Antti Laherto
Olivia Levrini
Sibel Erduran- 1Department of Education, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- 2Department of Physics and Astronomy “Augusto Righi”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 3Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Editorial on the Research Topic
Future-oriented science education for agency and sustainable development
The gravity of the climate crisis, the United Nations' Agenda 2030 programme and the related aims of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) call for a fundamental rethinking of values, aims and pedagogies of all education (UNESCO, 2017, 2021). Such developments pose new demands also for science education research and practice: taking responsible action and contributing to change have been taken up as important aims of school science (Hodson, 2003, 2020). The latest visions of science education and scientific literacy (“Vision III”, Sjöström, 2017) stress that students should not only understand the role of science and informed decision-making in the society but also be able to question societal choices and values on the basis of ethical consideration and take action to bring about desirable change. While such agency connects to how one orients toward the future, research has shown young people perceiving the global and societal futures as hopeless and out of their influence (e.g., Cook, 2016; Kaboli and Tapio, 2018). To meet the emerging societal demands, science education should be transformative to the students and to the society.
In the field of science education, the themes of agency, anticipation, future and models of change and transformation have gained an increasing (but still too little) attention during the past decade. Some literature has been published in order to develop science education for action and to facilitate students' action competence in socio-scientific issues (Hodson, 2020). Several initiatives promoting futures thinking, foresight, imagination and future narratives in science classrooms have been reported (e.g., Lloyd and Wallace, 2004; Paige and Lloyd, 2016; Levrini et al., 2021; Laherto and Rasa, 2022; Rasa et al., 2022). A number of research publications and white papers have focused on a variety of competencies people need in the future (e.g., European Commission, 2015; European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2022). Such skills typically relate, at least implicitly, to an individual's agency and ways of perceiving the future. Besides the research on students' learning and transformation, some initiatives have focused on institutional level changes: the emerging objectives necessitate the exploration of alternative scenarios for schools, e.g., open schooling (European Commission, 2015).
Yet, more theoretical, empirical and practical work is needed to support transformation both at institutional and individual levels, and put into operation the potential of science education in fostering students' agency and futures thinking for sustainability. To this end, and to facilitate new syntheses of theoretical and methodological approaches, we undertook this Research Topic, “Future-Oriented Science Education for Agency and Sustainable Development.”
The 33 authors in 10 peer-reviewed papers all considered the need to rethink the nature of science teaching and learning, and motivated this need by referring to the era of great uncertainty or the urgent need for climate action. Their papers set out to explore ways in which science education can support agency and/or futures thinking.
Laying the research-based groundwork for future-oriented education, one of the papers explores tensions in students' imagination of the future (Barelli et al.). Three papers focus on competencies that future-oriented science education should aim to develop in students. One of them investigates policy-makers views on what kind of competencies constitute ‘future-oriented skills' (Ioannidou and Erduran). The two other papers focus on specific competencies and their mutual connections: the relationship between students' anticipatory competence and environmental awareness (Ratinen and Linnanen), and teachers' systems thinking competencies and the sense of personal and collective responsibility toward actions (Uskola and Puig).
Three papers deal with pedagogical approaches and concepts, all aiming to revitalize the connection of science education to teaching and learning of other subjects and domains of the world. The proposed approaches and concepts involve holistic science learning (Lloyd and Paige), transdisciplinary collaboration (Kubisch et al.) and, more generally, a subject didaktik model for embodied and relational science teaching and learning (Yavuzkaya et al.).
Finally, three papers set out to investigate the effect of more specific teaching-learning activities developing students' sense of agency and perception of the future: activities of fictional writing and scenario building (Hervé and Panissal), activities of analyzing real-world data and scientific argumentation (Rap et al.), and computational simulations on complex systems (Barelli).
The final outcome of this Research Topic provides a multifaceted collection of theoretical and practical initiatives for orienting science education toward the future in a research-based manner. Together they pave the way for building the response of science education to the “new social contract for education” proposed by UNESCO (2021).
Author contributions
The editorial was written by AL. Commented and revised by SE and OL. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Cook, J. (2016). Young adults' hopes for the long-term future: from re-enchantment with technology to faith in humanity. J. Youth Stud. 19, 517–532. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1083959
European Commission (2015). Science Education for Responsible Citizenship: Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
European Commission and Joint Research Centre (2022). GreenComp, the European Sustainability Competence Framework. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25, 645–670. doi: 10.1080/09500690305021
Hodson, D. (2020). Going beyond STS education: building a curriculum for sociopolitical activism. Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 20, 592–622. doi: 10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6
Kaboli, S. A., and Tapio, P. (2018). How late-modern nomads imagine tomorrow? A causal layered analysis practice to explore the images of the future of young adults. Futures 96, 32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.004
Laherto, A., and Rasa, T. (2022). Facilitating transformative science education through futures thinking. On Horizon 30, 96–103. doi: 10.1108/OTH-09-2021-0114
Levrini, O., Tasquier, G., Barelli, E., Laherto, A., Palmgren, E., Branchetti, L., et al. (2021). Recognition and operationalization of future-scaffolding skills: results from an empirical study of a teaching-learning module on climate change and futures thinking. Sci. Educ. 105, 281–308. doi: 10.1002/sce.21612
Lloyd, D., and Wallace, J. (2004). Imaging the future of science education: the case for making futures studies explicit in student learning. Stud. Sci. Educ. 40, 139–177. doi: 10.1080/03057260408560205
Paige, K., and Lloyd, D. (2016). Use of future scenarios as a pedagogical approach for science teacher education. Res. Sci. Educ. 46, 263–285. doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9505-7
Rasa, T., Palmgren, E., and Laherto, A. (2022). Futurising science education: students' experiences from a course on futures thinking and quantum computing. Instruct. Sci. 50, 425–447. doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09572-3
Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V., and Eilks, I. (2017), Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, implications for teaching learning. Stud. Sci. Educ. 53, 165–192. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649
UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO. Available online at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (accessed January 30, 2023).
UNESCO (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris: UNESCO. Available online at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 (accessed January 30, 2023).
Keywords: futures thinking, agency, Education for Sustainable Development, transformative education, science education
Citation: Laherto A, Levrini O and Erduran S (2023) Editorial: Future-oriented science education for agency and sustainable development. Front. Educ. 8:1155507. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1155507
Received: 31 January 2023; Accepted: 16 February 2023;
Published: 02 March 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Lianghuo Fan, East China Normal University, China
Copyright © 2023 Laherto, Levrini and Erduran. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Antti Laherto, YW50dGkubGFoZXJ0byYjeDAwMDQwO2hlbHNpbmtpLmZp