PLEASE NOTE: The submission of Abstracts/Manuscripts to this topic is now Closed. Should you have a suitable manuscript within this domain, kindly submit this directly to the Journal section itself.
The aim of this Research Topic is to contribute to our understanding of the psychological means that bring about cultural forms of human conduct and experience. We consider cultural forms of perceiving of and acting in the world as primarily rooted in socially shared normativity. In this Research Topic, we want to examine closer what exactly can be understood by “sharedness” and “normativity” by taking a closer look at discursive, embodied and affective engagements with the world in social interaction. As Charles Goodwin has convincingly shown, these discursive practices need to be understood as part of a complex, collective and cultural human activity composed also of bodies, material artefacts and the space. Moreover, as has been pointed out by various scholars, an understanding of language as activity that brings about normativity also needs to address the affective dimensions inherent in discursive practices. Such understanding of language as practice that binds us to view the world in a specific way and as intersubjective form of action is in line with the modern philosophy of language paradigms as unfolded, for instance, by Wittgenstein, and Austin.
We consider both the sharedness of certain ways of understanding the world and the normative dimension of social life as action based, as processual, mutually shaped, dynamic and fluid, ever evolving meaning making in situated social interaction (cp. Bakhtin, Garfinkel and Wittgenstein). Within the broader field of Cultural Psychology, this Research Topic considers approaches that deem the nature of psychological phenomena to be dialogically intertwined with discursive and embodied practices in social interaction, the shape of which is always situational, ecologically embedded. We specifically want to address the question of methodology. What tools do we have to study empirical materials with this theoretical approach? What makes it possible to see or hear evidence in the data; how is shared normativity analytically recognizable.
We welcome:
- Theoretical contributions addressing the questions of sharedness and normativity, specifically addressing the nature of embodiment, materiality and language (i.e. not as abstract symbolic sign system that is ‘acquired’ by individual minds but as embodied and affective lived engagement with the world)
- Contributions that discuss methodological challenges and potentials in the study of sharedness and normativity (e.g. through the study of language as embodied social practice)
- Original research addressing psychological aspects (including affect, language, embodiment, materiality) of sharedness and normativity in social interaction
- Interdisciplinary exchange between cultural psychology, linguistic anthropology, applied linguistics, psychological anthropology, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, discursive and narrative psychology, philosophy of language, and dialogical approaches.
PLEASE NOTE: The submission of Abstracts/Manuscripts to this topic is now Closed. Should you have a suitable manuscript within this domain, kindly submit this directly to the Journal section itself.
The aim of this Research Topic is to contribute to our understanding of the psychological means that bring about cultural forms of human conduct and experience. We consider cultural forms of perceiving of and acting in the world as primarily rooted in socially shared normativity. In this Research Topic, we want to examine closer what exactly can be understood by “sharedness” and “normativity” by taking a closer look at discursive, embodied and affective engagements with the world in social interaction. As Charles Goodwin has convincingly shown, these discursive practices need to be understood as part of a complex, collective and cultural human activity composed also of bodies, material artefacts and the space. Moreover, as has been pointed out by various scholars, an understanding of language as activity that brings about normativity also needs to address the affective dimensions inherent in discursive practices. Such understanding of language as practice that binds us to view the world in a specific way and as intersubjective form of action is in line with the modern philosophy of language paradigms as unfolded, for instance, by Wittgenstein, and Austin.
We consider both the sharedness of certain ways of understanding the world and the normative dimension of social life as action based, as processual, mutually shaped, dynamic and fluid, ever evolving meaning making in situated social interaction (cp. Bakhtin, Garfinkel and Wittgenstein). Within the broader field of Cultural Psychology, this Research Topic considers approaches that deem the nature of psychological phenomena to be dialogically intertwined with discursive and embodied practices in social interaction, the shape of which is always situational, ecologically embedded. We specifically want to address the question of methodology. What tools do we have to study empirical materials with this theoretical approach? What makes it possible to see or hear evidence in the data; how is shared normativity analytically recognizable.
We welcome:
- Theoretical contributions addressing the questions of sharedness and normativity, specifically addressing the nature of embodiment, materiality and language (i.e. not as abstract symbolic sign system that is ‘acquired’ by individual minds but as embodied and affective lived engagement with the world)
- Contributions that discuss methodological challenges and potentials in the study of sharedness and normativity (e.g. through the study of language as embodied social practice)
- Original research addressing psychological aspects (including affect, language, embodiment, materiality) of sharedness and normativity in social interaction
- Interdisciplinary exchange between cultural psychology, linguistic anthropology, applied linguistics, psychological anthropology, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, discursive and narrative psychology, philosophy of language, and dialogical approaches.
