About this Research Topic
However, there are limits to such reasoning as decisions may be prone to bias, involve others and shaped by one’s sense of identity and emotional attachment. Alongside this, the emphasis has been on the front end of recruitment but once students are in HE, the ‘student experience’ is one aspect that needs further investigation, especially as they are positioned as consumers. Given the current context, the student experience becomes the gap between the expectations formed in part, from the promises made through marketing strategies and the reality of the day-to-day life of being a student. The student experience may feed directly into student satisfaction metrics, attrition rates, and formal complaint procedures but this needs a fuller investigation on what the experience of studying involves and how this plays out in terms of student learning, identities, relationships, and well-being.
Psychological inquiry can offer a fresh and unique lens to address the limits of this economic reasoning and re-frame questions and answers around the marketization of HE. Psychology is a broad church with the scope of inquiry extending from issues around identity, cognitive processes, group dynamics, the unconscious, power and conceptualizing the student as a consumer subject within the wider historical, social and political context. The breadth of Psychology offers diverse approaches that can create dialogue and add fresh insight on decisions to access HE and the student experience. In order to develop our understanding further, we encourage contributors from a range of fields and perspectives to contribute original research and theoretical articles.
Keywords: marketization of higher education, studen decision making, student experience, neoliberalism and psychology, student choice and consumerism
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.