RETRACTED: Study on the design of composite beams under complex environment in mountainous areas

Zhao, Yicheng; Sun, Caizhi; Li, Sheng

doi:10.3389/feart.2023.1121467

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci. , 09 March 2023

Sec. Environmental Informatics and Remote Sensing

Volume 11 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1121467

This article is part of the Research Topic Coal and Rock Dynamic Disasters: Advances of Physical and Numerical Simulation in Monitoring, Early Warning, and Prevention View all 15 articles

RETRACTED: Study on the design of composite beams under complex environment in mountainous areas

Retracted

A retraction of this article was approved in:

Retraction: Study on the design of composite beams under complex environment in mountainous areas
1. Read retraction

Yicheng Zhao¹

Caizhi Sun²*

Sheng Li¹

¹Sichuan Communications Vocational and Technical College, Chengdu, China
²Sichuan Highway Planning, Survey, Design And Research Institute Co, Ltd., Chengdu, China

This article has been retracted. Please follow the link to the full retraction notice for details.

Citation: Zhao Y, Sun C and Li S (2023) Study on the design of composite beams under complex environment in mountainous areas. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1121467. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1121467

Received: 11 December 2022; Accepted: 20 February 2023;
Published: 09 March 2023; Retracted: 21 May 2024.

Edited by:

Xuelong Li, Shandong University of Science and Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Ping Du, Shandong University, China
Jie Wu, Wuhan Polytechnic University, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

RETRACTED: Study on the design of composite beams under complex environment in mountainous areas

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good