ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1592569

Translation and validation of the German version of the Pet-Related Stress Scale

Provisionally accepted
André  HajekAndré Hajek1*Ariana  NeumannAriana Neumann1Larissa  ZwarLarissa Zwar2Razak  M GyasiRazak M Gyasi3Dong Keon  YonDong Keon Yon4Supa  PengpidSupa Pengpid5Karl  PeltzerKarl Peltzer5Rosalie  CoronaRosalie Corona6Shelby  Elaine McDonaldShelby Elaine McDonald7Hans-Helmut  KönigHans-Helmut König1
  • 1University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • 2Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
  • 3African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya
  • 4College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 5Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand
  • 6Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
  • 7Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Pet-related stress refers to the stress of living with a pet. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the German version of the Pet-Related Stress Scale (PRSS-G). Moreover, reference values were determined. Methods: Data for validation were gathered from a quota-based online sample of Germany's adult population aged 18 to 74 years, with n=3,270 representing the demographic distribution of Germany in terms of sex, age, and federal states. The data collection took place online in January 2025. Reliability was assessed, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed to evaluate construct validity. Concurrent validity was examined through pairwise correlations of PRSS-G with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, life satisfaction and loneliness. Additionally, reference values were provided for key sociodemographic groups.Results: Strong to excellent reliability was found for the PRSS-G, with Cronbach's alpha of .96 overall and coefficients from .88 to .96 for the subscales. The mean pet-related stress score equaled 1.9 (SD: 0.8), with the highest levels among younger individuals, individuals with low education and individuals with a migration background. The original three-factor model (economic, psychological and social stress subscales) was confirmed in the present study. Higher pet-related stress was associated with more depressive symptoms (r=.50, p<.001), more anxiety symptoms (r=.48, p<.001), more perceived stress (r=.35, p<.001), lower life satisfaction (r=-.13, p<.001) and higher loneliness (r=.30, p<.001).The PRSS-G is a reliable and valid tool to measure pet-related stress levels among individuals speaking German. To facilitate comparisons across different countries, additional translation and validation studies are required.

Keywords: pet-related stress, pet ownership, Anxiety, Depression, Validation, Mental Health, stress, Loneliness

Received: 12 Mar 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hajek, Neumann, Zwar, Gyasi, Yon, Pengpid, Peltzer, Corona, McDonald and König. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: André Hajek, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more