About this Research Topic
This Research Topic on ”Resting-state EEG and fMRI” intends to break down the barrier between resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) and resting-state EEG (rsEEG). Firstly, there are many common methods for both modalities: independent component analysis (ICA), functional connectivity and graph theory are currently widely utilized to discuss the systematic structure of brain networks. Secondly, both modalities suffer from the problem of reliability and reproducibility, desiring stability measures of the human brain functional connectomics. In addition, the simultaneous EEG-fMRI technique provides new potential to match the findings from previous studies with any modal individually. An extensive discussion between rs-fMRI and rsEEG may benefit both fields and encourage further cooperation from various disciplines. Our target is to address the challenges in analysis, modelling and interpreting the resting-state EEG and fMRI data from different perspectives: neural computation, biomedical engineering, and cognitive neuroscience.
This Research Topic welcomes submissions of all types (original research, case report, case series, viewpoint, review articles, etc.) around a variety of behavioral states and neuropsychiatric disorders. We will discuss the potential utility of these methods in detecting neurophysiological impairments in disease and monitoring neurophysiological changes in response to an intervention. The crucial point is to provide a objective comparison of the brain networks extracted from rsEEG and rsfMRI about brain function and disorders. We welcome submissions focused on innovative technologies and methods that can foster resting-state neuroimaging. We also welcome our colleagues to submit paper with theoretical work, simulation studies, practical experimental data analysis as well as critical reviews.
Keywords: Resting-state fMRI, resting-state EEG, resting-state brain network, microstate, default mode
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.