Corrigendum: Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace as an Aspect of Horizontal Segregation in the Nursing Profession
- 1Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
- 2Rzeszów University of Technology, Rzeszow, Poland
The purpose of this article was to assess the influence of psychosocial hazards as a factor affecting the presence of men in the nursing profession. The article refers to the topic of particularly low representation of men among nursing staff in Poland, in comparison to what similar statistics show for other countries. The aim of the study was to assess whether the psychosocial hazards in the nursing profession constitute a significant factor in the small number of men present in this occupation. In this article psychosocial hazards are considered as all the aspects of management and work organization that may negatively affect the employee's mental and physical health. The research was conducted from September 2017 to April 2018 in the Podlaskie Voivodeship (Poland). A total of 640 respondents working as nurses in inpatient health care facilities, of which 87% were women and 13% were men, were included in the study. A standardized Work Design Questionnaire for an objective assessment of work stressfulness was used as a research tool. The research has been run by a group of experts, who explained the aim and the meaning of the particular questions to the surveyed group. Afterwards, based on the answers and observations of the responders, the experts filled in the questionnaire. The results of the study show that in almost all the evaluated aspects, the nursing profession was assessed more negatively by surveyed men than women. The most negative aspects reported by women included hazards (a score of 60), complexity (58.3), and haste (50.0), while those reported by men included haste (70.0), complexity (66.7), and hazards (65.0). As a conclusion it has been noticed, that results received from the research confirm that psychosocial hazards may have significant impact on the number of men present in the nursing profession in Poland. This study also suggests that the greater psychosocial hazards experienced by male nurses in the workplace may be an effect of the particularly low representation of men among practicing nursing staff.
Introduction
In Poland and most countries worldwide, the nursing profession is considered to be a typically female dominated occupation. Such a view is based on the conviction that women, in line with their instincts, should perform care-related tasks (Myungkeun and Keogh, 2016; Kluczynska, 2017b). Statistical data confirm that the nursing profession is dominated by women on a global scale (Main Chamber of Nurses Midwives, 2010). This is particularly visible in Poland, where men constitute a mere 2.0% of all registered nurses, while in Canada, 4.6%; in Great Britain, approximately 9.0%; in Ireland, 10.0% and in Iran, 23.0% (Whittock and Leonard, 2003; Evans, 2004; Keogh and O' Lynn, 2007; Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland, 2012; Abshire et al., 2017; Kluczynska, 2017a).
These statistics cause that men are more sought after in Poland and other countries as nurses than women. Additionally, working in a female-dominated profession results in men being in a privileged position, which is demonstrated, for example, by being assigned more prestigious, administrative, and better paid tasks. This is known as the glass elevator effect, which allows men to advance only because of their gender. In the case of female nurses, a glass ceiling mechanism is activated, making it difficult for women in feminized occupations to get a promotion (Lipinska-Grobelny and Gozdzik, 2012; Williams, 2013). This is known as vertical segregation, wherein it is more difficult for women to be promoted from less-prestigious and less-paid positions, such as a unit nurse, due to the feminization of the profession. Most men working as nurses are aware that their professional development could be faster and easier due to their gender, and a promotion in the nursing profession typically means doing office work and withdrawing from patient care (Kluczynska, 2012; Lipinska-Grobelny and Gozdzik, 2012; Dudak, 2016).
Most countries around the world, including Poland, have permanent nursing staff shortages. Still, relatively few men work as nurses, despite being preferred for employment (LaRocco, 2007; Eley et al., 2012; Dudak, 2016; Kluczynska, 2017a).
One of the reasons for this is the firmly rooted stereotype that a man working as a nurse is not very manly (LaRocco, 2007; Eley et al., 2012; Dudak, 2016; Kluczynska, 2017a). The decision to perform an unmanly profession affects the perception of a man in the eyes of a large portion of society. Such a man is believed to have characteristics of laziness and submissiveness, or to be self-serving, a failure, a dependent, or of so-called subordinated masculinity. In Poland, a man who chooses the nursing profession may be perceived as a person who has failed to become a doctor and experienced defeat because he was not admitted to study medicine. Another unflattering stereotype prevalent in Poland is the perception that men working as nurses do it as secondary work, which due to the 12-h shift system enables men to do real men's work in the time between shifts (Kluczynska, 2012, 2017a; Dudak, 2016).
Undoubtedly, the prevailing stereotypes are not the only reasons for the low representation of men in the nursing profession. Another important factor influencing this issue can be the psychosocial hazards affecting this professional group, the nature, and the intensity of which may vary depending on the employee's gender (LaRocco, 2007; Eley et al., 2012; Kluczynska, 2017a).
Work under stress and psychosocial hazards corresponds to an increase in employee absenteeism loss of productivity, and high costs of health and social care (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work Topic Centre Risk Observatory, 2007). Psychosocial hazards in the workplace can be described as the aspects of work organization and management that may negatively affect the employee's mental and physical health (Cox and Cox, 1993). In the literature, there are many divisions of psychosocial hazards that consider the negative work environment determinants, also known as stressors. The classifications are usually based on theoretic models of stress or empirical data (Leka et al., 2010; Cox et al., 2016). A dynamic work environment is prone to developing existing or new hazards such as mobbing, aggression, and the introduction of new technologies (Hanna and Mona, 2014; Jamali and Ayatollahi, 2015).
No uniform classification of workplace hazards has been done so far in the scientific literature. The most common hazards classification pertains to the context and content of the work.
Hazards regarding the work context such as ambiguity and role conflict, lack of scope of control and decisions, threats, responsibility, and negative family relations resulting from a work–home conflict cause a decrease in work satisfaction (Jamali and Ayatollahi, 2015), leading to exhaustion, fear, low self-esteem, and professional burnout, finally resulting in leaving the profession (Gurková et al., 2013; Yamaguchi et al., 2016). Poor organizational culture, improper communication at all organizational levels, lowering employees' self-esteem, and mobilizing them to negative rivalry constitute sources of stress and contribute indirectly to inducing many diseases of somatic and mental bases.
In addition, work-related hazards resulting from the work context, such as quantity and quality hazards (Hamaideh et al., 2008), work complexity, work schedule, work environment and equipment lower self-control can lead to making medical errors as well as accidents or injuries leading to decreased productivity (Donnelly, 2014). Night shifts interfere with the human circadian rhythm, leading to frequent poor physical and mental health symptoms such as sleep problems and gastrointestinal disorders. Shift work generally increases morbidity and disease-related absences as well as disrupts employee functioning in family and social life (Harrington, 2001; Pilcher et al., 2003).
The aim of this study was to assess if the psychosocial hazards in the nursing profession, affecting men and women to varying degrees, may constitute a significant cause for the small number of men present in this profession.
Materials and Methods
The research was conducted from September 2017 to April 2018 in the Podlaskie Voivodeship (Poland). A total of 640 respondents working as nurses in inpatient health care facilities, constituting 87.0% of women and 13.0% of men, were included in the study. Participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. The consent of the participants was obtained by virtue of survey completion. All procedures were approved by the Local Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Bialystok R-I 002/296/2017 and R-I 002/175/2018.
Study Procedure
The study was conducted by a group of experts who were representatives of nurses and educators belonging to the nursing profession. These experts had a clear understanding of the purpose of the study and detailed knowledge about the specifics of the unit nurse responsibilities in inpatient health care facilities. The research was conducted using the standardized Work Design Questionnaire for an objective assessment of work stress, which was developed by Dudek et al. (1999). The experts explained the aim and meaning of the particular questions to the surveyed group. Then, based on the answers and observations of the responders, they filled in the questionnaire. Conducting the study using this method ensured objective assessment of work stressfulness. Objectivity, in this case, means that the assessment is independent of the knowledge of the stress experienced by the individual surveyed person, but is a result of the assessment made independently by 2–3 experts, who have knowledge about the specifics and work conditions of the given job position.
Study Group Selection
The selection of the responders for the research group was conducted based on the register of nurses affiliated to the District Chamber of Nurses and Midwives in Białystok. The criterion adopted was employment in a hospital under an employment contract to work in the internal ward, surgical ward, admission room, or emergency department. Out of the group of people who have met the selection criteria, 10.0% of randomly selected women and 100.0% of men were invited to take part in the study. In total, 13.0% of the invited men decided not to participate. Participation in the study was voluntary and could be discontinued at any stage without providing a reason.
Questionnaire Description
A standardized Work Design Questionnaire for an objective assessment of work stress was used as a research tool (Dudek et al., 1999).
The questionnaire consisted of 34 statements describing each work characteristic. The statements were graded on a scale of 1–5, depending on the frequency, duration, or intensity of the given occurrence of the characteristic.
Based on the statements included in the questionnaire, one overall measure and ten specific measures of work arduousness were determined, including, unpleasant working conditions, complexity, hazards, conflicts, uncertainty resulting from the organization of work, arduousness, haste, responsibility, physical effort, and competition. The higher the score, the higher the work arduousness in a given aspect. However, the results for different measures are not comparable, because of a different number of component statements corresponding to each detailed measure (and the overall measure). Therefore, raw values of the individual measures were normalized in the range of 0–100 (with 0 indicating absence of work arduousness and 100 indicating maximum work arduousness), to allow for the comparison between work arduousness estimations in the different categories.
Based on the standards set out for the questionnaire, individuals with high stress levels due to work arduousness in the different areas were distinguished.
In the overall scale of work arduousness, three categories were distinguished: low, medium, and high.
Statistical Methods
Depending on the nature of the variables being compared, appropriate statistical techniques were used, including descriptive statistics of assessments of work characteristics in the men and women groups. Due to the asymmetry in the distribution of some measures, interpretation was based on the median value rather than the average. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess the significance of the differences between women and men.
Results
This study included a total of 640 respondents (87.0% of women and 13.0% of men), who were employed as nurses. Most men were employed in emergency units, that is, 41.0% in admission room and 38.6% in emergency department. In the case of women, 37.5% worked in admission rooms, 33.8% in surgical units, and 28.7% were employed in medical treatment units and only 0.2% in emergency units.
Male nurses were better educated than their female counterparts. Higher education was reported by 79.5% of men and 57.7% of women. The structure of job positions did not indicate significant differences between women and men–a unit nurse was the predominant position held in both groups (78.3% of women and 85.5% of men). A total of 59.0% of male nurses and only 26.6% of female nurses were unmarried. Men employed as nurses were significantly younger than women and had shorter work experience (by an average of 8 years). This may have some impact on the comparison of working condition assessments presented in Table 1.
Table 2 shows the selected descriptive statistics of assessments of work characteristics in the group of women and men. Due to the asymmetry in the distribution of some measures, interpretation was based on the median value rather than the average. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess the significance of the differences between women and men. The nursing profession was assessed more negatively by men in almost all the evaluated aspects. The most negative aspects reported by women included hazards (a score of 60.0), complexity (58.3), and haste (50.0), while those reported by men included haste (75.0), complexity (66.7), and hazards (65.0). The median for the overall score was 40.4 among the surveyed female nurses and 48.5 among the male nurses.
Table 3 shows proportions of respondents (based on the point thresholds published by the authors of the questionnaire) whose ratings of the intensity of negative phenomena at the workplace were classified as high. As it can be seen for most of the considered aspects of work, a high level of negative opinions is more common among male nurses. This is particularly clear while assessing conflict, organizational uncertainty, arduousness, and haste. The characteristics that occur with the highest intensity include complexity, unpleasant working conditions, and haste for women, as well as complexity, haste, and unpleasant working conditions for men.
Figure 1 shows the percentage of respondents declaring a high level of negative phenomena in their professional work (along with the accuracy of estimation in the form of 95.0% confidence intervals) in the group of women and men. It further shows the result of the Chi-squared test of independence; therefore, it may be a more illustrative presentation of the results (instead of a table).
Table 4 shows a comparison between the classifications of the level of negative phenomena at work according to a summarized scale. The chi-squared test indicates statistically significant differences between female and male opinions in the intensity of negative workplace phenomena. The scale of negative workplace phenomena was described as high by the vast majority of men (85.5%) and only about two-thirds of women (67.7%).
Discussion
All countries around the world, including Poland, are affected by the phenomenon of professional horizontal segregation. The percentage of men working in nursing is very low on a global scale. This is particularly visible in Poland, where men constitute a mere 2.0% of all registered nurses, while in Canada, 4.6%; Great Britain, approximately 9.0%; Ireland, 10.0%; Spain, 16.0%, and Iran, 23.0%. (Whittock and Leonard, 2003; Evans, 2004; Keogh and O' Lynn, 2007; Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland, 2012; Abshire et al., 2017; Kluczynska, 2017b). In most countries, stereotypes prevailing in societies are indicated as the main barrier in undertaking the nursing profession by men. What is characteristic is that the prevailing stereotypes are similar in different countries, even those that are culturally distant. Everywhere, nursing is identified with providing care, and this with being a typically women's activity. The masculinity of men who work as nurses is questioned; they are viewed as those who did not succeed in becoming doctors or those who became nurses as a result of lack of other career prospects (Neighbours, 2008; Kouta and Kaite, 2011).
Men are not only reluctant to become nurses; they also, according to research conducted by Kluczynska (2017b), much more frequently leave the profession than women in the first years of work similar inferences were obtained in the United States (Sochalski, 2002) and in South Korea (Kim and Shim, 2018). An important reason for resigning from the nursing profession is due to the workplace psychosocial hazards, which is confirmed by studies carried out by Eley et al. (2010); Cortese (2012); Rangel de Oliveira et al. (2017), and Hasselhorn et al. (2008).
In the present study, we examined to what extent the intensity of the psychosocial hazards in the workplace varies in nursing depending on the nurse's gender. On the basis of the obtained results, we found that far more men assessed their working conditions as highly unfavorable. Other studies published in the scientific literature so far have shown different results. According to a study conducted in Iran, women assessing their working conditions worse than men were in the majority; however, men constitute 23.0% of people working in nursing on the Iranian job market (Jamali and Ayatollahi, 2015). A better physical and psychophysical condition of male nurses than female nurses was found in the study conducted in Spain. The percentage of men working in the nursing profession in Spain is also significantly higher than in Poland and is over 16.0% (Rosa et al., 2013). In turn, in a study conducted in hospitals in southwestern Ethiopia, nurses' gender did not affect the degree of negative work characteristics in any way (Dagget et al., 2016).
Work complexity, as a characteristic constituting psychosocial hazards in the workplace, was assessed in our study as having the highest intensity among the tested hazards. Again, a higher incidence of this characteristic was found among men than women. Moreover, our results are also inconsistent with the results of studies carried out in other countries. Research in Andalusia (Spain) showed that men cope with work complexity a little better than women, but it should be noted that in the sample studied in Andalusia, the share of men was slightly higher than that of women, while in our study, women definitely dominated (87.0%) (Rivera-Torres et al., 2013). Similar results to the study of Rivera-Torres et al. (2013) were obtained in the research conducted in Italy (Romano et al., 2015).
The next psychosocial hazards that were indicated the most by the studied group were hazards in the workplace. In this case also, this characteristic was more intensely felt by men than women. Research carried out in Great Britain, the United States, and Iran showed that the nurse's gender did not affect the extent of perceived hazards in the workplace. In each of these countries, the number of men in the nursing professional group and the studied groups was significantly higher than in Poland (Domagała et al., 2017; Zaree et al., 2018).
Differences in the perception of conflict, a workplace hazard, to a large extent depend on individual employee's characteristics and factors such as professional experience, education, relationships with colleagues, position, and organizational climate. In our study, the potential for conflict was a characteristic with the highest discrepancy in the evaluation of intensity by men (73.5% assessed as high) and women (51.5% assessed as high). This is consistent with the results of a study in Sweden (Leineweber et al., 2014). Whereas, research from Iran showed that conflict did not depend on the respondents' gender (Najimi et al., 2012). Differences in the age and education of men and women could have affected our study results. In the studied sample, men were better educated (79.5% of men had higher education and only 57.7% of women) and younger (by 8 years), both in terms of age and work experience, than women.
Physical effort, as a psychosocial hazard in the nursing profession, was the only characteristic assessed in our study that was consistent with the results of studies from other countries such as those from Japan and Brazil (Rotenberg et al., 2008; Yada et al., 2014). This is probably due to the “He-man” stereotype, according to which a male nurse is naturally inclined to all kinds of hard physical work, because who, if not he, can lift, overturn, or bring something (Neighbours, 2008).
Conclusions
The conducted analysis showed that in Poland, male nurses experience psychosocial hazards more severely than female nurses, and this is unlike the results of studies conducted in other countries in terms of most of the studied characteristics. Is the low representation of men in the nursing profession in Poland the reason for this? Certainly this is one of the most important reasons. It is also possible to draw another conclusion, which is a form of specific feedback, that the reason for the greater psychosocial hazards perceived by male nurses in Poland is a result of their particularly low representation in the nursing profession compared with other countries.
Author Contributions
KK: concept of the research, design of article structure, conducting of the research, review of the literature, results analysis, writing the article; EK-K: review of the literature, review of article drafts; MS: statistical analysis.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Abshire, D., Graves, J., Lee Roberts, M., Katz, J., Barbosa-Leiker, C., and Corbett, C. (2017). Student support in accelerated nursing programs: gender-based perspectives and impact on academic outcomes nursing outlook. Nurs. Outlook 66, 84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.08.010
Cortese, C. (2012). Predictors of critical care nurses' intention to leave the unit, the hospital, and the nursing profession. Open J. Nurs. 2, 311–326. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2012.223046
Cox, T., and Cox, S. (1993). Psychosocial and Organizational Hazards: Monitoring 299 and Control in Occupational Health. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Cox, T., Griffiths, A. J., and Rial-Gonzalez, E. (2016). Research on Work-related1 Stress. Report to the EuropeaAgency for Safety and Health at Work. Luxembourg. Available online at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/magazine/5 (Accessed 15 December, 2017).
Dagget, T., Molla, A., and Belachew, T. (2016). Job related stress among nurses working in Jimma Zone public hospitals, South West Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Nurs. 15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0158-2
Domagała, P., Kretowicz, K., and Gaworska- Krzeminska, A. (2017). Mȩżczyżni w pielȩgniarstwie z perspektywy płci kulturowej. [Men in nursing from the perspective of gender]. Kwart. Pedagog. 62, 270–283. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.3404
Donnelly, T. (2014). Stress among nurses working in an acute hospital in Ireland. Br. J. Nurs. Br. J. Nurs. 23, 746–750. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.13.746
Dudak, A. (2016). Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania Mȩżczyżn w zawodach sfeminizowanych. [Men in feminized professions–selected aspects]. In Polish. Problemy Profesjologii 2, 23–32.
Dudek, B., Waszkowska, M., Merecz, D., and Hanke, W. (1999). Ochrona Zdrowia Pracowników Przed Skutkami Stresu Zawodowego. [Protection of Employees' Health Against the Effects of Occupational Stress]. Łódz. Instytut Medycyny Pracy [In Polish].
Eley, D., Eley, R., Bertello, M., and Rogers-Clark, C. (2012). Why did I become a nurse? Personality traits and reasons for entering nursing. J. Adv. Nurs. 68, 1546–1555. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05955.x
Eley, R., Eley, D., and Rogers-Clark, C. (2010). Reasons for entering and leaving nursing: an Australian regional study. Austral. J. Adv. Nurs. 28, 6–13.
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work Topic Centre Risk Observatory (2007). Expert Forecast on Emerging Psychosocial Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (Accessed on May 1, 2017).
Evans, J. (2004). Men nurses: a historical and feminist perspective. J. Adv. Nurs. 47, 321–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03096.x
Gurková, E., Soósová, M., Haroková, S., Žiaková, K., Šerfelová, R., and Zamboriová, M. (2013). Job satisfaction and leaving intentions of Slovak and Czech nurses. Int. Nurs. Rev. 60, 112–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.01030.x
Hamaideh, S., Mrayyan, M., Mudallal, R., Faouri, I., and Khasawneh, N. (2008). Jordanian nurses' job stressors and social support. Int. Nurs. Rev. 55, 40–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00605.x
Hanna, T., and Mona, E. (2014). Psychosocial work environment, stress factors and individual characteristics among nursing staff in psychiatric in-patient care. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 1161–1175. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110101161
Harrington, J. M. (2001). Health effects of shift work and extended hours of work. Occup. Environ. Med. 58, 68–72. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.1.68
Hasselhorn, H. M., Conway, P. M., Widerszal-Bazyl, M., Simon, M., Tackenberg, P., Schmidt, S., et al. (2008). Contribution of job strain to nurses' consideration of leaving the profession–Results from the longitudinal European nurses' early exit study. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 6, 75–82.
Jamali, J., and Ayatollahi, S. (2015). Classification of Iranian nurses according to their mental health outcomes using GHQ-12 questionnaire: a comparison between latent class analysis and K-means clustering with traditional scoring method. Mater. Soc. Med. Mater. Soc. Med. 27, 337–341. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.337-341
Keogh, B., and O' Lynn, C. (2007). Male nurses experiences on gender barriers. Irish and American perspectives. Nurse Educ. 32, 256–259. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000299478.64809.82
Kim, I.-J., and Shim, H.-W. (2018). Subjectivity about turnover intention among male nurses in South Korea: a Q-methodological study. Asian Nurs. Res. 12, 113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2018.04.002
Kluczynska, U. (2012). Nieobecność mezczyzn w pielegniarstwie – funkcjonujace stereotypy i ich konsekwencje. [Men's (in)visibility in nursing–stereotypes and their consequences]. In Polish. Nowiny Lekarskie 81, 564–568.
Kluczynska, U. (2017a). Mezczyzni w Pielegniarstwie w Strone Meskości Opiekunczej [Men in Nursing–Caring Masculinity].Wydawnictwo Uniwersytet Medyczny im Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu, Poznan 2017 [In Polish].
Kluczynska, U. (2017b). Motives for choosing and resigning from nursing by men and the definition of masculinity: a qualitative study. J. Adv. Nurs. 73, 1366–1376. doi: 10.1111/jan.13240
Kouta, C., and Kaite, C. P. (2011). Gender discrimination and nursing: a literature review. J Prof Nurs. 27, 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.10.006
LaRocco, S. A. (2007). A grounded theory study of socializing men into nursing. J. Men's Studies 15, 120–129. doi: 10.3149/jms.1502.120
Leineweber, C., Chungkham, H. S., Westerlund, H., Tishelman, C., and Lindqvist, R. (2014). Hospital organizational factors influence work-family conflict in registered nurses: multilevel modeling of a nation-wide cross-sectional survey in Sweden. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 51, 744–751. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.010
Leka, S., Jain, A., Zwetsloot, G., and Cox, T. (2010). Policy-level interventions and work-related psychosocial risk management in the European Union. Work Stress Int. J. Work Health Organ. 24, 298–307. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2010.519918
Lipinska-Grobelny, A., and Gozdzik, I. (2012). Płeć psychologiczna a zadowolenie z pracy w zawodach stereotypowo meskich i kobiecych. [Gender and job satisfaction in stereotypical masculine and feminine occupations]. Medycyna Pracy 63, s531–s540. In Polish.
Main Chamber of Nurses Midwives (2010). Wstepna Oceana Zasobów Kadrowych Pielegniarek i Połoznych w Polsce do roku 2020 [Preliminary Evaluation of Human Resources of Nurses and Midwives in Poland until 2020]. Warszawa. Available online at http://www.izbapiel.org.pl/upload/Wstepna.ocena.zasobow.kadrowych.pdf (Accessed on May 1, 2018).
Myungkeun, Y., and Keogh, B. (2016). What motivates men to choose nursing as a profession? A systematic review of qualitative studies. Contemporary Nurse 52, 95–105. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1192952
Najimi, A., Goudarzi, A. M., and Sharifirad, G. (2012). Causes of job stress in nurses: a cross-sectional study. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 17, 301–305.
Neighbours, C. H. (2008). Male Nurses, Men in a Female Dominated Profession. The Perceived Need for Masculinity Maintainance. Available online at: http://studentnurse.tripod.com/men.html/ (Accessed 1, June 2018).
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (2012). Register Statistics 2012. Dublin, Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (Accessed on May 1, 2018).
Pilcher, J. J., Lambert, B. J., and Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). Differential effects of permanent and rotating shifts on self-report sleep length: a meta-analytic review. Sleep 23, 155–163. doi: 10.1093/sleep/23.2.1b
Rangel de Oliveira, D., Härter Griep, R., Fernandes Portela, L., and Rotenberg, L. (2017). Intention to leave profession, psychosocial environment and self-rated health among registered nurses from large hospitals in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17:21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1949-6
Rivera-Torres, P., Araque-Padilla, R. A., and Montero-Simó, M. J. (2013). Job stress across gender: the importance of emotional and intellectual demands and social support in women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 375–389. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010375
Romano, M., Festini, F., and Bronner, L. (2015). Cross-sectional study on the determinants of work stress for nurses and intention of leaving the profession. Professioni Infermieristiche 68, 203–210. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.684203
Rosa, M., Limiñana-Gras, M., Pilar Sánchez-López, A., Saavedra-San, R., and Corbalán-Berná, F. (2013). Health and gender in female-dominated occupations: the case of male nurses. J. Mens Stud. 21, 135–148. doi: 10.3149/jms.2102.135
Rotenberg, L., Portela, L. F., Banks, B., Griep, R. H., Fischer, F. M., and Landsbergis, P. (2008). A gender approach to work ability and its relationship to professional and domestic work hours among nursing personnel. Appl. Ergon. 39, 646–652. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.013
Sochalski, J. (2002). Nursing shortage redux: turning the corner on an enduring problem. Health Affairs 21, 157–164. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.157
Whittock, M., and Leonard, L. (2003). Stepping outside the stereotype. A pilot study of the motivations and experiences of males in the nursing profession. J. Nurs. Manag. 11, 242–249. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00379.x
Williams, C. L. (2013). The glass escalator, revisited: gender inequality in neoliberal Times, SWS feminist lecturer. Gender Soc. 27, 609–629. doi: 10.1177/0891243213490232
Yada, H., Abe, H., Omori, H., Matsuo, H., Masaki, O., Ishida, Y., et al. (2014). Job stress of psychiatric nurses. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 23, 468–476. doi: 10.1111/inm.12080
Yamaguchi, Y., Inoue, T., Harada, H., and Oike, M. (2016). Job control, work-family balance and nurses' intention to leave their profession and organization: a comparative cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 64, 52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.003
Zaree, T. Y., Nazari, J., Asghary Jafarabadi, M., and Alinia, T. (2018). Impact of psychosocial factors on occurrence of medication errors among Tehran public hospitals nurses by evaluating the balance between effort and reward. Safety Health Work. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.12.005. [Epub ahead of print].
Keywords: gender, psychosocial aspects of work, male nurse, nurse, feminized profession, psychosocial hazards
Citation: Kowalczuk K, Krajewska-Kułak E and Sobolewski M (2018) Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace as an Aspect of Horizontal Segregation in the Nursing Profession. Front. Psychol. 9:2042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02042
Received: 29 March 2018; Accepted: 04 October 2018;
Published: 16 November 2018.
Edited by:
Maria Vera, Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, EcuadorReviewed by:
Chris Myburgh, University of Johannesburg, South AfricaSimon George Taukeni, University of Namibia, Namibia
Copyright © 2018 Kowalczuk, Krajewska-Kułak and Sobolewski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Krystyna Kowalczuk, krystyna.kowalczuk@umb.edu.pl