BackgroundParkinson’s disease (PD) is caused by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Neuroinflammation is considered a key factor contributing to the pathophysiology of PD. Current gold-standard therapies for PD provide only symptomatic relief without slowing disease progression, highlighting the need to develop new disease-modifying treatments. Metformin has been demonstrated to exert a neuroprotective role in several neurodegenerative disorders including PD.AimThis study aimed to clarify the role of metformin as adjuvant therapy in patients with PD.MethodsSixty patients with PD were divided into 2 groups (n = 30). Patients in group 1 received levodopa/carbidopa (250/25 mg) three times daily for 3 months plus placebo (Control group), while those in group 2 received levodopa/carbidopa (250/25 mg) three times daily and 500 mg metformin two times daily (Metformin group). Patients were assessed via Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The serum concentrations of toll like receptor 4 (TLR-4), α-synuclein, brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB-1) were measured before and after treatment.Primary outcomeThe improvement in UPDRS from baseline to 3 months.Secondary outcomeChange in the level of biological markers.ResultsThe control group did not show significant difference in UPDRS when compared to their baseline value by Wilcoxon test (P > 0.05), meanwhile the metformin group showed significant difference when compared to before treatment by Wilcoxon test (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in UPDRS after treatment (P > 0.05) by Man Whitney test. However, the metformin group showed a significant decrease in TLR-4, HMGB-1, and α-synuclein along with a statistically significant increase in BDNF (P < 0.05) when compared to its baseline and control group. The control group did not show any significant changes in all markers when compared to their baseline.ConclusionWhile no significant differences in UPDRS scores were observed between the metformin and control groups, trends in biomarker changes suggest a potential impact of adjunctive metformin use on the underlying pathophysiology of PD. Further studies are needed to assess its effects on motor symptoms over a longer duration.Clinical Trial Registrationidentifier NCT05781711.

BackgroundMetformin, hypoglycemic medication, is recognized for its diverse properties and its capacity to influence the inflammatory pathways. Medications with anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative characteristics have been demonstrated to be able to elicit and sustain remission in ulcerative colitis (UC), chronic inflammatory disorder of the bowel. Studies in both preclinical and clinical settings have looked into the several metabolic pathways via which metformin protects against UC.AimTo assess efficacy of metformin as adjunctive therapy in patients with mild to moderate UC.MethodsThis clinical research was double-blinded, randomized, controlled, and involved 60 patients with mild to moderate UC. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 30). The control group was given 1 g of mesalamine three times a day (t.i.d.) for a period of 6 months (mesalamine group). The metformin group was given 500 mg of metformin twice daily and 1 g of mesalamine t. i.d. For a period of 6 months. Patients with UC were assessed by a gastroenterologist using the disease activity index (DAI) both at the beginning of treatment and 6 months thereafter. To evaluate the drug’s biological efficacy, measurements of fecal calprotectin, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and nitric oxide (NO) were taken both before and after treatment.Study outcomesDecrease in DAI and change in the level of measured serum and fecal markers.ResultsThe metformin group displayed a statistical reduction in DAI (p = 0.0001), serum CRP (p = 0.019), NO (p = 0.04), and fecal calprotectin (p = 0.027), as well as a significant increase in IL-10 (p = 0.04) when compared to the mesalamine group. There was a significant direct correlation between DAI and calprotectin (p < 0.0001, r = 0.551), and between DAI and CRP (p < 0.0001, r = 0.794). There was a significant negative correlation between DAI and IL-10 (p = 0.0003, r = 0.371).ConclusionMetformin may be an effective adjunct drug in management of patients with mild to moderate UC by decreasing DAI and other inflammatory markers that were involved in the pathogenesis of UC.Clinical Trial Registrationidentifier NCT05553704.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness among the elderly worldwide. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections remain the first-line therapy for AMD. However, their high cost and the need for frequent administration pose challenges to long-term adherence, highlighting the need for accessible and cost-effective preventive strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that traditional antidiabetic drugs, such as metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones, may offer neuroprotective benefits, opening new avenues for AMD prevention. Among these, metformin has emerged as the most promising candidate, demonstrating significant potential in reducing AMD risk, even at low cumulative doses, primarily through AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation. Sulfonylureas, although effective in stimulating insulin secretion, carry risks such as hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and a possible association with increased cancer risk. Similarly, thiazolidinediones, while improving insulin sensitivity, are associated with adverse effects, including cardiovascular risks and macular edema, limiting their broader application in AMD prevention. This paper explores the preventive potential and underlying mechanisms of these antidiabetic drugs in AMD and discusses the role of artificial intelligence in optimizing individualized prevention strategies. By advancing precision medicine, these approaches may improve public health outcomes and reduce the burden of aging-related vision loss.