Editors
6
Impact
Loading...
Original Research
09 December 2021
Reconnecting the Elwha River: Spatial Patterns of Fish Response to Dam Removal
Jeffrey J. Duda
14 more and 
George R. Pess
Article Cover Image

The removal of two large dams on the Elwha River was completed in 2014 with a goal of restoring anadromous salmonid populations. Using observations from ongoing field studies, we compiled a timeline of migratory fish passage upstream of each dam. We also used spatially continuous snorkeling surveys in consecutive years before (2007, 2008) and after (2018, 2019) dam removal during summer baseflow to assess changes in fish distribution and density over 65 km of the mainstem Elwha River. Before dam removal, anadromous fishes were limited to the 7.9 km section of river downstream of Elwha Dam, potamodromous species could not migrate throughout the river system, and resident trout were the most abundant species. After dam removal, there was rapid passage into areas upstream of Elwha Dam, with 8 anadromous species (Chinook, Coho, Sockeye, Pink, Chum, Winter Steelhead, Summer Steelhead, Pacific Lamprey, and Bull Trout) observed within 2.5 years. All of these runs except Chum Salmon were also observed in upper Elwha upstream of Glines Canyon Dam within 5 years. The spatial extent of fish passage by adult Chinook Salmon and Summer Steelhead increased by 50 km and 60 km, respectively, after dam removal. Adult Chinook Salmon densities in some previously inaccessible reaches in the middle section of the river exceeded the highest densities observed in the lower section of the river prior to dam removal. The large number (>100) of adult Summer Steelhead in the upper river after dam removal was notable because it was among the rarest anadromous species in the Elwha River prior to dam removal. The spatial extent of trout and Bull Trout remained unchanged after dam removal, but their total abundance increased and their highest densities shifted from the lower 25 km of the river to the upper 40 km. Our results show that reconnecting the Elwha River through dam removal provided fish access to portions of the watershed that had been blocked for nearly a century.

11,607 views
32 citations
Review
09 February 2021

Aquatic invasive species (AIS) are one of the principal threats to freshwater biodiversity. Exclusion barriers are increasingly being used as a management strategy to control the spread of AIS. However, exclusion barriers can also impact native organisms and their effectiveness is likely to be context dependent. We conducted a quantitative literature review to evaluate the use of barriers to control animal AIS in freshwater ecosystems worldwide. The quantitative aspect of the review was supplemented by case studies that describe some of the challenges, successes, and opportunities for the use of the use of AIS exclusion barriers globally. Barriers have been used since the 1950s to control the spread of AIS, but effort has been increasing since 2005 (80% of studies) and an increasingly diverse range of AIS taxa are now targeted in a wide range of habitat types. The global use of AIS barriers has been concentrated in North America (74% of studies), Australasia (11%), and Europe (10%). Physical barriers (e.g., weirs, exclusion screens, and velocity barriers) have been most widely used (47%), followed by electric (27%) and chemical barriers (12%). Fish were the most targeted taxa (86%), followed by crustaceans (10%), molluscs (3%) and amphibians (1%). Most studies have been moderately successful in limiting the passage of AIS, with 86% of the barriers tested deterring >70% of individuals. However, only 25% of studies evaluated barrier impacts on native species, and development of selective passage is still in its infancy. Most studies have been too short (47% < 1 year, 87% < 5 years) to detect ecological impacts or have failed to use robust before-after-control-impact (BACI) study designs (only 5%). Hence, more effective monitoring is required to assess the long-term effectiveness of exclusion barriers as an AIS management tool. Our global case studies highlight the pressing need for AIS control in many ecoregions, and exclusion barriers have the potential to become an effective tool in some situations. However, the design and operation of exclusion barriers must be refined to deliver selective passage of native fauna, and exclusion barriers should only be used sparingly as part of a wider integrated management strategy.

19,302 views
68 citations
Open for submission
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Sphingolipids in Infection Control
Edited by Sibylle Schneider-Schaulies, Burkhard Kleuser, Juergen Seibel
148.9K
views
82
authors
17
articles
Recommended Research Topics
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Sphingolipids in Infection Control
Edited by Sibylle Schneider-Schaulies, Burkhard Kleuser, Juergen Seibel
148.9K
views
82
authors
17
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Vesicular Trafficking in Cell Communication: New Insights in Physiology and Pathology
Edited by Anna Onnis, Alvaro H. Crevenna
44.1K
views
78
authors
9
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

The Evolving Role of Lipid Droplets: Advancements and Future Directions
Edited by Vineet Choudhary, Joel M Goodman
56.1K
views
34
authors
8
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

The Functions of Extracellular Vesicles in Melanoma
Edited by Susana García-Silva, Alberto Benito-Martin, Miriam Galvonas Jasiulionis
29K
views
9
articles
Frontiers Logo

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Endocytic and Extracellular Vesicles: Physiology, Mechanisms, and Modeling
Edited by Shiro Suetsugu, Yosuke Senju
16.7K
views
33
authors
4
articles