Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Ecol. Evol., 02 February 2023
Sec. Paleoecology
Volume 11 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1138623

Corrigendum: Uncertainty in coprophilous fungal spore concentration estimates

This article is a correction to:

  1. Uncertainty in coprophilous fungal spore concentration estimates

    1. Read original article
\nAngelina G. Perrotti, Angelina G. Perrotti1,2*Tanjona Ramiadantsoa,Tanjona Ramiadantsoa3,4Jennifer O&#x;KeefeJennifer O'Keefe5Noelia Nuez OtaoNoelia Nuñez Otaño6
  • 1Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
  • 2Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
  • 3Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
  • 4Madagascar Biodiversity Center, Antananarivo, Madagascar
  • 5Department of Physics, Earth Science, and Space Systems Engineering, Morehead State–University, Morehead, KY, United States
  • 6Laboratorio de Geología de Llanuras (FCyT-CICyTTP), Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos, Diamante, Argentina

A corrigendum on
Uncertainty in coprophilous fungal spore concentration estimates

by Perrotti, A. G., Ramiadantsoa, T., O'Keefe, J., and Otaño, N. N. (2022). Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:1086109. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.1086109

In the published article, there was an error in the Discussion section, page 5, first paragraph. The terms “over-reported” and “under-reported” were switched in the sentence, rendering it incorrect. The corrected sentence appears below:

“Due to the asymmetrical uncertainty, we suggest that it is more likely CFS are over-reported than under-reported in studies with low total counts.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: coprophilous fungal spores, palynology, quantification methods, presence/absence analysis, megaherbivore decline

Citation: Perrotti AG, Ramiadantsoa T, O'Keefe J and Nuñez Otaño N (2023) Corrigendum: Uncertainty in coprophilous fungal spore concentration estimates. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11:1138623. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1138623

Received: 05 January 2023; Accepted: 17 January 2023;
Published: 02 February 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Franco Biondi, University of Nevada, United States

Copyright © 2023 Perrotti, Ramiadantsoa, O'Keefe and Nuñez Otaño. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Angelina G. Perrotti, yes YXBlcnJvdHRpJiN4MDAwNDA7d2lzYy5lZHU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.