Expression of the atypical chemokine receptor D6 in human alveolar macrophages in COPD. Chest (2013) 143:98–106. doi:10.1378/chest.11-3220
42. Mori M, Andersson CK, Graham GJ, Lofdahl CG, Erjefalt JS. Increased number and altered phenotype of lymphatic vessels in peripheral lung compartments of patients with COPD. Respir Res (2013) 14:65. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-14-65
43. Di Liberto D, Locati M, Caccamo N, Vecchi A, Meraviglia S, Salerno A, et al. Role of the chemokine decoy receptor D6 in balancing inflammation, immune activation, and antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med (2008) 205:2075–84. doi:10.1084/jem.20070608
44. Whitehead GS, Wang T, Degraff LM, Card JW, Lira SA, Graham GJ, et al. The chemokine receptor D6 has opposing effects on allergic inflammation and airway reactivity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2007) 175:243–9. doi:10.1164/rccm.200606-839OC
45. Vetrano S, Borroni EM, Sarukhan A, Savino B, Bonecchi R, Correale C, et al. The lymphatic system controls intestinal inflammation and inflammation-associated colon cancer through the chemokine decoy receptor D6. Gut (2010) 59:197–206. doi:10.1136/gut.2009.183772
46. Bordon Y, Hansell CA, Sester DP, Clarke M, Mowat AM, Nibbs RJ. The atypical chemokine receptor D6 contributes to the development of experimental colitis. J Immunol (2009) 182:5032–40. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0802802
47. Liu L, Graham GJ, Damodaran A, Hu T, Lira SA, Sasse M, et al. Cutting edge: the silent chemokine receptor D6 is required for generating T cell responses that mediate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol (2006) 177:17–21. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.17
48. Hansell CA, Maclellan LM, Oldham RS, Doonan J, Chapple KJ, Anderson EJ, et al. The atypical chemokine receptor ACKR2 suppresses Th17 responses to protein autoantigens. Immunol Cell Biol (2015) 93:167–76. doi:10.1038/icb.2014.90
49. Savino B, Castor MG, Caronni N, Sarukhan A, Anselmo A, Buracchi C, et al. Control of murine Ly6C(high) monocyte traffic and immunosuppressive activities by atypical chemokine receptor D6. Blood (2012) 119:5250–60. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-388082
50. Daibata M, Matsuo Y, Machida H, Taguchi T, Ohtsuki Y, Taguchi H. Differential gene-expression profiling in the leukemia cell lines derived from indolent and aggressive phases of CD56+ T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Int J Cancer (2004) 108:845–51. doi:10.1002/ijc.11647
51. Wu FY, Ou ZL, Feng LY, Luo JM, Wang LP, Shen ZZ, et al. Chemokine decoy receptor d6 plays a negative role in human breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res (2008) 6:1276–88. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2108
52. Savino B, Caronni N, Anselmo A, Pasqualini F, Borroni EM, Basso G, et al. ERK-dependent downregulation of the atypical chemokine receptor D6 drives tumor aggressiveness in Kaposi sarcoma. Cancer Immunol Res (2014) 2:679–89. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0202
53. Bonecchi R, Savino B, Caronni N, Celesti G, Mantovani A, Locati M. Atypical chemokine receptor 2: a brake against Kaposi’s sarcoma aggressiveness. Oncoimmunology (2014) 3:e955337. doi:10.4161/21624011.2014.955337
54. Yu KD, Wang X, Yang C, Zeng XH, Shao ZM. Host genotype and tumor phenotype of chemokine decoy receptors integrally affect breast cancer relapse. Oncotarget (2015) 6:26519–27. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4470
55. Zeng XH, Ou ZL, Yu KD, Feng LY, Yin WJ, Li J, et al. Absence of multiple atypical chemokine binders (ACBs) and the presence of VEGF and MMP-9 predict axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast carcinomas. Med Oncol (2014) 31:145. doi:10.1007/s12032-014-0145-y
Keywords: chemokine, chemokine receptor, atypical chemokine receptor, lymphatic vessels, inflammation
Citation: Bonavita O, Mollica Poeta V, Setten E, Massara M and Bonecchi R (2017) ACKR2: An Atypical Chemokine Receptor Regulating Lymphatic Biology. Front. Immunol. 7:691. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00691
Received: 27 October 2016; Accepted: 28 December 2016;
Published: 11 January 2017
Edited by:
Sonia Elhadad, Weill Cornell Medical College, USAReviewed by:
Giuseppe Sciume, Sapienza University, ItalyCaroline Sokol, Harvard Medical School, USA
Copyright: © 2017 Bonavita, Mollica Poeta, Setten, Massara and Bonecchi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Raffaella Bonecchi, cmFmZmFlbGxhLmJvbmVjY2hpJiN4MDAwNDA7aHVtYW5pdGFzcmVzZWFyY2guaXQ=