Erratum: Developing and assessing pre- and in-service science and engineering teachers' systems thinking and modeling skills through an asynchronous online course

, Frontiers Production Office

doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1209966

ERRATUM article

Front. Educ. , 16 May 2023

Sec. STEM Education

Volume 8 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1209966

This article is part of the Research Topic Investigating Complex Phenomena: Bridging between Systems Thinking and Modeling in Science Education View all 13 articles

Erratum: Developing and assessing pre- and in-service science and engineering teachers' systems thinking and modeling skills through an asynchronous online course

This article is an erratum on:

Developing and assessing pre- and in-service science and engineering teachers’ systems thinking and modeling skills through an asynchronous online course
1. Read original article

$\r\nFrontiers Production Office$ Frontiers Production Office^*

Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland

An Erratum on
Developing and assessing pre- and in-service science and engineering teachers' systems thinking and modeling skills through an asynchronous online course

By Peretz, R., Dori, D., and Dori, Y. J. (2023). Front. Educ. 8:1154893. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1154893

Due to a production error in Table 3, the “Content description” column heading was placed above the “Module” column, and vice versa. This has been rectified.

TABLE 3

Table 3. The content of the four modules that formed the learning process.

In the published article, there was an error in the Abstract. The original sentence was: “Research tools included the online assignment that the participants developed, dedicated rubrics for analyzing their assignments, accounting for use of modeling, media, visualization, micro–macro-process scientific understanding levels, and a mix of closed- and open-ended questions.”

This should have been written as: “Research tools included the online assignment that the participants developed, a dedicated rubric for analyzing their assignments, accounting for use of modeling and systems concepts and the integration of sustainability and COVID-19 issues, a variety of thinking skills, visualizations and disciplines, and a mix of closed- and open-ended questions.”

The publisher apologizes for these errors. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: STEM teachers, systems thinking, modeling, online assignments, rubric, Object-Process Methodology—OPM

Citation: Frontiers Production Office (2023) Erratum: Developing and assessing pre- and in-service science and engineering teachers' systems thinking and modeling skills through an asynchronous online course. Front. Educ. 8:1209966. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1209966

Received: 21 April 2023; Accepted: 27 April 2023;
Published: 16 May 2023.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, cHJvZHVjdGlvbi5vZmZpY2VAZnJvbnRpZXJzaW4ub3Jn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Erratum: Developing and assessing pre- and in-service science and engineering teachers' systems thinking and modeling skills through an asynchronous online course

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good