Objectives: Although the preoperative assessment of whether a bladder cancer (BCa) indicates muscular invasion is crucial for adequate treatment, there currently exist some challenges involved in preoperative diagnosis of BCa with muscular invasion. The aim of this study was to construct deep learning radiomic signature (DLRS) for preoperative predicting the muscle invasion status of BCa.
Methods: A retrospective review covering 173 patients revealed 43 with pathologically proven muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and 130 with non–muscle–invasive bladder cancer (non- MIBC). A total of 129 patients were randomly assigned to the training cohort and 44 to the test cohort. The Pearson correlation coefficient combined with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was utilized to reduce radiomic redundancy. To decrease the dimension of deep learning features, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was adopted. Six machine learning classifiers were finally constructed based on deep learning radiomics features, which were adopted to predict the muscle invasion status of bladder cancer. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of the model.
Results: According to the comparison, DLRS-based models performed the best in predicting muscle violation status, with MLP (Train AUC: 0.973260 (95% CI 0.9488-0.9978) and Test AUC: 0.884298 (95% CI 0.7831-0.9855)) outperforming the other models. In the test cohort, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the MLP model were 0.91 (95% CI 0.551-0.873), 0.78 (95% CI 0.594-0.863) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.729-0.827), respectively. DCA indicated that the MLP model showed better clinical utility than Radiomics-only model, which was demonstrated by the decision curve analysis.
Conclusions: A deep radiomics model constructed with CT images can accurately predict the muscle invasion status of bladder cancer.
Prostate cancer can be diagnosed by prostate biopsy using transectal ultrasound guidance. The high number of pathology images from biopsy tissues is a burden on pathologists, and analysis is subjective and susceptible to inter-rater variability. The use of machine learning techniques could make prostate histopathology diagnostics more precise, consistent, and efficient overall. This paper presents a new classification fusion network model that was created by fusing eight advanced image features: seven hand-crafted features and one deep-learning feature. These features are the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), speeded up robust feature (SURF), oriented features from accelerated segment test (FAST) and rotated binary robust independent elementary features (BRIEF) (ORB) of local features, shape and texture features of the cell nuclei, the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) feature of the cavities, a color feature, and a convolution deep-learning feature. Matching, integrated, and fusion networks are the three essential components of the proposed deep-learning network. The integrated network consists of both a backbone and an additional network. When classifying 1100 prostate pathology images using this fusion network with different backbones (ResNet-18/50, VGG-11/16, and DenseNet-121/201), we discovered that the proposed model with the ResNet-18 backbone achieved the best performance in terms of the accuracy (95.54%), specificity (93.64%), and sensitivity (97.27%) as well as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (98.34%). However, each of the assessment criteria for these separate features had a value lower than 90%, which demonstrates that the suggested model combines differently derived characteristics in an effective manner. Moreover, a Grad-CAM++ heatmap was used to observe the differences between the proposed model and ResNet-18 in terms of the regions of interest. This map showed that the proposed model was better at focusing on cancerous cells than ResNet-18. Hence, the proposed classification fusion network, which combines hand-crafted features and a deep-learning feature, is useful for computer-aided diagnoses based on pathology images of prostate cancer. Because of the similarities in the feature engineering and deep learning for different types of pathology images, the proposed method could be used for other pathology images, such as those of breast, thyroid cancer.