Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Allergy, 06 November 2023
Sec. Food Allergy
This article is part of the Research Topic Understanding Eosinophilic Esophagitis View all 7 articles

A unique role for IL-13 in inducing esophageal eosinophilia through MID-1 and STAT6

  • 1The Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs and The Asthma and Breathing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  • 2The Priority Research Centre, GrowUpWellTM and The Asthma and Breathing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  • 3Department of Immunology and Pathology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 4Centre for Inflammation, Faculty of Science, School of Life Sciences, Centenary Institute and University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 5The Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Children's Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is associated with allergen-driven inflammation of the esophagus and an upregulated Th2 cytokine signature. Recombinant interleukin (IL)-13 (rIL-13) administration to mice induces some of the hallmark features of EoE, including increased eotaxin expression and eosinophil recruitment. Inflammation in EoE has previously been shown to depend on the expression of TRAIL and MID-1, which reduced protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activity. The relationship between IL-13 and TRAIL signalling in esophageal eosinophilia is currently unknown.

Objective: To investigate the interaction between IL-13-driven eosinophil infiltration and TRAIL or MID-1 in the esophagus.

Method: We administered rIL-13 to wild type (WT), TRAIL-deficient (Tnsf10−/−) or STAT6-deficient (STAT6−/−) mice and targeted MID-1 with small interfering RNA.

Results: rIL-13 administration to mice increased TRAIL and MID-1 expression in the esophagus while reducing PP2A activity. TRAIL deficient, but not STAT6 deficient mice demonstrated increased MID-1 expression and PP2A reduction upon IL-13 challenge which correlated with eosinophil infiltration into the esophagus. Silencing MID-1 expression with siRNA completely ablated IL-13 induced eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus, restored PP2A activity, and reduced eotaxin-1 expression.

Conclusion: IL-13-driven eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus induced eosinophilia and eotaxin-1 expression in a STAT6-dependent and MID-1-dependent manner. This study highlights a novel mechanism employed by IL-13 to perpetuate eosinophil infiltration.

Introduction

Eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus is associated with several inflammatory pathologies, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, parasitic infections, and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). EoE is an allergic phenomenon associated with food antigens, with a tendency to present primarily in young, atopic males (13). As a potential cause of dysphagia and food impaction, the treatments currently available to counter the associated morbidity are dietary restrictions, swallowed corticosteroid therapy and biologics such as interleukin (IL)-4 receptor antibodies [Dupiliumab] (47). With a rising prevalence in westernized societies (8), there is a greater need to elucidate the specific molecular pathways underpinning the pathogenesis to improve the quality of life of patients who do not respond to mainstream therapies.

The inflammation in EoE is associated with T helper 2 (Th2) driven eosinophilia via the cytokines IL-5 and IL-13 (9, 10). Both cytokines are elevated in patients with EoE in addition to in vivo studies modeling EoE. IL-5 plays a core role in eosinophilic trafficking to the esophagus, while IL-13 regulates the transcription of chemokines and cytokines involved in epithelial remodeling (e.g., Periostin, TGF-β) and inflammatory (CCL11, CCL24) cytokines through the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-6 (1115). Indeed, administering recombinant (r) IL-13 intratracheally to mice is itself sufficient to induce the hallmark features of EoE (13). IL-13-driven EoE was shown to be dependent on STAT6, IL-5, and eotaxin-1 (CCL11) using knockout mice, demonstrating that it plays an essential upstream role in inflammatory signaling in the esophagus (13). Despite this, other inflammatory pathways related to IL-13 signaling in EoE have yet to be investigated.

Previous studies on tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) signaling in murine models of EoE have shown that inflammation and remodeling of esophageal tissue are dependent on the expression of TRAIL and downstream signaling through the E3 ubiquitin ligase Midline (MID)-1 (16, 17). TRAIL and MID-1 are known to augment allergen-induced inflammation (17, 18), but their relevance in specifically promoting IL-13-induced effector functions in EoE is unknown. In this study, we administered rIL-13 to TRAIL knockout (Tnfsf10−/−) mice and compared their inflammatory responses to mice that were STAT6 deficient (STAT6−/−). We also silenced MID-1 with small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to wild-type (WT) mice to dissect further its role in IL-13-induced eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. We demonstrate that IL-13-mediated eosinophil infiltration depends on TRAIL and MID-1 and that MID-1-knockdown completely ablated eosinophilia and eotaxin-1 production, unlike TRAIL deficiency.

Methods

Mouse models of inflammation

Specific pathogen-free, 6–8 week-old, male Wide Type (WT), Tnfsf10−/−, and Stat6−/− mice (on BALB/c background) were obtained from Australian Bioresources (Moss Vale, Australia). All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the University of Newcastle. To induce inflammation of the esophagus, WT, Tnfsf10−/−, and Stat6−/− mice were intranasally challenged with 15 μg of rIL-13 (in 35 μl of saline) under isoflurane anesthethesia administered in a supine position. Validated MID-1 siRNA (seq-5-AGAGUAAUCUCACCAAUCU-3) or control siRNA (seq-5-UGGUUUACAUGUCGACU AA-3) (3.75 nmol in nuclease-free water) (Dharmacon™) were administered 24 h before rIL-13 (Biolegend®) administration (19). Mice were sacrificed 24 h after the rIL-13 challenge via pentobarbitone overdose (Virbac), and the esophagus was collected for protein, histological, and mRNA analysis.

Histological analysis of esophageal eosinophilia

Esophageal tissues were collected as described previously (16) and were stained for eosinophils (Congo-red). Eosinophil infiltration was determined by counting the number of eosinophils within 1 mm2 of the transverse esophageal section. Images were taken using the Aperio Slide Scanner (Leica Biosystems).

RNA extraction and gene expression of esophageal tissue

Esophageal samples isolated from mice were homogenised in TRIzol® (Ambion, Life Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia) using the Tissue Tearor® rotor-stator. RNA was then extracted using chloroform phase-separation, followed by isopropanol precipitation ethanol wash and water-elution. RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using BioScript (Bioline, Alexandria, Australia) per the manufacturer's instructions. All genes (listed below) were quantified using qPCR SYBR® green (Life Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia) on the Eppendorf Realplex (Hamburg, Germany) platform. The primers were used at optimal melting temperature (60°C) and are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Quantified genes and primer sequences.

Protein quantification and activity assays

Snap-frozen esophageal tissue was homogenised in Lysis Buffer consisting of IC#10 diluent (EGTA, EDTA, NP-40 alternative, HEPES, and water) and supplemented with Leupeptin (2.5 mg/ml), Pepstatin (1.25 mg/ml), Aprotinin (1.1 mg/ml), and PMSF. Assays were performed on clarified lysates. PP2A activity was determined by Active PP2A DuoSet IC activity assay as per manufacturer protocols (Active Motif). PP2A activity was normalised to Saline (SAL) vehicle controls. TRAIL protein expression was quantified through ELISA as per manufacturers protocols (R&D Systems).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined between experimental groups using Student's t-tests (single comparison) or one-way ANOVA (Holm-Sidak) (multiple comparisons) in Graphpad Prism 6 (La Jolla, CA) as outlined in each figure legend. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Results

MID-1 is induced by IL-13 in WT and Tnfsf10−/− mice, but not in Stat6−/− mice

Our previous studies comprehensively outlined the role of TRAIL and MID-1 signalling axis in the propagation of allergic diseases of the airways and EoE models. To assess the role of the TRAIL and MID-1 signalling processes in the allergic mechanisms driven specifically by IL-13 in EoE, we assessed MID-1 expression downstream of IL-13 administration in Tnfsf10−/− (TRAIL-deficient) mice and Stat6−/− (transcription factor governing propagation of Th2-mediated allergic inflammation). Intranasal administration of rIL-13 to WT mice resulted in an upregulation of TRAIL protein (Figure 1A) and MID-1 mRNA expression (Figure 1D) in the esophagus. Interestingly, there was a significant increase in MID-1 expression in the Tnfsf10−/− group in response to IL-13 (Figure 1D). As expected, Tnfsf10−/− mice had no detectable TRAIL expression (Figure 1B). Stat6−/− mice demonstrated baseline expression of TRAIL, however rIL-13 did not increase TRAIL above baseline in Stat6−/− mice (Figure 1C). Tnfsf10−/− but not Stat6−/− mice had increased MID-1 expression upon IL-13 exposure (Figures 1E,F). Thus, IL-13-induced TRAIL and MID-1 expression is dependent on STAT6.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. TRAIL, MID-1 expression, in the esophagus of WT, Tnfsf10−/−, and Stat6−/− mice upon rIL-13 administration. TRAIL mRNA expression in (A) WT, (B) Tnfsf10−/− and (C) Stat6−/− mouse esophagi determined by qPCR, normalised to β-actin. MID-1 mRNA expression in (D) WT, (E) Tnfsf10−/− and (F) Stat6−/− mouse esophagi determined by qPCR, normalised to β-actin. Data expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–6). * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01 as determined by Student's t-tests.

TRAIL deficiency attenuates, while STAT6 deficiency ablates IL-13-driven eosinophilia in the esophagus

Eosinophils are the hallmark effector cell in EoE and are recruited downstream of IL-13 signalling. Therefore congo-red stained transverse esophageal sections were analysed using light microscopy in our experiments. The number of eosinophils (per mm2) was determined in WT, Tnfsf10−/−and Stat6−/− mice upon IL-13 exposure (Figures 2A–D). While rIL-13 administration resulted in a marked increase of eosinophil infiltration in WT mice (Figure 2A), eosinophil recruitment was attenuated in Tnfsf10−/− mice (Figure 2B), and completely ablated in Stat6−/− mice (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. IL-13-induced esophageal eosinophilia is partially reduced in Tnfsf10−/− mice and ablated in STAT6−/− mice. (AC) Average eosinophil counts in Congo-red stained traverse esophageal sections determined via light microscopy per mm2. (D) Transverse Congo-red stained esophageal pictographs (A = WT SAL, B = WT IL-13, C = Tnfsf10−/− SAL, D = Tnfsf10−/− IL-13, E = STAT6−/− SAL, F = STAT6−/− IL-13). Data expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3–6). ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001 as determined by Student's t-tests.

IL-13 upregulates eotaxin-1 and periostin in the esophagus of WT and Tnfsf10−/− mice, but not in Stat6−/−

Eotaxin-1 and periostin are effector cytokines and immune correlates of disease in EoE. We therefore sought to determine whether their expression induced by IL-13 is dependent on TRAIL/MID-1 and STAT6 signalling. Both WT and Tnfsf10−/− mice significantly increased eotaxin-1 expression after rIL-13 administration (Figures 3A,B), which was not observed in Stat6−/− mice (Figure 3C). Similarly, periostin expression was significantly upregulated in rIL-13 administered WT and Tnfsf10−/− (Figures 3D,E) but not Stat6−/− mice (Figure 3F). In summary, IL-13 induced expression of eotaxin and periostin is STAT6 but not TRAIL-dependent.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. TRAIL deficiency does not reduce IL-13-induced eotaxin-1 and periostin mRNA expression in the esophagus, unlike STAT6−/− mice. (A–C) Eotaxin-1, and (D–F) periostin mRNA expression in mouse esophagi determined by qPCR, normalised to β-actin. Data expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6). * = P < 0.05 as determined by Student's t-tests.

MID-1 siRNA administration restored PP2A activity but not TRAIL or STAT6 expression after esophageal IL-13 exposure

The MID-1 signalling pathway is thought to propagate inflammation by causing polyubiquitination and degradation of protein phosphatase 2a (PP2A). PP2A is a constitutive negative regulator of inflammation. Reduced PP2A resulted in inflammation through subsequent increase ERK-1/JNK inflammatory signalling. In order to suppress MID-1 expression locally we administered MID-1 targting siRNA in the esophagus. As expected MID-1 expression was significantly reduced compared to the nonsense (control) siRNA (NONc) control (Figure 4A). Further, the reduced MID-1 expression resulted in increased PP2A activity (Figure 4B). The lack of difference between saline and NONc control siRNA IL-13 exposed mice remains unexplained but could be related to unspecific siRNA effects. STAT6 expression was not altered by MID-1 inhibition (Figure 4C) indicating that STAT6 is upstream of MID-1 mediated suppression of PP2A during IL-13-driven inflammatory signalling in the esophagus.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Silencing MID-1 before IL-13 administration restores PP2A activity in the esophagus but does not alter TRAIL and STAT6 expression. (A) MID-1 mRNA expression in mouse esophagi was determined by qPCR, normalised to β-actin, in saline exposed (SAL) mice, or nonsense control siRNA (NONc) and MID1-silencing siRNA (MID-1) IL-13 exposed mice. (B) PP2A activity measured in mouse esophagi normalised to esophageal tissue weight and respective SAL control (%). (C) STAT6 mRNA expression in mouse esophagi determined by qPCR, normalised to β-actin. Data expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–8). * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01. as determined by one-way ANOVA (Holm-Sidak).

MID-1 silencing ablated Il-13-driven eosinophilia and eotaxin-1 expression in the esophagus

Targeting MID-1 using siRNA (as above) prevented IL-13-induced eosinophilic infiltration compared to the NONc control (Figures 5A,D). There was also a significant reduction of eotaxin-1 mRNA expression in the esophagus (Figure 5B). No changes in periostin expression were observed (Figure 5C) indicating that IL-13 driven eosinophil recruitment, could be dependant on eotaxin-1 (not periostin), and that eotaxin-1 is downstream of MID-1.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Ablation of IL-13 induced eosinophilia and eotaxin-1, but not periostin, in MID-1 siRNA-treated mice. (A) Average eosinophil counts in Congo-red stained traverse esophageal sections determined via light microscopy per mm2. (B) Eotaxin-1 and (C) periostin mRNA expression in mouse esophagi determined by qPCR, normalised to β-actin. (D) Transverse Congo-red stained esophageal pictographs (A = SAL, B = NONc siRNA/IL-13, C = MID-1 siRNA/IL-13). Data expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–6). * = P < 0.01, **** = P < 0.0001 as determined by one-way ANOVA (Holm-Sidak).

Discussion

Recombinant IL-13 has been shown to induce some hallmark features of experimental EoE in animal models. For instance, IL-13 regulates the expression of eosinophil-attracting chemokines in esophageal epithelial cells (14). In allergen driven in vivo models, we have shown that IL-13 production was dependent on the expression of TRAIL and MID-1 (16, 17). However, it remained unclear whether IL-13 alone can propagate eosinophilic inflammation through the MID-1 and PP2A siginalling pathway. Here, we show that intranasal administration of rIL-13 to Tnfsf10−/− mice resulted in reduced eosinophilic infiltration compared to wildtype mice without effecting eotaxin-1 expression. This may be explained by the reduced levels of other cytokines regulating eosinophilic chemotaxis in Tnfsf10−/− mice described earlier (18). Interestingly, targeting MID-1 with siRNAs resulted in complete ablated IL-13-mediated EoE features, unlike seen in Tnfsf10−/− mice. These findings indicate that IL-13 propagated EoE features through MID-1 and although TRAIL does play an important a role in EoE, it is partly dispensible when recombinant IL-13 is directly administered.

MID-1 siRNA ablated IL-13-induced eosinophilic infiltration in the esophagus to levels comparable with IL-13-challenged Stat6−/− mice. MID-1 silencing also reduced eotaxin-1 expression but not periostin expression. Thus MID-1 and STAT6 are essential for IL-13-induced eotaxin-1 expression and eosinophil recruitment, even though a MID-1 independent pathway mediates periostin expression upon IL-13 signalling. These results define MID-1 as an integral component of the IL-13-mediated, STAT6-dependent proinflammatory effector pathway in the esophagus.We have previously shown that IL-13 is required for TRAIL-induced eosinophil recruitment of the lung (18). Our new data indicate that TRAIL can partially mediate some of the IL-13-driven EoE features, but is redundant following rIL-13 instillation.

Upregulation of MID1 following rIL-13 exposure was reduced in Tnfsf10−/− mice but completely abolished in Stat6−/− mice. This suggests that IL-13 induced MID1 expression can occur in a Stat6-dependant manner. Furthermore, MID-1 siRNA ablated both eotaxin-1 expression and eosinophilia after rIL-13 administration, which indicative that IL-13 induces eosinophilic infiltration through MID-1 signaling. We therefore infer that IL-13 propagates hallmark EoE inflammatory features (e.g., eosinophil recruitment and inflammatory mediators) through Stat6 and then MID-1.

In our previous works, IL-13 and STAT6 were dependent on TRAIL and MID-1 expression in allergen-driven EoE (16). Now, this current study demonstrates that rIL-13 can induce TRAIL and MID-1 expression in the esophagus, indicating that IL-13 is not merely to be an effector molecule downstream of TRAIL-induced inflammation. It is also a modulator of MID-1 mediated inflammation. Taken together, these studies could indicate a positive feedback loop between IL-13 and TRAIL in the perpetuation or progression of EoE. In addition, intratracheal rIL-13 administration was identified as a critical driver of Th2-driven inflammation of the esophagus dependent on eotaxin-1 and STAT6 (13) which complements and reinforces our findings. Our previous works showed that eotaxin-1 and STAT6 were regulated by TRAIL (16, 17). Here we identify, for the first time, that IL-13 can perpetuate eosinophil infiltration through MID-1.

We propose that IL-13, signaling through the E3 ubiquitin ligase MID-1, modulates PP2A activity in a STAT6-dependent manner. Targeting IL-13 with biologics is now a therapeutic option for EoE patients (20). Our data highlights MID-1 as a new, potentially critical element of IL-13 induced EoE pathology, and as a new therapeutic target. Future studies are required to completely characterize MID-1 regulated signaling pathways relevant to the development of inflammation employing for instance RNA sequencing and proteomics.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by University of Newcastle Animal Care and Ethics Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

LS, AC, and JG performed and designed mouse experiments, analysed data, generated figures, drafted and edited the manuscript. MS and PH assisted in interpreting and analysing data. JM conceptualised, coordinated, designed, supervised mouse studies, analysed data, and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NH&MRC 1011153 & 1060074 to JM), the Hunter Medical Research Institute (to AC, and JM). MS and PH are supported by fellowships from NHMRC (1072000 and 1079187).

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Ana Pereira de Siqueira, Matthew Morton, Jane Grehan, and Melissa Lowe for their assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, Atkins D, Attwood SE, Bonis PA, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2011) 128:3–20 e26; quiz 21–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. DeBrosse CW, Collins MH, Buckmeier Butz BK, Allen CL, King EC, Assa'ad AH, et al. Identification, epidemiology, and chronicity of pediatric esophageal eosinophilia, 1982–1999. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2010) 126:112–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.05.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Noel RJ, Putnam PE, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med. (2004) 351:940–1. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200408263510924

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Konikoff MR, Noel RJ, Blanchard C, Kirby C, Jameson SC, Buckmeier BK, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluticasone propionate for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. (2006) 131:1381–91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Abu-Sultaneh SM, Durst P, Maynard V, Elitsur Y. Fluticasone and food allergen elimination reverse sub-epithelial fibrosis in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci. (2011) 56:97–102. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1259-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kagalwalla AF, Sentongo TA, Ritz S, Hess T, Nelson SP, Emerick KM, et al. Effect of six-food elimination diet on clinical and histologic outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2006) 4:1097–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.05.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Arias A, Lucendo AJ, Martinez-Fernandez P, Gonzalez-Castro AM, Fortea M, Gonzalez-Cervera J, et al. Dietary treatment modulates mast cell phenotype, density, and activity in adult eosinophilic oesophagitis. Clin Exp Allergy. (2016) 46:78–91. doi: 10.1111/cea.12504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Arias A, Perez-Martinez I, Tenias JM, Lucendo AJ. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2016) 43:3–15. doi: 10.1111/apt.13441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Foster PS, Hogan SP, Ramsay AJ, Matthaei KI, Young IG. Interleukin 5 deficiency abolishes eosinophilia, airways hyperreactivity, and lung damage in a mouse asthma model. J Exp Med. (1996) 183:195–201. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.1.195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wills-Karp M, Luyimbazi J, Xu X, Schofield B, Neben TY, Karp CL, et al. Interleukin-13: central mediator of allergic asthma. Science. (1998) 282:2258–61. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General, and United States. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: 50 years of progress: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). p. 1 online resource (1 PDF file (xxii, 943 pages)).

12. Mishra A, Hogan SP, Brandt EB, Rothenberg ME. An etiological role for aeroallergens and eosinophils in experimental esophagitis. J Clin Invest. (2001) 107:83–90. doi: 10.1172/JCI10224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mishra A, Rothenberg ME. Intratracheal IL-13 induces eosinophilic esophagitis by an IL-5, eotaxin-1, and STAT6-dependent mechanism. Gastroenterology. (2003) 125:1419–27. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Blanchard C, Mingler MK, McBride M, Putnam PE, Collins MH, Chang G, et al. Periostin facilitates eosinophil tissue infiltration in allergic lung and esophageal responses. Mucosal Immunol. (2008) 1:289–96. doi: 10.1038/mi.2008.15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zuo L, Fulkerson PC, Finkelman FD, Mingler M, Fischetti CA, Blanchard C, et al. IL-13 induces esophageal remodeling and gene expression by an eosinophil-independent, IL-13R alpha 2-inhibited pathway. J Immunol. (2010) 185:660–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000471

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Collison AM, Sokulsky LA, Sherrill JD, Nightingale S, Hatchwell L, Talley NJ, et al. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) regulates midline-1, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, inflammation, and remodeling in experimental eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2015) 136:971–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.03.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sokulsky LA, Collison AM, Nightingale S, Le Fevre A, Percival E, Starkey MR, et al. TRAIL Deficiency and PP2A activation with salmeterol ameliorates egg allergen driven eosinophilic esophagitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2016) 311(6):G998–1008. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00151.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Weckmann M, Collison A, Simpson JL, Kopp MV, Wark PA, Smyth MJ, et al. Critical link between TRAIL and CCL20 for the activation of TH2 cells and the expression of allergic airway disease. Nat Med. (2007) 13:1308–15. doi: 10.1038/nm1660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Collison C, Hatchwell L, Verrills N, Wark PAB, Pereira de Siqueira A, Tooze M, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase midline 1 promotes allergen and rhinovirus-induced asthma by inhibiting protein phosphatase 2A activity. Nat Med. (2013) 19:232–7. doi: 10.1038/nm.3049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Rothenberg ME. Scientific journey to the first FDA-approved drug for eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 150:1325–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.09.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: eosinophils, eosinophilic esophagitis, allergy, interleukin 13 (IL-13), midline 1 (Mid1)

Citation: Girkin JLN, Sokulsky LA, Starkey MR, Hansbro PM, Foster PS, Collison AM and Mattes J (2023) A unique role for IL-13 in inducing esophageal eosinophilia through MID-1 and STAT6. Front. Allergy 4:1248432. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1248432

Received: 27 June 2023; Accepted: 17 October 2023;
Published: 6 November 2023.

Edited by:

Amanda Muir, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States

Reviewed by:

Cynthia Kanagaratham, Harvard Medical School, United States
Tobias Kaeser, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria

© 2023 Girkin, Sokulsky, Starkey, Hansbro, Foster, Collison and Mattes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Adam M. Collison QWRhbS5Db2xsaXNvbkBuZXdjYXN0bGUuZWR1LmF1 Joerg Mattes Sm9lcmcubWF0dGVzQG5ld2Nhc3RsZS5lZHUuYXU=

These authors share senior authorship.

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.