Progress Monitoring and Data-Based Decision-Making in Inclusive Schools

  • 5,757

    Total downloads

  • 40k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Even though there is already much research and good practice regarding inclusive education, there are also still schools and cases where students struggle with academic skills. Progress monitoring (PM) is an effective approach to provide direct feedback in school practice. The idea of PM is to document learning development and provide feedback on instructional decisions and interventions over time using repeated short reliable standardized tests. PM is a form of formative diagnostics that measures and evaluates learning development at multiple points in time and provides direct feedback to teachers and learners. Formative diagnostics measure for the purpose of supporting learning rather than to evaluate learning outcomes or determine special educational needs.

PM enables the observation of learning development and allows formative constructive feedback, which is a necessary condition for inclusive schools and the support of students with special educational needs. Without Progress monitoring, there is a risk that students with special educational needs will be evaluated based on their performance relative to their classmates rather than their progress.

According to current research there are positive effects of using PM on students achievement, but the use of PM is not widespread. This may be due to additional work for teachers and a lack of knowledge on how to use PM in context of data-based decision making. Similarly, tests or online platforms for PM are not available in many countries and languages.

Tests for PM must provide the psychometric quality to measure learning progress in addition to the psychometric quality criteria for status tests. For this purpose, classical test theory is usually no longer sufficient, since learning trajectories differ among students. The tests must be fair over time both for an individual level and for specific groups of students (measurement invariance) and measure learning trajectories sensitively (i.e., be sensitive to change even for weak learners). On the other hand, the tests must be as short and easy to use as possible, so that the tests can be used frequently enough in everyday teaching. Thus, the criterion of usefulness, practicability as well as economy is of crucial importance. This is because PM can only be effective when teachers reflect on their decisions based on the new information provided by PM. Compared to status tests, the requirements of PM are thus much higher, both psychometrically and in terms of practical implementation. Therefore, it makes sense for PM to be flanked by adapted materials and recommendation to support teachers and students.

The goal of this Research Topic is to provide a set of research articles that presents empirical or methodological studies on progress monitoring. We invite manuscripts that use standard methods of test construction in education research, as well as those that use novel analytical techniques to provide new insights into the data from example self-developed online platforms.

We welcome papers that focus on test construction and implementation of PM in schools. We encourage article submissions from collaborations between different scientists from the fields of computer science, psychology, education and special education. Submissions related to this main theme and below specific themes are all welcome:
- Test construction and psychometric qualities for students in inclusive schools and students with special educational needs
- Construction of web-platforms for progress monitoring, data collection and feedback to the teachers
- Single Case studies with progress monitoring
- Teacher Trainings for progress monitoring and diagnostic competence to interpret growth data

Keywords: Progress Monitoring, Formative Diagnostic, Learning Growth, Data Based Decision Making, curriculum based measurement

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 40kTopic views
  • 31kArticle views
  • 5,757Article downloads
View impact