Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1587131

This article is part of the Research Topic Utilizing Real World Data and Real World Evidence in Veterinary Medicine: Current Practices and Future Potentials View all 9 articles

African Swine Fever Incursion Risks in Latin America and the Caribbean: Informal and Legal Import Pathways

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Minnesota System, Saint Paul, United States
  • 2 Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    African swine fever (ASF) is a devastating hemorrhagic disease of swine with high mortality rates and severe socioeconomic impacts on affected pig industries. In 2021, ASF was reported in the Americas for the first time in 40 years, prompting risk assessments for its introduction and spread. This study evaluates ASF incursion risk across 40 territories in the Caribbean, Central America, North America, and northern South America. A structured, multi-step assessment synthesized peer-reviewed literature, government reports, grey literature, and epidemiological databases to classify two primary ASF incursion pathways: informal imports (e.g., traveler-carried pork, illegal migration, unregulated waste disposal) and legal imports (e.g., trade in live swine and pork products). Territories were categorized as “Probable,” “Unlikely,” or “Unknown,” with certainty levels (Low, Medium, High) based on data robustness. Results indicate ASF incursion is “Probable” (Medium certainty) via informal or formal imports in the Bahamas, British Virgin Islands, Colombia, Cuba, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Turks and Caicos, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In contrast, Barbados, Bermuda, Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Guyana were classified as “Unlikely” (Medium certainty) to experience an ASF outbreak under current conditions. Due to insufficient data, 24 territories were categorized as “Unknown” (Low certainty), highlighting critical knowledge gaps. These findings emphasize the need for enhanced surveillance, systematic data-sharing, and regional collaboration to improve risk assessments and implement effective ASF prevention measures in the Americas.

    Keywords: Surveillance Gaps, Risk Assessment, Biosecurity Enforcement, Grey literature, Transboundary diseases

    Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Arcega Castillo, Schultze, Schulte, Schambow, Hervé-Claude, León and Perez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Andres M Perez, University of Minnesota System, Saint Paul, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more