Adaptions to therapeutic pressures exerted on cancer cells enable malignant progression of the tumor, culminating in escape from programmed cell death and development of resistant diseases. A common form of cancer adaptation is non-genetic alterations that exploit mechanisms already present in cancer cells and do not require genetic modifications that can also lead to resistance mechanisms. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one of the most prevalent mechanisms of adaptive drug resistance and resulting cancer treatment failure, driven by epigenetic reprogramming and EMT-specific transcription factors. A recent breakthrough in cancer treatment is the development of KRASG12C inhibitors, which herald a new era of therapy by knocking out a unique substitution of an oncogenic driver. However, these highly selective agents targeting KRASG12C, such as FDA-approved sotorasib (AMG510) and adagrasib (MRTX849), inevitably encounter multiple mechanisms of drug resistance. In addition to EMT, cancer cells can hijack or rewire the sophisticated signaling networks that physiologically control cell proliferation, growth, and differentiation to promote malignant cancer cell phenotypes, suggesting that inhibition of multiple interconnected signaling pathways may be required to block tumor progression on KRASG12C inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment (TME) of cancer cells, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), contribute significantly to immune escape and tumor progression, suggesting a therapeutic approach that targets not only cancer cells but also the TME. Deciphering and targeting cancer adaptions promises mechanistic insights into tumor pathobiology and improved clinical management of KRASG12C-mutant cancer. This review presents recent advances in non-genetic adaptations leading to resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors, with a focus on oncogenic pathway rewiring, TME, and EMT.
Objective: Platelet activation and adhesion to cancer cells increase the release of multiple factors that contribute to EMT and chemoresistance. Elevated levels of D-dimer have been associated with poor clinical outcomes in lung cancer. Platelets in high D-dimer plasma may be activated and implicated in acquired resistance to EGFR TKI in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with mutant EGFR.
Materials and Methods: Clinical responsive rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were prospectively measured in treatment-naïve lung adenocarcinoma patients with activation mutation. Plasma or platelets from patients with high or low D-dimer level were obtained to investigate the cytotoxic effects of TKIs on mutant cancer cells, and the mechanistic pathways were also explored.
Results: Patients with high D-dimer had worse RR, PFS, and OS. High D-dimer plasma induced resistance to gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, or osimertinib in EGFR mutant lung cancer cells. Depletion of platelets in high D-dimer plasma reversed the resistance to TKI. Platelets of high D-dimer plasma had higher adherence capacity to cancer cells, and induced EGFR and Akt activation as well as EMT through Src activation. Inhibition of platelet adherence or activation of Src or Akt conquered the resistance to TKI. The acquired resistance to TKI by high D-dimer plasma was less attributed to secondary gene mutation.
Conclusion: Increased platelet activation in the high D-dimer plasma may contribute to first-line acquired EGFR TKI resistance. Thus, therapeutic strategy against platelet activation in patients with high D-dimer levels may improve the efficacy of first-line treatment with EGFR TKI.