Women in Urologic Oncology: 2022

7.1K
views
23
authors
4
articles
Cover image for research topic "Women in Urologic Oncology: 2022"
Editors
4
Impact
Loading...
Original Research
29 June 2023
Safety profile of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in rectal mucosa cleansing during prostate biopsy
Adriana M. Pedraza
3 more and 
Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Article Cover Image

Objective: To evaluate the use of rectal mucosal cleansings before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with a transrectal approach, comparing the safety profile of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained database between August 2019 to September 2020 in a high-volume hospital in Cali, Colombia. 428 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-PB with a transrectal approach were included in this study. 117 patients received povidone-iodine and 311 patients received chlorhexidine for rectal mucosa cleansings. After the procedure, we conducted telephone follow-ups at 48 hours, 7 days, and 30 days. The complications were registered in our database. Analysis was performed using STATA 15.

Results: There was a statistically significant increased risk of hematuria, urinary retention, and rectal bleeding in those patients exposed to Chlorhexidine (p <0.001, <0.001, and 0.01 respectively). We did not find any differences in sepsis (p 0.18) or urinary tract infection (p 0.77) rates between the groups. Rectal antisepsis with chlorhexidine significantly increased the risk of non-infectious complications.

Conclusions: In terms of infectious complications, there were no differences between the use of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine for rectal mucosal cleansing prior to TRUS-PB. Povidone iodine appeared to be a safer option, as it is associated with fewer risks of hematuria, rectal bleeding, and urine retention.

2,093 views
0 citations
Original Research
23 November 2022

Purpose: The outcome of the present study is to determine variables available at the time of diagnosis able to predict disease reclassification in prostate cancer (PCa) patients on active surveillance (AS).

Materials and methods: From January 2014 to December 2018, 114 consecutive low-risk PCa patients were enrolled in AS protocol according to inclusion criteria: PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, Gleason score (GS) ≤ 6 or International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason grade group (GG) 1, maximum cancer core length (MCCI) < 50%, and ≤ 2 positive cores on biopsy. Patients were followed with confirmatory and yearly prostate biopsy, semi-annually with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and digital rectal examination (DRE). Disease reclassification was defined as upgrading biopsy: GS ≥ 3 + 4 = 7 or ISUP GG ≥ 2, more than two positive cores, MCCI > 50%, or changes in serum PSA > 10 ng/ml. Uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models, receiver performance curves (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed to characterize AS criteria and identify variables that predict disease reclassification. Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the net benefit of using PV in addition to standard variables to predict disease reclassification.

Results: PCa was diagnosed by systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx). The mean (range) follow-up was 32.7 (12-126) months. Disease reclassification occurred in 46 patients (40%). On univariate statistical analysis prostate specific antigen (PSA) (p = 0.05), prostate volume (PV) (p = 0.022), PSA density (PSAD) (p < 0.001) and number of positive cores (p = 0.021) were significant factors for disease reclassification. On the multivariate analysis, PSAD (p < 0.001) and PV (p = 0.003) were the only statistically significant independent variables to predict disease reclassification. A PSAD cut-off of 0.16 ng/ml² and a PV cut-off of 44 ml gave a maximal area under the curve, 0.69 and 0.63, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median survival free from disease reclassification during AS was almost doubled in patients with PSAD < 0.16 ng/ml2 or PV > 44 ml. DCA showed a positive net benefit and clinical usefulness of the model, including PV, to predict disease reclassification between threshold probabilities of 20-50%.

Conclusions: PV and PSAD significantly predicted failure from AS in our patients. Patients with a baseline PV of fewer than 44 ml would be more likely to have disease reclassification and unsuitable for acceptable AS protocols. Therefore, we believe that PV may help to select PCa patients for AS, especially in populations where the use of mpMRI is limited.

1,714 views
0 citations
Original Research
04 February 2022

Introduction and Objectives: We report our experience with salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) post radical prostatectomy (RP).

Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 24 patients who underwent sLND for biochemical recurrence (BCR) post RP, from July 2012 to February 2018. sLND was performed following an extended bilateral template. Clinical and pathological characteristics of primary RP and sLND were reported. Biochemical response and initiation of additional therapy post sLND were analyzed. Survival analysis was performed using KaplanMeier curves.

Results: 24 sLND were performed. RP specimens showed 58.3% of Gleason score 7 and 50% of locally advanced disease. Median time to BCR post RP was 24 months with a median PSA value of 1.4 ng/ml pre sLND. 75% of patients underwent imaging prior to sLND. sLND showed oligometastasis on the final pathology report in 54.2% of patients. Metastatic lymph nodes were mainly identified in the iliac artery territory (61.5%). Complete biochemical response (PSA < 0.2 ng/ml) was maintained throughout the first 12 months of follow-up in 20.83% of patients and 8.33% of patients at the end of the study (median follow-up 70 months). Survival rates free of additional therapy (ADT/RT) were 45.83% at one year and 25% at 5 years.

Conclusions: We observed a biochemical response post sLND in 20.83% of our patients, lasting throughout the first year of follow up, with survival rates free of ADT and/or RT of 45.83% at one year and 25% at 5 years.

1,722 views
0 citations
Open for submission
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Urology

Advancements in Robotic Surgery for Urologic Cancer Treatment
Edited by Matin Sheriff, Stergios Boussios
Deadline
03 June 2024
Submit a paper
Recommended Research Topics
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Urology

Rising Stars in Urologic Oncology: 2021
Edited by Juan Gomez Rivas, Riccardo Campi
18.7K
views
64
authors
7
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Urology

Insights in Urologic Oncology, Volume I
Edited by Ketan K Badani, Trushar Patel
10.4K
views
52
authors
5
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Urology

Rising Stars in Urologic Oncology: 2023
Edited by Roberto Contieri, Juan Gomez Rivas, Riccardo Campi
9.2K
views
33
authors
5
articles
7.1K
views
35
authors
5
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Urology

Women in Urology: 2024
Edited by Katie Murray, Genevieve Nadeau, Courtney Rowe, Lindsey Cox, Pamela A. Moalli, Larissa Belardin
1.4K
views
10
authors
2
articles