Advances in ME/CFS Research and Clinical Care

450.6K

views

78

authors

25

articles

Editorial

18 September 2019

Editorial: Advances in ME/CFS Research and Clinical Care

Kenneth J. Friedman

,

Lucinda Bateman

,

Alison Bested

and

Zaher Nahle

10,189 views

5 citations

Editors

4

Kenneth Joseph Friedman

New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Lucinda Bateman

Bateman Horne Center

Center for a Humane Economy

Alison Christine Bested

Nova Southeastern University

Impact

Fetching...

About

In 2015, the United States Department of Health and Human Services contracted with the Institute of Medicine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine, to author a report on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Despite having come to the attention of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the 1930s, little progress had been made in understanding the illness, identifying its cause, developing one or more effective treatment strategies for the disease, finding a cure, or implementing method of prevention. The independent, status review of ME/CFS by the IOM has spurred interest in, and acceptance of, the disease as never before. Does the IOM report point the U.S. government, the nation, and the world, in appropriate directions to deal with ME/CFS? The IOM report found the federal response to ME/CFS insufficient: research progress, both clinical and medical, was judged to be lagging, and availability and quality of patient care was found to be unsatisfactory. The IOM report went so far as to declare the illness, previously characterized as a syndrome, a real disease, and suggested that it be renamed to emphasize the primary characteristic of the disease - intolerance of exertion, whether physical, mental, or both. The report also urged more attention be paid to the characterization of the disease, its cause, and its treatment by the government, the research community and the private sector.

The federal government, research community and the private sector have begun to respond to the IOM report and its findings. This Research Topic in Frontiers in Pediatrics is devoted to that upsurge in research:
-What are the new areas of research?
-What are the rejuvenated areas of research?
-Are there improvements in clinical care as evidenced by reports from clinicians or in the clinical literature with regard to ME/CFS?

In 2015, the United States Department of Health and Human Services contracted with the Institute of Medicine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine, to author a report on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Despite having come to the attention of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the 1930s, little progress had been made in understanding the illness, identifying its cause, developing one or more effective treatment strategies for the disease, finding a cure, or implementing method of prevention. The independent, status review of ME/CFS by the IOM has spurred interest in, and acceptance of, the disease as never before. Does the IOM report point the U.S. government, the nation, and the world, in appropriate directions to deal with ME/CFS? The IOM report found the federal response to ME/CFS insufficient: research progress, both clinical and medical, was judged to be lagging, and availability and quality of patient care was found to be unsatisfactory. The IOM report went so far as to declare the illness, previously characterized as a syndrome, a real disease, and suggested that it be renamed to emphasize the primary characteristic of the disease - intolerance of exertion, whether physical, mental, or both. The report also urged more attention be paid to the characterization of the disease, its cause, and its treatment by the government, the research community and the private sector.

The federal government, research community and the private sector have begun to respond to the IOM report and its findings. This Research Topic in Frontiers in Pediatrics is devoted to that upsurge in research:
-What are the new areas of research?
-What are the rejuvenated areas of research?
-Are there improvements in clinical care as evidenced by reports from clinicians or in the clinical literature with regard to ME/CFS?

Download ebook

Share

Editors

Kenneth Joseph Friedman

New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Lucinda Bateman

Bateman Horne Center

Center for a Humane Economy

Alison Christine Bested

Nova Southeastern University

Impact

450,611 Total views

376,769 Article views

53,628 Article downloads

20,214 Topic views

Published In

Journal Thumbnail

Frontiers in Pediatrics

Pediatric Neurology

Journal Thumbnail

Frontiers in Neurology

Pediatric Neurology

About Frontiers Research Topics

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.

Suggest a topic