About this Research Topic
The goal of this Research Topic is to give explanations for the cultural differences in thinking and reasoning and to connect these to a further explanation for how cultural diversity has arisen in the world. Thinking and reasoning are not only influenced by culture (cultural value, cultural practice, morality, religion, custom, etc.) but have created culture including legal and economic systems and have taken an important role in cultural transmission. However, the evidence-base for how culture and thinking interact has much scope for development. There are possibly many kinds of explanations for cultural differences in thinking: Group level factors such as Westerners’ individualistic culture and Easterners’ collectivist culture, factors of philosophical tradition, and geographical and ecological factors. Meanwhile, there is a need to continue gathering new evidence on cultural differences in thinking and in doing so broaden opportunities for cultural exchange in our increasingly globalized societies.
To achieve the goal above, we welcome either empirical, theoretical, or review studies from cognition, cognitive science, cultural psychology, evolutionary psychology, developmental psychology, theoretical and philosophical psychology, indigenous psychology, and anthropological psychology. The core question is how humans (or animals) think and reason in a given culture, on a cultural product (rule, moral and/or religion), or for the creation of cultural systems. Cross-cultural studies are welcomed including comparison of cultural contents (e.g. legal system, television commercials, school textbooks, etc.), but it is not a necessary condition. Authors are encouraged to discuss in what sense human (or animal) thinking and reasoning can be adaptive culturally and to give an implication for history or cultural diversity.
Keywords: reasoning, cross-cultural study, dialectical thinking, dual-process theory, socioecological approach
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.