How and Why Does Spatial-Hearing Ability Differ among Listeners? What Is the Role of Learning and Multisensory Interactions?

163.5K

views

64

authors

24

articles

How and Why Does Spatial-Hearing Ability Differ among Listeners? What Is the Role of Learning and Multisensory Interactions?

163.5K

views

64

authors

24

articles

Editorial

16 February 2016

Editorial: How, and Why, Does Spatial-Hearing Ability Differ among Listeners? What is the Role of Learning and Multisensory Interactions?

Guillaume Andéol

and

Brian D. Simpson

3,981 views

5 citations

Editors

3

Guillaume Andeol

Ewan Andrew Macpherson

Western University

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Impact

Fetching...

About

Spatial-hearing ability has been found to vary widely across listeners. A survey of the existing auditory-space perception literature suggests that three main types of factors may account for this variability:
- physical factors, e.g., acoustical characteristics related to sound-localization cues,
- perceptual factors, e.g., sensory/cognitive processing, perceptual learning, multisensory interactions.
- and methodological factors, e.g., differences in stimulus presentation methods across studies.
However, the extent to which these–and perhaps other, still unidentified—factors actually contribute to the observed variability in spatial hearing across individuals with normal hearing or within special populations (e.g., hearing-impaired listeners) remains largely unknown. Likewise, the role of perceptual learning and multisensory interactions in the emergence of a multimodal but unified representation of “auditory space,” is still an active topic of research.
A better characterization and understanding of the determinants of inter-individual variability in spatial hearing, and of its relationship with perceptual learning and multisensory interactions, would have numerous benefits. In particular, it would enhance the design of rehabilitative devices and of human-machine interfaces involving auditory, or multimodal space perception, such as virtual auditory/multimodal displays in aeronautics, or navigational aids for the visually impaired.
For this research topic, we will consider manuscripts that:
- present new methods, or review existing methods, for the study of inter-individual differences, including statistical methods;
- present new data (or review existing) data, concerning acoustical features relevant for explaining inter-individual differences in sound-localization performance;
- present new (or review existing) psychophysical or neurophysiological findings concerning spatial hearing and/or auditory perceptual learning, and/or multisensory interactions in humans (normal or impaired, young or older listeners) or other species;
– discuss the influence of inter-individual differences on the design and use of assistive listening devices (rehabilitation) or human-machine interfaces involving spatial hearing or multimodal perception of space (ergonomy).

Spatial-hearing ability has been found to vary widely across listeners. A survey of the existing auditory-space perception literature suggests that three main types of factors may account for this variability:
- physical factors, e.g., acoustical characteristics related to sound-localization cues,
- perceptual factors, e.g., sensory/cognitive processing, perceptual learning, multisensory interactions.
- and methodological factors, e.g., differences in stimulus presentation methods across studies.
However, the extent to which these–and perhaps other, still unidentified—factors actually contribute to the observed variability in spatial hearing across individuals with normal hearing or within special populations (e.g., hearing-impaired listeners) remains largely unknown. Likewise, the role of perceptual learning and multisensory interactions in the emergence of a multimodal but unified representation of “auditory space,” is still an active topic of research.
A better characterization and understanding of the determinants of inter-individual variability in spatial hearing, and of its relationship with perceptual learning and multisensory interactions, would have numerous benefits. In particular, it would enhance the design of rehabilitative devices and of human-machine interfaces involving auditory, or multimodal space perception, such as virtual auditory/multimodal displays in aeronautics, or navigational aids for the visually impaired.
For this research topic, we will consider manuscripts that:
- present new methods, or review existing methods, for the study of inter-individual differences, including statistical methods;
- present new data (or review existing) data, concerning acoustical features relevant for explaining inter-individual differences in sound-localization performance;
- present new (or review existing) psychophysical or neurophysiological findings concerning spatial hearing and/or auditory perceptual learning, and/or multisensory interactions in humans (normal or impaired, young or older listeners) or other species;
– discuss the influence of inter-individual differences on the design and use of assistive listening devices (rehabilitation) or human-machine interfaces involving spatial hearing or multimodal perception of space (ergonomy).

Download ebook

Share

Editors

Guillaume Andeol

Ewan Andrew Macpherson

Western University

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Impact

163,461 Total views

126,866 Article views

31,190 Article downloads

5,405 Topic views

Published In

Journal Thumbnail

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience

Journal Thumbnail

Frontiers in Psychology

Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience

About Frontiers Research Topics

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.

Suggest a topic