
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Reproduction - Theriogenology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1574351
This article is part of the Research TopicReproductive biotechnologies and challenges in their application - volume IIView all 4 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The use of transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration (TVA) for oocyte collection has become a widely used procedure in horses for in vitro embryo production (IVEP). The TVA procedure is characterized by various manipulations, which are physical restraint, perineal preparation, transrectal palpation, insertion of an intravaginal device, and needle punctures. These repeated transvaginal and transovarian punctures have raised concerns about their potential effects on mare welfare. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of TVA manipulations, and especially puncturing, on pain and stress in mares in a commercial set-up. Therefore, eight mares were subjected to three TVA procedures: two with puncturing (P + ) and one without (P -, control). Before, during and after all TVA procedures, blood was collected for serum glucose, lactate and cortisol levels, and facial pain scores were assessed. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded for each mare before and during the procedure to measure heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV). Parameters in response to manipulations and puncturing were analyzed using linear mixed effect models for each outcome variable at different timepoints during the procedure. Results revealed that puncturing during TVA did not significantly influence serum metabolite levels, facial pain scores, HR, or HRV over the complete procedure (P>0.05). Notably, HR did not increase at the moment of puncturing (P>0.05), and no significant changes in HRV parameters between P + and P -were detected (P>0.05). Both P + and P -procedures triggered significant increases in cortisol and lactate levels, facial pain scores, and HR during restraint in stocks and perineal preparation compared to the day before and the day after TVA (P<0.05). Interestingly, even without puncturing, manipulations in the P -procedure were sufficient to induce significant elevations in metabolite levels and facial pain scores compared to the day before and after (P<0.05). These results indicate that the TVA procedure induces stress responses in mares, predominantly associated with all manipulations specific to TVA, while the effect of puncturing itself was minimal. All effects were acute, with parameters returning to baseline when measured 24 hours later.
Keywords: Equine, Assisted reproduction, Ovum pick-up, Animal Welfare, stress
Received: 10 Feb 2025; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Van den Branden, Salamone, Broothaers, Peere, Polfliet, Dewulf, Van Steenkiste, van Loon, Smits and Govaere. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Emma Van den Branden, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.