Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Phys., 15 October 2020
Sec. Statistical and Computational Physics
This article is part of the Research Topic Complex Dynamical Systems with Analytical and Numerical Wave Solutions View all 6 articles

Investigation of Electromagnetic Wave Structures for a Coupled Model in Anti-ferromagnetic Spin Ladder Medium

\nMuhammad Younis
Muhammad Younis1*Umair YousafUmair Yousaf2Nauman AhmedNauman Ahmed2Syed Tahir Raza RizviSyed Tahir Raza Rizvi3Muhammad Sajid IqbalMuhammad Sajid Iqbal2Dumitru Baleanu,Dumitru Baleanu4,5
  • 1Punjab University College of Information Technology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 2Department of Mathematics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 3Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 4Department of Mathematics, Cankaya University, Ankara, Turkey
  • 5Institute of Space Sciences, Bucharest, Romania

The article studies the extraction of electromagnetic wave structures in a spin ladder anti-ferromagnetic medium with a coupled generalized non-linear Schrodinger model. The direct algebraic technique is used to extract the wave solutions. The solutions are obtained in the form of dark, singular, kink, and dark-singular under different constraint conditions. Moreover, the dynamic behavior of the structures have depicted in 3D graphs and their corresponding counterplots. The results are helpful for the understanding of wave propagation study and are also vital for numerical and experimental verifications in the field of electromagnetic wave theory.

1. Introduction

The theory of solitons is an attractive and exciting area of research. It is interlinked with many branches of mathematics and engineering [19]. Its aspects are charming and amazing because soliton travels with a steady speed and maintains its shape while propagating. It arises by balancing dispersive and non-linear terms. Solitons are discussed in different fields, and for references see [1018].

The magnetic moments of molecules and atoms, normally linked to the spins of electrons, adjusted in an ordinary pattern with neighboring spins spell in reverse directions. This is like ferrimagnetism and ferromagnetism, a manifestation of ordered magnetism. Theoretical and mathematical theories argue that the spin ladder system is an excellent medium through which the interaction between different spins can be mapped to an approximate Heisinberg-type coupling with a coupling parameter that is inversely proportional to the distance between two separated spins. The dynamics of electromagnetic solitons with the coupled model in an anti-ferromagnetic spin ladder medium is of great interest among researchers due to its variety of applications. The spin ladder systems are a great source with which to develop significant interest in both experimental and theoretical points of view. Anti-ferromagnets test different ideas that involve a strong correlated system [69]. Spin ladders have many applications in different fields of quark physics, superconductors, and ultra-cold atoms, etc. The study of anti-ferromagnetic is still in its early stages. In anti-ferromagnets, the staggered magnetization variable M contributes the first derivative in this manner, i.e., (∇M). This is because, in the case of anti-ferromagnets, we have taken limits in specified intervals for two different sublattices individually. The parent cuprate insulators are the best example of anti-ferromagnets with isotropic and predominantly nearest-neighbor coupling. They satisfied the theory that gives an ordered ground state for (s=12AF) by showing simple long range anti-ferromagnetic order at low temperature [1926].

In this article, a coupled generalized derivative non-linear Schrödinger that describes the dynamical behavior of electromagnetic waves in a spin ladder antiferromagnetic medium system is considered and under investigation. The Heisenberg model was studied in Chen et al. [15] and Xu et al. [16] and considered with an anisotropic spin ladder and two ferromagnetic lattices. This lattices consist of N spins and are directed in the same direction? For more details see also Kavitha et al. [26]. The system is read as

iqjt+2qjx2+iα1x(|qj|2qj)-α23qjx3+α3x(qn-qj)            +α43qnx3-α5qjx=0,    (1.1)

where qj for j = 1, 2, and n = 3 − j, are the wave profiles, and αk for k = 1, 2, ⋯ , 5, represent the real coefficients and are defined by α1=1+g2gM02α, α2=ijaα3gγ, α3=ijbαgγ, α4=ijcα3gγ and α5=iAgγα. Where ja is ferromagnetic spin exchange interaction, jb is antiferromagnetic coupling, jc is the exchange coupling, and A represents the single-ion uniaxial anisotropy. The last equation is reduced to generalized coupled derivative non-linear Schrodinger system by considering αm = 0, for m = 2, ⋯ , 5. In the following section, the considered model is analyzed.

2. The Modified Direct Algebraic Method

The section studies, MDAM [27] to investigate the wave structures of NLPDs. Thus, we consider NLPDs in following form:

H(q,qt,qx,qtx,qxx,)=0,

where q is a profile of wave structure and H is called a polynomial of q and its partial derivatives along with non-linear terms.

To extract wave structures, the method is followed by using the steps as discussed under.

Step 1: First, the NPDEs is converted into non-linear ODEs using the following transformation.

q(x,t)=U(ξ),  and  ξ=B(x-wt),

where B and w are arbitrary parameters. It allows us to reduce the above equation in an ODE of U and have the form

Q(U,U,U,U,)=0.

Step 2: It is supposed that the solution of above equation satisfies the following ansatze:

U(ξ)=A0+j=0m(Ajφj+Bjφ-j)i,                   φ=γ+φ2,                   

where γ is a parameter and its value is determined, φ=φ(ξ), φ=dφdξ.

Step 3: The homogeneous balance technique is followed where the highest order derivative is balanced with non-linear terms, to find the value of m, and where mZ+.

Step 4: The use of the above equation and collecting the terms of the same order of φj together. Equate each term of φj to zero, which produce the system of algebraic equations.

Step 5: The solution of the system of algebraic equations along with the following wave structures are general solutions.

(i) If γ < 0

φ=--γtanh(-γξ),   or  φ=--γcoth(-γξ),

it depends on condition.

(ii) If γ > 0

φ=γtan(γξ),   or  φ=-γcot(γξ),

it depends on condition.

(iii) If γ = 0

φ=-1ξ.

In the following section, the exact wave structures of Equation (1.1) can be obtained.

3. Analytical Analysis

We consider the complex transformation qj(x,t)=Uj(ξ)×eiϕ, where ξ = B(x − νt) and ϕ = −kx + wt + θ. It reduces the partial differential equation to an ordinary differential equation. After some mathematical work, the following real part of Equation (1.1) is obtained.

-ωUj+B2Uj-k2Uj+kα1Uj3+3α2Bk2Uj-B3α2Uj+Bα3Un-Bα3Uj-3Bk2α4Un+B3α4Un-α5BUj=0.    (3.2)

The imaginary part equation gives the constraint condition

ν=2k=±2α3+α5α2

for α23 + α5) > 0. To find the solution of Equation (1.1), let us consider the U(ξ)=a0+i=1m(aiZi+biZ-i) form of the solution (see also [18]), where Z′ = γ + Z2, ais, bis, and γ are the real parameters. The parameters are to be determined later. It is also noted that Z = Z(ξ), and so does Z=dZdξ.

To investigate the electromagnetic waves of the system, we find the solution of Equation (3.2) by finding the homogenous balance m = 1 between the non-linear term and highest order derivatives present in this equation. We have the following value of U after substituting the homogenous balance:

U=a0+a1Z+b1Z-1,    (3.3)

where a0, a1 and b1 are real parameters. To calculate real parameters, we put U and required derivatives in Equation (3.2). After simplification and by equating the coefficients of same power of Z, the system of equations is obtained. To get the values of parameters and the solutions against these different parameters, we solve this system by using Maple. Thus, different cases along with solutions are discussed below.

For case 1: The values of parameters are

a0=0, a1=0, b1=r-2Bα2α1(α3+α5), B=-(ωα22+α12(α3+α5)22α12α22r)

and the corresponding dark and singular wave structures can be obtained for different values of γ. The constraint condition, for the existence of these solutions, is given by

γ2b(b2δ+2γ2)<0.

For γ < 0, one may have the following wave structures of Equation (1.1)

qj1=q1=-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irξ)×eiϕ

and

qj2=q2=-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irξ)×eiϕ.

The following two cases are obtained from the above solution and considered as the diagonal components of the spin ladder.

qj2,1=[-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     cos(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ),

and

qj2,1=[-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     sin(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ).

For γ > 0, one may have the following periodic solutions.

qj3=q3=i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)cot(rξ)×eiϕ,

and

qj4=q4=-i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tan(rξ)×eiϕ.

For γ = 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj5=q5=-irξ2Bα2α1(α3+α5)×eiϕ,

where,

ξ=-ωα22+α12(α3+α5)22α12α22r(x-vt).           

The graphical representations and contour plots of the solutions for q1 to q4 are shown in Figure 1 for different values of parameters α1 = 1, r = 1.25, B = 5, k = 0.1, ξ = 0.01, θ = 0.2, and b = 0.5.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The 3D plots and contour plots of the real part of solution q1(x, t) to q4(x, t) for different parameters.

For case 2: The values of the parameters are

a0=0, a1=-2Bα2α1(α3+α5), b1=0, B=-12α2(α3+α5)α1a12

and the corresponding combined dark-singular wave structures are constructed.

For γ < 0, the following type of exact solutions of Equation (1.1) is written:

qj6=q6=2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irξ)×eiϕ,

The following two cases are obtained from the above solution and considered as the diagonal components of the spin ladder.

q6,1=[2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     cos(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ)q6,1=[2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     sin(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ)

and we also have

qj7=q7=2rBα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irξ)×eiϕ.                           

For γ > 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj8=q8=i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tan(rξ)×eiϕ,

and

qj9=q9=-i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)cot(rξ)×eiϕ.

For γ = 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj10=q10=-iξ2Bα2α1(α3+α5)×eiϕ,

where,

ξ=-12α2(α3+α5)α1a12(x-vt).

The pattern of the solutions for q6 to q9 are shown in Figure 2 for the values of parameters α1 = 0.007, α2 = 0.98, α3 = 0.01, r = 0.76, B = 0.98, k = 0.98, ξ = 0.01, θ = 0.2, and b = 1.5.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The 3D plots and contour plots of the real part of solution q6(x, t) to q9(x, t) for different parameters.

For case 3: The values of parameters are

a0=b12r, a1=0, b1=r-2Bα2α1(α3+α5), B=-(α3+α5)α1b122r2α2

and the corresponding dark and singular wave structures can be obtained.

For γ < 0, the following forms of the exact solutions to Equation (1.1) are obtained.

qj11=q11=[2b12r-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irξ)]×eiϕ,

and

qj12=q12=[2b12r-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irξ)]×eiϕ.

The following two cases are obtained from the above solution and considered as the diagonal components of the spin ladder.

q12,1=[2b12r-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     cos(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ)q12,1=[2b12r-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     sin(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ).

For γ > 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj13=q13=[2b12r+i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)cot(rξ)]×eiϕ,

and

qj14=q14=[2b12r-i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tan(rξ)]×eiϕ,.

For γ = 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj15=q15=[2b12r-irξ2Bα2α1(α3+α5)]×eiϕ,

where,

              ξ=-(α3+α5)α1b122r2α2(x-vt)           ϕ=2Br2α1b12x+(5(α3+α5)α1b12rα2-(α3+α5α2)2)t+θ.

The pattern of the solutions for q11 to q14 are shown in Figure 3 for the values of parameters α1 = 2, r = 1.5, B = 3.9, k = 0.98, ξ = 0.01, θ = 0.2, and b = 0.25.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The 3D plots and contour plots of the real part of solution q11(x, t) to q14(x, t) for different parameters.

For case 4: The values of parameters are

a0=0, a1=0, b1=r-2Bα2α1(α3+α5), B=-b12(α3+α5)α12α2r2

and the corresponding dark and singular wave structures can be obtained.

For γ < 0, the following exact solutions to Equation (1.1) are obtained.

qj16=q16=-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irξ)×eiϕ

and

qj17=q17=-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irξ)×eiϕ.

The following two cases are obtained from the above solution and are considered the diagonal components of the spin ladder.

q17,1=[-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     cos(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ)q17,1=[-2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irB(x-νt))]                     sin(-(α3+α5α2)x+wt+θ)

For γ > 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj18=q18=i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)cot(rξ)×eiϕ,

and

qj19=q19=-i2rBα2α1(α3+α5)tan(rξ)×eiϕ.

For γ = 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj20=q20=-irξ2Bα2α1(α3+α5)×eiϕ,

where

ξ=-b12(α3+α5)α12α2r2(x-vt).

The pattern of the solutions for q16 to q19 are shown in Figure 4 for the values of parameters α1 = 0.002, r = 0.5, B = 0.9, k = 0.98, ξ = 0.01, θ = 0.2, and b = 0.25.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The 3D plots and contourplots of the real part of solution q16(x, t) to q19(x, t), for different parameters.

For case 5: The values of parameters are

a0=0, b1=r-2Bα2α1(α3+α5),a1=ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5), B=ωα22+(α3+α5)2-3a1b1α1α2(α3+α5)2rα22

and the corresponding dark and singular wave structures are obtained.

For γ < 0, one can obtain the following exact solutions to Equation (1.1).

qj21=q21=[-ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)irtanh(irξ)           -2Brα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irξ)]×eiϕ.

The following two cases are obtained from the above solution and considered as the diagonal components of the spin ladder.

q21,1=[-ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)irtanh(irB(x-νt)                   -2rBα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irB(x-νt))]cos(-(α3+α5α2)x                   +wt+θ)q21,1=[-ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)irtanh(irB(x-νt)                   -2rBα2α1(α3+α5)coth(irB(x-νt))]sin(-(α3+α5α2)x                   +wt+θ),

and

qj22=q22=[-ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)ircoth(irξ)           -2Brα2α1(α3+α5)tanh(irξ)]×eiϕ.

For γ > 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj23=q23=[ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)rtan(rξ)           +-2Brα2α1(α3+α5)cot(rξ)]×eiϕqj24=q24=[-ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)rcot(rξ)           --2Brα2α1(α3+α5)tan(rξ)]×eiϕ

For γ = 0, one may have the following periodic solutions

qj25=q25=[-ωα22+(α3+α5)2-2α22Br3b1α1α2(α3+α5)(1ξ)           -rξ-2Bα2α1(α3+α5)]×eiϕ

where

ξ=ωα22+(α3+α5)2-3a1b1α1α2(α3+α5)2rα22(x-vt).

These are the new solitons and periodic wave structures.

4. Conclusions

The article gives single and combined electromagnetic wave structures for the coupled non-linear Schrödinger equations along with the coefficients of ferromagnetic spin exchange interaction, antiferromagnetic coupling, exchange coupling, and single-ion uniaxial anisotropy. The model under investigation describes the dynamic behavior of electromagnetic waves in a spin ladder antiferromagnetic medium. First the complex transformation is used and then modified extended direct algebraic method is utilized to find dark, singular, and dark-singular wave structures. Some other solutions (singular periodic) are also fall out during the analytical analysis. The constraint conditions for the existence of wave structures for different parameters are also observed. Moreover, the 3D plots and corresponding contour plots of the real part of solutions are drawn by choosing suitable parameters.

It is also observed that the method used is effective, powerful, reliable, and much more practical in obtaining the exact wave structures for non-linear phenomena that arise in fields like telecommunication engineering, mathematical biology, mathematical physics, an ocean engineering and vice versa.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

MY, SR, and DB contributed to conception and design of the study. MY and UY performed the analytical analysis. NA and MI established the results. NA and UY draw the graphs using mathematical. MI and UY wrote the first draft of manuscript. MY, SR, NA, and DB wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Esbensen BK, Bache M, Bang O, Krolikowski W. Anomalous interaction of nonlocal solitons in media with competing nonlinearities. Phys Rev A. (2012) 86:033838. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.033838

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Chen W, Shen M, Kong Q, Shi J, Wang Q, Krolikowski W. Interactions of nonlocal dark solitons under competing cubic-quintic nonlinearities. Opt Lett. (2014) 39:1764. doi: 10.1364/OL.39.001764

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Krolikowski W, Bang O, Nikolov NI, Neshev D, Wyller J, Rasmussen JJ, et al. Modulational instability solitons and beam propagation in spatially nonlocal nonlinear media. J Opt B Quantum Semiclass Opt. (2004) 6:288. doi: 10.1088/1464-4266/6/5/017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Krolikowski W, Bang O, Rasmussen JJ, Wyller J. Modulational instability in nonlocal nonlinear Kerr media. Phys Rev E. (2001) 64:016612. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Wyller J, Krolikowski W, Bang O, Rasmussen JJ. Generic features of modulational instability in nonlocal Kerr media. Phys Rev E. (2002) 66:066615. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.066615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bang O, Krolikowski W, Wyller J, Rasmussen JJ. Collapse arrest and soliton stabilization in nonlocal nonlinear media. Phys Rev E. (2002) 66:046619. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.046619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kartashov YV, Vysloukh VA, Torner L. Tunable soliton self-bending in optical lattices with nonlocal nonlinearity. Phys Rev Lett. (2004) 93:153903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.153903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Xu Z, Kartashov YV, Torner L. Soliton mobility in nonlocal optical lattices. Phys Rev Lett. (2005) 95:113901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.113901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rotschild C, Cohen O, Manela O, Segev M, Carmon T. Solitons in nonlinear media with an infinite range of nonlocality: first observation of coherent elliptic solitons and of vortex-ring solitons. Phys Rev Lett. (2005) 95:213904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.213904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Islam W, Younis M. Weakly nonlocal single and combined solitons in nonlinear optics with cubic quintic nonlinearities. J Nano Optoelectron. (2017) 12:1008–12. doi: 10.1166/jno.2017.2096

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Younis M, Bilal M, Rehman S, Younas U, Rizvi STR. Investigation of optical solitons in birefringent polarization preserving fibers with four-wave mixing effect. Int J Mod Phys B. (2020) 34:2050113. doi: 10.1142/S0217979220501131

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ali S, Younis M. Rogue wave solutions and modulation instability with variable coefficient and harmonic potential. Front Phys. (2020) 7:255. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Younas B, Younis M. Chirped solitons in optical monomode fibres modelled with Chen-Lee-Liu equation. Pramana J Phys. (2020) 94:3. doi: 10.1007/s12043-019-1872-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chen SJ, Yin YH, Ma WX, Lu X. Abundant exact solutions and interaction phenomena of the (2 + 1)-dimensional YTSF equation. Anal Math Phys. (2019) 9:2329–44. doi: 10.1007/s13324-019-00338-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Chen SJ, Ma WX, Lu X. Backlund transformation, exact solutions and interaction behaviour of the (3+1)-dimensional Hirota-Satsuma-Ito-like equation. Commun Nonlin Sci. (2020) 83:105135. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.105135

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Xu HN, Ruan WY, Zhang Y, Lu X. Multi-exponential wave solutions to two extended Jimbo-Miwa equations and the resonance behavior. Appl Math Lett. (2020) 99:105976. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Usman MS, Baleanu D, Tariq KUH, Kaplan M, Younis M, Rizvi STR. Different types of progressive wave solutions via the 2D-chiral nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Front Phys. (2020) 8:215. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Osman MS, Tariq KU, Bekir A, Elmoasry A, Elazab NS, Younis M, et al. Investigation of soliton solutions with different wave structures to the (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation. Commun Theor Phys. (2020) 72:035002. doi: 10.1088/1572-9494/ab6181

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shen M, Lin YY, Jeng CC, Lee RK. Vortex pairs in nonlocal nonlinear media. J Opt. (2012) 14:065204. doi: 10.1088/2040-8978/14/6/065204

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Buccoliero D, Desyatnikov AS, Krolikowski W, Kivshar YS. Laguerre and Hermite soliton clusters in nonlocal nonlinear media. Phys Rev Lett. (2007) 98:053901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.053901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Alfassi B, Rotschild C, Manela O, Segev M, Christodoulides DN. Nonlocal surface-wave solitons. Phys Rev Lett. (2007) 98:213901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.213901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Shen M, Wang Q, Shi J, Chen Y, Wang X. Nonlocal incoherent white-light solitons in logarithmically nonlinear media. Phys Rev E. (2005) 72:026604. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.026604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rotschild C, Schwartz T, Cohen O, Segev M. Incoherent solitons in effectively instantaneous nonlocal nonlinear media. Nat Photonics. (2008) 2:371. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2008.81

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Shen M, Ding H, Kong Q, Ruan L, Pang S, Shi J, et al. Self-trapping of two-dimensional vector dipole soliton in nonlocal media. Phys Rev A. (2010) 82:043815. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.043815

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Alberucci A, Peccianti M, Assanto G, Dyadyusha A, Kaczmarek M. Two-color vector solitons in nonlocal media. Phys Rev Lett. (2006) 97:153903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.153903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kavitha L, Parasuraman E, Gopi D, Bhuvaneswari S. Propagation of electromagnetic solitons in an antiferromagnetic spinladder medium. J Electromagnet Wave. (2016) 30:740–66. doi: 10.1080/09205071.2015.1137500

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Younis M, Rehman HU, Iftikhar M. Travelling wave solutions to some nonlinear evolution equations. Appl Math Comput. (2014) 249:81–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: electromagnetic waves, coupled Schrödinger model, anti-ferromagnetic medium, integrability, direct algebraic technique

Citation: Younis M, Yousaf U, Ahmed N, Rizvi STR, Iqbal MS and Baleanu D (2020) Investigation of Electromagnetic Wave Structures for a Coupled Model in Anti-ferromagnetic Spin Ladder Medium. Front. Phys. 8:372. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00372

Received: 29 February 2020; Accepted: 31 July 2020;
Published: 15 October 2020.

Edited by:

Grienggrai Rajchakit, Maejo University, Thailand

Reviewed by:

Xing Lu, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
Gunasekaran Nallappan, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan

Copyright © 2020 Younis, Yousaf, Ahmed, Rizvi, Iqbal and Baleanu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Muhammad Younis, eW91bmlzLnB1JiN4MDAwNDA7Z21haWwuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.