Design Change to Fishery Independent Surveys: When to Adjust and How to Account For It

28.8K

views

52

authors

14

articles

Design Change to Fishery Independent Surveys: When to Adjust and How to Account For It

28.8K

views

52

authors

14

articles

Editorial

27 February 2025

Editorial: Design change to fishery independent surveys: when to adjust and how to account for it

Kyle Shertzer

,

Nathan M. Bacheler

,

Fabio Campanella

and

Ben Scoulding

423 views

0 citations

Editors

0

Impact

About

Fishery independent surveys provide crucial information for monitoring and assessing marine fish stocks. Their utility can largely be attributed to sampling procedures that are consistent across space and time, such that observed dynamics can reasonably be assumed to reflect those of the population or community being studied. However, sometimes changes to the survey design become desirable or necessary. They may be desirable if the benefits of modification outweigh the benefits of consistency, for example, with improvements in sampling technology or efficiency, revised survey priorities, or increased funding that allows for greater spatial coverage or temporal resolution. In other cases, changes to the survey design may not be desirable but necessary, for example, when specific supplies or equipment become unobtainable, or with reductions in funding, ship time, or human resources. This Special Issue compiles case studies from around the globe documenting changes to fishery independent surveys. The case studies document the rationale for making changes and how those changes were accounted for in monitoring and assessment. Ultimately, the goal is to assemble “lessons learned” from real-world examples, to inform those in the future faced with potential or inevitable changes to fishery independent surveys.

Fishery independent surveys provide crucial information for monitoring and assessing marine fish stocks. Their utility can largely be attributed to sampling procedures that are consistent across space and time, such that observed dynamics can reasonably be assumed to reflect those of the population or community being studied. However, sometimes changes to the survey design become desirable or necessary. They may be desirable if the benefits of modification outweigh the benefits of consistency, for example, with improvements in sampling technology or efficiency, revised survey priorities, or increased funding that allows for greater spatial coverage or temporal resolution. In other cases, changes to the survey design may not be desirable but necessary, for example, when specific supplies or equipment become unobtainable, or with reductions in funding, ship time, or human resources. This Special Issue compiles case studies from around the globe documenting changes to fishery independent surveys. The case studies document the rationale for making changes and how those changes were accounted for in monitoring and assessment. Ultimately, the goal is to assemble “lessons learned” from real-world examples, to inform those in the future faced with potential or inevitable changes to fishery independent surveys.

Download ebook

Share

Editors

Impact

28,817 Total views

22,979 Article views

4,308 Article downloads

1,530 Topic views

Published In

Journal Thumbnail

Frontiers in Marine Science

Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture and Living Resources

About Frontiers Research Topics

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.

Suggest a topic