Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Genet., 14 July 2022
Sec. Human and Medical Genomics

Case Report: Pathogenesis With a Rare RHOA A161E Mutation in a Patient With Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma

Lihong Cao&#x;Lihong Cao1Hongyan Tong&#x;Hongyan Tong2Xing Liu&#x;Xing Liu3Yingqing XuYingqing Xu4Fang YuFang Yu5Qi PanQi Pan1Jin LaiJin Lai1Jian HuangJian Huang6Jiayue Qin
Jiayue Qin7*Jie Jin
Jie Jin2*
  • 1Department of Hematology, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Pathology, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China
  • 4Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China
  • 5Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 6Department of Hematology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China
  • 7Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) genomic abnormalities are highly disease-specific, and the ras homology family member A (RHOA) gene is one of the most recurrent mutated genes, especially for RHOA G17V mutation site. Here, we identified a rare RHOA A161E mutation in an AITL patient through gene sequencing platforms. The patient presented with persistent hypereosinophilia, asymptomatic or symptomatic mildly for over 3 years. At diagnosis, this patient manifested night sweats, weight loss, multiple lymphadenopathies, and enlargement of the liver and spleen. We performed a retrospective genetic mutation analysis by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) on serial gastric, intestinal, and lymph node specimens. The genetic mutation testing result demonstrated that a rare RHOA A161E mutation was found, which was elevated significantly on diagnosis related to AITL pathogenesis. Our case confirms that genetic mutation testing is helpful for diagnostic classification in AITL and dynamic monitoring of gene mutations at multiple time points may facilitate early detection of disease diagnosis.

Introduction

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a unique form of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), accounting for 18.5% of all PTCLs (Federico et al., 2013). According to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) revised classification, AITL belongs to the nodular PTCL with a T follicular helper (Tfh) cell phenotype (Swerdlow et al., 2016). AITL is characterized by B symptoms (fevers, unintentional weight loss, and/or night sweats), generalized lymphadenopathy, and autoimmune-like manifestations (Lunning & Vose, 2017). Most AITLs are in advanced stages (III/IV) at diagnosis, plausibly leading to adverse prognosis due to atypical clinical and laboratory results (Chiba & Sakata-Yanagimoto, 2020). Hypereosinophilia is seen in one-third to one-half of the AITL cases and causes great difficulty in making the diagnosis (Mourad et al., 2008; de Leval et al., 2010). In the past few decades, diagnostic capabilities in AITL have been continuously improved with the development of molecular markers based on sequencing platforms, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). AITL genomic abnormalities are highly disease-specific and the ras homology family member A (RHOA) gene is one of the most recurrent mutated genes discovered in AITL patients, especially for RHOA G17V mutation site (Chiba & Sakata-Yanagimoto, 2020). In this study, we identified a rare RHOA A161E mutation related to pathogenesis in a patient with AITL.

Case Presentation

A 57-year-old female was presented to the hospital on 6 April 2020 with hypereosinophilia for 3 years and abdominal discomfort for 8 months. Physical examination showed that the upper abdomen was slightly tender on palpation. Laboratory data showed that the eosinophil count was 33.67×109/L. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was slightly elevated (356 U/L). Serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE) was elevated (315.149 KIU/L). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) testing showed that HBsAg, anti-HBe, and anti-HBc were all positive, but no HBV-DNA was detected. EBV-DNA was also undetectable. Bone marrow (BM) examination showed significantly increased eosinophils (Figure 1). The immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) and the T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements were negative based on PCR analysis of the BM. Gene detection by NGS in BM indicated that JAK2 V617F, PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, and FGFR1 were all negative. Cytogenetics showed an abnormal karyotype with 45, XX, -13 (1); 45, XX, -16 (1); 46, XX (18) (Supplementary Figure S1). Then, positron-emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) was performed. As shown in Figure 2A, the FDG-PET on 9 April 2020 showed positive FDG uptake in multiple enlarged lymph nodes throughout the abdominal cavity and in the duodenum, terminal ileum, and colon. Two gastrointestinal specimens on 12 April 2020 and 3 May 2020 showed eosinophil invasion (Supplementary Figure S2). We also performed a laparoscopic lymphadenectomy on 17 April 2020, but it didn’t show any diagnostic significance. Ultimately, the diagnosis of idiopathic eosinophilia was made and imatinib combined with prednisone regimen was restarted.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Bone marrow examination demonstrated eosinophils increased significantly. (A) Smear, Giemsa stain, 400x. (B) Smear, Giemsa stain, 1,000x. (C) Biopsy, H&E stain, 100x. (D) Biopsy, H&E stain, 400x.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. FDG-PET showed positive FDG uptake in multiple enlarged lymph nodes on 9 April (A) and 30 July (B), respectively. FDG-PET, positron-emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.

The patient was readmitted 3 months later with obvious abdominal pain and abdominal distension. At the same time, she complained of night sweats and apparent 5 kg weight loss. Laboratory data revealed that the leukocyte count was 1.9×109/L and an eosinophil of 1.8%. LDH was 546 U/L. EBV-DNA was 8.41 × 103 IU/ml. Liver function showed albumin (ALB), 28.9 g/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), 254 U/L; Asparagus aminotransferase (AST), 122 U/L; γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), 310 U/L; and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 156 U/L. The ultrasound and CT both demonstrated diffuse changes in the liver and multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the retroperitoneum, mesenteric, pelvic cavity, and groin. The FDG-PET on 30 July 2020 showed multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the body (Figure 2B). Compared with previous CT images, lymph node and spleen lesions progressed, with newly emerged pathological changes in the gastric antrum. Retroperitoneal lymph node puncture guided by ultrasound was performed on 6 August 2020. The sample of the retroperitoneal lymph node showed that the neoplastic T cells had intermediate-sized nuclei, copious pale/clear cytoplasm, and abundant clear cytoplasm (Figures 3A, B). Immunohistochemistry showed that the atypical large lymphoid cells were CD3+, CD4+, CD5+, CD8, ICOS+, Bcl-6+, PD-1+, Bcl-2+, Ki-67+ (70–80%), CD56, TIA-1-, CD20, CD79a-, CD10, immunoblasts CD30+, follicular dendritic cells CD21+, and scattered lymphocytes EBER+ (Figures 3C–I). TCR gene rearrangements were positive (Supplementary Table S1). The patient was eventually diagnosed with AITL on 6 August 2020. After diagnosis, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted on the retrospective lymphoma specimens, followed by ddPCR analysis on all the retrospective specimens before diagnosis involving one gastric, two intestinal, and two lymph node samples. Two mutations were identified through WES in the lymph node sample collected on 6 August 2020, including RHOA A161E and TP53 Q100X mutation sites, with the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of 16.00% and 20.60%, respectively. As shown in Figure 4, the VAFs of RHOA and TP53 gene mutations were 0.015% and 4.127%, respectively, in the gastric specimen on 12 April 2020. Also, they were both <0.001 in the intestinal specimen on 12 April 2020 and increased at a frequency of 0.023% and 1.198% on 3 May 2020. They were 1.299% and 3.303% in the abdominal lymph node specimen on 17 April 2020 and were elevated by 16.00% and 20.60%, respectively, on 6 August 2020 (Figure 4A). Unfortunately, due to tissue problems, we were unable to detect these two mutations in the BM specimens and the gastric ones on 3 May 2020. From the diagram of clonal evolution, the RHOA A161E mutation site was detected nearly 4 months before diagnosis in the lymph node specimen (Figure 4B), indicating that dynamic monitoring based on sequencing platforms at multiple time points may facilitate early detection of disease diagnosis in AITL.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Neoplastic cells in the specimen of the retroperitoneal lymph node showed intermediate-sized nuclei, copious pale/clear cytoplasm, and abundant clear cytoplasm (A,B). Immunohistochemistry of the neoplastic cells showed CD3+ (C), CD4+ (D), CD5+, CD8, ICOS+ (E), Bcl-6+ (F), PD-1+ (G), Bcl-2+, Ki-67+ (70–80%), CD56, TIA-1-, CD20, CD79a-, CD10, immunoblots CD30+, follicular dendritic cells CD21+ (H), and scattered lymphocytes EBER+ (I).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Comparison of VAFs before and at diagnosis. (A) VAF of the RHOA and TP53 mutations in different specimens at different periods. Five samples were involved, including one gastric, two intestinal, and two lymph node samples. (B) Map of clonal evolution. Four samples were collected, including two intestinal and two lymph node samples. VAF, variant allele frequency.

As for treatment, an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody (brentuximab vedotin) combined with CHP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and prednisone 100 mg) was given for seven cycles, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, a relapse occurred 2 months later. Then, targeted therapy including chidamide, selinexor, and decitabine was tried, but all failed. Now, this patient is undergoing CD30-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy at another hospital.

Discussion

Studies have shown that RHOA mutations exhibit different patterns depending on tumor types. RHOA R5 and Y42 are predominant mutations in Burkitt lymphoma (Rohde et al., 2014) and gastric adenocarcinoma (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2014; Kakiuchi et al., 2014), while adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) has two types of RHOA mutations, loss-of-function (G17V and A161E) and gain-of-function (C16R, C16F, K118E, A161V, and A161P) mutations (Nagata et al., 2016). In AITL, the type of RHOA mutation has been reported to be G17V (Palomero et al., 2014; Yoo et al., 2014). The RHOA G17V mutant protein could enhance both TCR and inducible T-cell co-stimulator signaling pathways to specify the Tfh lineage and maintain the Tfh phenotype (Chiba & Sakata-Yanagimoto, 2020). RHOA G17V mutations were discovered in nearly 70% of AITLs and a smaller proportion of PTCL-NOS (Palomero et al., 2014; Sakata-Yanagimoto et al., 2014). RHOA G17V mutants were found in Tfh-derived neoplastic cells rather than other cells. A recent study has shown that RHOA G17V mutations contribute to AITL-specific pathogenesis (Nguyen et al., 2021). Hence, the functional consequences of RHOA mutation in tumor development may depend on the tissue and cell from which it originates.

In this AITL patient, we identified a rare RHOA A161E mutation. As shown in Figure 4, the frequencies of this mutation are low or undetectable in the early tissues including the gastric, intestinal, and lymph node samples. However, in the same tissues such as the intestine and lymph nodes, they showed a tendency to increase as the disease progresses. Notably, the frequency of mutations at diagnosis was significantly higher, approaching 20%, suggesting that the RHOA A161E mutation may be associated with the pathogenesis of AITL. This patient presented with persistent hypereosinophilia, causing great difficulty in the diagnosis of AITL. Therefore, the clinical characteristics of the specific RHOA mutation in this case do not appear to differ significantly from those in AITL with RHOA G17V or wild-type RHOA. The RHOA A161E mutation has been identified in one case of AITL (Sakata-Yanagimoto et al., 2014) and three cases of ATLL (Nagata et al., 2016). Up to date, few studies have been conducted on this kind of RHOA mutation. It is speculated that A161E mutants have no ability to bind GTP and inhibit the binding of wild-type RHOA proteins to GTP (Sakata-Yanagimoto et al., 2014; Yoo et al., 2014; Nagata et al., 2016). The clear molecular mechanism for the mutation of RHOA A161E, a rare AITL tumor type, needs to be further studied.

In addition to RHOA mutations, the most commonly mutated genes in AITL involve epigenetic pathways (including TET2, DNMT3A, and IDH2), TCR, and costimulatory signaling pathways (Odejide et al., 2014; Vallois et al., 2016). Unlike RHOA mutations, this mutation may be present in both tumor and non-tumor cells of patients with AITL (Nguyen et al., 2021). It has been reported that RHOA G17V mutations in AITL are often co-occurring with TET2 mutations and usually with DNMT3A mutations. The coexistence of these mutations may play a synergistic role in the pathogenesis of AITL (Sakata-Yanagimoto et al., 2014). Nonetheless, the TP53 mutation in this case occurred simultaneously with the RHOA mutation. TP53 mutations are considered to be a disadvantage in several cancer subtypes. A few studies suggest that it tends to be a risk factor for PTCL (Huang et al., 2018; Ye et al., 2021). In our case, the poor prognosis may be related to the TP53 mutation.

There are some limitations to our study. First, genetic mutation testing in our research is a retrospective analysis, and the follow-up prospective testing needs to be studied. Second, as for the function of RHOA A161E mutation, both cell line experiments and large-scale clinical data are needed to verify it in the future.

Conclusion

In summary, our study presents a rare RHOA A161E mutation in a patient with AITL, which is related to AITL pathogenesis. Our case confirms that genetic mutation testing is helpful for diagnostic classification in AITL and dynamic monitoring at multiple time points based on gene sequencing platforms may facilitate early detection of AITL diagnosis, providing options for the precise diagnosis of such patients.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets for this article are not publicly available due to concerns regarding participant/patient anonymity. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

LC, HT, JQ, and JJ conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. LC, XL, YX, FY, QP, JL, and JH collected and analyzed the clinical data. JQ performed the NGS platform and analyzed the sequencing data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was funded by the Program for the 2021 Zhejiang Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Fund Project (Grant number: 2021ZB248).

Conflict of Interest

Author JQ was employed by the company Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patient who participated in this study for approving the publication of this case report.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.948744/full#supplementary-material

References

Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. (2014). Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Nature 513 (7517), 202–209. doi:10.1038/nature13480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiba, S., and Sakata-Yanagimoto, M. (2020). Advances in Understanding of Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma. Leukemia 34 (10), 2592–2606. doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0990-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Leval, L., Gisselbrecht, C., and Gaulard, P. (2010). Advances in the Understanding and Management of Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 148 (5), 673–689. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.08003.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Federico, M., Rudiger, T., Bellei, M., Nathwani, B. N., Luminari, S., Coiffier, B., et al. (2013). Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma: Analysis of the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project. Jco 31 (2), 240–246. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.37.3647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, H.-S., Liao, C.-K., Liu, T.-T., You, H.-L., Wang, M.-C., and Huang, W.-T. (2018). TP53 Mutations in Peripheral Mature T and NK Cell Lymphomas: a Whole-Exome Sequencing Study with Correlation to P53 Expression. Hum. Pathol. 80, 145–151. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.05.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kakiuchi, M., Nishizawa, T., Ueda, H., Gotoh, K., Tanaka, A., Hayashi, A., et al. (2014). Recurrent Gain-Of-Function Mutations of RHOA in Diffuse-type Gastric Carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 46 (6), 583–587. doi:10.1038/ng.2984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lunning, M. A., and Vose, J. M. (2017). Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma: the Many-Faced Lymphoma. Blood 129 (9), 1095–1102. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-09-692541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mourad, N., Mounier, N., Brière, J., Raffoux, E., Delmer, A., Feller, A., et al. (2008). amp; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de, l. AClinical, biologic, and pathologic features in 157 patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma treated within the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA) trials. Blood 111 (9), 4463–4470. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-08-105759

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nagata, Y., Kontani, K., Enami, T., Kataoka, K., Ishii, R., Totoki, Y., et al. (2016). Variegated RHOA Mutations in Adult T-Cell Leukemia/lymphoma. Blood 127 (5), 596–604. doi:10.1182/blood-2015-06-644948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguyen, P. N., Tran, N. T. B., Nguyen, T. P. X., Ngo, T. N. M., Lai, D. V., Deel, C. D., et al. (2021). Clinicopathological Implications of RHOA Mutations in Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis: RHOA Mutations in AITL. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leukemia 21 (7), 431–438. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2021.03.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Odejide, O., Weigert, O., Lane, A. A., Toscano, D., Lunning, M. A., Kopp, N., et al. (2014). A Targeted Mutational Landscape of Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma. Blood 123 (9), 1293–1296. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-10-531509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palomero, T., Couronné, L., Khiabanian, H., Kim, M.-Y., Ambesi-Impiombato, A., Perez-Garcia, A., et al. (2014). Recurrent Mutations in Epigenetic Regulators, RHOA and FYN Kinase in Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas. Nat. Genet. 46 (2), 166–170. doi:10.1038/ng.2873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rohde, M., Richter, J., Schlesner, M., Betts, M. J., Claviez, A., Bonn, B. R., et al. (2014). RecurrentRHOAmutations in Pediatric Burkitt Lymphoma Treated According to the NHL-BFM Protocols. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 53 (11), 911–916. doi:10.1002/gcc.22202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakata-Yanagimoto, M., Enami, T., Yoshida, K., Shiraishi, Y., Ishii, R., Miyake, Y., et al. (2014). Somatic RHOA Mutation in Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 46 (2), 171–175. doi:10.1038/ng.2872

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swerdlow, S. H., Campo, E., Pileri, S. A., Harris, N. L., Stein, H., Siebert, R., et al. (2016). The 2016 Revision of the World Health Organization Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms. Blood 127 (20), 2375–2390. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vallois, D., Dobay, M. P. D., Morin, R. D., Lemonnier, F., Missiaglia, E., Juilland, M., et al. (2016). Activating Mutations in Genes Related to TCR Signaling in Angioimmunoblastic and Other Follicular Helper T-Cell-Derived Lymphomas. Blood 128 (11), 1490–1502. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-698977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, Y., Ding, N., Mi, L., Shi, Y., Liu, W., Song, Y., et al. (2021). Correlation of Mutational Landscape and Survival Outcome of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 10 (1), 9. doi:10.1186/s40164-021-00200-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoo, H. Y., Sung, M. K., Lee, S. H., Kim, S., Lee, H., Park, S., et al. (2014). A Recurrent Inactivating Mutation in RHOA GTPase in Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 46 (4), 371–375. doi:10.1038/ng.2916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, hypereosinophilia, RHOA A161E mutation, variant allele frequency, case report

Citation: Cao L, Tong H, Liu X, Xu Y, Yu F, Pan Q, Lai J, Huang J, Qin J and Jin J (2022) Case Report: Pathogenesis With a Rare RHOA A161E Mutation in a Patient With Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma. Front. Genet. 13:948744. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.948744

Received: 20 May 2022; Accepted: 23 June 2022;
Published: 14 July 2022.

Edited by:

Hauke Thomsen, ProtaGene CGT GmbH, Germany

Reviewed by:

Junichi Furuta, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Stefano Aldo Pileri, University of Bologna, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Cao, Tong, Liu, Xu, Yu, Pan, Lai, Huang, Qin and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jie Jin, SmllSjA1MDNAemp1LmVkdS5jbg==; Jiayue Qin, anlxaW5AbGl2ZS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.