About this Research Topic

Background

In climate communication research, knowledge has a rather negative image. Numerous empirical studies have proven that knowledge has very little to no effect on behavioral changes. Related theoretical models like the ‘knowledge-deficit model,’ meanwhile, have been widely criticized for being linear, technocratic and unable to explain public perceptions. Likewise, the truth-to-power model for science-policy interfaces has come under critique insofar as it underscores the importance of values, beliefs, identities and system-inherent logics. A prominent view among climate communication practitioners, by contrast, is that we should proceed ‘from knowledge to action,’ thereby stressing that action–such as behavioral change or political protest–is the key destination to arrive at. In doing so, they risk obscuring the need to continually deepen and discuss our knowledge in order to act most effectively.

Furthermore, it is questionable what kind of knowledge is actually considered as 'low impact' here. In public discourses, there is often a focus on knowledge that stems from the natural sciences, and accordingly on environmental problems. From the perspective of public discourse, this raises the question of what kind of knowledge is actually visible and negotiated in the public sphere at all. An empirically unproved assumption is that social scientific and humanities-based knowledge pertaining to climate change (e.g. on the obstacles to and potential for transformation) has little impact simply because it is hardly visible to the public. This critique also applies to other knowledge producers, such as indigenous peoples and many other social groups.

Accordingly, this Research Topic aims to critically reflect on how climate related knowledge is understood, conceptualized and measured, particularly where communication and public discourse is concerned. In this regard, it seeks to analyze the entire process of knowledge selection at all stages of (public) communication. In understanding what people make out of the knowledge disseminated in public discourses, emotions are a crucial area of interest. Are emotions antagonistic toward information? Conceptualizing the relationship between information and emotion has a long tradition in communication studies, especially in light of current phenomena such as hate speech and disinformation. In addition, the interrelation between knowledge and emotion is important in analyzing how actors in the field (such as those in the Fridays for Future movement) communicate. This Research Topic particularly welcomes articles that take up prior and related work and shed further light on these interrelations, whether theoretically or empirically.

The Topic welcomes all articles (including original research, reviews, and commentaries) that assess different kinds of climate-related knowledge, their (normative) function in communication processes from different perspectives, and critical reflections and systematizations of (theoretical understanding and empirical measuring of) non-knowledge/ignorance and uncertainties. Specific themes may include, but are not limited to, the following:

Theoretical and/or normative perspectives

• theoretical concepts and approaches to describe different types of climate related knowledge that originates from diverse epistemic traditions (natural sciences, social sciences, economics etc.)
• the predominance of natural science perspectives over other epistemic traditions in public discourses about climate change
• approaches to describing the knowledge of ‘lay’ people, indigenous people, or other forms of expertise, particularly with a view to gaining transformative knowledge
• approaches that consider climate related knowledge in relation to theories of emotions and affects
• normative/ethical questions concerning the role of climate related knowledge (and their agents, such as scientists, journalists, climate activists) in communication processes
• different communicative strategies to enhance climate related knowledge.

Methodological perspectives

• methodological challenges in measuring climate-related knowledge in surveys, experiments and/or qualitative methods; for example: media coverage that reports exact and precise results stemming from the natural sciences is important, yet it is often delivered in the form of a technocratic, cumbersome language that exudes authority–does simply recalling this terminology, however, constitute knowledge?
• the relationship between climate related knowledge and other relevant variables such as risk perception/problem awareness trust in science, media use, and personal characteristics
• the role of climate related knowledge in public discourses and different public arenas, both in modern media environments and hybrid media systems.

Keywords: Climate change communication, science communication, knowledge, journalism, audience research

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

• What is a Research Topic?

  Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

  Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

• Why does Frontiers publish Research Topics? 

  The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

  Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

• Why are Research Topics important for journals?

  As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

  A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

• How do we ensure the quality of articles within Research Topics?

  Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

  In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

• What are the benefits of publishing my article in a Research Topic?

  Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

  As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

  Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

   
• What types of articles can be published in a Research Topic?

  Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

  Check available article types here 

• Can I suggest a new Research Topic? 

  Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

  Suggest your topic here 

• Who leads a Research Topic? 

  A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

  The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

• What is the role of a topic editor?

  As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

   

  You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

• What support will I receive when editing a new Research Topic? 

  As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

• As a junior researcher, can I be involved in editing a Research Topic? 

  If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

• Can I get a certificate for editing a Research Topic?

  Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

• Who will I collaborate with?

  Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

• How long does it take to publish a Research Topic?

  As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

  Find out more about our Research Topics

• What fee support is available to authors publishing in a Research Topic?

  Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

  Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

• Will there be a printed version of my Research Topic?

  In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.