Advances in Haptic Feedback for Neurorobotics Applications

31.1K
views
67
authors
10
articles
Editors
6
Impact
Loading...
Original Research
21 February 2023
Substitutive proprioception feedback of a prosthetic wrist by electrotactile stimulation
Yichen Han
8 more and 
Wensheng Hou

Objective: Sensory feedback of upper-limb prostheses is widely desired and studied. As important components of proprioception, position, and movement feedback help users to control prostheses better. Among various feedback methods, electrotactile stimulation is a potential method for coding proprioceptive information of a prosthesis. This study was motivated by the need for proprioception information for a prosthetic wrist. The flexion-extension (FE) position and movement information of the prosthetic wrist are transmitted back to the human body through multichannel electrotactile stimulation.

Approach: We developed an electrotactile scheme to encode the FE position and movement of the prosthetic wrist and designed an integrated experimental platform. A preliminary experiment on the sensory threshold and discomfort threshold was performed. Then, two proprioceptive feedback experiments were performed: a position sense experiment (Exp 1) and a movement sense experiment (Exp 2). Each experiment included a learning session and a test session. The success rate (SR) and discrimination reaction time (DRT) were analyzed to evaluate the recognition effect. The acceptance of the electrotactile scheme was evaluated by a questionnaire.

Main results: Our results showed that the average position SRs of five able-bodied subjects, amputee 1, and amputee 2 were 83.78, 97.78, and 84.44%, respectively. The average movement SR, and the direction and range SR of wrist movement in five able-bodied subjects were 76.25, 96.67%, respectively. Amputee 1 and amputee 2 had movement SRs of 87.78 and 90.00% and direction and range SRs of 64.58 and 77.08%, respectively. The average DRT of five able-bodied subjects was less than 1.5 s and that of amputees was less than 3.5 s.

Conclusion: The results indicate that after a short period of learning, the subjects can sense the position and movement of wrist FE. The proposed substitutive scheme has the potential for amputees to sense a prosthetic wrist, thus enhancing the human-machine interaction.

3,863 views
7 citations
Original Research
20 September 2022

Closing the prosthesis control loop by providing artificial somatosensory feedback can improve utility and user experience. Additionally, closed-loop control should be more robust with respect to disturbance, but this might depend on the type of feedback provided. Thus, the present study investigates and compares the performance of EMG and force feedback in the presence of control disturbances. Twenty able-bodied subjects and one transradial amputee performed delicate and power grasps with a prosthesis in a functional task, while the control signal gain was temporarily increased (high-gain disturbance) or decreased (low-gain disturbance) without their knowledge. Three outcome measures were considered: the percentage of trials successful in the first attempt (reaction to disturbance), the average number of attempts in trials where the wrong force was initially applied (adaptation to disturbance), and the average completion time of the last attempt in every trial. EMG feedback was shown to offer significantly better performance compared to force feedback during power grasping in terms of reaction to disturbance and completion time. During power grasping with high-gain disturbance, the median first-attempt success rate was significantly higher with EMG feedback (73.3%) compared to that achieved with force feedback (60%). Moreover, the median completion time for power grasps with low-gain disturbance was significantly longer with force feedback than with EMG feedback (3.64 against 2.48 s, an increase of 32%). Contrary to our expectations, there was no significant difference between feedback types with regards to adaptation to disturbances and the two feedback types performed similarly in delicate grasps. The results indicated that EMG feedback displayed better performance than force feedback in the presence of control disturbances, further demonstrating the potential of this approach to provide a reliable prosthesis-user interaction.

4,006 views
10 citations
2,648 views
7 citations
Recommended Research Topics
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Neuroscience

NeuroHaptics: From Human Touch to Neuroscience
Edited by Wanjoo Park, Laehyun Kim, Tonio Ball, S. Farokh Atashzar
47.4K
views
42
authors
8
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Robotics and AI

Getting Neuroprosthetics Out of the Lab: Improving the Human-Machine Interactions To Restore Sensory-Motor Functions
Edited by Ivo Strauss, Aaron M. Dingle, Solaiman Shokur, Karen Moxon
39.7K
views
29
authors
6
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Neuroscience

The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Brain for High-performance Neuroprosthesis and Cyborg Systems
Edited by Yu Qi, Yu SUN, Quanying Liu, Qiaosheng Zhang, Hanshu Cai, Qian Zheng
25.8K
views
32
authors
7
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Neural Information Processing and Novel Technologies to Read and Write the Neural Code
Edited by Yang Zhan, Yueming Wang, Saugat Bhattacharyya
28.9K
views
44
authors
8
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Neural Computations for Brain Machine interface Applications
Edited by Abed Khorasani, Sang Wan Lee, Robert D Flint, Jose Luis Contreras-Vidal
33.6K
views
28
authors
6
articles