Abstract
The subiculum is the gatekeeper between the hippocampus and cortical areas. Yet, the lack of a pyramidal cell-specific marker gene has made the analysis of the subicular area very difficult. Here we report that the vesicular-glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2) functions as a specific marker gene for subicular burst-firing neurons, and demonstrate that VGLUT2-Cre mice allow for Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-assisted connectivity analysis.
Introduction
The hippocampal formation consists of anatomically defined brain areas such as the dentate gyrus (DG), the cornu ammonis (area CA1-CA3 in rodents), the subiculum (SUB), pre- and parasubiculum, and the entorhinal cortices (EC), all of which fulfill a variety of different tasks. Well documented is the role of these hippocampal subregions in spatial navigation.
The SUB is the main hippocampal output structure and functions as a relay between the hippocampus proper and the EC. Two different types of subicular pyramidal neurons have been described based on their intrinsic firing pattern as burst- or regular-firing neurons (Stewart and Wong, 1993; Taube, 1993; Staff et al., 2000). These neurons project to different brain regions: burst-firing neurons to the medial EC, the presubiculum, the retrosplenial cortex, and to the hypothalamus, whereas mostly regular-firing neurons project to the amygdala, the lateral EC and the nucleus accumbens (Kim and Spruston, 2012). Remarkably, CA1 inputs to these two cell-types express different forms of synaptic plasticity (Fidzinski et al., 2008; Wozny et al., 2008; Aoto et al., 2013). The intrinsic firing pattern, however, is not static, but might be modulated by neuronal activity (Moore et al., 2009). Until now, the lack of cell-specific marker genes for burst- and regular-firing neurons has, however, hampered the application of state-of-art circuit analysis tools such as Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), which would allow to redefine the cortico-hippocampal wiring diagram and to further disentangle the role of these particular neurons.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement and Animal Handling
Animal husbandry and experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of local authorities (Berlin, Germany), the German Animal Welfare Act, and the European Council Directive 86/609/EEC. Animals were housed on a 12:12 h day-night cycle with food and water available ad libitum.
Molecular Biology and Adeno-Associated Virus Delivery to Transgenic Mice
Two different Cre-dependent vector were used, firstly, an AAV-CAG-DIO-hChR2(H134R)-mCherry/ or -EYFP vector, and secondly, a Switch vector. The Cre-dependent Switch vector for AAVs was created as following: The WPRE element in pAAV-EF1α-double floxed-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP-WPRE-HGHpA (Addgene 20298) was deleted by ClaI digestion and relegation, in order to increase the packaging capacity of the vector. The 5′ Lox2272 and LoxP sites were removed by a SalI/AscI digestion, and Lox2272 and LoxP sites flanking a SV40 nuclear localization-sequence (NLS, encoding PKKKRKV) were inserted by oligo-annealing. The coding sequence of mRuby2 was PCR amplified from Addgene clone 50943 and inserted downstream of the NLS, resulting in pAAV-EF1α-Switch:NLSmRuby2/ChR2(H134R)-EYFP-HGHpA. This vector enables expression of NLS-mRuby2 in Cre-negative cells, and of ChR2(H134R)-EYFP in Cre-positive neurons. Constructs were packaged into AAV serotypes 1 and 9 using published protocols (Rost et al., 2015).
Viral particles (200 to 500 nl) were injected in the SUB of VGLUT2-ires-Cre mice (Slc17a6tm2(cre)Lowl knock-in (Vong et al., 2011) aged three to 5 weeks. In these mice Cre recombinase expression is tightly coupled to VGLUT2 expression, and can be found in glutamatergic neurons in various brain region. The coordinates for viral injections were adjusted depending on the age of the animal and the bregma-lambda length: For a P31 animal, for example, the following coordinates were used: AP ± 2.66, ML ± 3.79, and DV -2.8.
Electrophysiology
Horizontal slices were prepared at 2 to 3 weeks after the injections using a sucrose-based artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing 87 mM NaCl, 50 mM sucrose, 26 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 7.0 mM MgCl2, and 25 mM glucose, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). Recordings were performed at room temperature (22–25°C) in artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, 3 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4.
Drugs were applied to block synaptic transmission at the following concentrations: AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX, 25 μM; NMDA receptor antagonist D-APV, 50 μM; GABAA receptor antagonist gabazine, 1–2 μM; GABAB receptor antagonist CGP55845, 10 μM. For circuit mapping the following drugs were used: TTX, 1 μM; and 4-AP, 100 μM. All drugs are purchased from Tocris, Bio-Techne GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany, with the exception of 4-AP (Sigma, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, München, Germany).
The intracellular solution contained (in mM): 135 potassium-gluconate, 6 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 0.2 EGTA, 5 Na2-phosphocreatine, 2 Na2-ATP, 0.5 Na2-GTP, 10 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer, and 0.2% biocytin. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with potassium hydroxide (KOH).
Data Acquisition
Recordings were performed using Multiclamp 700A/B amplifiers (Molecular Devices). Data sampled at 5–20 kHz and filtered at 2–10 kHz was acquired using either Igor (Wavemetrics) or pClamp (Molecular Devices).
Light Stimulation
Excitation light from a mercury lamp (in conjunction with a TTL-controlled mechanical shutter from Uniblitz, Vincent Associates, NY, United States) was applied via an Olympus 60x objective to activate ChR2. The light intensity was measured to 2.7 mW/mm2.
Histology
Slices were fixed overnight, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), processed, and mounted on a slide using previously published protocols (Wozny and Williams, 2011). Confocal images were acquired using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope.
Statistical Analysis
Excel (Microsoft) or GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software) were used for statistical analysis. No power calculations were performed to determine sample sizes prior to the study, but similar cohorts were used in a previous study (Rost et al., 2015). Data were compared with a Mann-Whitney test, and displayed as mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).
Results
To identify promising candidate genes for SUB-specific expression pattern we screened public repositories such as the Allen Brain Atlas. A differential search between area CA1 of the hippocampus and the SUB further aided to narrow the number of genes, and revealed VGLUT2 as one of the most promising candidates (Supplementary Figure S1).
Injection of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) encoding Cre-dependent DIO (double-floxed inverted orientation) ChR2(H134R)-mCherry into the SUB of VGLUT2-Cre mice resulted in localized expression of ChR2-mCherry (Figures 1A–C). To test the functional expression of ChR2 we recorded light-evoked responses in the presence of synaptic blockers (Figures 1D,E).
FIGURE 1
We first classified SUB neurons in respect to their intrinsic firing pattern into burst- and regular firing neurons (Figure 1C). Very little difference was found between both cell types with respect to their intrinsic electrophysiological properties in response to hyper- or depolarizing pulses except for the initial firing frequency, which actually defines burst-firing (Supplementary Figure S2).
However, expression of ChR2 nicely coincided with the intrinsic firing pattern as subsequent light stimulation elicited action potentials (AP) only in intrinsically burst-firing neurons (Figures 1E,H,I). Post-hoc confocal imaging of the biocytin-labeled recorded neurons confirmed the typical characteristics of pyramidal neurons (Figure 1C), as well as co-localization of the biocytin signal and the virally induced expression of ChR2-mCherry (Supplementary Figure S3).
We next created a Cre-dependent Switch vector that allowed us to identify both Cre-positive neurons by ChR2-YFP expression, as well as Cre-negative neurons by a red fluorophore (Figure 1F). In Cre-negative cells, the Ef1α promoter drives expression of mRuby2 fused to a nuclear-localization sequence (NLS), whereas the ChR2-YFP coding sequence is reversely orientated. Cre-mediated recombination of the construct removes the NLS-mRuby2 coding sequence and initiates ChR2-YFP expression by inverting the ChR2-YFP sequence. This technique allowed us to identify the infected brain area more precisely, and also to distinguish infected from uninfected neurons (Figure 1G).
Regarding the expression of ChR2 in subicular neurons the response patterns upon blue light illumination were further analyzed and grouped into three categories: (i) strong, (ii) weak, and (iii) no response. A strong response was considered to be an AP. In 36 out of 39 burst-firing neurons light elicited an AP (AP size: 108.7 ± 1.8 mV, n = 36; Figure 1H). A weak response was smaller than 10 mV following either a 10, 100, 200, or 500 ms light pulse. Five out of eleven regular-firing neurons showed such a response (6.5 ± 1.7 mV, range 1.7–9.6 mV, n = 5; see inset Figure 1H). No expression of ChR2, and therefore no response to light was evident in 3 out 39 burst-firing (8%), and in 6 out of 11 regular-firing neurons (55%; Figure 1I).
Previously, subicular neurons have been shown to project to the deep layers of the entorhinal cortex (Kloosterman et al., 2003). More recently the wiring has been refined demonstrating that subicular (and CA1) pyramidal neurons project onto Coup-TF interacting protein 2 (CTIP2)-expressing neurons located in layer 5b of the EC (Surmeli et al., 2016). However, whether these subicular neurons express VGLUT2 is unclear.
We therefore recorded from layer 5b neurons in the EC and applied ChR2-assisted mapping circuit in VGLUT2-Cre mice to monitor efferent monosynaptic connections of subicular burst-firing neurons (Figures 2A–D). Subicular efferents were stimulated using blue light pulses (2–5 ms; Figure 2C). Application of either glutamate receptor blockers (Figure 2C), or the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX; Figures 2E,F) abolished the response, confirming that the synaptic response was driven by AP-triggered transmitter release. Addition of the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) rescued the light-evoked EPSP (Figures 2E,F), proving the monosynaptic nature of the synaptic input. In contrast, and consistent with previous reports (Surmeli et al., 2016), layer 5A neurons did not receive inputs from subicular burst-firing neurons (Figure 2D; Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.01).
FIGURE 2
Discussion
Here we report the identification of VGLUT2 as a marker of subicular burst-firing neurons. By utilizing VGLUT2-Cre mice in combination with viral gene delivery strategies of Cre-dependent ChR2-expression constructs we demonstrate that VGLUT2 expression is mainly found in subicular burst-firing neurons. This versatile tool allows microcircuit analysis confirming and extending previous results of where hippocampal output neurons synapse onto mEC L5b neurons (Tamamaki and Nojyo, 1995; Naber et al., 2001; Kloosterman et al., 2003; Surmeli et al., 2016).
Recently, the restricted expression of fibronectin-1 (FN1) in the dorsal subiculum was utilized to generate a mouse line expressing Cre specifically in dorsal SUB neurons. Subsequently, optogenetic manipulations were performed to address the role of the dorsal SUB in memory formation (Roy et al., 2017). Another recent study divided proximal and distal subicular pyramidal neurons (Cembrowski et al., 2018). Proximal subicular neurons express neuronatin (Nnat), whereas neurotensin (Nts) is found in distal neurons. However, it is currently not known whether these marker genes specifically label subpopulations of subicular principal neurons.
Földy et al. (2016) performed a single-cell transcriptome study of subicular pyramidal neurons. Following electrophysiological characterization the mRNA of burst- and regular-firing neurons was collected, and sequenced. There was no difference in the number of detected genes between these two types of subicular neurons, and only a small number of exclusively expressed genes were found, however, none of these were further validated as a functional genetic marker. We used a differential approach. Viruses were used to infect Cre- and non-Cre-recombinase expressing neurons. In our hands, over 90% of the recorded burst-firing neurons expressed high amounts of ChR2, whereas none of the subicular regular-firing neurons expressed sufficient amounts of ChR2 to drive AP firing following blue light illumination with varying lengths.
Of note, the expression of VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 in the brain is thought to be complementary: VGLUT1 is mainly expressed in cortical areas, whereas VGLUT2 is expressed in subcortical areas such as the thalamus, amygdala or hypothalamus (Hisano et al., 2000; Fremeau et al., 2001; Herzog et al., 2001). A few brain areas including the SUB, however, seem to express both, VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 (Ishihara and Fukuda, 2016; Kinnavane et al., 2018). Whether VGLUT1-positive neurons in the SUB are mainly of the regular-firing type has to be determined, as has the role of both types of subicular neurons during behavior.
Statements
Author contributions
CW and DS designed the experiments. CW, PB, NN, and YP performed research. CW, PB, NN and BRR analyzed data. BRR generated molecular tools. CW wrote the paper with help of PB, BRR, and DS. All authors read and edited the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Seed Award to CW (205917/z/17/Z), by the NeuroCure Clusters of Excellence, the DZNE, the Einstein Foundation, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to DS (EXC257, SFB858, SPP1665), by the SPP1926 (‘Next Generation Optogenetics’) to BRR, and by the Stiftung Charité to PB. We further acknowledge the support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. A preprint of this article was released at bioRxiv (Wozny et al., 2018).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Susanne Rieckmann and Anke Schönherr for excellent technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2018.00337/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AotoJ.MartinelliD. C.MalenkaR. C.TabuchiK.SudhofT. C. (2013). Presynaptic neurexin-3 alternative splicing trans-synaptically controls postsynaptic AMPA receptor trafficking.Cell15475–88. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.060
2
CembrowskiM. S.PhillipsM. G.DiLisioS. F.ShieldsB. C.WinnubstJ.ChandrashekarJ.et al (2018). Dissociable structural and functional hippocampal outputs via distinct subiculum cell classes.Cell1731280–1292. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.031
3
FidzinskiP.ShorO.BehrJ. (2008). Target-cell-specific bidirectional synaptic plasticity at hippocampal output synapses.Eur. J. Neurosci.271111–1118. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06089.x
4
FöldyC.DarmanisS.AotoJ.MalenkaR. C.QuakeS. R.SüdhofT. C. (2016). Single-cell RNAseq reveals cell adhesion molecule profiles in electrophysiologically defined neurons.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.113E5222–E5231. 10.1073/pnas.1610155113
5
FremeauR. T.Jr.TroyerM. D.PahnerI.NygaardG. O.TranC. H.ReimerR. J.et al (2001). The expression of vesicular glutamate transporters defines two classes of excitatory synapse.Neuron31247–260.
6
HerzogE.BellenchiG. C.GrasC.BernardV.RavassardP.BedetC.et al (2001). The existence of a second vesicular glutamate transporter specifies subpopulations of glutamatergic neurons.J. Neurosci.21:RC181.
7
HisanoS.HoshiK.IkedaY.MaruyamaD.KanemotoM.IchijoH.et al (2000). Regional expression of a gene encoding a neuron-specific Na(+)-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter (DNPI) in the rat forebrain.Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.8334–43.
8
IshiharaY.FukudaT. (2016). Immunohistochemical investigation of the internal structure of the mouse subiculum.Neuroscience337242–266. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.027
9
KimY.SprustonN. (2012). Target-specific output patterns are predicted by the distribution of regular-spiking and bursting pyramidal neurons in the subiculum.Hippocampus22693–706. 10.1002/hipo.20931
10
KinnavaneL.VannS. D.NelsonA. J. D.O’MaraS. M.AggletonJ. P. (2018). Collateral projections innervate the mammillary bodies and retrosplenial cortex: a new category of hippocampal cells.eNeuro5:ENEURO.0383-17.2018. 10.1523/ENEURO.0383-17.2018
11
KloostermanF.WitterM. P.van HaeftenT. (2003). Topographical and laminar organization of subicular projections to the parahippocampal region of the rat.J. Comp. Neurol.455156–171. 10.1002/cne.10472
12
MooreS. J.CooperD. C.SprustonN. (2009). Plasticity of burst firing induced by synergistic activation of metabotropic glutamate and acetylcholine receptors.Neuron61287–300. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.013
13
NaberP. A.Lopes da SilvaF. H.WitterM. P. (2001). Reciprocal connections between the entorhinal cortex and hippocampal fields CA1 and the subiculum are in register with the projections from CA1 to the subiculum.Hippocampus1199–104. 10.1002/hipo.1028
14
RostB. R.SchneiderF.GrauelM. K.WoznyC.BentzC.BlessingA.et al (2015). Optogenetic acidification of synaptic vesicles and lysosomes.Nat. Neurosci.181845–1852. 10.1038/nn.4161
15
RoyD. S.KitamuraT.OkuyamaT.OgawaS. K.SunC.ObataY.et al (2017). Distinct neural circuits for the formation and retrieval of episodic memories.Cell1701000–1012. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.013
16
StaffN. P.JungH. Y.ThiagarajanT.YaoM.SprustonN. (2000). Resting and active properties of pyramidal neurons in subiculum and CA1 of rat hippocampus.J. Neurophysiol.842398–2408.
17
StewartM.WongR. K. (1993). Intrinsic properties and evoked responses of guinea pig subicular neurons in vitro.J. Neurophysiol.70232–245.
18
SurmeliG.MarcuD. C.McClureC.GardenD. L. F.PastollH.NolanM. F. (2016). Molecularly defined circuitry reveals input-output segregation in deep layers of the medial entorhinal cortex.Neuron881040–1053. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.011
19
TamamakiN.NojyoY. (1995). Preservation of topography in the connections between the subiculum, field CA1, and the entorhinal cortex in rats.J. Comp. Neurol.353379–390. 10.1002/cne.903530306
20
TaubeJ. S. (1993). Electrophysiological properties of neurons in the rat subiculum in vitro.Exp. Brain Res.96304–318.
21
VongL.YeC.YangZ.ChoiB.ChuaS.Jr.LowellB. B. (2011). Leptin action on GABAergic neurons prevents obesity and reduces inhibitory tone to POMC neurons.Neuron71142–154. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.028
22
WoznyC.BeepP.NitzamN.PössneckerY.RostB. R.SchmitzD. (2018). VGLUT2 functions as a differential marker for hippocampal output neurons.bioRxiv.10.1101/348227
23
WoznyC.MaierN.SchmitzD.BehrJ. (2008). Two different forms of long-term potentiation at CA1-subiculum synapses.J. Physiol.5862725–2734. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.149203
24
WoznyC.WilliamsS. R. (2011). Specificity of synaptic connectivity between layer 1 inhibitory interneurons and layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in the rat neocortex.Cereb. Cortex211818–1826. 10.1093/cercor/bhq257
Summary
Keywords
channelrhodopsin-2, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, subiculum, synaptic transmission, VGLUT2
Citation
Wozny C, Beed P, Nitzan N, Pössnecker Y, Rost BR and Schmitz D (2018) VGLUT2 Functions as a Differential Marker for Hippocampal Output Neurons. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:337. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00337
Received
05 July 2018
Accepted
12 September 2018
Published
02 October 2018
Volume
12 - 2018
Edited by
Tommaso Pizzorusso, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy
Reviewed by
Valérie Crépel, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France; Lucas Pozzo-Miller, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Wozny, Beed, Nitzan, Pössnecker, Rost and Schmitz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christian Wozny, christian.wozny@strath.ac.uk
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.