This article is a correction to:
Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage – A Swedish Case Study
Filip Johnsson
Fredrik Normann
Elin SvenssonA Corrigendum on
Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage – A Swedish Case Study
by Johnsson, F., Normann, F., and Svensson, E. (2020). Front. Energy Res. 8:175. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00175
In the original article, there were two typographical errors in the citations included in the foot notes of Table 5 as published. In foot note 1, the citation to Garðarsdóttir et al. (2018) was incorrectly written as Güleç et al. (2020). In footnote 2, the citation to Kjärstad et al. (2016) was incorrectly written as Skogsindustrierna (2016). The corrected Table 5 appears below.
TABLE 5
Table 5. Mapping of potential for implementing carbon capture and storage at Swedish emission sources >500 kt/a.
In the original article, information was missing in the reference for European Environment Agency [EEA] (2016), which was incorrectly written as European Environment Agency [EEA] (2016). European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. It should be European Environment Agency [EEA] (2016). European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Available online at: http://prtr.eea.europa.eu/#/facilitylevels (accessed September 30, 2018).
In the original article, the reference for Swedish Ministry of the Environment (2017) was incorrectly written as Government Offices of Sweden, and Ministry of the Environment and Energy (2017). The Swedish Climate Policy Framework. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment. It should be Swedish Ministry of the Environment (2017). The Swedish Climate Policy Framework. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden; Ministry of the Environment.
In the original article, the reference for Skogsindustrierna (2016) was incorrectly written as Skogsindustrierna, (2016). Skogsindustriernas Miljödatabas (Forest Industries Environmental Database. Bentley, WA: Forest Industries Federation. It should be Skogsindustrierna (2016). Skogsindustriernas Miljödatabas Forest Industries Environmental Database. Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries Federation. Available online at: http://miljodatabas.skogsindustrierna.org/ (accessed August 31, 2018).
In the original article, information was missing in the reference for Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA] (2016a), which was incorrectly written as Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA], (2016a). Statistik och Uppföljning. Stockholm: Environmental Protection Agency. It should be Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA], (2016a). Statistik och Uppföljning. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Available online at: https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbete-i-Sverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Utslappshandel/Resultat-och-uppfoljning (accessed March 31, 2018).
In the original article, information was missing in the reference for Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA] (2016b), which was incorrectly written as Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA], (2016b). Swedish Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR). Stockholm: Environmental Protection Agency. It should be Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA] (2016b). Swedish Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR). Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Available online at: https://utslappisiffror.naturvardsverket.se/Sok/ (accessed March 31, 2018).
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
Garðarsdóttir, S. Ó, Normann, F., Skagestad, R., and Johnsson, F. (2018). Investment costs and CO2 reduction potential of carbon capture from industrial plants – A Swedish case study. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 76, 111–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.06.022
Keywords: CCS, CO2 capture, MACC, industrial, case study
Citation: Johnsson F, Normann F and Svensson E (2020) Corrigendum: Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage – A Swedish Case Study. Front. Energy Res. 8:220. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00220
Received: 11 August 2020; Accepted: 11 August 2020;
Published: 18 September 2020.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2020 Johnsson, Normann and Svensson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Filip Johnsson, filip.johnsson@chalmers.se