Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Open Science for Toxicological Risk Assessment

About this Research Topic

Background

Background: The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has experienced an upsurge in almost all scientific disciplines. From physics and medicine to social sciences and biology, scientists have been increasingly applying advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques to solve problems that seemed unsolvable for a long time. As an example, a more than fifty-year-old scientific challenge of predicting the 3-dimensional protein conformation from its primary amino acid sequence was recently strongly advanced applying deep learning. The AlphaFold 2 team, responsible for solving this challenge, had already worked on this problem before and now managed to greatly improve the performance of their predictive model by applying innovative AI techniques (Tunyasuvunakool et al., 2021) and shared their work openly. This example shows how AI is revolutionizing not only the way we solve scientific problems, but also the way we collaborate. More researchers than ever are using open-source software for computations and to write algorithms. Increasingly, this work is shared via publicly available repositories.
In this research topic we address the way forward to better predict toxicity of compounds in the human risk context. The aim of the topic is to collect practical examples of AI applications to solve complex toxicological problems. Especially, predicting risk related to compound exposure, has been a field where classically scientists and regulators have been relying heavily on animal experiments. Although progress has been made to replace some of the mandatory animal tests by in-vitro test batteries, currently no AI-driven approach has been accepted as a valid risk assessment approach in Europe or the US.

Goal: Although computational toxicology has been around for quite some time, efforts have been focused on employing more classical prediction methods such as physiology-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), and differential equation modeling. Only recently, machine learning and deep learning techniques have found their way into predicting the hazard of chemicals for humans. Obviously, there are many examples where techniques such as PBPK and QSAR can be enriched by using machine learning, leading to better predictions and the possibility to integrate data sources or just use more data. In terms of establishing an AI that can confidently predict hazard AND toxicological risk for humans, we are not there yet. Considering the massive amount of progress in the field of AI over the past five years alone, we think that now the time is ripe for establishing a true probabilistic risk assessment framework, incorporating everything that AI has to offer. This will lead not only to a reduction of the animals used for risk assessment, but it will also lead to a better understanding of how compounds cause effects and to better predictions for human health in general.

Scope and Details for Authors: The traditional approaches such as animal tests and in vitro test batteries follow a fundamentally different way of evaluating risk, than AI methods would. Emerging techniques in natural language processing, semantic interoperability, machine learning and deep learning also offer a way to connect these approaches. The goal of this Research Topic is to showcase novel AI-driven methods and tools for integrating in vivo and in vitro methods with machine learning, or AI-only approaches, that can lead to the establishment of a probabilistic risk assessment framework.
Papers submitted to this Research Topic should demonstrate and/or highlight the potential of the approach to be adapted or integrated into risk assessment for compound safety in humans. We especially invite contributions that address integrative approaches addressing multiple aspects of risk assessment simultaneously. Research contributions showcasing AI approaches where e.g. chemical information is integrated with historical animal data, in vitro and omics data in a read across approach are highly valued.
This Research Topic will include both review papers and original research papers. Review papers should summarize the relevant existing literature and highlight overarching trends to date, as well as future directions. Original research papers should utilize and/or integrate in vivo, in vitro and machine learning approaches. Original papers that ONLY use either in vitro/in vivo data or machine learning approaches will not be considered.
We encourage original papers that present novel methods or computational tools, combine existing (i.e., published) models and/or approaches, or deploy existing models and/or approaches. The authors should address how data was collected and how models could be used in probabilistic risk assessment context. We also would like to invite more technical contributions that aim to educate the audience on performing machine learning tasks. Contributions, with an educational scope should demonstrate a case example, using programming code and should be written in tutorial style. Materials in relation to those tutorial-type papers should be freely available and reusable under a permissive license. An educational contribution does not necessarily need to be a code demo. It can also be a showcase for a good-practice, a workflow or process tool that the authors created, or a description of valuable data, collected, described and shared by the authors.
Authors should also describe their work preferably in adherence to Open Science principles. Code used to establish machine learning models should preferentially be shared openly in a git repository and should be clearly documented.

Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature, 596(7873), 590–596.

Keywords: Probabilistic risk assessment, Machine Learning, Toxicology, Open Science

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

• What is a Research Topic?

  Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

  Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

• Why does Frontiers publish Research Topics? 

  The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

  Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

• Why are Research Topics important for journals?

  As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

  A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

• How do we ensure the quality of articles within Research Topics?

  Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

  In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

• What are the benefits of publishing my article in a Research Topic?

  Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

  As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

  Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

   
• What types of articles can be published in a Research Topic?

  Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

  Check available article types here 

• Can I suggest a new Research Topic? 

  Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

  Suggest your topic here 

• Who leads a Research Topic? 

  A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

  The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

• What is the role of a topic editor?

  As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

   

  You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

• What support will I receive when editing a new Research Topic? 

  As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

• As a junior researcher, can I be involved in editing a Research Topic? 

  If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

• Can I get a certificate for editing a Research Topic?

  Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

• Who will I collaborate with?

  Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

• How long does it take to publish a Research Topic?

  As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

  Find out more about our Research Topics

• What fee support is available to authors publishing in a Research Topic?

  Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

  Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

• Will there be a printed version of my Research Topic?

  In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.