Self-Conscious Emotions and Group-Identification - Theoretical, Empirical, and Normative Questions

  • 5,110

    Total downloads

  • 35k

    Total views and downloads

Submit your idea

Select the journal/section where you want your idea to be submitted:

Submit your manuscript summarySubmit your manuscript

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Self-conscious or self-evaluative emotions have a crucial role in building our sense of self as individuals. They are also social and relational because other people may have an effect on how we feel about various dimensions of our selves. For example, sometimes we feel ashamed (and thus faulty, deficient, or unworthy in the eyes of others) because of shameful actions performed by people with a connection or relation to us. On other occasions, we might feel pride (and thus empowered, self-assertive, or self-confident) because of others’ commendable actions but also because of connections that can seem arbitrary. The belongings of other persons may affect our sense of self by inducing in us that sense of inferiority which is quintessential to envy. Furthermore, others’ opinions about ourselves may impact our emotional self-evaluation, triggering episodes of self-esteem or self-disesteem. Self-conscious emotions that display this social form have been labeled “hetero-induced”, “vicarious”, “reflected” (i.e., reflected glory or failure) or “group-based” (i.e., embodying or enacting self-relevant changes in group status or power).

Although self-conscious emotions have been at the center of lively debates in several disciplines, comparably little attention has been devoted to social forms of self-conscious emotions. The purpose of this Research Topic is to gather empirical and theoretical contributions that shed light on various aspects of self-conscious emotions felt based on group identification, and how sociality and self-consciousness intersect in them.

Specifically, some questions we aim to explore are:

• What do we mean by such expressions as “I am proud/ashamed of you”; should we read them literally, or do expressions of this kind have other meanings or functions in social life?

• What is the conceptual relationship between “hetero-induced” or “vicarious” emotions discussed in philosophy and “group-based” emotions studied in social psychology?

• How should we normatively evaluate the adaptiveness or appropriateness of these emotions from the perspective of an individual feeling the emotion on the one hand, and from the perspective of the group with which the person identifies on the other?

• What are the main forms of self-conscious emotions felt on the basis of group identification?

• What is the difference between effective self-evaluation triggered by another individual and those triggered by a group as such?

• What kind of cultural and contextual variation is there in social forms of pride and shame and their normative evaluation?

• How are group-based self-evaluative emotions related to shared or collective emotions? And what is special about shared or collective emotions of others as objects of group-based self-evaluative emotions? (E.g, under what circumstances can we come to be ashamed of the collective pride, arrogance or contempt of our own group?)

• What is it like to be the object of the pride, guilt or shame of others (e.g., in what sense can these emotions be regarded as quickly shared or “contagious”)?

• Are explanations based on different types or modes of group identification and relatedness sufficient to explain the occurrence of social and shared self-conscious emotions (e.g., are social identity and social fusion explanations complementary or contradictory)

To address these (and related) questions, we welcome original and innovative contributions that are empirical, theoretical, conceptual, or normative. The contributions may include philosophical and theoretical analyses; reports of theoretically grounded empirical studies from developmental psychology, social psychology, sociology; methodological contributions, as well as commentaries on existing key articles or other contributions to this Research Topic.

Keywords: Group-Identification, self-evaluation, Self-evaluative emotions, Group-based emotions, Social Self, self-conscious emotions, Pride, Shame, Envy, Self-Esteem

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

     

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

     

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

     

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 35kTopic views
  • 27kArticle views
  • 5,110Article downloads
View impact