Reading in the Digital Age: The Impact of Using Digital Devices on Children’s Reading, Writing and Thinking Skills

81.2K
views
20
authors
5
articles
Editors
2
Impact
Loading...

During the last years, digital writing devices are increasingly replacing handwriting with pencil and paper. As reading and writing skills are central for education, it is important to know, which writing tool is optimal for initial literacy education. The present training study was therefore set up to test the influence of the writing tool on the acquisition of literacy skills at the letter and word level with various tests in a large sample of kindergarten children (n = 147). Using closely matched letter learning games, children were trained with 16 letters by handwriting with a pencil on a sheet of paper, by writing with a stylus on a tablet computer, or by typing letters using a virtual keyboard on a tablet across 7 weeks. Training using a stylus on a touchscreen is an interesting comparison condition for traditional handwriting, because the slippery surface of a touchscreen has lower friction than paper and thus increases difficulty of motor control. Before training, immediately after training and four to five weeks after training, we assessed reading and writing performance using standardized tests. We also assessed visuo-spatial skills before and after training, in order to test, whether the different training regimens affected cognitive domains other than written language. Children of the pencil group showed superior performance in letter recognition and improved visuo-spatial skills compared with keyboard training. The performance of the stylus group did not differ significantly neither from the keyboard nor from the pencil group. Keyboard training, however, resulted in superior performance in word writing and reading compared with handwriting training with a stylus on the tablet, but not compared with the pencil group. Our results suggest that handwriting with pencil fosters acquisition of letter knowledge and improves visuo-spatial skills compared with keyboarding. At least given the current technological state, writing with a stylus on a touchscreen seems to be the least favorable writing tool, possibly because of increased demands on motor control. Future training studies covering a more extended observation period over years are needed to allow conclusions about long-term effects of writing tools on literacy acquisition as well as on general cognitive development.

24,901 views
56 citations
Original Research
10 July 2019
MindPlay Virtual Reading Coach: Does It Affect Reading Fluency in Elementary School?
Heidi Kloos
3 more and 
Scott Stage

Important strides have been made in the science of learning to read. Yet, many students still struggle to attain reading proficiency. This calls for sustained efforts to bridge theoretical insights with applied considerations about ideal pedagogy. The current study was designed to contribute to this conversation, namely by looking at the efficacy of an online reading program. The chosen reading program, referred to as MindPlay Virtual Reading Coach (MVRC), emphasizes the mastery of basic reading skills to support the development of reading fluency. Its focus on basic skills diverges from the goal of increasing reading motivation. And its focus on reading fluency, vs. broad literacy achievement, offers an alternative to already existing reading enrichment. In order to test the efficacy of MVRC, we recruited three school districts. One district provided data from elementary schools that used the MVRC program in Grades 2 to 6 (N = 2,531 total). The other two districts participated in a quasi-experimental design: Six 2nd-grade classrooms and nine 4th-grade classrooms were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) instruction as usual, (2) instruction with an alternative online reading program, and (3) instruction with MVRC. Complete data sets were available from 142 2nd-graders and 172 4th-graders. Three assessments from the MVRC screener were used: They assessed reading fluency, phonic skills, and listening vocabulary at two time points: before and after the intervention. Results show a clear advantage of MVRC on reading fluency, more so than on phonics or listening vocabulary. At the same time, teachers reported concerns with MVRC, highlighting the challenge with reading programs that emphasize basic-skills mastery over programs that seek to encourage reading.

28,205 views
5 citations
Recommended Research Topics
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Psychology

Emergentist Approaches to Language
Edited by Brian MacWhinney, Vera Kempe, Ping Li, Patricia J. Brooks
110.8K
views
55
authors
20
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Psychology

Second Language Learning and Neuroplasticity: Individual Differences
Edited by Jing Yang, Fan Cao, Walter J B van Heuven, Leilei Mei
21.7K
views
29
authors
6
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Psychology

Digital Participation and Communication Disorders across the Lifespan
Edited by Petra Jaecks, Hendrike Frieg, Kristina Jonas
66.8K
views
65
authors
15
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Psychology

Second or Foreign Language Learning and Cognitive Development
Edited by Dingfang Shu, Jinfen Xu, Hui Zhang
77.4K
views
39
authors
16
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Psychology

Cognition and Language Contact: Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Approaches
Edited by Andrew K.F. Cheung, Dechao Li, Adam Pease
38.9K
views
22
authors
9
articles