
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1572237
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Influenza A virus (IAV) in swine is a significant respiratory pathogen globally. This study aimed to characterize the macroepidemiological aspects of IAV reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-rtPCR) and IAV subtypes detection by RT-rtPCR assays in samples submitted from January 2004 until December 2024 to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) participating in the Swine Disease Reporting System (SDRS). A secondary aim was to implement an IAVmonitoring capability to inform stakeholders of weekly changes in IAV detection patterns. Of the 372,659 samples submitted, 31% tested positive for IAV RNA via RT-rtPCR. The most frequent sample types were oral fluids (44.1%) and lung tissue (38.7%). Submissions from wean-to-market samples had higher positivity (34.4%) than submissions from the adult/sow farm age category (26.9%). IAV detection followed a seasonal pattern of detection by RT-rtPCR with peaks during spring and fall seasons, with lower positivity in summer. From a total of 118,490 samples tested for IAV subtyping RT-rtPCR, the most common IAV subtypes detected were H1N1 (33.1%), H3N2 (25.5%), H1N2 (24.3%), H3N1 (0.2%), mixed detection (5.4%), and partial subtype detection (11.5%). Mixed IAV subtypes were detected in individual samples, such as lung samples, nasal swabs, and bronchoalveolar lavage, indicating infection of individual animals with two or more IAV viruses. For IAV forecasting, a combination model between a dynamic regression and a neural network model exhibited superior performance in 2023, achieving the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and improving the overall skill score compared to the individual models. This study highlights the importance of using laboratory submission data for IAV surveillance and assessing macroepidemiological aspects. The findings provide important insights into IAV dynamics and support the need for VDLs' standardized monitoring systems to enhance IAV understating in swine populations in the United States.
Keywords: Zoonotic disease, IAV, Monitoring, Swine, Epidemiology, diagnostic, Forecasting
Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 C. A. Moraes, Cezar, Magalhaes, Nicolino, Rupasinghe, Chandra, Silva, Almeida, Crim, Burrough, Gauger, Madson, Thomas, Zeller, Main, Thurn, Lages, Corzo, Sturos, Naikare, McGaughey, Matias Ferreyra, Retallick, Gebhardt, McReynolds, Greseth, Kersey, Clement, Pillatzki, Christopher-Hennings, Thompson, Prarat, Summers, Bowen, Boyle, Hendrix, Lyons, Werling, Arruda, Schwartz, Yeske, Murray, Mason, Schneider, Copeland, Dufresne, Boykin, Fruge, Hollis, Robbins, Petznick, Kuecker, Glowzenski, Niederwerder, Linhares and Trevisan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Giovani Trevisan, Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.