About this Research Topic
Nonischemic, rather than ischemic, cardiomyopathy is more common in women. This difference in cardiomyopathy etiology may explain the higher prevalence in women of pulseless electrical activity compared to ventricular fibrillation as the cause of sudden cardiac death. Female sex is associated with a greater risk for procedural complications from both atrial and ventricular ablation procedures as well as higher recurrence rates.
There is a need to better understand how sex-based differences in patient characteristics, the underlying myocardial substrate as well as triggers affect arrhythmic risk in women. This includes but is not limited to investigating how women differ from men with respect to cardiac structure and function; autonomic dysregulation; psychological stress or reaction to stress; systemic inflammation; as well as comorbidities, hormone levels and responses to pharmacotherapy. There continues to be an under-enrollment of women in clinical trials which limits our understanding. Women are often diagnosed later in the disease course, and/or treated less aggressively for arrhythmias, yet suffer more adverse effects from treatment and interventions. These gaps in knowledge limit optimal individualization of care of women at risk for or presenting with cardiac arrhythmias.
The scope of the Research Topic includes how sex impacts pathophysiology, epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, risk stratification approaches, therapy, management and prognosis of cardiac arrhythmias, channelopathies and sudden cardiac arrest/death. We are particularly interested in clinical and translational work including Original Research and Systematic Reviews/meta-analyses but will also consider foundational work.
Keywords: atrial arrhythmia, ventricular arrhythmia, sex, sudden cardiac death, risk stratification, women
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.