Development of Task Specific Phantoms and Test Objects for Medical Imaging

  • 1,095

    Total downloads

  • 6,144

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

In radiology (X-ray, CT, MRI, nuclear medicine and ultrasound), the quality of medical images is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment of various diseases. The interpretation of medical images requires the detection and characterization of small changes in anatomy or function, which can be affected by various factors such as image noise, artifacts, and resolution. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that the medical images are of appropriate quality for the respective diagnostic task. The development of task-specific phantoms and test objects is an essential aspect of image quality assurance and optimization. It allows for the evaluation of imaging system performance under various clinical scenarios, such as detection of small lesions, or the evaluation of contrast resolution. By using task-specific test phantoms, researchers can identify the strengths and weaknesses of imaging systems and develop new imaging technologies or adapted and optimized acquisition parameters that better meet the needs of clinicians and patients. Additive manufacturing and 3D printing have added tremendous and rapidly increasing possibilities and opportunities to design and build such phantoms and test objects, since new additive manufacturing tools, hard- and software, and materials are constantly being introduced.

Task-specific test objects are designed to simulate specific clinical scenarios and can be used to evaluate various aspects of imaging system performance, such as spatial resolution, contrast resolution, and noise. This can be done in various approaches.

In particular, we welcome papers with relevance to one or more of the following general areas:

1) Physical test phantoms are models that simulate parts of the human body and its various tissues and organs. Especially anthropomorphic phantoms are essential for the assessment of image quality in radiology because they provide a realistic representation of the human anatomy and enable the evaluation of the imaging system's performance in a controlled and standardized manner. The use of anthropomorphic phantoms in radiology allows for the simulation of various clinical scenarios, such as the detection of small lesions or the evaluation of the contrast resolution of the imaging system. The phantoms are designed to mimic the physical properties of human tissue, such as the attenuation and scattering of X-rays or ultrasound waves, as well as nuclear spin density and relaxation times for magnetic resonance imaging, which allows for a realistic assessment of the imaging systems’ performance. They provide a standardized and reproducible method for assessing image quality of different imaging systems and protocols, allowing to compare the performance of different imaging systems and protocols under identical conditions.

2) Functional phantoms capable of mimicking for example patient motion or tissue perfusion are essential to characterize and validate imaging procedures that target the visualization of dynamic physiological processes or the correction of related image artifacts. Thereby, the timescale at which these phantoms operate represents a crucial aspect requiring high accuracy and reproducibility. Importantly, these phantoms have to be suitable for the environmental conditions defined by the respective imaging system, e.g. withstanding of ionizing radiation or compatibility with high electromagnetic fields.

3) Another important prerequisite to address these issues is the need for a observer independent assessment of the images. The most appropriate solution to automated evaluation is represented by the concept of model observers (MO). A model observer is a computational tool that simulates human observers' performance in interpreting medical images. Model observers are designed to provide a standardized and objective assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy, which can help radiologists and ultrasound technicians to improve their interpretation skills as well as optimizing imaging system performance and usage. Nevertheless, the validity of such MOs has to be validated by human expert assessment, which requires valid test objects like anthropomorphic phantoms.

4) Numerical simulations are a valuable supplementary tool in medical imaging, and in particular for the development of test objects. They are able to quickly and efficiently reproduce experimental results by employing proper mathematical models and numerical schemes. Once their accuracy is verified, which can be done, for instance, by comparison with the results obtained from phantoms, numerical simulations can be used for a variety of tasks, including prediction of the output of an imaging device for arbitrary test objects or experimental setups, and identification of weak spots or defects of the imaging device at hand. In some situations, when the design of phantoms and test objects becomes prohibitively expensive or complicated, computer simulations may even serve as a proper substitute.

Keywords: task specific phantoms, medical imaging, radiology, ultrasound

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 6,144Topic views
  • 4,124Article views
  • 1,095Article downloads
View impact