Thymus-derived, peripherally-derived and in vitro-induced T regulatory cells

421.8K
views
76
authors
22
articles
Editors
1
Impact
Loading...
Review
30 July 2013

The role of CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been an area of intensive investigation and remains a matter of ardent debate. Investigation and interpretation suffered from uncertainties concerning Treg quantification. Firstly, Treg quantification and function in HIV infection remain controversial in part because of the lack of reliable and specific markers to identify human Tregs. Secondly, analyzing Treg percentages or absolute numbers led to apparent discrepancies that are now solved: it is now commonly accepted that Treg are targets of HIV infection, but are preferentially preserved compared to conventional CD4 T cells. Moreover, the duality of immune defects associated to HIV infection, i.e., low grade chronic inflammation and defects in HIV-specific responses also casts doubts on the potential impact of Treg on HIV infection. Tregs may be beneficial or/and detrimental to the control of HIV infection by suppressing chronic inflammation or HIV-specific responses respectively. Indeed both effects of Treg suppression have been described in HIV infection. The discovery in recent years of the existence of phenotypically and functionally distinct human CD4+FOXP3+ Treg subsets may provide a unique opportunity to reconcile these contrasting results. It is tempting to speculate that different Treg subsets exert these different suppressive effects. This review summarizes available data concerning Treg fate during HIV infection when considering Treg globally or as subsets. We discuss how the identification of naïve and effector Treg subsets modulates our understanding of Treg biology during HIV infection and the potential impact of HIV infection on mechanisms governing peripheral differentiation of adaptive Tregs.

118,969 views
45 citations
39,193 views
181 citations
In TH1 cells IL-10 expression is induced by IL-12-STAT4 and IL-27-STAT1 pathways, possibly through c-Maf and NFIL3 (Saraiva et al., 2009). In TH2 cells IL-10 expression is induced by IL-4-STAT6 through GATA3 (imprinting and chromatin modification) and NFIL3 (Shoemaker et al., 2006; Motomura et al., 2011). In TH17 cells IL-10 expression is induced by IL-6/TGF-β-STAT3 through c-Maf (Xu et al., 2009). In Tr1 cells, IL-10 is induced by IL-27 and AhR through induction of C-Maf (Pot et al., 2009; Apetoh et al., 2010). *c-Maf is correlated with IL-10 expression in TH1 cells (Saraiva et al., 2009). In non-polarizing culture conditions, IL-10 expression is dependent on c-Maf (Kim et al., 1999). Whether c-Maf binds to the IL-10 locus in TH1 cells is unknown. **NFIL3-deficient TH1 cells do not express IL-10 on repetitive stimulation, but NFIL3 has not been observed bound to the IL-10 locus in TH1 cells. (Motomura et al., 2011).
Review
31 May 2013
Regulation of Adaptive Immunity; The Role of Interleukin-10
T. H. Sky Ng
4 more and 
David C. Wraith

Since the discovery of interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the 1980s, a large body of work has led to its recognition as a pleiotropic immunomodulatory cytokine that affects both the innate and adaptive immune systems. IL-10 is produced by a wide range of cell types, but for the purposes of this review we shall focus on IL-10 secreted by CD4+ T cells. Here we describe the importance of IL-10 as a mediator of suppression used by both FoxP3+ and FoxP3 T regulatory cells. Moreover, we discuss the molecular events leading to the induction of IL-10 secretion in T helper cell subsets, where it acts as a pivotal negative feedback mechanism. Finally we discuss how a greater understanding of this principle has allowed for the design of more efficient, antigen-specific immunotherapy strategies to exploit this natural phenomenon clinically.

39,312 views
295 citations
Fetching...