ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Water

Sec. Water and Artificial Intelligence

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1545821

This article is part of the Research TopicHarnessing Artificial Intelligence to Address Climate-Induced Challenges in Water Resources ManagementView all 4 articles

Downscaling GRACE Total Water Storage Data Using Random Forest: A Three-Round Validation Approach under Drought Conditions

Provisionally accepted
Youssef  Hamou-AliYoussef Hamou-Ali1Nourlhouda  KarmoudaNourlhouda Karmouda1Ismail  MohsineIsmail Mohsine1Tarik  BouramtaneTarik Bouramtane1*ILIAS  KACIMIILIAS KACIMI1Sarah  TweedSarah Tweed1,2Mounia  TahiriMounia Tahiri1Nadia  KassouNadia Kassou1ALI  El BilaliALI El Bilali3Omar  ChafkiOmar Chafki3Mohamed  Abdellah EzzaouiniMohamed Abdellah Ezzaouini3Siham  LaraichiSiham Laraichi3Abdelaaziz  ZeroualiAbdelaaziz Zerouali3Marc  LeblancMarc Leblanc1,2,4*
  • 1Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
  • 2Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement (IRD), Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
  • 3River Basin Agency of Bouregreg and Chaouia, Chaouia, Morocco
  • 4University of Avignon, Avignon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The application of Total Water Storage (TWS) data from GRACE satellites to local water management is constrained by its coarse spatial resolution (100-300 km). To address this, Random Forest-based model was employed to downscale GRACE TWS data from 100 km to 1 km over Morocco, a region severely affected by drought, covering the period from 2002 to 2022. Input data included precipitation (GPM, 10 km), NDVI (MODIS, 1 km), land surface temperature (LST, MODIS, 1 km), evapotranspiration (MODIS, 500 m), elevation (SRTM, 30 m), and the normalized difference snow index (NDSI, MODIS, 500 m). Downscaling GRACE data improves spatial resolution, but validating these finer-scale results is a challenge. In this study, downscaled data were validated using three approaches: Statistical Validation , Validation using groundwater level in situ data , and Validation using known aquifer dynamics.Statistical validation demonstrated strong model performance, with a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.80, a low RMSE of 0.82 cm, and an MAE of 0.57 cm, along with an R² of 0.80 between the original and downscaled data. Cross-validation confirmed the model's consistency, with mean, median, and maximum R² values of 0.56, 0.64, and 0.89, respectively. Error metrics remained low throughout the study period, with MAE values ranging from 0.36 cm to 0.6 cm and RMSE values between 0.5 cm and 0.8 cm. Additionally, the comparison with in-situ groundwater levels showed significant improvements, with correlation coefficients increasing for 63% of the 139 analyzed wells. The 1 km TWS data revealed localized variations and more distinct trends across different aquifers, while aquifer systems within the same structural domain tended to exhibit similar TWS patterns. These findings highlight the downscaling model's potential for improving local water management by capturing finer hydrological variations.

Keywords: GRACE data, Total water storage, downscaling, Hydrological validation, drought, Morocco

Received: 15 Dec 2024; Accepted: 18 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hamou-Ali, Karmouda, Mohsine, Bouramtane, KACIMI, Tweed, Tahiri, Kassou, El Bilali, Chafki, Ezzaouini, Laraichi, Zerouali and Leblanc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Tarik Bouramtane, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
Marc Leblanc, University of Avignon, Avignon, 84029, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more