Editors
6
Impact
Loading...
Original Research
24 October 2022
Global and non-Global slow oscillations differentiate in their depth profiles
Sang-Cheol Seok
2 more and 
Paola Malerba
Changes in classifier performance when the depth profiles are reduced to the highest-ranking features. Classifier performance (assessed with MCC) measured with holdout (25%), when training the algorithms with pooled SOs from all participants, SOs from S2 in the top plot, SOs from SWS in the bottom plot. For each algorithm, compare its performance when trained on the dataset encoded by all region-by-time values (51 features, striped bars) to the performance achieved when trained on the dataset encoded only by the top selective features identified in Figure 6 and Table 1 (15 features in S2, and either 11 or 6 features in SWS, full-color bars).

Sleep slow oscillations (SOs, 0.5–1.5 Hz) are thought to organize activity across cortical and subcortical structures, leading to selective synaptic changes that mediate consolidation of recent memories. Currently, the specific mechanism that allows for this selectively coherent activation across brain regions is not understood. Our previous research has shown that SOs can be classified on the scalp as Global, Local or Frontal, where Global SOs are found in most electrodes within a short time delay and gate long-range information flow during NREM sleep. The functional significance of space-time profiles of SOs hinges on testing if these differential SOs scalp profiles are mirrored by differential depth structure of SOs in the brain. In this study, we built an analytical framework to allow for the characterization of SO depth profiles in space-time across cortical and sub-cortical regions. To test if the two SO types could be differentiated in their cortical-subcortical activity, we trained 30 machine learning classification algorithms to distinguish Global and non-Global SOs within each individual, and repeated this analysis for light (Stage 2, S2) and deep (slow wave sleep, SWS) NREM stages separately. Multiple algorithms reached high performance across all participants, in particular algorithms based on k-nearest neighbors classification principles. Univariate feature ranking and selection showed that the most differentiating features for Global vs. non-Global SOs appeared around the trough of the SO, and in regions including cortex, thalamus, caudate nucleus, and brainstem. Results also indicated that differentiation during S2 required an extended network of current from cortical-subcortical regions, including all regions found in SWS and other basal ganglia regions, and amygdala and hippocampus, suggesting a potential functional differentiation in the role of Global SOs in S2 vs. SWS. We interpret our results as supporting the potential functional difference of Global and non-Global SOs in sleep dynamics.

2,262 views
6 citations
4,093 views
7 citations
Open for submission
Recommended Research Topics
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Network Physiology

Network Physiology, Insights into the Brain System: 2021
Edited by Klaus Lehnertz
23.5K
views
29
authors
8
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

The New Frontier in Brain Network Physiology: From Temporal Dynamics to the Principles of Integration in Physiological Brain Networks
Edited by Ignacio Mendez-Balbuena, Alena Damborská, Amir Hussain, Mufti Mahmud, Carlos Trenado, Mohammad Reza Daliri
28.6K
views
23
authors
6
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Network Physiology

Brain-Heart Interaction: Recent Insights in Methods
Edited by Florian Chouchou, Christophe Corbier, Vincent Pichot
12.7K
views
34
authors
4
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Network Physiology

Reviews in Networks in the Brain System
Edited by Cristina Masoller, Klaus Lehnertz, Marc Goodfellow, Dimitris Kugiumtzis, Michal Zochowski
8.5K
views
13
authors
5
articles