Frank O. Masese
Francis O. Arimoro
Gordon C. O'Brien- 1Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya
- 2Department of Animal Biology, Federal University of Technology Minna, Minna, Nigeria
- 3School of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela, South Africa
Editorial on the Research Topic
Advances in Biomonitoring for the Sustainability of Vulnerable African Riverine Ecosystems
Introduction
Since recorded time, rivers have facilitated the establishment of human civilizations because of the myriad ecosystem goods and services they offer (Macklin and Lewin, 2015). Rivers provide transportation corridors, supply food in form of fisheries, and are major sources of water for irrigation, domestic use, renewable energy, and industrial development (Ripl, 2003). However, these benefits have come at a great cost to the structural and functional integrity of rivers and linked ecosystems (Dudgeon et al., 2006; Vörösmarty et al., 2010).
The capacity of rivers to sustainably meet human needs for water and ecosystem services is premised on maintaining their ecological integrity, which encompasses the gamut of biological diversity and ecosystem processes that maintain them (Karr, 1993). In river networks, ecological integrity is spatiotemporally dynamic, largely driven by the natural flow regime (Poff et al., 1997), which provides a template for ecological processes and species to thrive. River managers have the challenge of reconciling human needs with the ecological requirements of healthy ecosystems. This requires innovative decision-support tools for assessing and monitoring the ecological status of rivers to guide management and conservation efforts.
This Research Topic presents selected original research articles and reviews on some of the tools used to assess the ecological status of rivers in Africa. The objectives of the special issue are to:
i. contribute to the development of biomonitoring tools (e.g., biotic indices, multimeric indices, models, etc.), that are affordable, rapid and easy to use for enhanced understanding of human impacts on rivers.
ii. give novel insights into the effects of multiple stressors in rivers arising from human activities, such as land-use change, water pollution and excessive water withdrawals,
iii. address methodological challenges related to the use of existing tools used for biomonitoring, and
iv. encourage knowledge sharing and standardization of tools used for biomonitoring rivers in Africa, and promote interdisciplinary collaborations.
Ecological Status of African Rivers
Africa is a continent of immense natural heritage, including iconic rivers that fostered the earliest civilizations and continue to be integral to the continent's socio-economic development. Major rivers, such as the Nile, Niger, Orange, Tana, and Zambezi, drain Afromontane headwaters but downstream their flows quench semi-arid and arid lands that grace their journeys to the sea. Although Africa's rivers are amongst the least developed in the world (Grill et al., 2019), there have been ambitious plans to expand water use for irrigation, industry and hydropower (UN-Water Africa, 2003). These developments come with complex social, economic, governance or political challenges that exert multiple demands and stressors on river ecosystems at different spatial and temporal scales (Zeitoun et al., 2013; Fouchy et al., 2019; Birk et al., 2020).
Although data is limited, the status of African freshwater resources is one of a general decline (Darwall et al., 2011; UNEP-WCMC, 2016). Major concerns have been raised on the effects of pollution, urbanization, land-use change, overexploitation of biological resources, agriculture and invasive species on water quality and quantity, aquatic biodiversity, nutrient cycling, and energy sources supporting food webs (e.g., Masese et al., 2017; Fugère et al., 2018; Sayer et al., 2018; Matomela et al., 2021). These impacts are reducing ecosystem services offered by rivers and their floodplains, and undermining human well-being across the continent (IPBES, 2018).
Advances in Biomonitoring Vulnerable African Rivers
To address threats posed by multiple stressors in rivers, a determination of the present ecological condition is needed to guide decisions on management and conservation. For this reason, the development and use of bioassessment and biomonitoring tools is an integral part of integrated water resources management. While efforts have been made to develop indices or models to assess and monitor the status of rivers in Africa (Dallas, 2013; Masese et al., 2013), most countries, except South Africa, lack these tools and expertise on their use.
As a contribution to the use of biotic indices in Africa, Dallas, 2013 has presented a review on important methodological considerations for developing new or adapting existing macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices for bioassessment. Similarly, Achieng et al. and Tampo et al. present the application of multimetric indices in rivers based on fishes and macroinvertebrates, respectively. Other interesting biomonitoring approaches covered in this Special Topic include the use of macroinvertebrate traits as indicators of ecological health (Edegbene et al.) and the use of host-parasite dynamics as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution in rivers (Keke et al.). Considering that identification of reference conditions is a prerequisite for biomonitoring programs (Dallas, 2013), Agboola et al. demonstrate the use of the multivariate approach in the selection of reference sites, and in their second paper, they show how to conduct an ecological risk assessment of stressors in rivers in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
The use of citizen science as an environmental monitoring approach in many African countries is quite limited (Requier et al., 2020). To address this need, Aura et al. used indigenous knowledge to develop a multimeric index, called the “Citizen Index of Ecological Integrity (CIEI),” for bioassessment of rivers. Further, Ndiritu et al. developed a biomonitoring framework based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Biological Condition Gradient (BCG; USEPA, 2016) to support the rehabilitation of the upper Tana River basin in Kenya.
Way Forward
Innovative approaches and management solutions are required to achieve water-related sustainable development of African economies. The governments, research institutions, private sector, and civil society need to be involved in addressing the inherent problems. Below we highlight three areas of action that should be prioritized for improved conservation and management of rivers in Africa.
1. Plans to develop water resources should espouse principles of integrated water resources management (IWRM) (Dirwai et al., 2021). IWRM seeks to develop and manage water in a manner that maximizes economic and social benefits for multiple water users without degrading ecosystems (Meran et al., 2021).
2. While striving to supply water to millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa who lack access to safe drinking water and sanitation (Armah et al., 2018), the effects of water withdrawals on the ecological condition of rivers should be monitored. This calls for water allocation planning, water accounting and environmental flows assessments to apportion available water for river ecosystems and abstractive uses.
3. The complex mix of multiple stressors acting on rivers in Africa calls for multidisciplinary, multi-institutional, and transboundary (where necessary) collaborations and stakeholder participation to develop decision-support tools to guide the conservation and management of river ecosystems at multiple scales.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
We acknowledge the National Research Fund, Kenya for financial support Grant Number FY 2017/2018 (to FM).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
A special mention to Dr. Neels Kleynhans for his extensive work in putting together the topic for this special issue. His extensive knowledge of this field was important to the success of the Research Topic. We thank all the authors and reviewers who contributed their time to this special issue.
References
Armah, F. A., Ekumah, B., Yawson, D. O., Odoi, J. O., Afitiri, A. R., and Nyieku, F. E. (2018). Access to improved water and sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa in a quarter century. Heliyon 4:e00931. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00931
Birk, S., Chapman, D., Carvalho, L., Spears, B. M., Andersen, H. E., Argillier, C., et al. (2020). Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1060–1068. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1216-4
Dallas, H. F. (2013). Ecological status assessment in Mediterranean rivers: complexities and challenges in developing tools for assessing ecological status and defining reference conditions. Hydrobiology 719, 483–507. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1305-8
Darwall, W. R. T., Smith, K. G., Allen, D. J., Holland, R. A., Harrison, I. J., and Brooks, E. G. E. (2011). The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat. An Analysis of the Status and Distribution of Freshwater Species Throughout Mainland Africa. Gland: IUCN.
Dirwai, T. L., Kanda, E. K., Senzanje, A., and Busari, T. I. (2021). Water resource management: IWRM strategies for improved water management. A systematic review of case studies of East, West and Southern Africa. PLoS ONE 16:e0236903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236903
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z. I., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 81, 163–182. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950
Fouchy, K., McClain, M. E., Conallin, J., and O'Brien, G. (2019). “Multiple stressors in African freshwater systems,” in Multiple Stressors in River Ecosystems: Status, Impacts and Prospects for the Future, eds S. Sabater, A. Elosegi, and R. Ludwig (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 179–191.
Fugère, V., Jacobsen, D., Finestone, E. H., and Chapman, L. J. (2018). Ecosystem structure and function of afrotropical streams with contrasting land use. Freshwater Biol. 63, 1498–1513. doi: 10.1111/fwb.13178
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., et al. (2019). Mapping the world's free-flowing rivers. Nature 569, 215–221. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9
IPBES (2018). Summary for Policymakers of the Regional Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. eds E. Archer, L. E. Dziba, K. J. Mulongoy, M. A. Maoela, M. Walters, R. Biggs, M-C. Cormier-Salem, F. DeClerck, M. C. Diaw, A. E. Dunham, P. Failler, C. Gordon, K. A. Harhash, R. Kasisi, F. Kizito, W. D. Nyingi, N. Oguge, B. Osman-Elasha, L. C. Stringer, L. Tito de Morais, A. Assogbadjo, B. N. Egoh, M. W. Halmy, K. Heubach, A. Mensah, L. Pereira, and N. Sitas. Bonn: IPBES secretariat, 492.
Karr, J. R. (1993). Defining and assessing ecological integrity: beyond water quality. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12, 1521–1531. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620120902
Macklin, M. G., and Lewin, J. (2015). The rivers of civilization. Quarter. Sci. Rev. 114, 228–244. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.02.004
Masese, F. O., Omukoto, J. O., and Nyakeya, K. (2013). Biomonitoring as a prerequisite for sustainable water resources: a review of current status, opportunities and challenges to scaling up in East Africa. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 13, 173–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.004
Masese, F. O., Salcedo-Borda, J. S., Gettel, G. M., Irvine, K., and McClain, M. E. (2017). Influence of catchment land use and seasonality on dissolved organic matter composition and ecosystem metabolism in headwater streams of a Kenyan river. Biogeochemistry 132, 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s10533-016-0269-6
Matomela, N. H., Chakona, A., and Kadye, W. T. (2021). Comparative assessment of macroinvertebrate communities within three Afromontane headwater streams influenced by different land use patterns. Ecol. Indic. 129:107972. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107972
Meran, G., Siehlow, M., and von Hirschhausen, C. (2021). “Integrated water resource management: principles and applications,” in The Economics of Water, eds G. Meran, M. Siehlow, and C. von Hirschhausen (Cham: Springer), 23–121. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48485-9_3
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., et al. (1997). The natural flow regime. BioScience 47, 769–784. doi: 10.2307/1313099
Requier, F., Andersson, G. K., Oddi, F. J., and Garibaldi, L. A. (2020). Citizen science in developing countries: how to improve volunteer participation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18:2150. doi: 10.1002/fee.2150
Ripl, W. (2003). Water: the bloodstream of the biosphere. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358, 1921–1934. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1378
Sayer, C. A., Máiz-Tomé, L., and Darwall, W. R. T., (eds.). (2018). Freshwater Biodiversity in the Lake Victoria Basin: Guidance for Species Conservation, Site Protection, Climate Resilience and Sustainable Livelihoods. Cambridge: International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.RA.2.en
UNEP-WCMC (2016). The State of Biodiversity in Africa. A Mid-Term Review of Progress Towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
UN-Water Africa (2003). The Africa Water Vision for 2025: Equitable and Sustainable Use of Water for Socioeconomic Development. Addis Ababa: Economic Commission for Africa.
USEPA (2016). A Practitioner's Guide to the Biological Condition Gradient: A Framework to Describe Incremental Change in Aquatic Ecosystems. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561. doi: 10.1038/nature09440
Keywords: biomonitoring, bioassessment, biotic indices, multimetric indices, afrotropical rivers, water resources, macroinvertebrates, fishes
Citation: Masese FO, Arimoro FO and O'Brien GC (2021) Editorial: Advances in Biomonitoring for the Sustainability of Vulnerable African Riverine Ecosystems. Front. Water 3:772682. doi: 10.3389/frwa.2021.772682
Received: 08 September 2021; Accepted: 12 November 2021;
Published: 09 December 2021.
Edited by:
Mariele Evers, University of Bonn, GermanyReviewed by:
Kobingi N/A Nyakeya, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, KenyaCopyright © 2021 Masese, Arimoro and O'Brien. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frank O. Masese, Zi5tYXNlc2UmI3gwMDA0MDtnbWFpbC5jb20=